Never in my life would I have thought I’d be writing a blog about what just may be the unsuspected, but possibly planned, ‘effectiveness of vaccines in accomplishing a certain public health goal: reduced population growth’. Bill Gates, the Microsoft-wizard-turned-‘vaccine-expert’, makes vaccines an integral component of his famous “Population Control” equation “inaugurated” in a TED speech he gave a couple years ago.
What I find absolutely astonishing – and I saw that entire TED speech – is that no one in that apparently dumb-struck audience even challenged Gates’s comments! I wonder why?
Nevertheless, in all my years of researching vaccine literature, their components, plus their devastating adverse health effects, the unthinkable of using vaccines for population control reluctantly crossed my mind. It wasn’t until I read the published research, which so brazenly affirms that such research is being done, that population control ingredients just may be a “done deal” by including polysorbate 80, human chorionic gonadotropin [hGC], and some other ‘ingredients’.
In my 2013 book, Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, I devote an entire chapter (22 pages) to “Is There a Hidden Infertility Factor in Vaccines?” citing published research, plus listing the vaccines containing polysorbate 80, also known as “Tween 80™” as of 2013.
As an aside, there even is the possibility of mass public vaccination by air!
However, the REAL “smoking gun” about vaccine population control is found in the United Nations’ World Health Origination’s August 1992 publication FERTILITY REGULATING VACCINES. Vaccine safety researcher, writer, and advocate Christina England produced an excellent article, which discussed her findings about that WHO report in her article “WHO Caught Recommending Vaccinations Known to Render Primates Infertile.”
Christina points out
The WHO stated that hCG [human chorionic gonadotropin] is a hormone produced by the body to establish and maintain a pregnancy and further stated that when primates were vaccinated using anti-hCG vaccines, they were rendered infertile without any detectable alteration to their menstrual cycle!”
In 1994, the World Health Organization gave many women in developing countries aged between 15 and 45 a tetanus vaccine containing the hCG hormone.
When combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, the vaccines caused a woman’s body to produce antibodies against pregnancy, forcing her body to abort the fetus spontaneously.
Don’t believe what you just read? Well, the U.S. government’s PubMed publishes a host of anti-fertility vaccine research and literature here.
The following published research papers represent just a smidgen of what’s listed on that website:
Influence of carrier protein conjugation site and terminal modification of a GnRH-I peptide sequence in the development of a highly specific anti-fertility vaccine. Part I.
Ferro VA, Khan MA, Earl ER, Harvey MJ, Colston A, Stimson WH.
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002 Dec;48(6):361-71
DNA immunization with plasmids expressing hCGbeta-chimeras.
Terrazzini N, Hannesdóttir S, Delves PJ, Lund T.
Vaccine. 2004 Jun 2;22(17-18):2146-53.
Immune responses to a GnRH-based anti-fertility immunogen, induced by different adjuvants and subsequent effect on vaccine efficacy.
Ferro VA, Costa R, Carter KC, Harvey MJ, Waterston MM, Mullen AB, Matschke C, Mann JF, Colston A, Stimson WH.
Vaccine. 2004 Feb 25;22(8):1024-31
Research on anti-fertility vaccines: serious concerns for women’s health.
Saheli Women’s Health Centre.
Issues Med Ethics. 2000 Apr-Jun;8(2):51-2. No abstract available.
Gene conjugation of molecular adjuvant C3d3 to hCGbeta increased the anti-hCGbeta Th2 and humoral immune response in DNA immunization.
Wang XL, Zhao XR, Yu M, Yuan MM, Yao XY, Li DJ.
J Gene Med. 2006 Apr;8(4):498-505.
Effect of fertilization antigen (FA-1) DNA vaccine on fertility of female mice.
Mol Reprod Dev. 2006 Nov;73(11):1473-9.
Controlling animal populations using anti-fertility vaccines.
Reprod Domest Anim. 2008 Jul;43 Suppl 2:179-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01159.x. Review.
Single-layer tungsten oxide as intelligent photo-responsive nanoagents for permanent male sterilization.
Liu Z, Liu X, Ran X, Ju E, Ren J, Qu X.
Biomaterials. 2015 Nov;69:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
For anyone doubting that vaccine population and fertility controls are in the works—and have been for quite some time—the above articles ought to demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only are they ongoing, but possibly even being implemented.
Why do I make such a statement? Interestingly, another blogger, Judy Molland, has written and published on Care2 statistics indicating the dramatic drop in teen pregnancies: “Is the Dramatic Drop in Teen Pregnancies Good News?”
