All Of A Sudden, Fish Are Dying By The MILLIONS All Over The Planet

dead+fish.jpgBy Michael Snyder

Why are millions upon millions of dead sea creatures suddenly washing up on beaches all over the world?  It is certainly not unusual for fish and other inhabitants of our oceans to die.  This happens all the time.  But over the past month we have seen a series of extremely alarming mass death incidents all over the planet.  As you will see below, many of these mass death incidents have involved more than 30 tons of fish.  In places such as Chile and Vietnam, it has already gotten to the level where it has started to become a major national crisis.  People see their coastlines absolutely buried in dead sea creatures, and they are starting to freak out.

For example, just check out what is going on in Chile right now.  The following comes from a Smithsonian Magazine article entitled “Why Are Chilean Beaches Covered With Dead Animals?“…

Compared to other countries, Chile is almost all coast, and that geographical fluke means that the country is known for its beautiful beaches. But that reputation may be on the wane thanks to a new sight on Chilean shores: dead animals. Lots of them. Heaps of them, in fact. As Giovanna Fleitas reports for the Agence France-Presse, the South American country’s beaches are covered with piles of dead sea creatures—and scientists are trying to figure out why.

Tales of dead animals washing up on shore are relatively common; after all, the ocean has a weird way of depositing its dead on shore. But Chile’s problem is getting slightly out of hand. As Fleitas writes, recent months have not been kind to the Chilean coast, which has played host to washed-up carcasses of over 300 whales, 8,000 tons of sardines, and nearly 12 percent of the country’s annual salmon catch, to name a few.

Authorities in Chile are scrambling to come up with a reason for why this is happening, but nobody appears to be quite sure what is causing this tsunami of death.

In Vietnam, things are even worse.  At this point, so many dead fish and clams have been washing up along the coast that soldiers have been deployed to bury them

Millions of fish have washed up dead along a 125-kilometre stretch of the Vietnamese coast in one of the communist country’s worst environmental disasters.

Soldiers have been deployed to bury tonnes of fish, clams and the occasional whale that began dying in early April along the north-central coast, including some popular tourist beaches.

Vietnamese officials facing growing anger over the disaster have not announced the official cause of the deaths, which have affected the livelihoods of tens of thousands of families.

Elsewhere in Asia, there have been similar incidents.  For example, CNN is reporting that one lake in southern China is currently dealing with 35 tons of dead fish…

At least 35 tons of dead fish appeared in a lake in southern China, leaving residents stunned.

The piles of fish washed up in a lake in Hainan province on Wednesday, Chinese state media reported.

Residents expressed concerns on pollution, but local authorities said the fish died as a result of salinity change.

Natural and Non-Toxic Products. Up to 50% Off – Every Day (Ad)

On the other side of the world, similar incidents have also happened in major lakes.  Here is one example from Bolivia

Thousands of dead fish have washed up onto the shores of a lake in Bolivia.

Just before they died, some of the fish had just hatched from their eggs in lake Alalay, in the central Bolivian city of Cochabamba.

No one yet knows the number of dead fish, but they have stockpiled five cubic metres (177 cubic feet) so far, so it’s possible there is over a tonne of dead fish in the lake.

And here is an example from Brazil

More than 200 tons of dead fish were removed from the Furnas Lake on Sunday (1st) in Alfenas (MG). According to the Military Police of the Environment, both fish raised in ponds, networks and those who are released, all of the tilapia species in the lake were affected. The damage to the psicultores is estimated at around R $ 900 thousand.

I could go on and on all day with examples such as these.

Just within the last month, 40 tons of fish died in India, 65 tons of fish died in Cambodia, 70 tons of fish died in Colombia, and millions of fish “suddenly died” in Indonesia.

So why is this happening?

I don’t know.

Could it be possible that these mass deaths are somehow related to the alarming earth changes that we see happening all around us?

Without a doubt, we have seen a dramatic rise in seismic activity during the early portions of 2016.  There has been a series of very destructive earthquakes around the world in recent months, and once dormant volcanoes are coming to life all over the globe with distressing regularity.

Of course humanity has done much to destroy the planet as well, and we continue to deal with the aftermath of the Fukushima nuclear disaster.  I do think that it is very interesting to note that most of these mass fish deaths have happened in nations that border the Pacific Ocean.

I am certainly not claiming to have an answer for why so many fish are dying.  All I know is that millions upon millions of dead fish are washing up on shores all over the globe, and people are really starting to freak out about this.

We live in a world that is becoming increasingly unstable, and major disasters seem to be getting more frequent and more intense.  Just look at what is happening up in Alberta right now.

I believe that we are entering the “perfect storm” that myself and so many others have been warning about for so long.

Or could it be possible that I am just being overly dramatic?

Please feel free to tell us what you think by posting a comment below…

Also Read: What’s Causing All the Wildlife Die-offs Around the World?

Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogs The American Dream and Economic Collapse Blog. Follow him on Twitter here.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

143 Comments on "All Of A Sudden, Fish Are Dying By The MILLIONS All Over The Planet"

  1. James Bennett | May 9, 2016 at 8:48 am | Reply

    Ever watch a geo-engineering campaign being conducted over you – and trip on the volume of material it must take to effect so much change on the sky?
    They must have to ‘reload’ every hour!
    Pillaging, oppressing humanity under a pretense of environmental concern?
    While funding enormous geo-engineering operations with OUR money?
    This is the REAL environmental catastrophe of our time.

    BTW; if over half of our oxygen comes from aquatic vegetation;phytoplankton , algae…
    what’s next?

    • Pyra Gorgon | May 9, 2016 at 10:01 am | Reply

      “”BTW; if over half of our oxygen comes from aquatic vegetation; phytoplankton , algae…what’s next?””

      Humans become the next fish that die in heaps.

      • James Bennett | May 9, 2016 at 11:12 am | Reply

        Toxicity is cumulative;
        a living organism can withstand it, endure it for a finite amount of time.
        Until it can’t.

      • How realistic is this? Those who are involved in the geoengineering and poisoning would die too without oxygen…

        • Pyra Gorgon | May 10, 2016 at 7:17 am | Reply

          It is not only realistic, but highly probable to occur. Professing to be wise, they became fools. Those fools are the ones who run things these days. College educated idiots who have had their minds corrupted by formal educational programs.

  2. Verbal Bomb Chucker | May 9, 2016 at 8:54 am | Reply

    Back in March we had a massive fish kill where I live. We had a large Brown Algae bloom that sucked all the dissolved oxygen out of the water. The result, millions of dead fish. Beautiful large Sea Trout, Redfish, Snook, Mullet and everything else was dead. Took a few weeks to clean it up.
    The lagoon is now in recovery mode.

    • Pyra Gorgon | May 10, 2016 at 7:21 am | Reply

      Pay attention to your ‘recovery mode’ numbers and success. What ‘recovers’ is never as lush, vibrant, thriving, or numerically equivalent. What you lose is not fully recovered anymore.

      • Verbal Bomb Chucker | May 10, 2016 at 7:28 am | Reply

        Oh I know it will never be like it was. We’ve loss hundreds of acres of sea grass, oyster and clam beds, etc. It will take decades to maybe come close to what we lost.

        • Pyra Gorgon | May 10, 2016 at 8:03 am | Reply

          It is a real shame things are happening the way they are. I sympathize, our woodlands have been obliterated by fungi, bacteria, and insect vermin. We’ve replanted a lot, but the woodlands will never be the same around here. We’ve lost botanical diversity that is not going to come back.

  3. We have to decide: geo-/climateengineering and the collaps of all sea life and life elsewhere or no geo-/climateengineering.
    Btw, earthquakes can be caused by geoengineering, too.
    And that’s all possible besides the normal insanity like Fukushima.
    What about these new submarines?

  4. HAARP, CERN, Fukushima, BP oil spill, Secret Military experimentation. Geo-engineering, ozone depletion, magnetic pole shift, chem-trails, fluoride, rocket fuel and aircraft fuel pollution, increased tectonic activity, any and all possible combinations of these is enough to make many animals die off including humans. 50% of all pollution is military. prior to Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and Fukushima the nuclear fuel cycle was responsible for a minimum of 1,000,000 new cancers per year planet wide. The alien,military/industrial/complex considers US as expendable do not look for solutions from them or from the Hillary/Trump presidential ticket.

    • William Burke | May 9, 2016 at 3:10 pm | Reply

      But what causes increases in freshwater lake salinity? Universally, it is water level drops, and drought is the cause of this. Terraforming would be the prime suspect.

      As for ocean waters, I believe ice ages have historically caused saline levels to spike in oceans.

