Six Issues That Are Agenda 21

Agenda21By Tom DeWeese

Every day, in meetings at all levels of government, representatives of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), planning groups, and federal agents surround elected representatives and insist that their policies have nothing to do with international agendas. They regularly publish reports and rail against anyone even mentioning the names Agenda 21 or the new Agenda 2030. “No, no, no,” they insist. “Those people are just crazy conspiracy theorists. Ours is just a local plan for our community.”

Elected representatives are often confused. Issues and policies suddenly appear in front of them with sample, ready-made legislation. And then the unending pressure begins for them to pass it. There is confusion, uncertainty and there is the herd mentality to pass legislation. And it’s passed without knowledge of its origins, its purpose, and especially a lack of understanding of its consequences. “Just do it,” goes the mantra.

What most of these legislators fail to understand is the direct relationship much of this legislation has with a much larger agenda. Most legislation interconnects with other pieces and parts contained in other legislation. Like the children’s song goes… “the toe bone’s connected to the ankle bone…”  And it’s done so well, wrapped in innocent-sounding, positive wrapping, so that most elected representatives will argue vigorously that they passed no such thing.  And most of all, they will answer, Agenda 21, never heard of it. Just local. Just local. Just local.

Well, let me show you how it works and how the toe bone gets connected to the ankle bone ending up with the Frankenstein monster.  Here are six issues that are rarely connected to Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development (especially when we are assured that Agenda 21 has nothing to do with local, state or federal government policy). However, these seemingly unrelated policies, once implemented, help enforce the stated Agenda 21 goal of “reorganizing human society.”

Issue 1: Global Warming/Climate Change.

It has been so discredited in the true scientific community that proponents have become almost hysterical in their continued attempts to enforce Climate Change policy. Most recently the Justice Department is considering legal action against “deniers.”  Why don’t they stop, even to question if their science is sound? They instead use great energy to attack any scientist who does dare ask questions or finds data contrary to the “official” line. Why is it so vitally important that they continue to promote something that clearly is, to say the least, questionable?

It’s because all of Agenda 21 policy is built on the premise that man is destroying the Earth. Climate Change is their “proof.” To eliminate that premise is to remove all credibility and purpose for their entire agenda. They are willing to go to any length, even lies, to keep the climate change foot on our throats.

On the local level this translates into planning policy that controls energy use and the efforts to cut down on the use of cars, enforcement of the building of expensive light rail train systems and bike paths and installation of smart meters, etc.

But don’t take my word for it. I’ll let them speak for themselves:

“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” Christine Stewart (Former Canadian Minister of the Environment) 

“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” Timothy Wirth (President, UN Foundation)

“It doesn’t matter what is true. It only matters what people believe is true.” Paul Watson (Co-Founder of Green Peace.)

Issue 2: Fear of overpopulation.

This is the central driving force behind nearly every Sustainable policy initiative. It’s the real force behind Stack and Pack Smart Growth cities.

The fact is, in developed nations populations are actually going down. The only real growth in the US population in recent years has been from immigration, legal or otherwise. Open border immigration policy is actually implementation of Agenda 21 as part of the drive to destroy national sovereignty and “nation states.”

Environmentalists insist that the borders must be open to allow as many to immigrate here as possible. They argue that the U.S. has a greater ability to control them and protect the environment than if we left them in third world countries. That’s because the Greens already have a stranglehold over our nation’s industry through massive environmental regulations.

In the face of their fear of overpopulation, however, studies have shown that there is no worldwide overpopulation crisis. In fact one study insists that we could put the entire population of the world in an area the size of Texas with a population density of Paris, France. Overpopulation, and its accompanying environmental degradation, is a problem primarily in countries where the poor are deprived by government to improve their conditions. Nations that refuse to legalize private property ownership for the masses, for example, are a primary reason for growing poverty.

