Hillary Clinton Brags About Getting A Pedophile Off The Hook

clinton_tapesBy Brandon Turbeville

When Hillary Clinton was just beginning her career as an attorney in Fayetteville, Arkansas, she received a request to represent a 41-year-old man by the name of Thomas Alfred Taylor who had been accused of raping a 12-year-old girl whom he had allegedly lured into his car.

Clinton accepted the case, represented Taylor, and succeeded in securing a plea to a much lesser charge. Years later, Clinton was taped discussing the case (sometime between 1983-1987) and the audio contained in these tapes shocked even those who may have already maintained a hatred for a politician who may be the most openly psychopathic “leader” since Dick Cheney.

The audio tapes – obtained and released by the Washington Free Beacon revealed that, not only did Clinton use a number of technicalities and devious tricks to essentially free Taylor, she did so knowing full well that he was guilty the whole time. In fact, Clinton even went so far as to slander the victim of the case in her effort to get Taylor a lesser charge than the 30 years he was originally facing.[1][2]

These revelations came out as far back as 2014 yet Clinton continues to paint herself as a tireless advocate for women and children ever since she began her legal career.

Clinton’s comments on the rape trial were taken down during the course of unpublished interviews with Bill and Hillary conducted by reporter Roy Reed in the 1980s while Bill was governor of Arkansas.

10 Strategies to Survive and Thrive During Economic Collapse - Subscribe To Get Your Free Copy
Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL

Alana Goodman of the Washington Free Beacon sums up the details of the case as follows, along with pertinent quotes from Clinton herself. Goodman writes,

Twenty-seven-year-old Hillary Rodham had just moved to Fayetteville, and was running the University of Arkansas’ newly-formed legal aid clinic, when she received a call from prosecutor Mahlon Gibson.

“The prosecutor called me a few years ago, he said he had a guy who had been accused of rape, and the guy wanted a woman lawyer,” said Clinton in the interview. “Would I do it as a favor for him?”

The case was not easy. In the early hours of May 10, 1975, the Springdale, Arkansas police department received a call from a nearby hospital. It was treating a 12-year-old girl who said she had been raped.

The suspect was identified as Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41-year-old factory worker and friend of the girl’s family.

And though the former first lady mentioned the ethical difficulties of the case in Living History, her written account some three decades later is short on details and has a far different tone than the tapes.

“It was a fascinating case, it was a very interesting case,” Clinton says in the recording. “This guy was accused of raping a 12-year-old. Course he claimed that he didn’t, and all this stuff” (LISTEN HERE).[3]

Describing the events almost a decade after they had occurred, Clinton’s struck a casual and complacent attitude toward her client and the trial for rape of a minor.

“I had him take a polygraph, which he passed – which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” she added with a laugh.

Clinton can also be heard laughing at several points when discussing the crime lab’s accidental destruction of DNA evidence that tied Taylor to the crime.

. . . . .

Public records provide few details of what happened on the night in question. The Washington County Sherriff’s Office, which investigated the case after the Springdale Police Department handled the initial arrest, said it was unable to provide an incident report since many records from that time were not maintained and others were destroyed in a flood.

A lengthy yet largely overlooked 2008 Newsday story focused on Clinton’s legal strategy of attacking the credibility of the 12-year-old victim.

The girl had joined Taylor and two male acquaintances, including one 15-year-old boy she had a crush on, on a late-night trip to the bowling alley, according to Newsday.

Taylor drove the group around in his truck, pouring the girl whisky and coke on the way.

The group later drove to a “weedy ravine” near the highway where Taylor raped the 12-year-old.

Around 4 a.m., the girl and her mother went to the hospital, where she was given medical tests and reported that she had been assaulted.

Taylor was arrested on May 13, 1975. The court initially appointed public defender John Barry Baker to serve as his attorney. But Taylor insisted he wanted a female lawyer.

The lawyer he would end up with: Hillary Rodham.

According to court documents, the prosecution’s case was based on testimony from the 12-year-old girl and the two male witnesses as well as on a “pair of men’s undershorts taken from the defendant herein.”[4]

Goodman then goes on to describe how Clinton went on the warpath against the 12 year-old victim. Goodman writes,

In a July 28, 1975, court affidavit, Clinton wrote that she had been informed the young girl was “emotionally unstable” and had a “tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.”