      • The Aluminum Oxide nanoparticles in stratospheric aerosols (geo-engineering) have a tendency to raise fresh water alkalinity. This is also killing (and has documented to have killed) about 90% or more of the fresh water invertebrates in streams in the western U.S. particularly California. This translates into no food for spawning Salmon and other fish, lower Salmon runs, fewer fish for sea lions, seals and aquatic birds to eat. Personally, I think we are only beginning to see the consequences of the Fukushima disaster. Within ten years, the radio-isotope-contaminated waters flowing out of that site by a volume of 88,000 gallons a day, (since March 2011) will have reached every major ocean on the planet. If the oceans die, I suspect that most of the Earth’s life will die with it.

        • sharon sampson | May 12, 2016 at 2:17 am | Reply

          There we go, great facts Mr. Mark! Not only raise pH of water but our soils. Geoengineers. sigh. Have tried to get a conversation going with them and they talk to me like I am an idiot without answering my questions. I think that scientists that rely on grants from our gov’t have to say what they are told to say so they can get on with their other projects. The retired Nobel Prize scientists have LOTS to say against CO2, global warming. Geology 101 taught us that this crap is crap. Probably the same for geoengineers. I was surprized at their animosity when the label chemtrails is uttered…

    • Wow! A cognizant person! Pleasure to read your comment, thanks.

    • Agree with most of this, lots of human (?), if we can call these creatures that purposely destroy Earth, humans.

      However we do know the puppet Hillary won’t do a dang thing, however Trump is a wildcard. Which is why he’s encountering such visceral resistance from the establishment in both corrupt puppet parties.

      • Andrew Sean Barthel | May 11, 2016 at 1:24 pm | Reply

        Trump was hand picked by the puppets don’t be fooled.

      • sharon sampson | May 12, 2016 at 1:54 am | Reply

        There is no way jose that humans can destroy the earth, sweetie. We can, however, destroy the environment us idiot humans need to thrive and not become extinct. The Earth will go on just fine albeit having lost a bunch of species either naturally or by our selfish needs…or by us having accidents, major boo boos like Fukushima. Major.

        Screw global warming, we ARE killing our ocean, all connected of course to weather, climate, atmosphere, food sources…Fukushima should never have happened. If there is any chance of failure such as ships with oil… should not be allowed. One accident is catastrophic and wrong. Preventable. But money rules. Money is god. Money will cause us humans to go extinct. I don’t see at all that we are killing this planet, ha ha, I see that we just don’t FIT in any natural pattern, any environmental cycle…we aren’t NEEDED on this planet. We’ve no important niche and if we all disappeared in an instant…nothing at all would happen. Nothing. I am one embarrassed human!

        Presidents are puppets. Trump would be interesting. Hillary a nightmare. Do you guys actually think OUR votes count?

    • sharon sampson | May 12, 2016 at 1:40 am | Reply

      I’m glad you didn’t include carbon dioxide and global warming…truly most of all you listed I am paying a lot of attention to…do you have any ideas for solutions? Even ideas that are way out there?

    • As I understand the data, the ozone hole (aggravated by HAARP & “Solar Radiation Management”) is allowing previously blocked UV-B and UV-C to burn not only the bark of trees, but also killing phytoplankton, the broad base of the oceanic food chain.

      • The so-called ozone was supposedly over Antarctica so may not have killed much phytoplankton in the oceans? A lack of iron in the oceans is much more deadly.
        Since today, ozone is considered a greenhouse, perhaps any supposed lack of ozone might increase phytoplankton?
        An interesting history:
        1. A previously unknown scientist announced the CFC ozone hypothesis.
        2. Dupont, the major CFC manufacturer, immediately denounced it as a crackpot theory.
        3. The next morning, Dupont reversed 180 degrees. Dupont’s CFC patents were running out.
        4. I bought Dupont stock,
        5. Dupont and others suggested that there should be a ban on increased CFC manufacture which effectively extended their patents. Then a phase out until Dupont could come up with replacements that they could claim are safer.
        6. My stock doubled in value so I sold it.
        Easy to make a bundle when you understand corporate fiduciary responsibility.
        Corporate administrators are required to lie, cheat, and steal to make a buck.
        The same for allopathic “medicine”.

        • (1) While I have not independently reviewed the data, it is my understanding that the ozone hole is sufficiently enlarged as to influence oceans and land masses, no longer just Antarctica.
          (2) “Allopathic” is not the problem with medicine (homeopathy’s fundamentals are deeply flawed quackery). It is the godless pursuit of money by the “medical-industrial complex” (including the minions of the complex, a new generation of physicians who no longer take an oath to patients) that is the problem.

          • Mark, the supposed ozone hole is normal low variance in the thickness of ozone above Antarctica. That was twisted into something to scare people.
            Allopathic “medicine” controls all non-traditional “medicine” in the U.S. including homeopathic “medicine”. Traditional medicine is outlawed and extremely prosecuted.
            The most hated word in allopathy is the c-word that stops income dead cold.
            Allopathic “medicine” block all attempts to introduce all cures and prefers treat, treat, and treat methods that causes more harm to increase income. They even stoop low enough to cutting out parts of people’s immune system like tonsils and lymph nodes.
            A good example of the damage done by allopathic “medicine” is non-therapeutic vaccines that in over two hundreds years of trying have never been proven beneficial but in the same over two hundred years have been proven both harmful and sometimes deadly.

          • I’ll repeat myself. Though I have not vetted the data myself, I understand that, due to HAARP and “SRM” aerosols, the ozone hole is now sufficiently large as to influence oceans and land masses. If you have contrary data I am happy to review it.

            I’ll repeat myself. The problem is not allopathy, but love of money. The problem is the godless pursuit of money by corporations and a new generation of greedy doctors who serve themselves and their corporate masters.

            I do not take vaccines nor have my family vaccinated—not because vaccines are inherently a bad idea, but because the current business and depopulationist model has usurped a good idea and provided tainted products. Consider that smallpox vaccines together with public health measures eradicated smallpox (except from the devil’s biowarfare labs). Compare that with contaminated Gardasil and MMR vaccines that create most disease than they prevent. Vaccines are just one tool in the toolbox of medicine. Like another tool, a gun, the tool can be used for good or bad.

            Cutting out diseased tissue, whether an abscessed tonsil or burned tissue, makes sense.

          • Good heavens! Activist Post is foolishly nervous about hyperlinks…

            I recognize that this is not the primary data and that this comes from a group with political agenda, however the article supports some points I have made and the article has an extensive bibliography: geoengineeringwatch dot org/geoengineering-is-destroying-the-ozone-layer/

          • Mark, wow, you found an “Off The Chart” scare article that did not give current numbers with numbers measured a few or more years ago.
            You must be so worried that you cannot even lookup proper measurements.

          • I asked you to provide contradictory data, but instead you have only sarcasm. So far we have only your opinion and your sarcasm.

          • You did not ask me “to provide contradictory data” to your two year old article and I wouldn’t have bothered anyway.
            The articles doesn’t bother to give numbers so there are no numbers to contradict.
            What were some ozone measurements or UV measurements back then compared to several years before back then?
            The article is fluff and I would not take it seriously enough to bother contradicting.
            If the secret numbers were off-the-chart back then,
            then we are all dead by now so why bother contradicting the old article?
            The sky is falling. The sky is falling. No evidence presented but the sky is falling.

          • I said I was open to any data that contradicted what I have read. You have provided no such data, only your raving opinions and insults. Since you claim to be so current on the subject and so knowledgeable, you should have the data at your fingertips, but where is your data? Apparently it is your data that is “secret.”

          • Mark, you have presented no data to be agreed with or contradicted.
            Your old fluff the-sky-is-falling article presents no facts to validate or to invalidate.
            Yes, we have ozone and it might have been here for billions of years?.
            Is it higher or lower over some years?
            How much and when?
            If there was a change, what proof do you have for a cause.
            What are the numbers and what does that have to do with the old fluff article that you were able to find.

          • I provided an article with data. You have provided no contradictory data, only raving insults, personal opinion, and outright deceits.

          • Mark, your old fluff articles presents opinions without any data to back the opinions.
            I’ve several times asked to to find any data in the article about ozone levels, UV levels for back when the old article was published and for a few years prior to that.
            You did not because you can not get that information from an old fluff opinionated article anymore than anyone else could.

          • Wouldn’t you rather expound on your theory of Indonesians interbreeding with a species of Hobbit ?: theprancingpapio.blogspot DOT com/2009/11/hobbits-are-indeed-separate-species.html

          • Mark, I understand that you have an issue with logic, but why do you want me to expand on what someone that I never met said.
            Do you not understand how ridicules that your posts are?
            You might want to read some of your posts but expect them to shock you.
            Then again, the shock may do you some good?
            P.S. Thanks for bringing up fond memories.

          • Nice battle, some twists and turns but somitcw you are undoubtbly the winner and Mark’s best friend when battleing seems to be google.

            I had more fun reading you’re argue than the article, Thanks!