Meanwhile, Sustainablists work to keep these nations from developing or increasing energy use, thereby keeping them poor. Green regulations stop the building of infrastructure. They panic at the idea of increased energy use in developing nations. Instead of working to solve the real problems – the root of poverty- they exploit the excuse of over population and advocate enforcing polices to drastically reduce populations. China’s brutal one-child policy of forced abortions and sterilization has become their model.

Do you think I’m joking? Then consider these quotes from the Sustainablists:

“Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” David Brower (Sierra Club)

“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At a more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment.

Issue 3: The destruction of the free market system.

We have heard statement after statement from the UN; from members of Congress; the news media; and from Hollywood, all deriding the free market system as evil, corrupt and a tool of the rich to hold down the poor. So now, after deciding that the poor are expendable for the sake of stopping overpopulation, suddenly the planners are worried about them – if it leads to their ability to raid our bank accounts. So are they really worried about protecting the environment – or are they actually honoring the tactics of Jesse James?

Redistribution of wealth is behind every policy that comes out of the UN, and now the Obama Administration as well. The EPA is the attack dog to shut down entire industries like coal. It has become very difficult to operate a manufacturing business in the US, and nearly impossible to start a new one. Environmental protection is always the excuse, even when Obama’s own State Department said the Keystone Pipeline was not an environmental threat. A couple of years ago, radical greens, wielding torches, demonstrated outside the home of the head of the Keystone pipeline company. Visions of the terror of the Dark Agenda?

At the UN’s Rio + 20 Summit held in 2012, the idea of “Zero Economic Growth” was advocated – just to keep things fair. It was stated that even the building of new roads upsets the status quo and disrupts a well ordered society. Such idiotic ideas are the driving force behind Sustainable Development. Again, images of the Dark Ages come to mind.

Yet, consider “local” planning programs that cut off access roads, and again, discourage cars. What about the EPA’s war on industry. Pretty hard to have economic growth without industry. The timber industry is killed and communities die. Dams are torn down and farmers disappear. Zero Economic Growth in the making. Just local?

Again, not my words, let them tell you themselves:

“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects. We must reclaim the roads and plowed lands, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land.” Dave Foreman, (Earth First).

“Global sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control” Professor Maurice King (Population Control Advocate)

“We believe planning should be a tool for allocating resources…and eliminating the great inequalities of wealth and power in our society… because the free market has proven itself incapable of doing this.” Statement of Principles. the American Planning Association is a member and supporter of these principles.  

Issue 4: Cheap Energy is the enemy of the Earth.

To the average person the drive to stop any ability to obtain cheap energy makes no sense. People are hurting economically. Jobs are lost. Energy costs are skyrocketing. Any attempt to drill oil, fracking of shale gas, and mining coal are all vigorously blocked by government and green policy. Yet the government spends billions of dollars on “alternative energy” such as wind and solar, which provides less than 3% of our energy needs. Why? What is the motivation to put such shackles on the US economic engine? The excuse is that energy use drives up CO2 emissions and accelerates global warming – the excuse necessary to “harmonize” the US into the socialist, Sustainable global noose.

Many current state and local policies now are moving to increase taxes at the gas pump to keep energy costs high. In addition, Obama just issued an Executive Order to ban any off shore drilling of oil. So, just as the consumer started to get a break at the pump, higher taxes and Obama’s action will force prices back up.  As the prices rise the “planners” will insist that the only solution is to enforce the building of expensive public transportation.

But, according to some anti-energy advocates, the fear of cheap energy goes beyond environmental protection – energy availability helps build wealth for individuals and removes them from the rolls of the dependent – the opposite goal of sustainable policy.

“Giving society cheap, abundant energy is the worst thing that could ever happen to the planet.” Prof. Paul Ehrlich  (Professor of Population Studies, Stanford University).

“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.” Amory Lovins (Rocky Mountain Institute).  

“The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.” Jeremy Rifkin (Greenhouse Crisis Foundation).   

Issue 5: Common Core.

