University of Alaska Fairbanks Professor Launches New 9/11 Research Project

9/11 WTC7By Derrick Broze

Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ (UAF) Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, is conducting a study into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001.

Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and two Ph.D. research assistants are partnering with the non-profit Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth for an engineering study known as “World Trade Center Building 7 Evaluation.” The researchers are using finite element modeling to evaluate the possible causes of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse.

Although questions still remain about how the two planes that hit the Twin Towers could cause the total collapse of the high-rise buildings, many 9/11 researchers now focus on the mysterious collapse of building 7.  A number of 9/11 family members point to the collapse of WTC7 as a possible crack in the official story that could spark a new national conversation on the events of that day. WTC7 was not hit by a plane that day; however, it collapsed at 5:20 p.m. according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the official cause for the collapse was office fires. A growing number of family members, activists, architects and engineers question the official theory for collapse and are seeking a new investigation into WTC7.

Dr. Hulsey and the WTC7 Evaluation project hope to answer some of the remaining questions. The project is a two-year study that is being crowd-funded through Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Dr. Hulsey has invited professionals from the fields of structural engineering, civil engineering, mechanical engineering, architecture, building design and construction, physics, math, and science, as well as everyday citizens, to get involved.

“Over the next year, with a team of PhD students, I will be rebuilding World Trade Center building 7, using the same drawings that were used to build it originally we will reconstruct it  digitally,” said Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey. “NIST says the building fell down due to office fires. Our investigation will evaluate the probability that this was the cause of the collapse.”

The researchers are promising a “completely open and transparent investigation into the cause of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse,” and will post every step of their scientific process on The WTC7 Evaluation project will also include a review by a committee of technical experts who will vet the research being conducted by Dr. Hulsey and his students. The professor and his team are soliciting financial support from the public from now until the completion of the study in April 2017.

Ted Walter, Director of Strategy and Development for A&E 9/11 Truth, is in charge of working with the professor and raising money to fund the WTC7 Evaluation. Walter told Activist Post that the project began in May 2015 and should should wrap up in April of next year.

“They are coming up with different scenarios of how hot the fires could have been in different parts of the building, and then for the next 6 months they will be running tests and scenarios,” Walter told Activist Post. “The last few months, early next year, will be all about putting the findings into a final report.”

Walter said the goal is to get the report published in peer-reviewed engineering journals. “We hope to gain significant traction in the engineering community by providing an authoritative refutation of NIST’s report, by showing that there is no way that fires could have brought down building 7.” Walter also mentioned the possibility of getting the report into the hands of every member of Congress.

As we approach the 15th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, it has never been more important to question and challenge the official government narrative. Exposing the lies and bringing the truth to light is going to take efforts by researchers like Dr. Hulsey, as well as architects, engineers, firefighters, pilots, government officials, and everyday citizens. Without a coordinated effort and campaign for truth, the American public will likely never know exactly what happened during that tragic day.

Image Credit

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for and the founder of the Follow him on Twitter.

Derrick is available for interviews.

This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

63 Comments on "University of Alaska Fairbanks Professor Launches New 9/11 Research Project"

  1. The “how” is different from the “why”. As far as I’m concerned, the building was rigged with explosives and it was taken down in a controlled demolition. But why? This question is much more compelling and dangerous.

    • Too early for the “who” and “why”.

      First you need to know WHAT happened.

      After a controled demolition the pile of rubble of a huge skyscraper must be much greataer than it really was.
      There is almost no mass left. The pile is TOO SMALL…..

      It can not possibly be a conventional demolition using explosives.
      It must have been something else.
      Something unconventional that makes a lot of the mass disappear….

      • Space based particle beam weapons ?

        • You seem to forget the many levels of underground that encompassed the parking levels too! Explosives were used at the very base which is why they were not so evident during the false flag! I have to admit that I suspect mini nukes used due to radiation etc and the fact they shipped out all proof, so there would be some loss of material that would be vapourised (if true obviously) although not enough so you would notice… In my opinion!