            Exess and ao’s

          • Where is YOUR data about Indonesians interbreeding with a species of Hobbit? : theprancingpapio.blogspot DOT com/2009/11/hobbits-are-indeed-separate-species.html

          • Mark, my first question is how you invented multiple “species” of Hobbit?
            Second question is why should I supply data to prove or disprove what people in Rampapasa/Rampasasa say?
            Third question is how are your weird remarks in anyway related to fish dying?
            P.S. I’m still enjoying the ancient reminders you are posting.

          • Yes Mark, you made it clear that you don’t know much about the supposed ozone hole. I believe you. You convinced me.
            Traditional physicians made money, they just didn’t have a fiduciary responsibility to lie, cheat, and steal to make a buck.
            Allopathic “medicine” tries to not heal but to block cures to make money.
            Non-therapeutic vaccines were introduced over two hundred years ago.
            A flawed theory then and still crippling and killing innocent people now.
            Non-therapeutic Gardasil vaccine does not need to be contaminated.
            It has polysorbate 80 to reduce fertility which is why it is being pushed.
            It’s already working. Teen pregnancies are down.
            Non-therapeutic attenuated virus MMR vaccine has no benefit but does damage.
            Tonsils job is to block infections. Removing them was to make a buck.
            Too many people figured that out back then and the practice had to be stopped.
            Cutting out swollen lymph nodes, swollen means that they are doing their job, became a popular scam but people are starting wise up to it also.

          • Exactly, I do not claim to have expertise unless warranted. You, sorry to be blunt, feign expertise where you have none.

            With your careless prejudice, you throw out the baby with the bath water. I have already given examples of a beneficial vaccine (smallpox) and harmful vaccines (Gardasil and MMR). With similar illogic, your anti-allopathy dogmatism makes no distinction between the removal of abscessed tonsils or the “immune tissue” of a rupturing appendix (that no longer can prevent infections, but threaten life) and undiseased tonsils (a money-making fraud). These are distinctions with meaning, distinctions worth your notice.

            If you break your arm, have a peritonsillar abscess, or get appendicitis, please feel free to see your homeopath.

          • Mark, the non-therapeutic attenuated virus smallpox vaccine was a pox on the U.S. and Europe. Europeans and Africans had had smallpox for centuries so people that could be killed by smallpox were already dead and left no descendants.
            The non-therapeutic attenuated virus smallpox vaccine was forced in some cities so they had much disease but not forced in other cities so they had little disease.
            Repeated all over the U.S. and Europe.
            Finally in 1974, too many people in the U.S. knew the truth that there had been no real case of smallpox in the U.S. for decades but plenty of disease from the
            non-therapeutic attenuated virus smallpox vaccine so forced non-therapeutic attenuated virus smallpox vaccination was stopped in the U.S.
            In the 1950s, any child that went on an allopathic sales-droid visit was in danger of having their tonsils stolen. Being diseased or not made no difference.
            Sort of like non-therapeutic vaccines today.
            Most victims lived through the theft and could still fight off most infections.
            People wised up and the practice stopped.
            Today, for an allopathic sales-droid to sell a tonsillectomy to a parent of a victim, the allopathic sales-droid needs to do some fast talking. It can still happen but the benefit is for the bank accounts of allopathic “medicine”, not for the victim nor for the bamboozled parents of the victim.
            Why do you love your homeopaths so much?
            Homeopaths are as non-traditional and all other allopathic “medicine”.
            They are not in business for your benefit.

          • Is English your native language? I have repeatedly stated I OPPOSE homeopathy as quackery.

            Your gratuitous use of “non-therapeutic” to describe the smallpox vaccine is just your evidence-free mantra. The smallpox vaccine was one important tool that helped eradicate smallpox from the world (except from the laboratories of biowarfare maniacs).

            Similarly I have made a careful distinction that you ignore—the difference between legitimate surgical removal of diseased tissue and illegitimate removal of undiseased tissue for profit. I praise the legitimate surgery and condemn the illegitimate surgery.

          • Mark, you must really love homeopathy to bring it up over and over.
            It is the same quackery as the other allopathic “medicine” that controls it.
            If you think that the non-therapeutic attenuated virus smallpox vaccine is therapeutic, you might want to check a dictionary. The lack of your knowledge about the difference might be the base for your confusion?
            If you think that the deaths and disease caused by the non-therapeutic attenuated virus smallpox vaccine had a benefit to the victims or to the community, you might want to check history.
            Many have fought against forcibly assaulting people with the non-therapeutic attenuated virus smallpox vaccine. The fighting against the assaults started over two centuries ago. They had good reason to fight it.
            If you think that cutting out victims tonsils provided any benefit for the victims, you may want to try to find one case that matches your dream. You won’t find one.
            The same for many other absurd organ removal. Prepuce, adenoids, .uterus, mastectomy, lymph nodes, and anything else that allopathic “medicine” can get away with. An occasional allopathic sales-droid doing a once-in-a-blue-moon appendectomy whether it is needed or not does not excuse the constant victims losing other body parts.

          • You are welcome to joust with your own made up straw man arguments.

          • Mark, I’m just responding to your silliness.
            You are the one that brought up and keeps bringing up your beloved homeopathic “medicine”.
            You keep claiming that the non-therapeutic attenuated virus smallpox vaccine provided a benefit.
            You are the one claiming that forcibly cutting body organs is a good thing.

          • Silliness? Like your theory about Indonesians interbreeding with a species of Hobbit? t: theprancingpapio.blogspot DOT com/2009/11/hobbits-are-indeed-separate-species.html

          • Mark, where did you read that I somehow inherited what people claim in Rampapasa/Rampasasa and how did there oral history become my claim?
            Yes, I know that you have a logic issue, but are there any limits?
            P.S. It is still a fond memory from an article published on 2009-11-21

          • No, I really want to hear more about your theory about Indonesians interbreeding with a species of Hobbit: theprancingpapio.blogspot DOT com/2009/11/hobbits-are-indeed-separate-species.html

          • Mark, please go visit there and ask them about their claim.
            Don’t ask me about what I never claimed.
            Read and try to comprehend what I posted.
            I understand that you have issues but please try anyway.
            The first three words are important:
            “People that claim that they are a mixture of Flores Hobbits and taller people are pictured at:
            cameronlaird dot com/Galleries/News-Photos/Hobbits-in-Flores-Indonesia ”
            P.S. You may want to cut out your weird “a species of Hobbit” phrase or at least define how many “species of Hobbit” that you think there are.
            Zero, one, or hundreds? Can you prove your weird speculation?
            P.P.S. I still appreciate you bring back fond memories even if you are far off topic and appear to be claiming to be totally out of reason.

          • Mark, the word quackery came from the German pronunciation of quick silver.
            Allopathic sales-droids were actually putting quick silver, mercury, in tooth caries.
            The quacks, mercury selling allopathic sales-droids, won and traditional medicine was outlawed.

          • …and people actually wrote letters before they had email… so what? Times change. Technology advances. I am no luddite. Neither am I a reflexive “first adopter” of technologies. I prefer to wait and see if the technology is actually better.

            Homeopathy’s fundamentals are flawed. Treat same with same? Treat diarrhea with laxatives/purgatives? Result: dehydration and death. Treat fever with more heat? Result: death from hyperpyrexia.

            “The more the medicine is diluted, the more ‘essence’ remains.” Superstitious magical thinking, long debunked.

          • Mark, quack is a quack is a quack is allopathic “medicine”. Nothing changed.
            All non-traditional “medicine” is quack.
            That includes you precious homeopathic “medicine”.
            They are all controlled by the same people and same groups.
            They are all licensed the same and function the same.
            If someone wants to treat diarrhea with their method, more power to them.
            If someone wants to use heat to assist their body in fighting off infections and cancer, more power to them.
            When it was legal, induced fevers stopped one-third to one-half of cancers.
            It is not my place or your place to judge which people want traditional medicine and which want “medicine” under the allopathic umbrella.
            I will tell them that in the U.S. people seldom die of disease.
            It is more common for allopathic treatment to get them.

          • “My” homeopathy? I oppose it. If you intend to have a discussion, please read carefully.

          • Mark, you are the one that brings up homeopathy and imply that it is somehow different than different branches of allopathic “medicine”.
            I just remind you that your favourite allopathic “medicine” is controlled by the same people and groups that control other parts of allopathic “medicine”.
            You are the one that claims that curing diarrhea causes dehydration and death.
            Did I say that right, ?the?lack?of?diarrhea?causes?dehydration?
            Well how about helping someones body fight infection or cancer by helping a fever do its job is a bad thing?
            Have you given any thought to what you have been posting?

          • When you lump homeopathy with allopathy, you betray your ignorance of the subject.

            Carefully re-read what I wrote. I condemned homeopathy’s “treat same with same” precept.

            You are raving.