Many people see the reorganization of the public school issue as separate from Agenda 21. It’s not. Those who are promoting what they call the Agenda for the 21st Century understand that it is going to be a long drawn out process. To “reform” a nation created on the ideals of limited government, free enterprise and individual liberty into one that unquestioningly accepts government top down control will take time and a determined effort. There’s no room in a Sustainablist society for those who believe that we were born with our rights and that government’s job is to protect those rights. The sustainable system says government will grant us our rights.

To enforce such a radical turn around of our society requires that the children be indoctrinated to accept it. The effort started in earnest in the 1990s under the Clinton Administration through the massive growth of the Department of Education in such programs as Goals 2000, School To Work and Workforce Development Boards.

The original American education system effectively provided an overall academic education from which students could choose their own futures. No longer. Today, the new curriculum has morphed into what is called Common Core. It’s a State run central curriculum that revamps schools into little more than job training and indoctrination centers.

Because, you see, today’s public education system is also designed to strip the children of their attitudes, values and beliefs that parents may have instilled, and indoctrinate them into accepting global values – global citizenship and a global economy based on the sustainable agenda. Little of American civics and history are taught in today’s classroom. But text books contain whole chapters on the Five Pillars of Islam, while ignoring the 10 Commandments of Christianity. The children are fed an unending diet of the evils of capitalism; the selfishness of individualism, and the social justice of redistribution of wealth. It punishes students for possessing individuality and is designed to eliminate such natural human tendencies. That is the “common” in Common Core. Common values, common goals, common future. Don’t rock the boat of a well-ordered society.

Common Core is the nationally dictated curriculum necessary for the acceptance and implementation of Agenda 21.  Of course, we still elect local school boards pretending they have some say over the curriculum. It makes us all feel safer for our children. How, then do we explain the surge of Bernie Sanders and the Tsunami of Socialism? Well, today nearly every adult up to the age of 40 has gone thought this indoctrination, trained to accept a future chosen for them by someone else.

The education system was fully outlined in a very detailed letter to Hillary Clinton from Marc Tucker of the National Center on Education and the Economy in November, 1992, immediately after Bill. Clinton was elected President.

Said Tucker: “First, a vision of the kind of national – not federal – human resources development system the nation could have. This is interwoven with a new approach to governing that should inform that vision. What is essential is that we create a seamless web of opportunities to develop one’s skills that literally extends from cradle to grave and is the same system for everyone…” coordinated by “a system of labor market boards at the local, state, and federal levels” where curriculum and “job matching” will be handled by counselors “accessing the integrated computer-based program.”       

Issue 6: Healthcare.

How is healthcare connected to Agenda 21? Simply Google “Sustainable Medicine” and you will find more than 5,850,000 English language references to the subject. Read through the ideas expressed there and you will find nearly every provision of Obamacare.

An expert on Sustainable Medicine, the late Dr. Madeleine Cosman, put it this way: “Sustainable Medicine + Sustainable Development = Duty to Die.” Sustainable medicine makes decisions through visioning councils that determine what shall be done or not done to each body in its group in its native habitat. Sustainable medicine experts do not refer to citizens in sovereign nations, but to “humans” in their “settlements.” Sustainable medicine is the pivot around which all other Sustainable Development revolves. Principle #1 of the Rio Declaration that introduced Agenda 21 is that all humans must live in harmony with nature. The translation means rationing healthcare, low technology for health care treatment and emphasis on medical care not cure. And that, of course, will lead to population reduction, as called for in Agenda 21.

These are the issues that are not usually discussed or connected to Agenda 21. Yet they are being implemented, step by step, by local planners in policies that are approved by befuddled elected representatives.  It’s all driven through pressure from private NGO groups and funded by federal grants. That’s how it’s done, constantly driven a little bit with each innocent sounding idea. Then, without warning, Frankenstein rises from behind the smokescreen, toe bones and anklebones fully operational.