“I have also been told by an expert in child psychology that children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents in disorganized families, such as the complainant’s, are even more prone to exaggerate behavior,” Clinton said.

Clinton said the child had “in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body” and that the girl “exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”[5]

It turns out Clinton did not need to attack the girl at all and that the Prosecution would actually drop the ball or, at least drop it enough so that Clinton was able to salvage her case. Goodman writes,

“You know, what was sad about it,” Clinton told Reed, “was that the prosecutor had evidence, among which was [Taylor’s] underwear, which was bloody.”

Clinton wrote in Living History that she was able to win a plea deal for her client after she obtained forensic testimony that “cast doubt on the evidentiary value of semen and blood samples collected by the sheriff’s office.”

She did that by seizing on a missing link in the chain of evidence. According to Clinton’s interview, the prosecution lost track of its own forensic evidence after the testing was complete.

“The crime lab took the pair of underpants, neatly cut out the part that they were gonna test, tested it, came back with the result of what kind of blood it was what was mixed in with it – then sent the pants back with the hole in it to evidence,” said Clinton (LISTEN HERE). “Of course the crime lab had thrown away the piece they had cut out.”

Clinton said she got permission from the court to take the underwear to a renowned forensics expert in New York City to see if he could confirm that the evidence had been invalidated.

“The story through the grape vine was that if you could get [this investigator] interested in the case then you had the foremost expert in the world willing to testify, so maybe it came out the way you wanted it to come out,” she said.

She said the investigator examined the cut-up underwear and told her there was not enough blood left on it to test.

When Clinton returned to Arkansas, she said she gave the prosecutor a clipping of the New York forensic investigator’s “Who’s Who.”

“I handed it to Gibson, and I said, ‘Well this guy’s ready to come up from New York to prevent this miscarriage of justice,’” said Clinton, breaking into laughter.

“So we were gonna plea bargain,” she continued.

When she went before Judge Cummings to present the plea, he asked her to leave the room while he interrogated her client, she said.

“I said, ‘Judge I can’t leave the room, I’m his lawyer,’” said Clinton, laughing. “He said, ‘I know but I don’t want to talk about this in front of you.’”

“So that was Maupin [Cummings], we had a lot of fun with Maupin,” Clinton added.

Reed asked what happened to the rapist.

“Oh, he plea bargained. Got him off with time served in the county jail, he’d been in the county jail for about two months,” said Clinton.[6]

Please see this video (audio recording of Clinton’s interview).


To this day, the victim still harbors resentment toward Clinton for the way she was treated. In fact, she subscribes many of the obstacles she faced in later life to the trauma caused her by Clinton’s handling of the trial.“Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” she stated in an interview with the Daily Beast. “I would say [to Clinton], ‘You took a case of mine in ’75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.”[8]

She also responded to some of Hillary’s allegations regarding the victim’s alleged questionable behavior and her previous unsubstantiated allegations. “I’ve never said that about anyone. I don’t know why she said that. I have never made false allegations. I know she was lying,” she said. “I definitely didn’t see older men. I don’t know why Hillary put that in there and it makes me plumb mad.”

Brandon Turbeville’s new book, The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President is available in three different formats: Hardcopy (available here), Amazon Kindle for only .99 (available here), and a Free PDF Format (accessible free from his website, BrandonTurbeville.com).


[1] Goodman, Alana. “The Hillary Tapes.” Washington Free Beacon. June 15, 2014. http://freebeacon.com/politics/the-hillary-tapes/ Accessed on August 31, 2015.

[2] “AUDIO: Hillary Clinton Speaks Of Defense Of Child Rapist In Newly Unearthed Tapes.” Washington Free Beacon. June 15, 2014. http://freebeacon.com/politics/audio-hillary-clinton-speaks-of-defense-of-child-rapist-in-newly-unearthed-tapes/ Accessed on August 31, 2015.

[3] “AUDIO: Hillary Clinton Speaks Of Defense Of Child Rapist In Newly Unearthed Tapes.” Washington Free Beacon. June 15, 2014. http://freebeacon.com/politics/audio-hillary-clinton-speaks-of-defense-of-child-rapist-in-newly-unearthed-tapes/ Accessed on August 31, 2015.