          • Mark, where do people get your beloved homeopathy license?
            Who decides what your beloved homeopaths can do?
            It is the same as, controlled the same, and does the same as other allopathic “medicine”. Nothing special.
            There is traditional medicine and the other, which is allopathic “medicine”.
            Traditional medicine attempts to cure and the other outlaws any pretense of their
            c-word replaced by treat, treat, and treat for every U.S. dollar that they can get.
            Your beloved homeopathy is part of allopathic “medicine” and is no better or worse than other parts of non-traditional “medicine”.

          • Clearly you are dishonest. I oppose homeopathy, yet you insist it is my “beloved.”

          • Mark, homeopathy is the favourite thing that you mention.
            It must be a great attraction to you.
            You brought it up and keep repeating it over and over and over.

          • Searching the internet for your posts, I see that you habitually make outlandish claims for which you can provide no supportive data and that you habitually use straw man arguments and insults. Here is one of the most amusing examples:
            scienceblogs DOT com/insolence/2014/03/12/reason-com-defends-the-medical-neglect-of-sarah-hershberger/

          • And this thread is not the first in which you make fake attributions: theeconomiccollapseblog DOT com/archives/24-outrageous-facts-about-taxes-in-the-united-states-that-will-blow-your-min

          • And here you weigh in on interbreeding with a species of Hobbit: theprancingpapio.blogspot DOT com/2009/11/hobbits-are-indeed-separate-species.html

          • Mark, the people that live in Rampapasa/Rampapasa claim that they are descendants of other people. I didn’t invent what they said but merely posted pictures of the people that made that claim. If you don’t want to believe them, please tell them.
            Thanks for all of the fond memories. The pictures were cute also.

          • Your posts here and elsewhere show a pattern of:
            (1) failure to supply references for your opinions and
            (2) a considerable amount of insults, straw man arguments, and attributing to people the opposite of what they have said.

            You have done the same here.

            I don’t know whether your problem is psychiatric, Alzheimer’s, fronto-temporal dementia, or spiritual, but, now that I am aware of your habitual dishonesty, I see no reason to interact with you any further.

          • Mark, so you gave everyone another insulting and off-topic post.
            No surprise there.
            If there was ever a time that I was required to supply a reference and did not, you would have found where by now and posted the details.
            If you want to continue to try to insult me, please do.
            I will continue to laugh at you.
            If you instead want to actually post something on topic without insulting people, be careful or someone might have a heart attack.

          • Mark, I’ve posted many times many places.
            That particular post was another fond memory about an apparent error in the article.
            The article did not state where they got a 1900 statistic for something that they claimed started in 1913.
            No fake attribution involved.. It was all there in front of everyone.

            9 – According to The Tax Foundation, the average American has to work until April 17th just to pay federal, state, and local taxes. Back in 1900, “Tax Freedom Day” came on January 22nd.
            10 – When the U.S. government first implemented a personal income tax back in 1913, the vast majority of the population paid a rate of just 1 percent, and the highest marginal tax rate was just 7 percent.

            P.S. There was someone complaining about my post. Problem someone as bad at math as others that complain about my posts.

          • Yes, you have posted many places and your posts show a pattern of:
            (1) failure to supply references for your opinions
            (2) a considerable amount of insults, straw man arguments, and attributing to people the opposite of what they have said.
            You have done the same here.
            I don’t know whether your problem is psychiatric, Alzheimer’s, fronto-temporal dementia, or spiritual, but, now that I am aware of your habitual dishonesty, I see no reason to interact with you any further.

          • Mark, so you gave everyone another insulting and off-topic post.
            No surprise there.
            If there was ever a time that I was required to supply a reference and did not, you would have found where by now.
            If you want to continue to try to insult me, please do.
            I will continue to laugh at you.
            If you instead want to actually post something on topic without insulting people, be careful or someone may have a heart attack.

          • Yes, I exposed the truth as to why the allopaths wanted so badly to force an eleven year old girl to have supposed chemotherapy.
            1. It was secretly experimental chemo which was not what was told to her family.
            2. The hospital would get one million U.S. dollars if they could force the child to stay in the trial until end without the child taking any traditional medicine.
            3. Two court cases had already been decided in the family’s favor.
            4. The third court decided against the child and her family and ordered a guardian to take over the child’s “medical” treatment in favor of the allopaths.
            5. The child and her family escaped, sought traditional medical treatment, and returned in four months completely cured.
            No experimental chemo or other chemo needed.
            I bet that the judge is still upset that the girl is still alive.
            The family was not prosecuted for saving their child’s life.
            Interesting that a couple of months of traditional treatment cured cancer better, safer, less expensive, and without destroying someone’s immune system, fertility, or health compared to over 2 years of chemo for normally about a half of million U.S. dollars that does all the above mentioned damage.
            It was all about an allopathic lie and allopathic abuse that I exposed.
            Did you see how upset the people pushing allopathic “medicine” got anytime that any fact was revealed? I am certain that they are still upset.

          • But I really want to hear your theory about Indonesians interbreeding with a species of Hobbit: theprancingpapio.blogspot DOT com/2009/11/hobbits-are-indeed-separate-species.html

          • Mark, please go visit there and ask them about their claim.
            Don’t ask me about what I never claimed.
            Don’t keep making up a theory and then claiming that it was anything I said.
            Also you might want to ask the people in Rampapasa/Rampasasa why you have difficulty comprehending simple information and telling opinions from data.
            You might also want to ask them why you keep posting so far off topic.
            P.S. Thanks for bringing back fond memories but other posters might not appreciate your barrage of your off-topic posts.

  5. i hope they consider looking into” la nina/el nino” conditions and of course contaminations and or sonic under water attacks

  6. The lakes takes Fukishima off the hook. I wonder where Monsanto and there ilk fits in this puzzle?

    I know recently China has been poisoning the waters of the coast of one of the Spratley Islands so they get rid of the Filipino fishermen that live there and make the island into a military base.

    All the other comments bring up valid points too.

    • Beverly Hustins | May 10, 2016 at 2:18 pm | Reply

      sorry…Fukushima is the catalyst & hanging noose even with the lakes….remember how Water works, evaporation, clouds, rain. Radiation has now been widely distributed to different degrees over the entire world. The dead fish are only the beginning, it’s the fragile north & south poles that we should be paying close attention to. Global warming has been extremely harmful, but radiation fall out changes the molecular structure of ice so it is not able freeze & the small critical creatures like Krill that almost exclusively support the web food chain are made of a very important building element call Chitin, which actually absorbs radiation & destroys Chitin in the process. There are many toxic sources that have been destroying the earth & her creatures for years, but Fukushima was the tipping point. Most people don’t even know that the Pacific ocean has been unable to support life for a while now. There are only a few selected areas that are still able to hold life, but they are succumbing to the radiation too.

      • While your conclusions may be valid?, your idea on evaporation and radiation may not be completely accurate.
        Water evaporation alone will never have much radioactive iodine, radioactive cesium, radioactive strontium, uranium, or other radioactive elements.
        Tritium is an exception but there will still not be much.
        It is dust in the atmosphere that can be radioactive and can come down with rain.
        Pure water evaporation is closer to distilling water.
        Another issue is that what burns brightest burns out quickly.
        Radioactive iodine burns bright and quick. Ingest a tiny amount and if you are iodine deficient like most people eating U.S.A. processed food, the radioactive iodine will go straight to your thyroid and damage tissue and can kill you quickly with cancer.
        Store radioactive iodine between 6 to 12 months and it is no longer radioactive so completely harmless and is actually healthy for you. The 8 day half life works wonders.
        If we stop Fukushima from creating new radioactive material, the hottest burning radioactive elements will decay quickly. It’s been years with no real cleanup so don’t hold your breath.
        Radioactive cesium is stored in bones for about six months but doesn’t burn as bright as radioactive iodine..
        Radioactive cesium will still kill you if you don’t use a chelator like Prussian Blue ( which is of course almost impossible for you to obtain legally as medicine ).
        The real problem is that because radioactive cesium burns so slow, it’s half-life is thirty years. That coupled with governments preventing us from receiving real medicine will cause many deaths.

      • Dennis Hoppe | May 17, 2016 at 3:47 pm | Reply

        Watch the prices of canned fish in grocery stores and where the fish are being caught. If what is being said in this article is true and I have no reason to believe is isn’t, than watching the 3 factors mentioned should give us a good indication of how large the fish kill problem is. It would be a good idea to include freshly caught fish also. But this would be more difficult because there would be no identification as would be
        supplied on canned fish labels. I purchase canned salmon on a regular basis. I have not seen any large increase in price or lack of availability of this product. It would be great to start a blog regarding this issue.

  7. Arlene Lane | May 9, 2016 at 12:52 pm | Reply

    WE DO NOT KNOW HOW OR WHY, BUT BEHIND EVERY DISASTER IS THE USA, and I mean every disaster of every kind, because at this time there is no evidence of anyone as nasty as the USA.