          • I don’t know about the “many levels” at WTC7, but under WTC1 and 2 was almost no rubble.
            Investigators could easily walk at level -1 with almost no rubble in their way. Level -2 was untouched.
            Look up the photos. There is even a video available.

          • Cheers for the update but that is their word is it not? The same who backed the coverup???

          • No, not their word.
            It’s the empty sound in the video, which is very dark (no light in the garage).
            Also photos of the -1 level taken on Sept 12 or 13….. pretty close.

          • So you didn’ see too much then? You got that conclusion from the sound when it was well within their power to light up the place? You have a link please?

          • Elizabeth Martin | April 7, 2016 at 3:42 pm |

            I only recently found out about the huge piles of PAPERWORK the firefighters and first responders had to walk through…………….Very odd that the buildings were “dustified”, and yet papers did not burn up……………..Need to see photo. cheers

        • Absolutely a possibility. Most people do not know that there was a large hurricane heading straight to NYC………..and it suddenly turned around and went back out into the Atlantic. (All documented – you can’t make this stuff up!!!)

      • Right you are – as Dr. Judy Wood taught us all – first understand WHAT happened, then how and who made it happened……….cheers!

    • WHY? What happened basically the day after 9/11? Hmmmmm? Remember? It was called the “Patriot Act”………………..cheers

    • You ask, ‘Why?’ In 1989 the NY Port Authority (NYPA), owners of the WTC complex commissioned a group of Consulting Architects to inspect the buildings, they were to be engaged for about three months. After just a few weeks a group of them reported to the Authority that they had discovered a fatal flaw in the buildings original construction which would reduce their service life from several centuries to just a few decades.

      This flaw was GALVANIC CORROSION, aka electrolysis, when incompatible metals are placed together and over time simply rot, the process is accelerated by the presence of humidity and electricity. The Consultants reported that the buildings had, ‘just ten or twelve years’ to go, before bits of them would commence falling into the streets below. They estimated demolition costs at $5.6 Billion Dollars.

      Shortly after this report the Consultants arrived at their offices in the Towers to find security had packed all their files into cardboard boxes and had their contracted payments made out to all for their three months work after barely one month’s work had been done. They were then politely escorted out of the premises, needless to say their findings were to remain confidential.

      One evening a few weeks later one of the Consultants was at a bar in a restaurant waiting for his dates arrival when one of the Port Authority guys came along. The two men had a drink and the consultant asked casually, ‘what are guys doing about the metal rot in the WTC Towers?’ He replied, ‘ I Guess we’re just going to wait for ten or twelve years and then we’ll blow them up’.

      That was 1989, twelve years later the buildings were ‘sold’ the ink had barely dried on the new owners insurance documents and TWO Planes hit TWO Buildings causing the destruction of all SEVEN buildings in the Trade Center. Cost of the demolition? ZERO, all paid by the American taxpayers! Did the new owner make a profit? Was this an INSIDE Job?

      Too bad about the three THOUSAND murdered in broad daylight that day. America will never become, ‘Great again’ until the monsters who did this and their enablers in the Media, who have covered this up from day one, are rounded up and charged with mass murder and mass deceit. The question is, will a President Trump do so, does he have the guts?

  2. These people may need to hire bodyguards and avoid nail-guns. This project DOES seem to have a good chance of gaining traction, that’s why it could prove to be deemed TOO close!

  3. Why investigate, it’s clear charges brought down the building, plus Silverstein said “pull it.” No need, my investigation is over. It was an inside job.

    • The foundation of your “investigation” are two words of a liar and profiteer ?

      That is a very SMART investigation !


    • THAT applies only to Building 7. And intelligent people investigate and investigate until they get the TRUTH – that’s why. sheeeeeeesh

    • Why investigate Lexi? Good grief! For justice, 3,000 were murdered in broad daylight and the bastards who did it are laughing at us! We need to see these mongrels being fried in an electric chair! The MSM or rather its owners, are just as guilty because they have covered it up from day one. This is an opportunity to wrest media ownership from the reptiles who have used it as a weapon of mass deception for over a century. Go Donald J Trump!