[4] Goodman, Alana. “The Hillary Tapes.” Washington Free Beacon. June 15, 2014. http://freebeacon.com/politics/the-hillary-tapes/ Accessed on August 31, 2015.

[5] Goodman, Alana. “The Hillary Tapes.” Washington Free Beacon. June 15, 2014. http://freebeacon.com/politics/the-hillary-tapes/ Accessed on August 31, 2015.

[6] Goodman, Alana. “The Hillary Tapes.” Washington Free Beacon. June 15, 2014. http://freebeacon.com/politics/the-hillary-tapes/ Accessed on August 31, 2015.

[7] “The Hillary Clinton Tapes.” Youtube. Posted by Washington Free Beacon. June 15, 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2f13f2awK4 Accessed on August 31, 2015.

[8] Rogin, Josh. “Exclusive: ‘Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,’ Rape Victim Says.” The Daily Beast. June 20, 2014. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html Accessed on August 31, 2015.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

116 Comments on "Hillary Clinton Brags About Getting A Pedophile Off The Hook"

  1. I’m sure she was jealous – pedophiles one and all should be strung upside down.

  2. She is not doing so well against the Benghazi charges or the email charges. She has Obama’s help on Benghazi or she would sink.

    • @disqus_4ZaCpkD7aq:disqus I would dispute your claim about having Obama’s help by submitting this: the more questions Hillary faces about her responsibility for Benghazi, the less questions the Commander and Chief will have to address on that topic with regard to what sort of accountability he should have.

  3. Hillary Rotten Clinton; who delights in doing evil, and rejoices in the perversity of evil.

  4. denniscerasoli | January 21, 2016 at 11:12 am | Reply

    excuse folks as bad as it sounds Hillary was a 27 year old lawyer who is bound by law to defend any client to the best of her ability regarding any crime and it is part of their ethical oath,if indeed a lawyer is ethical,lol.She actually did her job and did it well.There have been many cases like this and he did pass the polygraph which isn’t allowed in court.I don’t want Hillary in the WH,but as a lawyer she was obligated to get her client the minimal and she accomplished that.

    • Francisco Machado | January 21, 2016 at 11:57 am | Reply

      I cannot but agree – that is, indeed, the job of a defense lawyer and to do otherwise would, in fact, be unethical. I don’t know what her options were as far as declining the case, particularly given she was just starting out. I do question the ethics of revealing the private details of the case to the press. Her apparent glee in having gotten the rapist off, well above just satisfaction at having served her client, is well within the observable nature of her character. I question the propriety of running for President a person so well known to be a liar that no one would trust anything she says and a person to whom no rational agency would grant a security clearance. Even were she to have the clearance, would anyone reveal to her information the security of which they deemed crucial? It’s chilling how closely she resembles an ancient stone relief of Medusa, one of the Harpys.

      • In many ways, Hillary is very like her husband and her former boss. The Dem Party must be proud to have such people as the standard-bearers.


        • Francisco Machado | January 21, 2016 at 1:41 pm | Reply

          The “ethics” of publicizing the trial extends to her treatment of national secrets. One significant difference: The trial is public record, so there’s no legal reason not to talk about it.

    • Hillary was not working for the Public Defender’s office nor did a judge assign or direct her to defend the parasitic, nasty pedophile. A friend of her’s phoned Hillary and asked her to defend him as it would look better for the defendant in court to have a WOMAN representing him.

      Hillary CHOSE, of her own volition, to represent the child rapist and malign the unfortunate young girl to help the scubag.

      • denniscerasoli | January 22, 2016 at 10:50 am | Reply

        This is true she was doing a favor,but if she were assigned to do it she would have been obligated to do what she did in this case.Take into consideration that she was 27 and like all lawyers she was trying to make a name for herself.Even if a lawyer deplores what a client did she still would be required to make the state prove it’s case wouldn’t she/? i don’t want her in the WH but her defending her client doesn’t mean that it was OK in her eye’s.In this country an accused person deserves the best defense so they claim and being a woman is something the client would have wanted,she was just doing her job.

      • denniscerasoli | January 22, 2016 at 10:59 am | Reply

        I would have expected any lawyer man or woman to do exactly what she did,that’s what defense lawyers do,and in this case you could put the blame on the prosecution because they messed up badly with forensics.When you put a 12 year old on the stand in cases like this it can be very nasty but the benefit of the doubt goes to the defendant in our system and a lawyer could be disbarred for deliberately hurting her client.