Americans must understand and connect these dots to everyday issues so they can clearly see the root and long-term goals of these policies that are affecting our personal lives. Elected representatives at every level of government must come to understand that legislative actions have consequences far beyond their understanding. Agenda 21 is the “common core” and it has already invaded every level of our society. Our battle cry must be to stop this monster or watch freedom perish.

Tom DeWeese, president of the American Policy Center, is one of the nation’s leading experts on Agenda 21 and its assault on property rights and personal freedom. He is author of the book “Now Tell Me I was Wrong” and editor of the monthly newsletter The DeWeese Report.  For more information visit

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

39 Comments on "Six Issues That Are Agenda 21"

  1. so agenda 21 in reality is all about the destruction of earth by the REPTILIAN OVERLORDS of the US GOVERNMENT through poisoning the land sea and air, there will be internal wars also implemented by the worldwide terrorist network of the CIA-NSA-MI6-and MOSSAD, the early and premature deaths created by toxic vaccine’s and medicine’s, and organised by the ROTHSCHILD and ROCKERFELLER families, this will include the complete sabotage of all countries and their government’s who disobey this directive. SO WAKE UP WORLD THEY WANT YOU DEAD.

    • The Synagogue of Satan is in full swing; the only thing left to implement their plans for their King-Despot is Albert Pike’s World War III.

  2. Let’s be honest. This is all self driven, and self sustained, based upon the principles adapted by the average American. Some say, this has been taught, but we know that it is just plain ole apathy at work. Nobody cares until they believe it will impact them negatively. Or at least so few cared, that it was just as though no one cared.

    It’s not like the people of the world are all striving for some great goal. While I don’t condone these acts, I realize the necessity for someone to attempt them. After all, time and time again, people have worshipped money, luxury, and liberty. Strangely enough, this was not something people were willing to extend. In fact, it has always been a, “I’ll get mine you get yours” bias. Of course few and far between there are people who are the exception to this, but those people are generally the type who lack fear of these types of events.

    So let’s see where we are so far.. Most people exist for no reason other than existence has planted them here. With their existence they have been terrible human beings, and somehow some grand plan is supposed to eliminate them, and implement a plethora of governing acts to combat the issue. Other than them being human, I would likely not care. Them being human, but not inclined to know where they are, and what they are doing here, it mitigates them being human. Because if they knew those two things, none of this would be relevant.

    I understand this can be a scary time, there has undoubtedly been scary time for portions of the population.. I mean, all these special interest groups came from the lack of justice. Imagine that those who were denied justice formed groups and now the whole system is divided. As I have said before, most people don’t survive this round. The ones that do, aren’t going to be pushing heinous agendas. But here’s to saying the same thing, knowing it will only reach the few.. Cheers!

    • “…all these groups came from the lack of justice.” Are you for real? Many of these groups have been planned, sometimes for decades or longer, to be effective rabble rousers. I don’t know about you and your relationship with other people (it honestly sounds like you hate people), but most of the people I have met throughout the course of my lifetime (with a few notable exceptions) are decent people who want to get along with their neighbors. These movements, special interest groups, lobbies, etc., are almost NEVER grassroots. Maybe take off the poop-tinted glasses, take a breath of fresh air, and gain a little compassion for the plight of your fellow men and women on this blue marble…their lives have been controlled from cradle to grave to act and think the way they do.

    • You don’t know what you’re talking about.

    • truly a diseased and befuddled intellect there. get help!

  3. The real environmental issues are overlooked because of articles like this one that labels thing green as a plot under the guise of Agenda 21. Alternative media is just as much at fault when clouding the waters of understanding. There are areas where the population is already crowded, there is climate and weather manipulation taking place via HAARP, CERN and chemtrails, your government is controlled by a sub-Rosa agenda that is not human.

    • Indeed, weather as a weapon has been a goal for a long time, and through the use of HAARP and related technology, as well as cloud seeding, this technology is nearly perfected. The agenda is truly not human (Principalities and Powers), but does affect us on this material plane of existence. Green Peace, The World Wildlife Fund, etc., as all illuminist organizations set up as controlled opposition to the corporate powers, both sides owned by the hidden hand of the Luciferian agenda.

