Pew Research Poll: 40% of Millennials Want to Restrict Free Speech

freedom of speechBy Joshua Krause

Pew Research recently surveyed a broad selection of Americans on the subject of offensive speech, and their findings do not bode well for the future of America. The respondents were asked if the government should step in to prevent speech that is offensive toward minorities, to which 28% of Americans agreed. Mind you, this wasn’t about speech that called for violence against minorities. It’s anything that could be deemed “offensive,” an increasingly vague and inclusive term in this day and age.

What was more shocking, however, was how different generations of Americans thought about the issue. 40% of millennials aged 18-34 thought that the government should prevent people from saying these things, which appears to be the latest in a long-term trend that favors free speech restrictions. Only 12% of those between the ages of 70-87, 24% of those aged 51-69, and 27% of Americans aged 35-50, supported government restrictions.

When the statistics were broken down by education level, those with college degrees had the lowest support, whereas those who had a high school degree or less were the most supportive. Depending on how you look at that, it either suggests that younger Americans are less enthusiastic about free speech rights than the generation that came before, or those who want to restrict speech aren’t as educated. Pew also found that woman and minorities were more likely to support government intervention, as were Democrats and Independents.

The only good news to come out of the survey, is that Americans still support free speech more than the citizens of other nations. “Compared with people we surveyed in dozens of nations, Americans as a whole are less likely to favor the government being able to prevent speech of any kind.” However, given the trends that we see in this poll, it doesn’t sound like Americans will be very tolerant of free speech in the future.

Image Credit

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger.

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

5 Comments on "Pew Research Poll: 40% of Millennials Want to Restrict Free Speech"

  1. There already is no free speech on one topic: homosexuals. Say anything derogatory, or even true like explaining what’s a chicken party, and you will be shut down. Go ahead and try it – go to Huff Post and say something about homosexuals – you’ll see free speech does not exists.

    • The right to “free speech” means free from the GOVERNMENT taking action against you because of your speech. Not being able to make stupid comments on internet comment boards. No wonder our rights are in danger. Dummies like you don’t even know what they mean.

  2. All you have to do is tell the truth about what the Zionists did to Palestine and you will be a target.

  3. THESE ** MILLENNIALS ** are nothing but a bunch of – MUSH FOR BRAINS – MINIONS who have been educated by the LIBERAL LEFT WING SOCIALIST people . /////////////////////////////////////

  4. Edgardo L. Perez-De Leon | November 22, 2015 at 5:26 pm | Reply

    Do not make feel bad the generation of my children. We have to be careful with questions made at surveys because can be designed to get the interpretation that you want at the analysis of the collected data. Using profanity or race based words do not hurt anyone when friendly mentioned, specially in a one to one friendly conversation. The use of them in mass media distribution is not freedom of speech but hate. Hate cannot be tolerated beyond a family discussion. For example: ” I hate you dad because you do not let me go out tonight with my boy friend to do what is not of your business”. We can and should regulate freedom of speech to a minimum and for compelling reasons (not interumpting another one while talking), but not hate. No reason to be tolerated. Hate based on race and other protected categories must not be tolerated by the civil society. If the line between both is clearly drawn, I am sure that all demographics will support freedom of speech 100%.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.