        • While I expect lawyers to defend accused people, I do not appreciate any lawyer who later, knowing that client’s guilt, unctuously laughs in a gloating manner regarding the outcome and her duplicity in getting the reprehensible molester off of the hook. That is the only point.

          • denniscerasoli | January 22, 2016 at 4:45 pm |

            I did pick up on her laughing and i agree with you,and when she says she is for woman’s rights she is full of it.

  5. The woman is a freakin’ psycho.

  6. Richard Bagenstose | January 21, 2016 at 11:25 am | Reply

    all dems are sychos , dems have no laws , it just shows you what kind of trash they really are

  7. allen goldberg | January 21, 2016 at 11:29 am | Reply

    So she proved the older man, did nothing, served two months for an assault..which was proven on a 12 yr. old….Wow!! ain’t she swell///this lying piece of excrement really makes me proud to have her run for national office!!!

    • And what is worse is SHE STILL HAS A FOLLOWING!!!!!! Mind blowing right?!

      • allen goldberg | January 21, 2016 at 12:58 pm | Reply

        I have dog droppings I pick up in my backyard…with more class and intellect than this walking talking POF*…it amazes me that anyone would not see through her frauds, her lack of regard for our Constitution and country….her 20+ scandals. her 40+ suspicious deaths surrounding her….anyone else…. Would be in custody for just the email scandals alone…but she’s running for President!!

        *piece of filth

        • so our country is already gone?

        • It’s very sad but it is true that those who prefer being victims are very comfortable in trusting those who use and defraud them, The Democrats have convinced the majority of blacks that they were victims and could not survive without the government to take care of them. Thus, we have generational blacks who were and are stuck in their victimhood. Somehow the Democrats have convinced them they did not have the intellect or morals to be all that they could be. Democrats have convinced them that Republicans are their enemy and it is the Republicans that accept them as intelligent and capable as every other race but the Dems have brainwashed the majority of them. It is also gotten much worse since Obama was elected and he systematically stirred up division between the races and every other category in life.

      • Not so mindblowing when you resign yourself to the facts that Progressives “buy votes” through entitlements (free college, free healthcare, free of responsibilities) and morality disappears in an electorate when free stuff is on the line.

        Her husband was REELECTED after American voters knew he was a souless philanderer. That says more about the voters’ immorality than Bill’s. Americans will elect a ham sandwich if it promises free stuff.

        Should anyone doubt that statement, just have a look at Congress. ?

      • As long as the freebe’s keep coming and as long as people prefer to label themselves ‘victims who need someone to take care of them than actually do something to reach their full potential, and or, have an iota of pride, Hillary will have a following. Being a ‘victim’ is so much easier than being responsible for oneself.

      • I cant even wrap my mind around that fact.

  8. Unconscionable. Sociopathic, guileful, unrepentant, morally bankrupt, venal.

    • And so much more.

      • Yep. Synthetic, contrived, unfit, pretentious, prevaricating, vengeful, empty, shallow, pandering, dumpy, foolhardy, bent, ungrateful, stiff, Nixonesque, duckfooted, amoral, imbecilic, friendless, useless, valueless, unwilling, unrequited, moronic, transparent, hopeless and unpleasant. To name a few.

        • Unwilling?! She’s not unwilling to lie like H**L when it serves her purpose. She’s not unwilling to cover her own backside when she knows she’s the cause of innocent Americans being killed when she could have stopped it. She’s not unwilling to break the law anywhere, anytime and say “What difference does it make?” She’d be very unwilling to go to jail for all the wrongs she’s done to further her SELF.

          • Unwilling in this context, to acknowledge or accept responsibility for her decisions or actions.

    • Amen!

    • you forgot “bitch”

      • Nope. I did not forget, I avoided that descriptive word due to my immense reverence for female dogs.

        Dogs’ character and loyalty is above reproach and Hillary hasn’t earned and doesn’t deserve that appellation. ?

    • You fully described the Clinton’s.

  9. The Clinton’s have no morals whatsoever, even the daughter is proving to be a liar.

  10. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.” – Edmund Burke, 1729 –

  11. She honed her skills in obfuscation substantially since then …

    • All without the benefit of a law license, this snake needs to be in prison…along with mr. cigar Billy boy himself. Would love to see them in the same cell together. Be willing to bet that’s the longest time they’ve ever spent together.