  8. R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed. | May 9, 2016 at 1:30 pm | Reply

    Do you know what the Petkau Effect means? It is relatively new in nuclear sciences, and many folks never heard about it. Petkau discovered that Low levels of nuclear radiation can be MORE destructive over time than was first thought.

    Also, the info about global fish kills shared with us by Michael Snyder confirms the fact that within 18 months, a poisonous dump in one ocean body will mix homogeneously throughout the World ocean (all oceans are connected).

    It takes time for the ionizing radiation from radioactive articles to destroy tissue, but once it starts, then death comes rapidly. We are in an Extinction Level Event caused by three meltdowns in the reactors on March 11, 2011 at Fukushima…the rest of the insults like chemtrails, drilling accidents, etc. are contributing to it.

    FACT: The world’s Eco-Web is collapsing…the global fish kill is more evidence to support that fact, albeit the fact is not wanted. Governments know the fact, but are not going to tell the people, who “might get mad.”


    R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./ sciences

    Investigative Science Reporter since 1996

    24 years – Virginia Licensed Science Teacher (biology, chemistry, physics)

    9.3 years-Nuclear lab and Nuclear Radiological Protection Inspector

    1992 – Certificate of Completion for “Teaching Nuclear Topics”

  9. With all the volcanic activity going on over the past couple of years I’d be looking at the possibility of poisonous gasses being released into the oceans.

  10. Arlene Lane | May 9, 2016 at 2:03 pm | Reply

    CHINA has not been poisoning the SPRATLEY ISLANDS, only AMERICA DOES THAT,

    • China even poisons baby food (milk, formula) with melamine!

    • thangco11 . | May 12, 2016 at 5:23 pm | Reply

      You look like an old Chinese woman who does not know anything about the brutality of Chinese who are taking over the South Pacific,dumping all nasty industrial waste into the ocean without knowing one day,there will be a dead sea even for their own children.You will die before that day but a lot of your grand kids will be terrible victims of Great China

  11. clarioncaller | May 9, 2016 at 4:40 pm | Reply

    The globalists must have altered their chemtrail formula.

  12. Well said, Kerf. You are spot on. For some of us the dots are easy to join up. For others, they just fail to even try…

  13. Does Fukushima ring a bell?

  14. elainewoodriff | May 9, 2016 at 9:23 pm | Reply

    Human overpopulation is destroying the world. How else could all the problems, such as the fish kills, be explained? All environmental destruction is human caused.

    • Pyra Gorgon | May 10, 2016 at 8:06 am | Reply

      Be the change you want to see in the world, then. All you have to do is remove yourself from this world and you’d be helping 1/ 7,125,000,000th of the problem!

      • elainewoodriff | May 10, 2016 at 4:11 pm | Reply

        My removing myself would not solve the problem.

        • Pyra Gorgon | May 11, 2016 at 6:15 am | Reply

          You’re the one making statements about too many people existing on the planet. The solution is for those who feel that way ought to start population reduction by going first. If there are about 4 billion people who feel the way you do, then population wouldn’t be a problem…

          OH WAIT! YOU WANT OTHER PEOPLE to stop existing, not yourself. Yeah, sure of course you offing yourself would not solve your eugenic mindset but it would solve OUR problem of having to deal with eugenicists. Like you.

          • elainewoodriff | May 11, 2016 at 10:45 pm |

            There is a way to reduce human population which would not be destructive. The China government’s policy of only one child was a good plan. It would be a slow reduction, but a sensible one.

          • Pyra Gorgon | May 12, 2016 at 6:31 am |

            How is murdering human babies a sensible solution?

          • elainewoodriff | May 12, 2016 at 8:30 pm |

            I did not say anything about murdering human babies. Apparently you incorrectly assumed that I did. Using good birth control procedures, along with a one-child policy, would be a responsible method of reducing human over population.

          • Pyra Gorgon | May 12, 2016 at 9:16 pm |

            No, all you are giving me is eugenic sophistry. Why is any of this needed anyways? The world is not over-populated. That is the fundamental flaw none of your solutions can fix.

          • elainewoodriff | May 12, 2016 at 9:28 pm |

            The amount of human beings existing on this finite planet is increasing dramatically. This finite planet cannot support more and more human beings continuously. The current quality of life for everyone is being degraded little by little. In addition, the planet is losing other species. The extinction rate of nonhuman species is accelerating dramatically. Will we lose all other animals?

          • Pyra Gorgon | May 13, 2016 at 6:36 am |

            I’ve heard all those various and sundry reasons before, Elaine. However, consider the framing of the question when ‘finite’ is added to the human growth which seems ‘infinite’. But this is not the case and we all know it. We also know that nearly ALL INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES RIGHT NOW are having problems with viable pregnancies to replace population lost through natural means. Only human vermin Muslims from 3rd world countries are breeding like lice. Maybe you could peddle birth control to Muslims before they out-breed people like YOU…

            Who says this planet cannot support more people than it currently does? How do you know these things? I daresay you do not, but you speculate and feel like your opinion is based on intelligent points, but all you do is parrot demonic doctrines of yesteryear’s eugenic folks. Don’t let that camel nose into your tent!

            The current quality of life is not dependent on volumes of people, but rather on the people themselves and their collective social value. Quality of life goes down the more restrictions are placed on life. Quality of life goes down the more socialist a culture becomes. Don’t believe this? Simple: FACT CHECK ME. (better find out who is putting out those facts, also)

            Extinction rates are not caused by human population, either. Elaine, every single thing you brought up have nothing to do with one another. Animal extinction rates are caused by human ACTIVITY, not human population. While activity is a consequence of populating an area, more so are industries, mining, waste disposal, cultural values (are they ‘disposable’?), agri-practices, and policies and regulations attempting to curtain greed and corporate avarice. Don’t forget sport, either.

            Eugenics is not the answer to human population, Elaine. Proper policy, living as moral humans, adopting positive worldviews that do not belittle being human and build dignity, being less selfish and more aware, caring for those protected classes that cannot fend for themselves: widows, orphans, the sick, the desperate…all those things will turn the world around!

          • elainewoodriff | May 13, 2016 at 8:53 pm |

            You are very right in saying that activity has much to do with animal extinction. But that does not solve the problem of the limited space and resources of this earth.
            There is only so much to go around for all. The fact that millions, if not billions, of people are at this very time living in poverty and as slaves says a lot about what is happening with the current population numbers and the ever increasing amount of humans on this limited-resource world.

          • Pyra Gorgon | May 14, 2016 at 6:49 am |

            I agree with you on that, Elaine, but again, none of the things you mentioned are population-centric issues. People’s attitudes, perceptions, values, and morals are to blame for slavery, violence, poverty (which is misallocation of resources).

            WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT population, policy changes can fix what you list: slavery= aggressively go after kidnappers, execute perpetrators publicly, poverty= gov’t stops meddling in the economy and allows people the autonomy to make such decisions. Resource allocation happens on its own, the trick is to STOP GOVERNMENT FROM MEDDLING.

            Centralized government accounts for 99% of all human problems and 100% of all democide is government related. Think about that.

          • Your overpopulation myth is a myth.
            The Earth can easily support 7 billion people and could support 7 trillion if needed but we will move underground, underwater, and off planet before then.
            Yes, your supposed population control makes slaves of us all.
            Eliminating the slavery you cause using murder is still murder.
            You and no one else has the right to kill babies, sterilize people, or commit other crimes to have more of the planet for themselves.

          • elainewoodriff | May 14, 2016 at 8:32 pm |

            Somitcaw, you are making ridiculous assumptions, saying that I advocate murder, killing babies, sterilizing people, or committing other crimes. Where did you see that on any post that I made?
            Your wild accusations show that you can’t reason but can only throw libelous mud at those who you disagree with.

          • elainewoodriff, it is you claiming that the overpopulation myth is true.
            elainewoodriff, it is you calling for forced population reduction.
            You do not have authority to force population reduction either by killing Chinese babies, poisoning food, poisoning medication, poisoning water, or by other means.
            It is I that suggest that your population reduction start with you.
            You don’t need to force yourself like you advocate against others.

          • elainewoodriff | May 15, 2016 at 7:04 pm |

            Somitcw, you are right – it is wrong for Chinese babies to be killed, it is wrong for food to be poisoned, it is wrong for medication to be poisoned, it is wrong that water be poisoned. You are very right on all of this. I commend you for your ethical thinking. I am glad that there are people in this world that support all these views. The world needs more conscientious people like you.

          • Dennis Hoppe | May 17, 2016 at 4:06 pm |

            No the world is not overpopulated. It is the lack of natural resources, including fertile soil and clean water to supply the approximately 7.2 billion people which are continuing to increase exponentially that is the problem. The natural resources on our planet are fixed. The human population is not.

