The Weather Geoengineering-Chemtrail Fight Song

chemtrail_beachBy Catherine J. Frompovich

Just about everyone knows the words to the moving and patriotic “America the Beautiful,” which many think ought to be our national anthem, instead of the “Star Spangled Banner,” a difficult octave range to sing for many folks, including lyrics about warfare and bombs bursting in air.

Using that familiar America the Beautiful melody, J Marvin Herndon, PhD, a chemtrail researcher, wrote amazingly poignant lyrics and called his song “America Once the Beautiful.” I call Herndon’s masterpiece the “chemtrail fight song.” Please enjoy it sung by the beautiful voice of Kate Magdalena Willens.

Dr Herndon’s exquisite words define what’s going on daily above our very heads polluting air, land, water, plants, animals and humans with toxic substances sprayed from specially-retrofitted planes that are laying down what’s commonly referred to as “chemtrails.”

Those toxic ‘sky trails’ [5] are integral to weather geoengineering, global weather modification, solar radiation management [3] and probably responsible for, or contributing to, the four-year drought in California and the winters of 2014 and 2015 experiencing something never heard in meteorological terms: Polar Vortex! Should we include the coming El Niño [6] too?

Natural and Non-Toxic Products. Up to 50% Off – Every Day (Ad)

Chemtrails, along with weather modification—also synonymous with military warfare—apparently are tied in with HAARP [1] and electromagnetic warfare. Incidentally, the U.S. Army intends to own the weather by 2025 [2].

I’m pleased to extend kudos to Dr Herndon for turning his research work [4] into an impressive “fight song,” which ought to become a classic for our times. Let’s all start singing it; asking radio and TV stations to play it; and send it as a musical tribute to our congressional delegations and state legislators. Maybe we can turn America once beautiful into America the beautiful again. I hope it’s not too late!



Image Credit

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

11 Comments on "The Weather Geoengineering-Chemtrail Fight Song"

  1. Herndon is not a climate scientist nor has he done any peer-reviewed research on the topic. He is a CEO with several wild ideas, none of which is taken seriously. His views on chemtrails lack any scientific support. Real atmospheric scientists continue to affirm the empirical reality of contrails and the absence of any evidence of “chemtrails.”

    Creating a cult of chemtrail victims in the absence of any science makes sense: songs, poetry, uniforms, perhaps a march on Washington? This is the odd case where the amateurs seek to characterize the real scientists as frauds, paid shills, sell outs. I will no doubt be called a paid shill for even mentioning the lack of scientific research for the claim of chemtrails. I urge you to print out a flight map of your area of ordinary commercial flights and then watch as the contrails are formed as planes fulfill these flight plans. I also urge you to note that no trails can be seen except in the stratosphere where freezing temperatures cause the trails to form. Lower levels necessary to target populations never show such trails, only those at 30-40K ft. where it takes months and thousands of miles to radically dilute the spray, most eventually falling into the ocean.

    If actual climate scientists and your own observations don’t work to persuade you., perhaps you are not open to scientific evidence, preferring to believe that the world’s 10,000 atmospheric scientists in 150 nations are all fakes, the claim promoted by the chemtrails lobby, whose goal is to distract your attention from the lethal ground level pollution to the skies above.

    • DALE, Dale, dale; if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck it is a DUCK and no degree is necessary. My dad was fighter pilot and I spent a lot of my youth looking at the sky. IT WAS NEVER LIKE IT IS TODAY. I showed the trails to my Dad before he passed this spring and after at first poo-pooing the idea as a “patriotic american” he remained on the deck for fifteen minutes and agreed that these were NOT contrails. He has a business degree but spent a lot of time in the skies. He is not a scientist but a reasonable observer. goodbye

      • rcade, you, have never taken even one basic class in atmospheric science are telling me that you know more than the world’s experts who study this topic? You can google many images of contrails during WWII……..since then, there are a thousand times more flights thus a thousand times more contrails.

        A pilot is not an atmospheric scientist. I will stick with the science, you can stick to your dad’s ancient memories and total lack of expertise in research on the atmosphere.

        I will stick with the actual experts who spend their lives studying the atmosphere. I urge you to do likewise.

        • I am a nobody. Although I did graduate with honors from one of the top ivy league schools. I have taken my share of science classes and have been intricately involved with the “professional papers” by “experts”. The first question I was asked when I wanted to do a study is “Where are you going to get the money?” So I know that the vast majority of scientific study is paid for by interested parties. So no I don’t believe the experts when there is obvious evidence to the contrary. I am also schooled in psychological manipulation and have experienced classic brainwashing personally. You are one of the narrow minded people who believe the propaganda………or more likely you are a paid shill. Good night Dale!