  12. And people are voting for her because…???

    • woman…why did blacks vote for 0? black…dems are not the brightest of people…

    • They bumped there friggin head. I vote for her to a JAIL CELL…


    • Because she PANDERS unabashedly to every group she addresses. Free college, free everything for everyone. Bill pandered shamelessly to 18 year olds on MTV saying “I feel your pain” and Hillary did much the same at a Town Hall gathering during which she described her realization of her “white privilege”. It was not coincidental that the group she was addressing was black people.

      There are a variety of motives for various people to support Hillary, generally, entirely selfish motives. It’s certainly not a John F. Kennedy moment. “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask rather, what you can do for your country”.

  13. J. Conrad Guest | January 21, 2016 at 12:12 pm | Reply

    Make no mistake, I loathe Hillary Clinton; but as a defense attorney, it’s her job to get her client off or the smallest sentence possible, whether or not she believes he is guilty.

    However, that she boasted about is indeed unconscionable. We need to be sure she never gets elected president.

    • I grit my teeth, but I totally understand your reply, and I thank you!. I for one could not only have a hard time living with myself for doing it, but I sure as heck would NOT be laughing and bragging about being a douche!

    • Yes, but she doesn’t have to take every case brought before her unless she was a public defender, which she was not.

    • This was my impression, too. But then I listened to the tapes, and I don’t really get a strong sense of “boasting” after all. I think the Free Beacon’s been editorializing a bit. She sounds like a defense lawyer talking shop, and I’m saying this as someone who is not going to vote for Hillary 🙂 I just think we need to keep things in context. If we’re going to crucify anyone, it should be the abysmal performance of the crime lab, who cut the bloody section of the underwear (the entirety of the case, it sounds like) out to test it and then /threw it away/ before trial. I mean, if anyone’s culpable, it’s them.

  14. And this is the best that 47 years of 2nd-Wave Feminist movement can produce as a presidential candidate? Oh, and the Baby Boom? This is as good as we get?

  15. Jeanette Bleckley | January 21, 2016 at 12:27 pm | Reply

    As an attorney, I had “rules” for myself! I REFUSED to represent certain “classes” of people who had been charged with crimes that I ABHORRED! I would NEVER defend a (1) Child molester/rapists; (2) Rapist; (3) Domestic Abuser; (4) Animal Abuser; (5) Drug Manufacturer; (6) Drug Pusher; nor (7) Elder Abuser! THESE WERE JUST MY PRINCIPALS! I did, however, defend murderers, robbers, thieves, etc. HILLARY CLINTON going “after” a child for her alleged “sexual behavior” is UNFORGIVABLE!! She, too, had choices and to brag about making a WRONG choice re a child is IMMORAL, DISGUSTING and PROBLEMATIC in all respects.

    • allen goldberg | January 21, 2016 at 1:51 pm | Reply

      Jeanette..since everyone is entitled to a fair trial..did you see your personal convictions ever stand in the way? I applaud your ethics and morals but wondered just how difficult it was maintaining these

    • Your my type of attorney. Congratulations and God bless you!

    • Jeanette, it appears you suffer from a disease which is rarely contracted by attorneys, integrity.

      Well done, however few of your brethren are bedeviled by such esoteric considerations. Bear witness to the shenanigans of our congressional representatives.

    • -Jeanette, In today’s ‘Wonderland’, Alice would feel right at home. The ‘Hookah Smoking Caterpillar’ would be a Supreme Court Justice.

      With the recent court decisions, your morals could be easily interpreted as ‘Discrimination’. You could very well be sentenced and fined for Not accepting certain distasteful ‘clients’. ….

      .”Go Ask Alice, When she is ten feet tall”… [Grace Slick]

    • How is defending a child rapist better or worse than defending a murderer? What about proven innocent until guilty? Isn’t defending the accused of whatever the sole purpose of a defence lawyer?