Moreover, these statistics incorporate the almost 40 percent fall in the teen birth rate that the United States has experienced over the past two decades. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22792555
After reading Molland’s article , perhaps you also will question what I find rather thought-provoking and possibly even incriminating, and something that unsuspecting healthcare consumers neither anticipate nor expect when they receive a vaccine, and what just about every vaccine package insert states, i.e., vaccines have not been studied or proven to interfere with fertility.
While the drop in teen births in the U.S. over the past 20 years is considerable, CDC Director Tom Friedman knows there is still a lot of work to do. “The United States has made remarkable progress in reducing both teen pregnancy and racial and ethnic differences,” he said, “but the reality is, too many American teens are still having babies.’” [CJF emphasis] 
Even though I think teenage pregnancies are something no young girl ought to aspire to either by accident or design, shouldn’t teens—and everyone—have both the say and control about how their biological functions are regulated, not government agencies using stealth health-promoting protocols?
According to this Guttmacher Institute report, teenage girls in the U.S. are far more likely to give birth than any others in countries where statistics for teen births are available. 
Those dramatic declines over the past decade are impressive, but the U.S. still has a long way to go, and it will not be easy. 
It’s interesting that there have been dramatic declines over the past two decades, a timeframe when more and more vaccines were being mandated—especially the HPV vaccine first FDA-licensed December 30, 1996—for young girls and rather recently for boys! Are vaccines really promoted for ‘herd immunity’ or surreptitiously to reduced teenage pregnancies thereby effectuating population control? One has to wonder especially in view of all the published literature on the subject plus teenage pregnancy reduction demographics cited.
Are teens really less sexually active? What do you think?
Even though Merck publishes that their two HPV vaccines will not interfere with fertility as ascertained from their animal research, I hereby suggest parents demand of their physicians copies of those studies to read prior to their children being vaccinated with Merck’s Gardasil® vaccines. Also, I’d like to see Merck publish their HPV animal studies about not interfering with fertility and male sterility so that everyone in the press, medicine, and vaccine safety advocacy can deconstruct them.
Glaxo-Smith-Kline’s HPV vaccine Cervarix®, however, has this on its package insert:
CERVARIX has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential. Vaccination of female rats with CERVARIX, at doses shown to be significantly immunogenic in the rat, had no effect on fertility. 
Where are those studies? Again, ask for GSK’s HPV female and male rat fertility/sterility studies. Furthermore, I think the U.S. FDA should make all HPV vaccine manufacturers publish their animal fertility/sterility studies in their HPV vaccine package inserts.
However, in the package insert for the M-M-R II® (Merck) vaccine given during infancy, we find this regarding
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
M-M-R II has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.  [CJF emphasis]
Why hasn’t the M-M-R II® vaccine been evaluated for those factors, especially when Merck, the CDC/FDA, and all health agencies dogmatically CLAIM vaccines are safe? Safety also includes vaccines not being able to produce cancer, birth defects in fetuses, and/or impair one’s fertility/sterility!
However, what needs to be mainstreamed is the meme that no one seems to be countering the probability that vaccines per se can reduce the population, especially since the Georgia Guidestones  promote maintaining the world’s population into perpetuity at one-half-billion, whereas now we have in excess of 7.4 billion humans on Planet Earth . How do they plan on getting rid of the excess population? A possible man-made ecological catastrophe? Poisoned air (chemtrails), food (GMOs and glyphosates), and water (fluoride and chloramine )? Who knows what happens to disable the human immune system when all those toxic chemicals combine and work synergistically after vaccines toxins are injected? High school and college chemistry should start kicking in for many readers by now.
The above ought to be very frightening omens for all humans, who do not take seriously what’s being done to manipulate us into believing, that all things “smart” and corporate-derived assets are in consumers’ best interests, I offer. There’s an example of how those who speak up are discounted by what’s called “the powers that [shouldn’t] be”. In November of 2014, Catholic bishops in Kenya, Africa, reported the following:
NAIROBI, Kenya (RNS) Catholic bishops said they had tested the vaccine privately and were shocked to find it was laced with a birth control hormone called beta human chorionic gonadotropin. [4,5,6] [CJF emphasis]
How tragic that the Vatican did not support those African bishops! Does it boil down to the fact that those in the know—and obviously in control—are part and parcel of the global population reduction plan? One would think that religions would be above that fray!
Everyone, especially the media, in my opinion, needs to get mind and head out of the sand regarding the toxic components, including the equally-toxic politics of vaccines, AND look the vaccine monster in the eye; call a poison a poison; and demand safety and the “Precautionary Principle ” that are rightfully due all humans regardless of color, creed, ethnicity, and race!
 http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf Pg. 6
 https://www.gsksource.com/pharma/content/dam/GlaxoSmithKline/US/en/Prescribing_Information/Cervarix/pdf/CERVARIX-PI-PIL.PDF Pg. 13
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)
Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich coming in Summer 2016