  4. Why bother. Anyone who watches it knows it was a controlled demolition. I can’t believe the American sheepulation is stupid enough to believe the “official explanation”. All they have to do is WATCH THE DAMN THING IMPLODE !!

    • Not dumb. Scared! Deductive reasoning suggests: 1.If not,then what? 2.If what? 3.What to do about it. Their in lies the debacle. 4. Is the scary part.If I start something, will I be killed as well? Can anything be done? It goes on and on.

  5. What about Building 6? Nothing hit it but it was demolished from
    the center out.

    • Yep – nothing left but a deep pit. Must have been documents to destroy in that building, too. (Maybe a mini-nuke?) cheers

      • Elizabeth, you say maybe a min-nuke? The old boys at ‘Veterans Today’ published some revealing info including that the IAEA took soil samples from ground zero a few weeks after 911 and found elements only explainable by a nuclear event at 50 times normal background levels. They also produced some photographs of a gigantic hole app. 30 Meters deep and 50 in diameter showing ‘waves’ of molten bedrock.

        This was where ‘molten steel’ was present for months and so hot it melted the soles of the firemen’s boots. The Vets and their Experts in Nuclear stuff postulate that a small Nuke was placed underneath the 21,000 Gallon Tank containing liquid Freon Gas for the Air conditioning. This they say, would result in the mini nuke turning into a mini Hydrogen bomb which would explain why the two buildings were turned into a dust as fine as talcum powder.

        It might also explain why there were about a thousand ‘Toasted cars’ some parked 600 meters distant

        There’s also a suggestion that the lying shysters became aware that a mini nuke can leave a strange blue light lingering on afterwards so now there is a large pool of water over the site and at nights so they have borrowed Albert Speer’s ( Adolf Hitler’s architect) idea of columns of light shining to the heavens only the light is blue. Pure Hollywood, you can’t make stuff like this up!

        • Fascinating, Floda – I will have to research that nuke plus Freon = hydrogen bomb explosion. I thought HYDROGEN bombs left buildings intact, vaporized living things. Maybe that was the NEUTRON bomb? Can’t keep up…………..Interesting about Albert Speer……….my Mum was somewhat obsessed w/Nazi history, and had Mr. Speer’s biography – I never read it. I remember that lady film-maker of Hitler’s who explained all her “artistry” away as being just that – art. Like you say – “pure Hollywood”………………………cheers

  6. question and challenge the government narrative? Oh, geezzz, that’s like gathering for a discussion of the flat earth theory. They laid out the 911 attacks years beforehand in their films and TV productions, such as the 1998 “Enemy Of The State”, in which actor Jon Voight’s NSA character was born on September 11th. It’s nauseating for me to even re-hash this stuff anymore. They did it. Thousands of people knew all about it ahead of time. People were warned away from the Twin Towers. And I personally know much more of the films’ background that formed the context in which this took place. Hey, I have an idea – ask Jon Voight back onto one of those talk shows and ask him about his NSA character in that film 3 years before the 911 attacks. Ask (Senator) Al Franken also, to tell us all about former NYC Mayor Koch’s September 10th 2001 telephone call warning the former SNL comedian away from the Towers the following day. Etc. etc. You will throw up if the whole story comes out, and I will do my best that it does.

    • Go get em’ mate…

      • they threaded the 911 attacks in films made from details of targeted perons’ lives – me being one of those targeted persons. So sometimes I review the premises from which this Government operated, and can rationally compare this with their theft of trillions of dollars, murder of millions directly and by proxy around the world, and then using their crimes as justification to commit more crimes against us than they had already committed. And I’m tired of repeating these things. As long as they continue dragging citizens the way they do into their satanic criminal justice system and using that to commit historic crimes, I’ll be here despite the insane asylum mentality of most people that it won’t reach and devour them before long. Some of them will utter last words, “But pastor, you said…..”