    • Rick Farnsworth | January 22, 2016 at 12:07 am | Reply



  16. Hillaryoncrack | January 21, 2016 at 12:51 pm | Reply

    At first look at the headline, I thought it referred to her defending Bill. He has been known to rape.. But, hey, any woman who supports Hillary should immediately report to the nearest police station and turn over her vagina to the authorities. Hillary leads the charge in the war on women. She demanded that her aides do anything to discredit the women that accused Bill of sexual misconduct, then tells women “we must believe you when you say you were attacked.” Liar. Fraud. Cheat. That is what she is. That is ALL she is.

  17. This is a very old story about Killary Rotten Benghazi Clinton. Some of us are well ahead of this blog!

    • Well Lottie friggin da… Old or not, doesn’t make it any better for her. SHE IS SCUM!!!!!!

      • Look, this is tired old news. We know how rotten she is. She has committed serious crimes since then. Why aren’t we talking about some of those things? What this Saul Alinski follower has done is treasonous! She should be in jail now!

        • I couldn’t agree with you more. Jail her a$$ and throw away the key. AMERICA NEEDS TO WISE UP AND TAKE NOTICE TO THIS EVIL BI_CH AND DO NOT VOTE FOR HER!!!!!! I hoping for “”HILLARY JAIL CELL TOUR 2016″”

          • I know no one who deserves jail-time more than Killary Rotten Benghazi Clinton, because has not only “broken laws” she has actually committed treasonous acts. She is evil to the bone!


    • What’s sad is that she still leads the dem. party for the nomination. What’s mind boggling is that it doesn’t seem to matter what this c–t does, the left blindly follow her.

  19. what do you expect from a scumbag.

  20. Democrats don’t carry about stories like this. They don’t carry about the scandals. They don’t care about the lying. Heck, they don’t even care that prospective, unvetted terrorists are being let into the country that put their own lives at risk.

    As long as “their team” wins, that’s all that matters to them. Party first, Comrades.

  21. Francisco Machado | January 21, 2016 at 1:45 pm | Reply

    Don’t assume she knew of the client’s guilt when she took the case. you can, of course, make any assumption you please about her glee at getting the guy off. Doing a god job and liking it are two different things.

  22. Well what do you expect? If she gets elected (God help us) she will no doubt welcome the Muslim “refugees” and the terrorists disguised as “refugees” because it is the Liberal Democratic Pukes thing to do and those Muslims like ’em young. Just ask Muhammad.

  23. They is what Shillery does to victim women, and it turned out to be great practice for her life with Willy. Shillery is for only one woman, her own sorry lying self and if she has to discredit and destroy any women in her quest to have total power, she is perfectly willing to do so. Shillery is arrogant, narcissistic trash.

  24. I read the story from the female’s side of it, and it has scarred her for life. I realize Hillary was young and just starting her career as an attorney but she had the option of saying no to this guy and the fact that she didn’t says a lot about her ethics and morals. She claims to look out for women but she obviously didn’t, and that means to me she lies. I want honesty in the W.H. and therefore, I’m voting for Trump. He doesn’t sugar coat anything and what he says I believe he means. I just hope the establishment can’t change that and that Trump won’t let them change it. He is paying for his own campaign and therefore, owes no one but the American people.

  25. I despise Hillary-but her job was to get her client the best deal -period. It is up to the prosecutor to get the harshest sentence-the prosecutor should eel the heat for doing a poor job.

  26. If she is the best candidate that the Democrats can come up with, other than an avowed Socialist who is so old that his vice president will probably finish his term, I think the Democrats are truly worthless. Their party is the party of power hungry old rich white men and women. They don’t come anywhere near to representing the blue collar voters, the poor, the minorities or women. All they want to do is exploit us for their own gain. Hillary learned early on how to destroy women and girls who were raped and used that knowledge later on to protect her rapist husband from his victims. Now she wants to make all of us the victims of her totalitarian ideas. She and her husband need to be thrown into prison for their crimes. If any of us “little people” did what they have done, we would be in San Quentin, Bluffdale, Corcoran, Folsom or another prison near us. They should not be above the law.

  27. An animal who cares nothing for justice. He cares only for herself and her desire for power.
    God help us if she ever gets power again.

  28. Trump. Willie was enough. No more Clintons please. Trump will get the job done!

  29. i didnt even know she was a lawyer…why dont somebody expose her days with Janet Reno and the suicide hot lines?

  30. She was programmed by Evil from birth, Hillary Rotten Clinton. She needs to be taken out of politics before she destroys more families and lives.