          • Dennis Hoppe, fertile soil and clean water is what you make of it.
            We have miles and miles of weeds, trees, deserts, tundra, and oceans that could grow whatever food you want. Some location would need greenhouses but that would also decrease the need for replacing clean water.
            The water we have is a finite amount but raining down from space 24 hours a day.
            Our current water can support million of times more people than the Earth has today.
            Water is also 100% renewable. It doesn’t disappear.
            Is there really a secret natural resource that is scaring people or is it all about eugenist and the elite using scare tactics as an excuse to get rid of useless eaters like you and me?
            P.S. Many developed countries have a problem of low birth rate so decreasing and aging populations. We have fluoride in our water, polysorbate 80 in our vaccines, and more assaults in our foods than we know.
            The fact that we have any birth rate above zero is a miracle.

    • The U.S. nation state of Texas could be divided into two billion lots for four person families and additional lots for churches, schools, and businesses.
      Using sealed green houses on each family lot, there would be no food or water shortage.
      With houses designed with the top 100% covered in solar cells and salt water batteries in their basements,there would be no lack of electricity.
      Planet Earth could easily support one thousand times as many people as we have today before moving much underwater or to outer space.
      The people pushing the “over-population” myth have no idea what they are talking about other than they want to kill everyone other than themselves.

      • elainewoodriff | May 11, 2016 at 10:32 pm | Reply

        The actual fact of humanity is that people do not stay in one compact place. They spread out all over the world, taking up territory and expanding into habitats of other species, both plants and other animals, thus causing extinctions of plants and other animals. Currently, we are experiencing the greatest extinction of species, other than human, since that of the time of the dinosaurs.

        • The U.S. is full of places that all you can see is miles and miles of miles and miles.
          The Earth’s oceans have areas of miles and miles of miles and miles.
          The Antarctic has areas that are miles and miles of miles and miles.
          Earth orbit has areas that are miles and miles of miles and miles.
          The entire Universe has areas that are miles and miles of miles and miles.
          The overpopulation myth is spread by eugenists and people that want the entire planet to themselves.
          Does elainewoodriff fit in with the eugenists, the greedy, or does elainewoodriff think that elainewoodriff’s suicide would be best for the remaining?
          Perhaps elainewoodriff supports killing babies for China’s one child crime against the people?

          • elainewoodriff | May 13, 2016 at 8:34 pm |

            It may apparently look that there is unlimited space to be seen, but the fact is that humans are increasing their take of global habitat, and leaving less and less for other species for their viable existence. Animals such as wolverines, bears, and wolves need very large territories for optimal existence, and unfortunately, their territories are being squeezed by human land expansion until they have not the right amount that they need.
            Say what you want about all the benefits for humans, they are deadly to other species.

          • If your goal is to increase wolverine, bear, and wolf population with you believing the silly human overpopulation myth, then you should purchase large tracts of land or zoo cages and nurture the animals instead of killing humans.
            With the entire world’s human population able to live in the U.S. nation state of Texas, I don’t see why you direct your concern at killing humans or non-humans.
            There are other ways to allow more non-human animals to live.
            If you goal is to kill babies, elderly, or other people that you don’t like, then please put yourself at the top of your list and your issue will be solved immediately.
            i.e. If you need to be deadly, then be deadly to yourself instead of being deadly to other humans and being deadly to non-humans.

          • Dennis Hoppe | May 17, 2016 at 4:31 pm |

            The question is would I want to live in Texas with a population of over 7 billion people crowded together. The nonrenewable natural resources and the logistics of transporting them to support a modern industrialized, technological way of life as we have in the U.S. would be unsustainable. The hydroponic farms and clean water purification systems as was suggested would take all the natural resources in the world just to build them. This is not even considering waste disposal that would be needed for this huge populations. Composting toilets are built from natural resources also.

          • Dennis Hoppe, you are trying to emphasize the minor issues to be addressed instead of the possibility.
            I was not proposing that we actually move with the stated method and only used it to demonstrate how silly the eugenics and elite overpopulation myth is.
            Their overpopulation myth is only an excuse to justify them killing who they consider useless eaters. That is you and me.
            Texas was just an example. Personally, I would prefer northern Alaska with the difference between the heat 200 to 300 feet down compared to the surface and Arctic Ocean generating all of the electricity that we will ever need.
            As for crowding, I was not suggesting high-rise apartment building but single family houses. There wouldn’t be any large farms, but is “crowding” the proper word to use?
            A well aimed asteroid strike could be an issue.
            What secret non-renewable resource is everyone keeping secret about?
            It can’t be water. Water is 100% renewable.
            Anyway, a sealed greenhouse doesn’t use much water.
            Water from proper wastewater treatment today is cleaner than what we drink from public water today.
            Other resources would not increase in use and most would decrease in use.
            What is the secret non-renewable resource?
            Transporting what is needed would be less effort, less distance, cheaper, and much more sustainable that what we have today.
            We already have housing for everyone that are constantly being rebuilt.
            To use a more efficient design and place in a different location is a reduction in resource use.
            We have waste disposal and sewage disposal now for the same number of people that we have now but because of better design and the closer proximity of people we would need less. Waste treatment would not be scattered over the entire planet.
            When going forward, why do you want to consider stone age composting toilets.
            We should strive for modern homes, modern greenhouses, modern neighborhoods, not try to move to a time before people used metal.

          • Dennis Hoppe | May 17, 2016 at 11:21 pm |

            First of all I respect you for your opinions. Let’s get right to the overpopulation problem. The world population was estimated to be 250 million in 1 A.D. The world population in 1492 was estimated to be 500 million. The population in 1804 was 1.0 billion 2 billion by 1922, 3 billion by 1959, 6.8 billion by 2006. It could be 8 to 13 billion by 2039. (increasing exponentially) Extracting minerals including oil and natural gas from the earth creates horrible environmental problems. Mining them for such a rapidly increasing population is an even bigger problem. (more pollution) Alternate forms of energy are part of the answer and hopefully all of the answer to our energy needs in the future. So the problem isn’t really overpopulation but the problem is having enough natural resources to give everyone in the world a modern technological society as in the highly developed countries like the U.S. Because that is what most people want. Industry and technology have created a much easier way of life for all of us in highly industrial societies. Maybe there are people in some countries that don’t want modern technology, but they are probably in the minority. When people from third world countries get an education in first world countries and then return to their country of origin they see opportunities and try to convince their people to create a first world lifestyle. That in itself is not evil, however it will not be possible because of the lack of easy and cheaply obtainable non-renewable natural resources. It is estimated that some day the sun will get so hot that life on our planet as we know it will be impossible. But that is estimated to be in billions of years. The point to be made is that mankind will not physically survive this far future situation. So if we were talking about all the problems we are having now in the world in billions of years when life would shorty be no longer possible, our conversation wouldn’t have much meaning. So mankind as we know it is not permanent. Let’s get back to now. In order to have healthy crops the proper amount of trace minerals are needed to grow these healthy crops. Much of the soil in the world does not have the proper amount of trace minerals to grow healthy food. Whether there are sufficient deposits of trace minerals in the world to add them to soil and hydroponic agriculture is questionable. If we can find an inexpensive method for the desalinization of salt water it would solve the clean water problem. But at this time cheap desalinization is not possible. There are areas of the world that get too much water from rain, but much of it runs off into the oceans and is not usable. And building more dam and reservoirs create problems of their own. Now regarding Eugenics. If the average person living in the world today lived to be 100 years old (which at this time isn’t the case) that means in the year 2016 approximately 7.2 people now existence will be dead.. Extending human life is a worthy effort. However that creates a huge problem Unless we extend the quality of life, increasing the quantity of years is meaningless. I would prefer a human population of 500 million people that lived forever than 10 billion people that are sick or starving. However I don’t believe in killing 6.8 billion people to reach that goal. If we had a fixed population who lived forever or until the hotter sun made life impossible that would make it much better for the existing population. Now let’s get serious. None of us is going to live forever, at least not in the physical body that we are currently living in. In fact nothing in the universe exists in its present form forever. . The only thing that stays the same is change. We live in a world that is a giant experimental laboratory with ever changing biological diversity. We don’t need eugenics of the physical body, we need eugenics of consciousness (awareness) because it is higher- consciousness that is needed. There are too many barbarians with a low state of consciousness that are ruling the world. Fear, greed and power is driving them, not intelligence. They are not aware of the whole picture. They are not the people that should be in control. Not enough scientists, biologists and humanists in power.