    • You’ve got it. And that’s only part of the truth. The truth yet to be discussed is about how the FBI knew of this, knew where the would-be Saudi pilots were and did nothing about it. Not a thing. It seems very evident that their was collusion among government agencies including the military commander who could have sent interceptors to shoot down the planes. There was plenty of time for that. Instead, the commander sent his entire force east, out over the Atlantic. Why? Yes.

      There’s no question that this was an inside job. All one has to do it watch the towers — hit by planes from the side — fall directly into their own footprint. Not topple over as a sideways hit would cause to happen, but fall straight down. It doesn’t take an engineer or a demolitions expert to realize the whole thing is phony.

      Several members of the Official 9/11 commission are now distancing themselves from their own report. They’ve openly admitted in was a whitewash, just like the Warren Commission report on the JFK assassination was.

      • yes, yes, yes on all those logistical and technical grounds but of course, because of the actual story. The September 11th date was selected because the evil powers ruling over us love symbolism. I remember living in Las Vegas when I wrote a letter to Laura Bush, following her visit there as part of her husband’s presidential campaign. She had praised a national law enforcement conference being held that week at the Las Vegas Hilton. I had been hiring homeless men and knew what the cops really did and had some things to say to her. About three weeks later, I received her response from the White House. One of the things I had said to her was that the Government prefers symbolism over substance. The very day I received her letter, I was watching Wolf Blitzer on CNN and he interrupted his news broadcast to read a special announcement from the White House. It was three words – “Symbolism IS substance!” There is more to this story, believe me. I could write a long detailed account of several Government/Hollywood films related to 911, and explain to you the scenes and conversations. The 911 attacks and what they have done from them is THE story of our era. They intended it to be considered up against events of centuries ago.

        • Bobby Bill, I hope you get down to it – it would be fascinating. Someone online – Conspiracy Theorista, I think – did a fascinating expose of “Double Indemnity”, and how many odd references there were to “9-11” and such………from the 1940s!!! cheers

          • Bobby Bill | April 1, 2016 at 11:50 am |

            At Australia’s 2020 Conference six years ago, actress Cate Blanchett was Chairperson of the Creative Arts Forum in Canberra. There, she made mention of governments’ (plural) collusion with their national film industries. She said it was “good for society”! What – because that is the only clue they will get to what their demonic overlords are up to? At the 1980 Academe Awards, emcee Steve Martin dropped a little one – “If you want to know what’s really happening in America, go to the movies”. There is only so much I can write in brief posts at a forum like this, and what a tragedy that is.

      • Please, please understand that the basic PHYSICS does not allow a plane (or 2) to melt like butter into an enormous, multi-reinforced steel skyscraper and cause ANY of the effects we witnessed. It is not PHYSICS – period. At least you know it was a long-planned inside job, with many nationalities partaking in the false-flag. Eventually the ENTIRE truth, with every detail and every person involved WILL be revealed. Cheers

        • Indeed, physics does not allow for what happened.
          I had originally thought it was Mossad. They are the world’s best at working under false flags. And they would have gladly helped – may have. But there’s too much evidence that it was absolutely an inside job and anyone who doesn’t realize that by merely watching it, is someone who wouldn’t understand it anyway.

          If bin Laden was really responsible, he was wealthy enough and smart enough to hit four or five cities in the US, which would have brought America to it’s knees. So it’s almost a given he had nothing to do with it and said he would appear before a world court to disclaim it. Funny how he was never taken up on that offer.

          This way the death toll was limited to only 3,000 people by those insiders who did this. But that was enough to enable Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld to get what they wanted. A war or two in the Middle East to protect the oil fields and a wonderful excuse to enact the Patriot Act, the single most heinous act of government since Truman dropped the atom bomb on Japan. It effectively removed the Bill of Rights from the citizens.

          The Patriot Act (the name of this oppressive thing is enough to make anyone gag) was originally developed by Cheney and Rumsfeld in the late Seventies and was worked on for years as a thing called “Continuity of Government” plan. In fact, 9/11 was probably done in order to enact this bill to oppress the citizens and control us with laws.