  31. Rick Farnsworth | January 22, 2016 at 12:00 am | Reply


  32. Sort of practice for tearing into her partner’s victims later on.

  33. I wonder how she would feel if it had been her daughter, oh, wait, I know, laughing, laughing while she helps the defendants lawyer tear at her daughter. She is cheap, cheap, cheap, and what is the matter with the prosecutor not defending or at least asking the girl if what Hillary said about her was true. He sounds just as cheap. And these lawyers make really good politicians, no wonder why this country is in trouble.

  34. Eugene Bertone | January 22, 2016 at 6:03 am | Reply

    SAD and yet she has the audacity to run for President! But the SADDEST part is that there are No Nixonic Woodward & Bernstein’s. The Liberal Lap Dogs of the Lame Stream Media are the SAD Lousy PROBLEM in this Nation!!!

  35. You mean she defended BILL and got him off the former prez is a rapist. Still is

  36. = liberal democrat

  37. Arthur Fernandez | January 22, 2016 at 3:03 pm | Reply

    …..She, as well as her former King, should be both brought up on High Treason charges, and if found guilty of any of the of charges,….. thrown them both in Jail for a long time!!,….if they let this two SOBs get away with all the Damages they have done to US,…we are opening ourselves to more abuse, by this so call American Politicians!!,…..Remember,… the Rule of Law has to Prevail,…….

  38. Doesnt surprise me a bit, that killary clinton upheld a rapist!!!! That is so pathetic and sickening!!!! And there are actually people out there that will vote for her to become president!!!! THEY ALL MUST BE PEDOPHILES!!!! SHE DOESNT DESERVE TO BE PRESIDENT, UNLESS IT IS PRESIDENT OF CHARLES MANSONS FAN CLUB!!!!!!

  39. Bill is a pervert and rapist. Hillary is a self centered ho. I’ll bet they are friends with the other Bill? (cosby)

  40. Hillary is a real disgusting piece of dog doo!

  41. deport all clintons!

  42. Besides all the far less than complimentary users’ comments, please indulge the following: Hillary Clinton is, at her marrow, a pathologically focused liar of the first stripe.

    Categorically, irrefutably, immutably, constantly a lying, conniving, deceiving, undoubtably morally bankrupt empty pant suit.

    And, absolutely physically unfit to perform the strenuous, demanding, 14-16 hour work days of President of The United States. Dumpy, slack, no muscle tone without the immense stamina required of a speciman who could discharge those responsibilities.

  43. Disturbing individual running for President. What a long, winding road she’s traveled. She’s taken some liberties, and I’m not sure how or why anyone can trust or defend her character.

  44. Hillary might distort the facts of how she was retained to represent the rapist, but she can’t deny that she had trashed this 12 year old girls reputation and life in doing so.

  45. George Vreeland Hill | May 8, 2016 at 11:03 pm | Reply

    Hillary Clinton thought the trial was funny.
    A 12 year old girl was raped.
    She is a horrible, self-interest woman who will do anything to get what she wants.
    was that way in 1975 when she got this 42 year old child rapist off and
    she is still the same today and her actions in the case hurt a 12 year
    old girl with lies about her.
    Hillary Clinton is a horrible woman.
    No way will I vote for that lying, underhanded, hurtful, disgusting, defender of rapists Hillary Clinton.

    George Vreeland Hill

  46. You are an idiot.

  47. It would certainly be nice if conservatives would occasionally fact check the stuff they repeat. This story, like everything else sites like this publish, is complete BULLSHIT.

    • DUH How much more fact checjing do you need ? The same exact information is on several hundred other websites, Let me guess, Whitewater was a witch hunt right ?

    • her voice is bullshit too!! you brainwashed sheep really only exist to be sacrificed.

  48. When Hillary said voters were stupid :”All you have to do is tell em what they wanna hear and they’ll vote for ya” With her supporters, obviously, she knew exactly what she was talking about ! Hillary supporters absolutely, flat out REFUSE to look at FACTS. Endless facts !

  49. LMFAO

  50. She’s the hero of her story. In her sociopath’s mind she thinks this as a good story about their legal career.

  51. Paul Chach Mcarthy | October 14, 2016 at 3:07 am | Reply

    So much for her accusation against Trump. A few years ago she’d have been the one defending him in court Hilary is a victim shaming rape apologist.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.