            Dennis Hoppe

          • Dennis Hoppe, yes, in one billion years, the human population may expand to not fit well in an area the size of Texas unless they have high-rise apartment buildings and underground cities. Since people will either all be dead or evolved far beyond what we are today to no longer be recognizable as people, I won’t cry over it.
            For now, unfortunately, human populations are stabilizing.
            Some places, they are even decreasing.
            As for your secret natural resources, we have the secret natural resources now so how would showing that people can fit in a small geographically area change that?
            We have plenty of oil and will have enough for decades. No worry there.
            We can also get off of oil use if we want to. Substitute hydro-electric, photo-electric, geo-electric, and other methods to generate and store electrical power or just design cars and homes to need less.
            As for secret trace elements needed, we have the secret trace elements now so how can shifting population location mean that we will not have the secret trace elements a year from now?
            Water does not go away and secret trace elements do not go away outside of a nuclear reactor. There is just no issue that can’t be easily solved.
            If someone wants to live to be 200 years old, who are you or I to tell them that they use too much secret resources to be allowed to live that long?
            Not our business.
            P.S. It is already “the year 2016”.

          • thangco11 . | May 15, 2016 at 10:46 pm |

            Do you know anything about China factory dumping all kind of factory waste into the rivers or ocean? Just pour a little bit of Liquid Plumber into your soup or your beer and see how long your family will last.

          • thangco11, please tell the Chinese that if they instead inject poisons into the ground like the U.S. fracking, they could destroy the ground water for centuries.
            Their rivers and the ocean will clean themselves up soon after the assaults stop.
            How did the Chinese environmental destruction get so far behind the U.S.?
            In both countries, put the perpetrators from the lowest worker to the highest administrator in prison with sentences that last until each is 99 years old and we could start recovering from their crimes.

          • thangco11 . | May 16, 2016 at 4:49 pm |

            Do you receive any money from the Chinese?According to this news article,most of the pile of dead fish come from Pacific Ocean close to those low standard countries and not the USA.Pollution in LA is no longer mentioned because of changes.Why is China claiming that the entire ocean south of it is now belongs to China to manipulate? A Chinese Rep told the Vietnamese they have to choose between fish or good steel from a brand new steel factory built in central VN?I am now a US citizen and I dont have to worry about my homeland being turned into China property,I only have to feed beautiful wild life outside my backdoor with the abundance of food that wealthy people throw out in the Sunday night black bins and contaminatons are a third world problem

          • thangco11, the Chinese send me nothing but please ask them to start.
            China holds much U.S. debt so are buying up parts of the U.S. as fast as they can.
            With the way that the U.S. is trashing our resources and people’s rights,
            China couldn’t be as bad to the environment or to us.
            The U.S. needs to fix its own problems instead of trying to control others.

  15. They probably glow in the dark.
    Guess the NWO agenda 2030 is working.
    Kill the oceans, the sky, the earth.
    EPA is too busy quaffing scones and lattes. Well they screwed up the animas rive here in Colorado so it’s just as well they do nothing.

  16. The answer is simple, alarming, and irreversible. It was recently discovered that phytoplankton is ingesting marine micro plastic. What is not widely known is that as marine plastic decomposes it absorbs PCBs spelling the demise of phytoplankton. Phytoplankton is the beginning of the food chain and the largest suppler of oxygen for this planet. It is in decline as is ocean oxygen levels as well as atmospheric oxygen levels. The oceans are gone and the atmosphere is next. A few percentage point drop and it’s over. Some cities are already there.

  17. Millions of tons of the most radioactive water ever seen, has be dumped into the Pacific Ocean by the crazy insane Japanese. And they act like nothing is wrong and still expect to host the Olympics in Tokyo.

    This is why there is basically a news blackout on this, they don’t want anything standing in the way of them hosting those games. And of course the News Corps are all tied in with the Nuclear Industry giants like GE, who owned NBC/CNBC/MSBNC for decades.

  18. It probably won’t be much longer until Earth shakes us off like a wet dog. With current societies and modern culture being what they are, including pollution and the abuse of technology, can’t say I’ll miss them.

  19. Kenneth Jacobson | May 11, 2016 at 6:55 am | Reply

    Besides all the serious reasons mentioned below, Algae bloom, radioactive fallout from Fukushima, plastic particles poisoning fish and birds, oil spills etc. Plus the propeller noise affecting larger sea mammals and the huge number of other unwanted effects of human activities, there is yet another reason, often unnoticed previously, since we until recently, have had no means to record these incidents.
    This reason is none the less scary, since it denotes larger changes beyond human influence and control.
    We are since the last decade experiencing an upheaval in geological activity, accelerating recent years where entire continents are on the move at an ever hastening pace. At present we have the largest number of active volcanoes ever recorded. The number of large earthquakes likewise increasing.
    When tectonic activity occurs, large amounts of gases are released into the atmosphere or into the sea, a lake or whatever else is above the gas releasing geological layers. These gases released are most highly poisonous: Methane, Carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, and a number of other gases. Fish are dependant of oxygen as well as most other lifeforms, and a large release of gas from the sea bottom will invariably kill any shoals of fish caught in it. Same would happen to birds passing through a cloud of carbon monoxide, or closer to ground. Gas-poisoned birds can fall out of the sky close to, or further away from the gas cloud.
    This goes also for larger mammals. In a case recently from Yellowstone, large numbers of Reindeer and Elk/Moose were found dead for no apparent reason. Sea mammals have suffered similar fate various places. As mentioned, only recently have we got an “eye in the sky” a satellite which can monitor large gas releases at ground level. Problem is of course that cause and effect are somewhat separated in time, which means that we must record gas releases registered by the satellite, later to compare with the effect in form of large cases of sudden deaths in various lifeforms where these appear.
    Of course, this one explanation does not exclude others, But gas releases from tectonic movements is nothing we as humans can be responsible for, or the cause of. We have plenty of other misdeeds to answer for. Is it the end of the world ? Hardly.. Is it the harbinger of great changes to come ? Probably.
    Has it happened before ? Most assuredly..

    Our earth is a living organism, as such change is the only sure thing.

  20. sharon sampson | May 12, 2016 at 2:09 am | Reply

    Love that you are a cat person! I think some of your ideas/feelings are wrong or at least you attribute too much power to the President. China’s peoples are dying just like all of us are! Where did you get that information? The worst people are the rich. The richer the badder. Grins. I read that you get that…but what I adore about you is your inclusion of animals. All but forgotten. Humans really make me mad with their ‘I-It’ attitude. Animals are for us to USE and abuse and get rid of when inconvenient?? I think us arrogant humans are missing out on the intelligence and skills of animals. The unconditional love and learning to see realiy through their eyes. Sigh. Grins…Try loving cats; feral, stray and domestic…wild…and falling in love with brush bunnies. How to deal with helping both knowing bunnies are tv dinners for any predator. I live in a transition zone between urban and wilderness…tough place to live.

  21. Follow the money …

  22. The article has an extensive bibliography: geoengineeringwatch DOT org/geoengineering-is-destroying-the-ozone-layer/

    • Mark, while the old article could point to several million web sites with a few still valid today, the old article presents opinion, not data. It is a fluff piece.
      If I need to dig through a bibliography to find what the old article neglected to say, I won’t waste my time.
      All opinions with zero data s not worth my time reading.

  23. Mario Accornero | May 19, 2016 at 3:09 am | Reply

    Unfortunately your article doesn’t agree with the picture (photographed beach is in Italy, Orbetello not even mentioned!)

  24. George Alookee | May 24, 2016 at 12:40 am | Reply

    This is what the Bible predicted in the Book Of Revelation and it is happening.

  25. James Miller | June 6, 2016 at 3:51 am | Reply

    80% deforestation of the Northern Hemisphere within 100 years has caused two major events to happen. The first is that with the increased amount of humans breathing in oxygen and out carbon dioxide, there is a massive adjustment in the ratio of oxygen to carbon dioxide, although this is not noticeable due to the fact that carbon dioxide is heavier than oxygen/nitrogen (air). The ratio of carbon dioxide to oxygen has changed far greater in the ocean than on the land, with the sea water in the deepest parts becoming increasingly unbreatheable for the animals that exist there. They are then forced upwards into the area above themselves, where they continue hunting. The gills and lungs of the sea dwelling animals are unable to adapt to the changing environment rapidly enough and the consequence is disorientation, leading to death.
    The second consequence of the sudden change in forestation levels is that the ‘bubble’ of the atmosphere has collapsed slightly. Because it is a sphere, a marginal collapse of only nanometres, leads to a vastly decreased volume internal to the atmosphere, which is largely comprised of dust. Due to the decrease in volume, the dust has an increased chance of collision and this warms up the atmosphere, with that warmth then being carried north by internal stratospheric current. This melts the ice caps, which then enter the sea, cooling it and hitting a vertical thermocline at about 60degrees north latitude, which propels the cooled water into the atmosphere, where it then falls to earth as super cooled rain, cooling down the ground temperature in preparation for an ice age. Meanwhile the disoriented fish are hit by sudden current bourne temperature changes that are beyond their ability to survive. The increase in dust collisions in the atmosphere, eventually leads to an increase in a particular type of lightning and thunder, recalled in advance as ‘thor’ (thaw).
    That global warming is blamed on carbon emissions is both a memory and for political reasons. One of the principle factors in the above events that leads to a terminal state is the use of rockets to escape the earth’s atmosphere. As these cylinders pass through the layers of the atmosphere molecular attraction ‘sucks’ one layer into the next. The weight of the atmosphere is normally prevented from creating an increase in heat due to friction by ozone, which is comprised of many small particles, like wd40. The small holes that are created by the penetration by rockets then coalesce together to form larger areas that have no ozone. These heat up and consequently allow greater ingress of UV. Politically, though, satellites are far more important than humans, since they are being used to control political expression.