          However, Elizebeth, I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for the truth to come out. Strong forces within our government see to it that the facts are buried so deep no one will find them or make sense of them.

          It was only in the last few years that the documents about the Kennedy assassination were made public through FOIA struggles by some brave souls.

          These show without doubt that the CIA and Johnson planned this and had it done. The suddenly revealed autopsy photos at Lakeland Hospital show without question that Kennedy was shot from the front, several times. Jacqueline Kennedy was screaming at the Secret Service that “they” are going to kill us.

          “They” being Johnson and the CIA among others who both hated Kennedy because he was on the verge of ending the Vietnam war and calling the US military home.

          Oswald had nothing to do with this, Nothing. He was the fall guy.

          The question remains, how long can we as a nation continue to exist with this level of corruption? And further, why are we allowing it to happen so frequently and blatantly?

          BTW I remember Johnson’s election. I preferred Goldwater by far. but Johnson’s dirty tricks portrayed Goldwater as a dangerous extremist, albeit, quite conservative. The chattering classes were saying, “Vote for Goldwater, and we’ll be in war” So, I voted for Goldwater, and sure enough, we were in a war.

          • Herbert Dorsey | April 3, 2016 at 4:02 pm |

            The book ” CIA Crime Incorporated of America” shows that one motive for 9/11 was to destroy evidence of large scale financial crimes committed by the George H. W. Bush Administration. The part of the Pentagon destroyed housed the Navy Department of Intelligence that was investigating financial crime. 39 members of this intelligence team were killed and their evidence destroyed. The destroyed Trade Towers contained much of the rest of the evidence.

          • Douglas Kelly | April 3, 2016 at 9:51 pm |

            Let me add that whatever it was that hit the Pentagon was not a plane. It was much more than a mere airplane. No plane could do that much damage to a building like the Pentagon. No way. It may have been a missile. Nothing else could have done so much damage. Those who were eye witnesses said it did not appear to be a plane — it was larger and without wings.

          • Herbert Dorsey | April 3, 2016 at 11:30 pm |

            It had to be a guided missile. Can you imagine Saudi pilots that can barely fly a Cessna being able to maneuver a passenger jet to precisely hit the Naval Intelligence section of the Pentagon? And of course the wreckage was brought in and scattered around the blast site later. And even this wreckage was incompatible with the alleged passenger plane. The perpetrators of this crime were very sloppy.

          • Douglas Kelly | April 4, 2016 at 8:40 am |

            No, I cannot imagine Saudi pilots maneuvering a plane to precisely hit a relatively small and precise area of the Pentagon, In fact, there are very few pilots who could do that given all the ground clutter.

            A man who was the head of the Middle East Desk at the CIA (unfortunately I can’t recall his name.) has been (or was) making the rounds of talk and news shows saying that this was not an act of the Saudis. And that there are many questions that remain unanswered about 9/11, but are being covered up. To which his interviewers and panelists looked at him as if he were a man from Mars. He has been ostracized from public appearances and I haven’t seen or heard of him since sometime around 2005.

            He pointed out that there is a large warehouse on the Jersey shore that contains pieces and parts of the buildings and planes. Trucks and people were seen bringing things of this nature to it. But it has been sealed and large fence surrounds it. It is guarded and absolutely no admittance is allowed to it. The interesting thing about this is that it is leased by the Israeli government. I leave it up to you to connect the dots.

            Many if not most members of the commission to investigate 9/11 and write a report about their findings have begun distancing themselves from their part in the commission and the credibility of the report they wrote. They imply the report was inaccurate and essentially a whitewash as was the Warren Commission’s Report.

            I’m convinced there is more we don’t know about 9/11, than there is that we do know. And many people I know do not believe the government’s story, but suspect it was an inside job.

            It may have been done without Bush’s knowledge. . . maybe. But the deep state: i.e., the real forces behind our government that are unseen had a big hand in this. The line of facts occurring the few days and the weekend prior to 9/11 lead one to believe the buildings were set with high explosives in a demolition method. There are several credible sources for this that are convincing and quite knowledgeable about how it was done.