          • So you know more than those who spend their lives studying the atmosphere?

            Because ” I don’t believe the experts when there is obvious evidence to the contrary. I am also schooled in psychological manipulation and have experienced classic brainwashing personally. You are one of the narrow minded people who believe the propaganda………or more likely you are a paid shill.”

            The likelihood that someone (who:the federal government? ) is paying me even you know is stated with zero evidence, a form of libel. If you cannot find evidence to support your cases(and you say there is”obviousevidence to the contrary,”then default would be ,make a baseless accusation, otherwise known as a “logical fallacy.”

            The obvious evidence should be easy to present. And yet you do not but commit the intellectual and moral crime of libel. I would submit that listening to the atmospheric scientists is NOT narrowminded or propaganda but the only rational path for an intelligent person. You are entitled to your opinion, tho you cannot find one atmospheric scientist with peer-reviewed research who would do anything but laugh at your take down the world’s population of over ten thousand atmospheric scientists in over a hundred nations. Obvious evidence should be easy to find cite. And yet you are unable to do that because the source of your information are amateurs and propagandists. I suggest you look in the mirror and admit you have no scientific data to back the chemtrails theory……..and stop making excuses and claiming thousands of actual scientists are all frauds.

          • Contrails dissipate, never lasting more than 30 seconds. Chemtrails don’t dissipate but spread out blocking the blue sky, or haven’t you noticed?

          • Atmospheric scientists inform us that contrails can be persistent and spread out to form cirrus clouds. These clouds then slowly dissipate while being carried up top thousands of miles over months before finally falling to earth, or in most cases, the ocean. Persistent contrails have been observed and photographed since WWII. Those cirrus clouds formed by contrails are not chemtrails but persistent contrails.

            Here is a response to a question from the UK information office in 2014, as just an example of the prevalence of persistent contrails.

            “. Please confirm in general terms if the atmosphere over the UK has changed
            significantly in the last 30 years, and if so how?
            The Met Office holds this information.
            The thing that has most changed in the last 30 years concerning the formation of persistent
            contrails is not so much the atmosphere itself but the jet aircraft. Modern jet aircraft engines
            will generate contrail formation at warmer temperatures than older engines, as a result of their
            increased fuel efficiency. This is well-documented in an authoritative reference, details are
            included below. Contrails are initiated when the environment temperature is colder than a
            threshold temperature. The value of this threshold temperature is around -45C but is warmer
            for more efficient engines and colder for older low-efficiency engines. The referenced report
            gives much more detail. Such temperatures typically occur at altitudes above about 30,000ft
            and so may be found at the cruising altitude of much jet aircraft traffic.” (sources given).

            The Journal of Geophysical Research reports:

            “Abstract: The expected increase of global air traffic raises concern over the impact of aviation on climate, for instance via the creation of persistent contrails that influence the radiative budget of the Earth. Here the radiative forcing due to persistent contrails due to potential new aircraft, which are added to the present fleet, is studied as a function of cruise altitudes.”

            Etc etc. There is much research on this topic. I urge you to listen to what actual atmospheric scientists have learned and ignore everyone else, especially whatever source told you persistent contrails do not exist.

    • RealeyesRealizeReallies | September 9, 2015 at 9:12 pm | Reply

      Well Dale. I would say you have not been paying attention or your research skills may need some brushing up. But you are entitled to your opinion. Kate, very well done and thanks for caring.

  2. Dale will listen to scientists in the field over amateurs and anonymous propagandists till the day he dies. I will never defend “chem trails”as they are an illusion designed to distract the public from the lethal pollution which kil ls millions a year. I will stand by the best science available. And you?

    • If you knew any science at all, you’d know these aren’t contrails. You don’t know what you’re talking about and you haven’t done any decent research on this topic. Quit trying to act like you know what you’re talking about, because you don’t.

  3. The more highly educated a person is, the more elaborate their rationalizations. Why else is it the “EXPERTS” at NIST still claim Building 7 collapsed demolition style in its footprint, symmetrically, and at nearly free fall speed from some moderate office fires? Same reason physicians bought the cholesterol heart disease myth hook line and sinker – for decades and many or most still do coercing patients to take dangerous statins.

    Dale pretends to not understand the power of groupthink and conveniently “forgets” Upton’s Sinclair’s observation that “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.