To tell or not to tell. That is the dilemma and heated debate which is occurring in California over Bisphenol A (BPA) in some of the canned food products sold at grocery stores. The regulators are concerned that wording on the label is too scary. They claim to be worried that poor customers won’t buy canned food anymore.
Warnings are supposed to be on food product labels and/or posted on retailers shelves by May of 2016, but California is delaying the labeling law and is making other, less alarming, plans to inform consumers of the presence of BPA.
According to the Associated Press:
California plans to delay state-required warnings on metal cans lined with the chemical BPA, arguing too-specific warnings could scare stores and shoppers in poor neighborhoods away from some of the only fruits and vegetables available — canned ones, officials said Thursday.
Instead, the state on May 11 will require stores to post general warnings at checkout counters about the dangers of BPA and note that some canned and bottled products being sold have liners with the toxic chemical.
For the next year, grocery retailers will be required to display general notices within their stores alerting customers that some canned foods for sale in the store contains BPA. This, in theory at least, will give manufacturers and retailers the needed time to come up with a better way to word the BPA warning labels so they will be less scary to consumers.
In 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration banned the usage of BPA in certain products, like baby bottles and sippy cups. Many other products on the market still contain BPA, like canned fruits and vegetables.
Past studies have shown that BPA contains estrogen-like substances which when ingested in high levels can cause problems within the female reproductive system. It has also been linked to obesity, infertility and breast cancer. The FDA has deemed the amount of BPA in these products to be currently safe for humans.
The State of California requires food manufacturers to label their products with a warning if the container has BPA in it, or require grocery stores to place a warning sign on shelves regarding specific products that are packaged in containers with BPA.
The warnings are coming on line in California under the state’s Proposition 65, a measure approved by voters in 1986 that requires businesses to notify the public about high levels of chemicals in products or places.
California officials decided last year to add BPA, or bisphenol A, to the list of about 800 other chemicals requiring Proposition 65 notices. Manufacturers use BPA in epoxy liners of some cans, bottles and jars.
However, Chief Deputy Director of California’s EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Allan Hirsch, stated that either warning would be a little chaotic. Mr. Hirsch fears that if the state pushes the requirements on either the food manufacturers or food retailers, it would cause the retailers to simply pull the food products off the shelf.
If the food that is packaged in BPA-containing bottles, jars and cans is pulled from the shelves, the concern is that low-income communities will not have access to much needed fruits and vegetables. In these food desert neighborhoods, canned foods are often the only affordable options and Mr. Hirsch considers having the canned food available to the poor to be the best option for the moment.
Natural and Non-Toxic Products. Up to 50% Off – Every Day (Ad)
Many disagree with Mr. Hirsch’s decision to not to inform consumers, especially given that truthful wording on the warning is too scary.
Community representatives have threatened to file protests because they feel everyone has a right to know what they are eating, regardless of their income level.
Steven Maxwell writes for ActivistPost.com where this article first appeared. This article may be republished in full with attribution and source link.
suck it up buttercup and stop protecting corporate profits and tell the damn truth!
Scary for? California really sucks as a parent.
Its supposed to, the STATE was never meant to be a ‘nanny’, or parent. It is supposed to be a good child and do as it is told.
Maybe the canning industry should go back to using lead.
So informing the people by labelling BPA is ‘scary’ but letting them ingest it is ok? Where’s the logic in that?
Well ya see the scary part is that these corporations are going to lose money if the people know this prior to them using up all the BPA stuff!
California – home of the autistic (forced vaccinations) – no surprise they wouldn’t want their autistic citizenry to know what they are eating.
Angie – there is no logic – Monsanto is paying some of the public servants.
I would only eat canned food if I was starving. Even Popeye can’t convince me that food suspended in chemicals will make me stronger.
BPA Warning Labels are Scary because BPA is Scary.
So what about the other states. I have not seen anything,ever, in Indiana.
So why bother commenting if you do not want anyone reading it?
What the A!!!! Cigarettes have a warning label that hasn’t stop “poor” people from buying them……what bullshit!!!!
Everything is poisoned right now because of Planet X!
The entire government are evil treasonous criminals. The day of the next false flag using the nuke they stole in 2007 and blamed on Iran, America will be destroyed by Russia, China and the SCO. This is the war of Armageddon and you can know it is now because of Planet X and the toxic chemtrails that hide it every day. Planet X will end the war when it rips the earth apart again but 90% of Americans will be dead already. All planned by your evil government.
Won’t happen that way – it does not make sense. The elite globalists rely on us peons to make their food, etc. There would be no logic for them to destroy what they also need to survive. They will use the nuke issue to wipe out Iran or other country. The evil corrupt establishment will continue to milk us, so they can live high on the hog. Trump is our only hope.
Cruz has always wanted to be a dictator – search youtube for “vt-vG_TdOT4”
Ted And Heidi have a nasty surprise for us if he is elected – search youtube for “9SANMMMft9Q”
Poison for profit. Unacceptable. Criminal!