            Here we are some 15 years after the fact, and very knowledgeable questions are surfacing. It’s becoming obvious over the past 15 years that we cannot trust the governance of our country, which is leading to more astute and deeper questions. I’m convinced that nothing about 9/11 happened as we have been told.

            Mechanics Illustrated contended the whole time since that the buildings were brought down by a demolition rather than a simple plane hitting the top stories of the buildings. The physics of the destruction simply does not match the results of it. They lost a lot of subscribers over this, but they steadfastly refuse to stop their claims.

    • Yeah, Bobby, I was living in San Francisco Bay Area at the time, and Mayor Willie Brown said (in the SF Chronicle, the next day) that he received a call telling him NOT to travel to the east coast on the 11th, as he had some business there. He took the advice. (As for Jon Voight – who knows? A lot of actors are just ACTORS……….and scripts are just scripts). However, all the TV cartoon show stuff – OMG!! “The Simpsons” writers seem deep into it, as well as other predictive-planning junk {“Family Guy” I have seen clear examples online, though I have never watched that show, and gave my TV away 7 years ago)………………..I doubt Al Franken will speak to you about it……..did he speak shortly after 9/11 to someone? Good luck – I look forward to throwing up when your work gets out! cheers

      • I respect you for throwing away your TV! People just don’t realise how thoroughly – how sickeningly – their programming there is collusively produced with a Government up to our eyeballs in crime. One of the problems with “my work coming out” is that it will not bring back the dead.

    • Best marijuana strains home place your order now and have it at your door step visit our website 420cannabisplug . com

  7. not to mention the twins turned to dust

    • Yep – I love Dr. Judy Woods’ term “dustification” of the towers………..not to mention the many, many other physical anomalies within the towers, on the ground, and in the larger surrounding areas – she has done outstanding, first-class analyses….and when she doesn’t know what has created some anomaly or another, she says “I don’t KNOW what did this……..” Many things happened there that have never been observed before – except by DARPA, etc. cheers

  8. Well ya never know – something might come of it.
    GL – PHD’s and students. WYB (watch yer back).
    The gold collar scum that owned these buildings are all about outing any thing but the truth – ooops – there goes another dirty secret.
    BTW: the folks that architected the buildings said (not verbatim) …’the airplanes would be like a fly hitting a screen…’

  9. 9/11 was an inside job.

  10. The NIST Investigating Committee should be charged with being accomplices in this horrible false flag. When and if the truth ever comes out, they should be rounded up, tried and if convicted thrown in jail for the rest of their lives!

  11. Wouldn’t it be better if the Professor starts investigating the sea-state up there in Alaska, the radiation situation and status of the North Pacific due to Fukujima?
    The US is acting as if nothing is wrong with Fukujima, only an earthquake. But it is becoming a global catastrophe as I interpret the news coming from that corner of the world.
    Radioactive contaminated water is streaming into the Pacific since 2011!
    Now I read that thousands and thousands of seabirds are just dying, with empty stomachs?
    Must be something wrong with the sea I presume?

  12. Zelikow is one of the gold collar scum nwo crowd and the hdic in charge of the 911 misinformation report. If it wasn’t for the Jersey girls , Henry ‘ the jeep driver’ Kissinger would have been a key member pushing the muslim baloney.
    government redress – right.
    and don’t forget the gold the was stolen (billion(s)).
    The reason 7 was Larry ‘pullit’ slime bucket Silverstein demolished had to do with the cia files on Mena Arkansas and other drug deals that the nwo criminals didn’t want made public.
    read :
    ‘The Commission the uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation” Philip Sheldon
    ‘Bary and the Boys’ Dennis Hopsicker – hint all about guns for drugs and Mena Arkansas – poor Barry rip.

  13. Another approach would be to collate the witness statements, along with Silverteins statements, to show that the building was “pulled”. If that doesn’t do it for you…. Nothing to see here move along. Good work guys, perhaps some pressure applied to the cognitative dissonance of the unconvinced (by the already available evidence) will shift some into the Truther camp.