  4. This is the work of the zionist scum that have usurped the world and own every major corporation.
    Thees subjects are used to create a false paradigm.
    END the unholy NWO.

  5. There are other means of energy other than coal and fossil fuels. Yet, they (corporations and greedy money grabbers) deny global warming because of their want to rule the world.
    Clean energy supplies such as solar , wind power to produce electricity, which can produce immense amounts of heat.
    It is their greed which will destroy the earth. It is their greed which will destroy humanity!

    • Global warming, at least man-made global warming, is complete nonsense. It’s the sun. CO2 has nothing to do with it, and that was proven in 1914. Nonetheless, yes, greedy corporations, fear-mongers, and the hidden hand of the Luciferians suppress the advance of free-energy technology.

  6. Not listed here is the elevation of women, accompanied by the neglect of men. Which perhaps explains the proposed elimination of funding for prostate cancer from the CDC budget. And the fact that before the elimination, funding for female-specific cancers is now 28 times greater than the funding for prostate cancer.

    • Eliminating funding by the CDC is good news, as they are in on the health care scam. Just check out the list of names at the head of CDC, FDA, and various pharma giants, and these names keep rotating. Good health could be very inexpensive, were it not for this cartel and its influence over government. Always question the doctor’s diagnosis! Always seek a second opinion, and from a homeopathic, if possible. Never submit to surgery unless there has been some questioning of the relevance. Over 200,000 die each year from medical mistakes in the US. (I can’t help thinking they murdered my wife).

      • Eliminating prostate cancer funding by the CDC is a good idea? Ask your female friends how they would feel if funding for breast cancer were reduced, let alone eliminated altogether. The PSA exam, witgh it’s record of false-positive results, is the ONLY diagnostic procedure for prostate cancer diagnosis,and absence of funding will not support an improved procedure.

        • I agree with you, however, the CDC are no friends to the American public. I personally think that all of these alphabet soup agencies need to be completely defunded, but that’s just me.

          • echofoxtrot | May 14, 2016 at 10:01 am |

            Thanks. The CDC and the other alphabet agencies are in place to promote the general welfare of the American public, Problems occur when special interest groups (in this case, organized feminism) hijack the machinery of government to steer ever-more public resources in their direction, at the expense of other population segments (men, in this case).The difference is that male health issues will not secure funding for improved methods of diagnosis and treatment. But the larger issue IMHO is that the male half of the population will be marginalized into oblivion, while the globalists will face a more compliant female population.

          • That’s because, as males, especially white males, we are now all considered redundant unless we’re gay. However, we have way too many alphabet soup agencies, none of which were REALLY set up to promote the general welfare of Americans, but were set up, indeed, to institute MORE laws and control systems. They should ALL be cut out, like the malignancies they are.

          • echofoxtrot | May 16, 2016 at 7:47 am |

            Thank you. Good points, well stated.

  7. Tom may not wish to say it, but agenda 21 is just another weapon in the arsenal to take over the world by the Zionist New World Order. We “Useless Eaters” must succumb. (Part of the hidden agenda of UN Agenda 21 is a reduction in population by 95%. I could make some very intelligent choices for just who should volunteer – starting with the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve).

    • Zionism, like Communism (and like every other modern -ism), is just a tool for the Luciferian agenda. The NWO is much older than any of these groups, and it’s taken thousands of years for these plans to come to fruition. Their great catastrophe isn’t here yet, thank God, but this is much bigger than any one group short of the Synagogue of Satan itself, trying to finish putting into action the Luciferian conspiracy. These Principalities and Powers are bigger than we can imagine, and it spills over into this material plane.
      Perhaps even the “Protocols,” while definitely NOT a hoax, were written in such a way as to distract and direct the attention and anger at the wrong people? Just a thought. I’m not exactly a friend of the so-called chosen, but I don’t hate them, either.