  26. Perfect storm…I agree…& it’s approaching fast

  27. Wow, in 1935, the sky-is-falling government claimed that 32 of the then U.S. states had some soil deficient in selenium.
    (sarcasm)Perhaps we should add fertilizer like we do for other soil deficiently or just let civilization end in 1935?(/sarcasm)
    That is your example of the depleting secret resource that the eugenist and elite require a 90% to 99.999% population reduction for?
    We are not out of air, water, oil, selenium, iron, copper, or aluminium.
    There are trillions of tons of them that we could extract if we wanted to.
    Most of our burning of oil is being slowly replaced anyway.
    Our previous iron pipes in our houses, then copper pipes are being replaced with plastic from coal, oil, or other organic material.
    Our previous wood, then aluminium house siding is being replaced with plastic.
    We are human so adapt. We will survive. We do not need a static world with what someone dreams are perfectly proportioned resources. That’s non-intelligent.
    The eugenist and elite are criminals and you should stop supporting their overpopulation myth for their 90% or their 99.999% population reduction.
    That is unless you can get them to pay you large sums of money to lie for them.

    • Dennis Hoppe | June 10, 2016 at 1:16 pm | Reply

      Boy! you sure do know how to overreact. All I did was give you reference to a 1935 article from the USDA that I read years ago stating that soil was getting depleted of some important minerals. You also said we should just add fertilizer. Do you know the difference between fertilizer and trace minerals? Two totally different things. Regarding trillions of tons of specific natural resources of many of the items that you mentioned be specific. How many trillion tons of iron, selenium, copper, aluminum and other minerals do we have? Also oil and water are not measured in tons they are measured in gallons. So do you realize how much a trillion tons is. The earth weighs approximately 5,972,000,000,000,000,000,000 tons and gains more every day from meteor hits. (5,972 sextillion Metric Tons and gaining) Eugenist Elites don’t have to get rid of 95% of our worlds population. We are all doing it for them. Scientists are determining that the earth is in a 6th period of mas extinction caused by many different reasons. Remember, there was a time on earth when there were no humans. The dinosaurs and many other species and plants no longer exist except for fossil remains. Mankind has no natural enemies other than themselves. It is nature that is the true Eugenicist. It is much more intelligent than any of us. The earth is a living organism and will destroy whatever it needs to destroy to perpetuate life. A new humanity will then evolve. A humanity that is not controlled by lower emotions will cosist of higher mental races than can solve problems mentally and not based on emotional illusions, and mental fictions.

      Dennis Hoppe

      • Mother Nature is not trying to destroy us.
        It is you, other U.S. “schooled” brainwashed people, the Eugenicist, and the Elite.
        Your claim of a secret resource that mutates to not be useable causing some overpopulation is at best, silly.
        Your claim that someone has authority to control other people’s reproduction or kill them is also at best, silly. Murder and genocide would be better words.
        (idiocy)You want us to kill most people because if we don’t, in a billion years we may have something called “too many people” and a few people might be hungry due to a lack of a secret resource that no one can name instead of our current government caused starvation. Their death is for their own good and murder is for the good all of “humanity”.(/idiocy)
        Overpopulation is a myth made up to justify killing 90% to 99.999% of the world’s population to allow the remaining few to own everything and to rule.
        For proof, you had to go back to 1935 to try to find a secret resource being depleted and failed miserably.

        • Dennis Hoppe | June 10, 2016 at 3:19 pm | Reply

          17Youth is the age of life ignorance and injudiciousness. Old age is (or should be) the ageof worked-up experience of life.18Life affords us opportunities to develop. And most people do not know “how to maketime pass”, so empty, vacuous, meaningless are their lives.19Most people are dissatisfied with, disappointed in life. They have not “got as theythought, hoped, wanted, desired”. What then do they desire from life: wealth, glory, power,amusements, enjoyments? Not knowledge and insight so that they may understand life and thepossibilities of their own lives?20It looks as if they had set their minds on wandering through life with as little reflection aspossible. The fact that mankind has not yet reached the mental stage is best seen in the factthat they find it very nice when they do not need to think.21It is our duty to be happy. Anyone who is not happy has lost sight of the meaning of life.The whole tendency of the present civilization amounts to making people disharmonious,pessimistic, discontented, and this is a clear warning signal that mankind is on the wrong path.All happy people are good and good people are happy.22If you practise the art of living then you simplify your situation and reduce your desires. So get happy and stop being a hater.

          Dennis Hoppe

          • Dennis Hoppe, is your post meant for this article or did you miss?
            Are you trying that you are a product of the U.S. “school” system.
            I already had enough proof.

        • Dennis Hoppe | June 10, 2016 at 3:29 pm | Reply

          You keep giving me the same old answers to things I talked about in the past and do not comment on anything that I have sent you today. I am 76 years old and known about the elite probably before you were born. If you hate them so much why don’t you form a group and start killing them off. Start with the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Bushes, Netanyahu, Yellen and many others that you despise so much. The fact is that they have the best security in the world. If you form a assassin group you will be infiltrated. So you have to start taking them out yourself. Lot’s of luck.

          Dennis Hoppe

          • Dennis Hoppe, please stop encouraging murder.
            To you, murder may be the answer to all issues but other people think differently.
            Also please stop letting people know that you are a product of the U.S.”school” system.

        • Dennis Hoppe | June 10, 2016 at 4:08 pm | Reply

          You are correct. Mother Nature is not trying to destroy us. Mother Nature, or God, or evolution or whatever you want to call it is trying to restore balance. What is the secret resource that mutated to not be usable causing some overpopulation. I don’t even know what you are talking about. You have twisted what I may have said so out of proportion that I don’t even recognize whatever comment that I said. I also never said that I want someone with authority to control other people’s reproduction or kill them at best. I am definitely against that. You are the one that are accusing me of that. And I resent it. Then you bring up about something about what I said about a billion years from now. That is a fact, it has nothing to do with my wanting billions of people to die before the earth is uninhabitable. About the USDA booklet from 1935 with finding a secret resource being depleted and that I failed miserably. What did I fail at. I wasn’t trying to accomplish anything I was just trying to give some information that I read. It also talked about the dust bowl in Oklahoma and improper farming methods leading to farmland destruction. Have you ever read the booklet. The facts are that we need to be very careful with our use of natural resources which are finite and the increasing population of the world which is potentially infinite. (these are facts, not speculation) We have to be stewards of the earth not conquerors.. So

          stop trying to change my words into something that I never implied. I am really on your side but you just don’t see it. Peace to you.

          • Dennis Hoppe, you want me to read a 1935 booklet about planting trees and the need for soil nutrients to grow crops to excuse your speculated secret finite resources by the trillions of tons and your speculated potentially infinite population.
            Neither you nor I have the authority to control other people’s reproduction so can certainly not convey that authority to any government.
            Please stop with your overpopulation myth that you are using to help kill people.

  28. Thank you for this article, however I must point out that one of your first paragraphs is misleading…”As Fleitas writes, recent months have not been kind to the Chilean coast, which has played host to washed-up carcasses of over 300 whales, 8,000 tons of sardines, and nearly 12 percent of the country’s annual salmon catch, to name a few.” Since Chili does not have a wild salmon population, there’s no “annual salmon catch” The salmon carcasses that washed ashore were farmed salmon and now there’s an investigation because the farms are supposed to dispose of their dead fish on land, but instead millions were just dumped into the ocean. Now people are saying this illegal dump has added a massive amount of fuel to their already out of control algae blooms….their salmon farms are now also being investigated as a potential source for the algae blooms starting in the first place…these farms need to move onto land or things will only keep getting worse…

  29. Valentina Della Gala | September 6, 2016 at 12:38 am | Reply

    Two weeks ago I was in the south of Crete (Greece )swimming in the Lybian sea, part of the Mediterranean sea, and I was surprised by how many dead fishes were both on the sea and on the beach. I asked around to the inhabitants without obtain any suitable answer …I’m Italian I’ m used to the Mediterranean sea but I’ve never seen something like that..

  30. Fu

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.