  14. NO questions remain about the ludicrous story of planes having anything to do with the “dustification” of the two towers – at least to anyone with a high-school level of physics. And why anyone would want to waste time on Bldg 7 – which was simply pre-set by professional demolition teams (but.OOOPS!…the timing was way off!) is silly. Even Larry Silverstein, the lease-holder, said on a televised interview “We decided to “PULL IT”, due to the loss of lives….” I SAW him say this – as if he thought it sounded rational!!! “Pull it” is simply the professional demolitionists’ term for bringing a building properly down into its own footprint, as we all have observed on TV many times. It took a long time in advance to wire Bldg. 7 – that does not occur on the spur of the moment. Must have been documents in there the 9/11 cartel wanted disappeared……….(Of course, the Towers came down from the TOP, not from the bottom as is normal – I was so shocked by seeing that over and over and over …………not until I listened to Dr. Judy Woods’ excellent work did I finally understand….and even she does not know exactly all the technologies used). cheers

  15. Maybe DEW? (Directed Energy Weapons)……………I’m sure you could look up the patents on them………….cheers

  16. Doing a physical science investigation is fine.

    They should also investigate why the BBC announced on live TV that building 7 had already collapsed….20 minutes before it actually did.

    • That was funny……………….hmmmmmmmmmmm………………….documents to disappear in there, perhaps?? Computers??? No trace left???? cheers

  17. I stand corrected! My apologies!

  18. Donald Trump knows exactly what happened on 911. As a builder of Skyscrapers he also knows what takes to demolish a 46 story building like WTC 7 the one which collapsed at free fall speed at 5.20 Pm on 911, it was not hit by anything but dust.

    Mr Trump knows it takes MANY WEEKS to rig such a building for a perfect controlled demolition, he also knows that such a job requires EXPERTS not amateurs. But most of all he knows that exhausted firemen from the NYFB who lost over 300 of their workmates that day would NEVER be capable of doing such a job in a single day, let alone as (Lucky) Larry Silverstein claims, in a few hours.

    Mr Trump has implied that if he’s elected, ‘you’ll find out what really happened on 911’. This has the INSIDERS soiling their undergarments. They are scared stiff at the prospect of hundreds of them suspected of involvement being arrested at 4 AM a few days after Trump takes office. They know and Trump knows America can never ‘be great again’ so long as the murderous lying shysters who planned and arranged the mass murder of 3,000 innocents are still walking around above ground.

    America has no choice, it must flush its sewers of these vermin, no choice at all.

  19. Ken O’Keefe 911 video is a great video

  20. Oh good grief. The reason why building 7 collapsed is well-known, and nothing is left to “study” about it. Sheeeish, you people are morons. IT CAUGHT ON FIRE, IDIOTS!

  21. My immediate thought when the towers collapsed was how much they resembled expert demolition jobs. All the buildings came down straight, they did not topple. I always felt that was a bit strange. Interesting project. Good luck!

  22. legal notice .. get your treatment here for cancer , insomnia, joint pains, multiplyg sclerosis patients . visitour website for more info 420cannabisplug . com

  23. come get your best strains now and order directly from our website : 420cannabisplug dot com

  24. Buildings did not explode they simply sank in the cavity created by underground nuclear detonations. As the nuclear cavity high pressure gases released through the building all the dislodge-able material, paper, wood furnishings, drywall etc blown through the building crashing out got shredded, grinded streamed out. The material that cavity gases could not dislodge like steel columns etc is in the nuclear cavity below. It is commonsense the buildings could not sink at freefall without creating a cavity below the building.

  25. When have experts discussed the distribution of steel in skyscrapers? Didn’t the steel in the first level of the WTC have to support the weight of 109 levelsabove? So as you go up wasn’t there one less leve to support? So in general didn’t the amount of steel decreas up the building? So where is there data on the tons of steel and concrete on every level? For any skyscraper?

    So no matter what the truth is shouldn’t experts have discussed that in FIFTEEN YEARS?

Leave a comment