      • Surely the order for deception aka SOS, based in chaos, fueled by blame with its effective forging the chains of hatred…is forever seeking dutiful sycophants.
        Leaving hate out of our thought, affords leavening for Love..

        • Indeed, for it is lack of love…love for self, love for family, love for neighbor and stranger and foreigner alike…that has led us down this path of destruction, leaving the likes of the SOS to clean it up in their way.

  8. Arlene thank you for telling the people. I have been talking and talking doing my best to get the people ready. If almost all of us are ready then we won’t have the panic that I’m sure is what they want. And they should have started at least the begining of this

  9. The Muzzie population is increasing while most others are decreasing. They have an average of over 7 children. Most others are under 2 . Another problem is how are we going to feed an increasing population. There are currently over 100 countries that rely on food from the US and the US is losing farmland every year. It may be several years but barring a war or other genocide this will eventually come to a head. This may be a good time to be old like me.

    • It’s not that the world is becoming over-populated; instead, because of the decrease in the small/family farm and the reliance of big commercial enterprises, central organization and distribution, that there’s a “shortage” of food, and an increasing one at that. The problem is definitely not with the Earth’s ability to handle the population, that’s for sure. Since we’ve forgotten how to grow our own food, we’ve become dependent on others. Muslims aren’t the problem, either. I think, re Albert Pike’s letter to Mazzini in 1871, that Pike thought that before the final social catastrophe can be implemented, the Muslim world must be made to look like a bunch of monsters in order to keep everyone fighting each other. I believe that he saw that the Christians and Muslims would actually get together to fight against the Synagogue of Satan, so they must be pitted against each other.

      • I live in the Texas panhandle/south plains area. Lots of grain and corn grown here. Our water table is dropping every year. When the Ogalalla is gone who knows what will happen. Right now they are putting up wind generators as fast as they can. It is supposed to be the largest wind farm in the world when they are done. We are losing an awfully lot of farm land in the process. The farmers are getting paid for the loss, but what about the loss of production and foodstuffs. Besides having the beautiful fields stretching for miles we are now getting lots and lots of ugly windmills. The problem with the Muslim population growth is that they are in a part of the world that relies on food production from another part of the world. If it gets to the point we cannot ship food out it will be katie barr the door.

        • Indeed, their population growth is amazing, while our population growth in the US is in such decline we cannot sustain our own population. Although I definitely support wind and solar, massive wind farms eating up countryside isn’t the answer as the way they are currently designed (besides potentially being a blight on the land) they do not store any of the energy that might be produced in excess.
          As far as food production on the diminishing farms goes, well, the PTB wouldn’t mind (indeed, they would prefer) if 95% or so of us died off, and starvation is as good a way as any. Ugh.

  10. I would wager a months pay that “renewable energy” products are losers. How much energy, chemical and electrical, is required to produce, market, transport, install and maintain solar cells verses the energy savings, without subsidies and government and bureaucratic assistance??? Not that much if any, would be my guess. The ROI would be negative. The same with wind turbines. The energy required manufacture, transport, erect and maintain the massive towers and generators, would never reach a positive ROI without financial assistance from the federal and state governments and bureaucracies, all on the hard working Patriotic American tax payers backs. Of coarse we have never seen the results of these money losing events. Why??? Because it would expose the TRUTH and alert the tax payers of the fraud dealing with “alternative energy” sources. This plays into the hands and minds of the elite globalist that don’t want lose their agenda21/ agenda 2030 …. or what ever they call it, now. Follow the money and the TRUTH will set you free.

    • Currently, you are correct. However, the reasons it costs so much, especially for solar panels, is because suppressing these technologies, and the mass production of them, is done purposefully because the PTB do not want us to have energy independence…or food, thought, health or spiritual, for that matter. Nonetheless, there are plenty of alternative energy sources and fixes that involve neither wind nor solar, but these technologies are also generally suppressed. However, check out Steorn, an Irish company. They were producing a a generator that didn’t require fuel, but that seemed to fall through. Instead, they have released a cell phone, and a portable cell/tablet/etc charger, that themselves do not ever need recharging.

      • Reminds me of when, the at the time 1998 head of NASA, was speaking to a group of high school grads.
        He said that those in attendance would see the day when they could connect to the Internet through a fingertip. That thought would be transmitted and received in this way.
        In Mikes observation that “ptb” seeks limitation of energy independence etc., one can only imagine how “The Borg” would feel about any manifestation whatsoever of independent thought.
        Remember “the body snatchers” and consider the mind snatching consequences of any assimilation of any kind with the as yet indeterminate entity “ptb”

  11. It’s not necessarily to overthrow capitalism; capitalism, like communism, is simply a tool of distraction and control. However, climate change is a natural, normal phenomenon that is mostly driven by the Sol, with other factors, both tangible and intangible. Manmade climate change, however, is total bunk. Ask the folks form Pompeii what kind of threat we are to the planet. Carbon dioxide is NOT a greenhouse gas, as evidenced very clearly in 1914. Indeed, we, as well as all other life on Earth, are carbon based. The reduction in in CO2 and other carbon-based ideas is ludicrous and anti-life.

    • So many claims, all unsubstantiated. Please provide credible and convincing support for them, namely:

      1. capitalism, like communism, is simply a tool of distraction and control.
      2. Manmade climate change, however, is total bunk.
      3. Carbon dioxide is NOT a greenhouse gas
      4. The reduction in in CO2 and other carbon-based ideas is ludicrous and anti-life.

      I doubt you can support any of these. Good luck.

      • Well, John, your comment is just plain lazy. I don’t need to provide credible and convincing support for anything, do your own research and reading instead of just outright dismissing what I, or anyone else, posts. However, if it will help point you in the right direction and help with your sloth-like nature, you should read the likes of William Carr, Henry Makow, Z. Brzezinski (in his own words, even). Then, when you’re through with some of their writings, read “It Came From Jekyll Island”. Watch some documentaries, like America: Freedom to Fascism.

        1. Capitalism, the way it is taught and practiced today, has no free markets. If we were truly a capitalist society, there would be much less government intrusion and regulation, no (or much less) need for business “licenses.” Communism, the theoretical opposite of so-called Capitalism, was implemented as a divide and conquer strategy. The same forces behind the so-called Capitalist markets are the same forces behind so-called Communism. These are the Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller, etc., families and banking cartels. To NOT know this information on your part is kind of weird at this point in the game.

        2. Not all the scientists agree on anthropological global warming. When the IPCC (I believe that’s the UN’s mouthpiece on global warming) puts out their reports that they claim 1,200 scientists work on, they don’t tell you that actually only around 400 actually do any of the writing. Their fact-checking comes from other institutions that gain (government grants, etc) on promoting this nonsense. There are more than 35,000 scientists from a broad spectrum of the sciences that disagree and have even signed a petition, but you probably get your information from Snopes or Rawstory, and they both tend to promote the established views.

        3. An experiment was done in 1914 that showed, without a shadow of a doubt, that CO2 is invisible to IR and UV radiation, and as such, those wavelengths of light pass through CO2 unaffected both into, and back out of, the atmosphere.

        4. Obviously, you didn’t really read my comment, otherwise you couldn’t have missed the fact that we are a CARBON-based form of life, hence the limiting of CO2 and carbon is anti-life.

        Oh, and good luck yourself. If you’ve the fortitude to research, you’ll need it. Otherwise, thanks for the useless comment.

        • Sorry my request for evidence distresses you so much. I’m looking for peer-reviewed evidence in the credible climate journals.

          The above is all claims, all unsubstantiated by you. The onus is on you(claimant) to prove your claims.

          Good Luck.

          • Sorry, but your comment doesn’t distrees me, it confuses me that you actually still believe it. Once again, I don’t have anything to prove to you; you absolutely have the right to disagree with anything that I say and believe anything that you want. For the whole climate change thing, however, I did my own small scale, 3 year long experiment while I lived in Florida, the results of which showed a relatively flat line, no up, no down. Climate change itself (a NATURAL process) cannot be proven nor disproved in a lab, which makes it a non-theory. Nonetheless, during the time (the ’90’s) the Earth was heating up, the other planets were heating up, too, at a similar rate. Since we don’t have factories, cars, or even farts on other planets (that we know of, anyway), what could account for the simultaneous warming? The only reasonable answer: the SUN. Beyond that, once again, do your own research instead of relying on so-called “experts.”


          • John Macdonell | May 18, 2016 at 11:51 am |

            Mike, see my reply above. Thanks.

          • John Macdonell | May 19, 2016 at 7:28 am |

            Re: Peer review.

            One must bear in mind the purpose of peer review. It is to see that the logic is good – that the paper’s conclusions are supported by the data provided. Removes “scientific spam”

            What peer review does *not* do is validate the data provided. Thus faulty data can pass peer review.

            Once a peer-reviewed paper is published, it is then open for other scientists to: duplicate – if they can; or refute; if they can(maybe the data or methodology was flawed)

            So Peer-review is necessary, but not sufficient to establish the paper’s ultimate worthiness.

            You and I could write a paper which is anti-AGW, which may even pass peer review – because the data logically support the conclusions. We may even get it published. But that paper isn’t worth much yet until it passes the inspection of other scientists in the community. If they refute it, our paper is dead.

            So, after publication, you look at acceptance in the scientific community, the reputation of both author and journal, impact factors, citations, etc.

            All these things, and more, help determine the ultimate worthiness of the paper.

            To repeat, peer review is a necessary 1st step, but it is not alone sufficient to determine the ultimate worthiness of the paper.

          • John Macdonell | May 17, 2016 at 7:05 pm |

            Hi Mike,

            Am replying to my own post because your reply to the above does not appear active.

            Here is what you wrote:


            Sorry, but your comment doesn’t distrees me, it confuses me that you actually still believe it. Once again, I don’t have anything to prove to you; you absolutely have the right to disagree with anything that I say and believe anything that you want. For the whole climate change thing, however, I did my own small scale, 3 year long experiment while I lived in Florida, the results of which showed a relatively flat line, no up, no down. Climate change itself (a NATURAL process) cannot be proven nor disproved in a lab, which makes it a non-theory. Nonetheless, during the time (the ’90’s) the Earth was heating up, the other planets were heating up, too, at a similar rate. Since we don’t have factories, cars, or even farts, what could account for the simultaneous warming? The only reasonable answer: the SUN. Beyond that, once again, do your own research instead of relying on so-called “experts.”


            And here is my reply to that:

            Still no peer-reviewed evidence for your claims.

            Peer-review, while not perfect, is the best error-correcting mechanism we have, and has served us very well in the past. You couldn’t use the internet, have a computer, blog, or have antibiotics if it were not for peer-review.

            If you want to declare yourself equal to or better than the “experts” who publish peer-reviewed articles, when you do not publish anything peer-reviewed – be my guest.

            Just don’t expect anyone, including me, to take you seriously.

            If you have an idea that will overturn all/part of AGW, get it published in peer-review climate journals. If you succeed, big prizes await you.(really). Torpedo AGW completely and very likely a Nobel prize will be awarded you. Seriously. You would be famous and your grandkids financially secure.

            If you don’t succeed, you get no respect from the science community.

            So go for it, if you can.

            Peace, brother.

  12. Continued burning of fossil fuels is most certainly a threat to life on Earth.
    Living in harmony with the earth and nature is not a communist plot.
    Capitalism is killing the living planet for selfish gain.
    Ecologically sound lifestyle is healthier and more harmonious than industrial lifestyle.
    Money, Finance, and associated usury is organised fraud.
    The way things are is not necessarily the best or how they should be.
    Agenda 21 is the privatisation and corporate take-over of individuals land and ability to self sustain.

Leave a comment