Attorney Suggests Suing U.S. Federal Government and Big Pharma Regarding Vaccinations

vaccine safetyBy Catherine J. Frompovich

Finally! it’s happened. An attorney feels that the U.S. federal government and Big Pharma must be sued and taken to task legally for their liability in causing false and inaccurate information about vaccines to be disseminated upon which FORCED vaccinations are based, including health damages that have resulted to infants, toddlers, teens (adults, too) from those forced vaccinations.

James Robert Deal, JD, a Washington state attorney, has considered horrendous vaccine damages caused and suffered, the lack of informed consent, and that

No entity under the sun has the right or lawful authority to arrogate [claim/appropriate/misappropriate] power unto itself to harm or injure, sicken or infect, paralyze or kill the people of this nation. Not only is such conduct by the state a serious breach of the social contract, it represents a profound violation of the public trust. Vaccination programs therefore break the inviolable bond between the citizenry and the government. [1]

Attorney Deal’s legal opinion is one that I have held for numerous years. Why has it taken so long for someone to decide to act upon the violations of public trust and the breach of social contract, if citizens of the USA are supposed to live in a free society? Where are our rights of self-determination? Do children belong to their parents, or to the state? Good questions?

The answers to my questions probably can be found in Attorney Deal’s realizing that something has to be done in Washington State regarding the overbearing mandatory vaccine agenda. Deal prepared a report, which can be read here wherein he lists many of the “mea culpas” involved with regard to vaccines, vaccinology ‘science’, fraud and deceit, and apparent collusion between federal agencies and Big Pharma.

In Deal’s report he states:

It is lazy language to say that vaccines are “safe and effective”, because that implies that all vaccines are safe and effective for all people. In fact, some vaccines have done great harm. If you doubt this, read the findings of the Vaccine Court, which has paid out around $3.0 billion to children for adverse reactions which admits were caused by vaccines. Go to www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/opinion-search and search for “measles-mumps-rubella” or “influenza”. And read the package inserts that come with vaccine boxes. You may also read them online at www.immunize.org/packageinserts . [1]

Personally, I feel it’s more than lazy language; it’s criminal since no vaccines have been tested for their abilities to cause cancer, birth defects, or interfere with reproduction or fertility! Furthermore, with all the animal viruses that have been found and acknowledged in vaccines over the years, which I talk about in my book Vaccination Voodoo, who knows what type of diseases are being spawned by vaccines given to children within 24 hours of birth?

Deal goes on to say,

The flu vaccine is big business, particularly the ones containing mercury. Some 300 million doses are sold, while only 20 million doses of all other vaccines are sold. In 1986 the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program made vaccine manufacturers immune from most liability, and in 2011 the Supreme Court twisted the plain language of the Vaccine Act to make vaccine manufacturers, hospitals, and physicians completely immune from absolutely ALL liability, reasoning that vaccines in general – using the language of the Court – are “unavoidably unsafe”. [1]

With overly dramatic increases in the rates of autism, ADD, ADHD, childhood diabetes, and other chronic “old-age-type” diseases for children since the ramp up of mandated vaccines, it is incumbent upon society to take federal and state agencies, plus Big Pharma and vaccine makers, to task and exercise the basic human right to self-preservation when faced with threats to our health, well-being and children.

This ought to get readers’ ‘juices’ riled up about vaccines:

Further, one who is vaccinated sheds viruses, and so one can be infected not only by those who contract a wild case of measles but also by those recently vaccinated. Moreover, the MMR is not particularly effective “In an October 2011 outbreak in Canada, over 50% of the 98 individuals had received two doses of measles vaccine”.

The Los Angeles Times and the Everett Herald printed an article entitled “Vaccine ignorance proving deadly and contagious”. It was written not by physicians or scientists but by prominent members of the Council on Foreign Relations. It contains numerous inaccuracies – scientific, historical, and legal. [1] [CJF emphasis added]

You can’t handle the truth about vaccines (Ad)

Nothing is more impressive AND FACTUAL a statement than what Attorney Deal says here:

A mother is not a vaccine denier if she questions the safety of a vaccine containing mercury, aluminum, MSG, antibiotics, eggs, or formaldehyde. Or Beta HCG hormone. Or the urabi virus . She is not a denier if her child is frail or has already had an adverse vaccine reaction and she chooses to opt her child out. She is not a denier if she questions giving children 49 injections of 14 vaccines by age six, including a vaccine at birth for hepatitis B, a disease usually infecting IV drug users. Nor is she a denier if she declines the CDC recommendation that she take the flu vaccine (containing mercury) when she is pregnant, even though the flu vaccine is not tested for safety for pregnant women and fetuses and the FDA advises it be used “only if clearly needed”.

The last sentence above is paramount as to why vaccines must be declared unsafe! Science, medicine, or government should not mandate injecting into a pregnant female something that has not been proven possibly to harm her fetus! That unconscionable ‘edict’ alone should be brought as criminal charges under the Nuremberg Code [2], as those vaccines are experiments not tested for safety.

Before I end, I’d like to point out this from Attorney Deal’s report:

Some vaccines are ineffective. Discover Magazine reported that 73 percent of kids aged 7 to 10 who caught pertussis in 2012 in Washington had been fully vaccinated. The same is true for the measles vaccine. A child vaccinated with a live virus vaccine experiences a mild version of the infection and is thus contagious and infects others. Outbreaks of measles and pertussis probably come from the vaccinated, not from the unvaccinated. The artificial immunity conferred by vaccines wears off, and boosters are required, making vaccines a cash machine that generates $30 billion yearly. [1]

That and much more—like the toxic ingredients and what they do in the body from peer-reviewed studies, I discuss in my 2013 book, Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, and to which I’d like to add another subtitle, “And which you should know before it’s too late”.

I congratulate Attorney Deal for what he’s doing in Washington State and encourage every attorney to take a similar legal position in each of the 50 states, plus file a class action lawsuit against the federal government agencies involved with pushing dangerous vaccines together with their manufacturers and Big Pharma.

References:

[1] http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/09/attorney-demolishes-pro-vaccine-talking-points-lays-foundation-for-lawsuits-against-govt-and-big-pharma-3220876.html
[2] http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html

Resource:

State of the Nation
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=12072

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

5 Comments on "Attorney Suggests Suing U.S. Federal Government and Big Pharma Regarding Vaccinations"

  1. Wonderful news but I won’t hold my breath. This battle has been going on for over 200 years and the “heath”care industry has ballooned to a > 3 billion dollar industry. They buy, they distort, they kill.

  2. False advertising to Murder all in law books and available for use. The whole industry would collapse if the Quacks ran a test first to prove some need for the garbage they want to dump on a clean healthy immune system for the life of the victim. No test then no shot!

  3. Corp. U.S. DBA – “U.S. Gov.” is a private corporation, and when your child gets a birth certificate…you have just given them to the company.

  4. actually they are being tested for safety – on the children of gullible, authority trusting parents. The data is out there if you choose to look. Every day our decision not to vaccinate our children is reinforced.

  5. I totally agree that no one should be subjected to coerced vaccination. We might want to be careful though about using the Nuremberg Code as a talking point. Someone please correct me, but I think that the Nuremberg Code describes requirements for experimentation on human subjects. A pro-vaxxer could easily say, “but this is not an experiment, this is proven medicine!” Yeah, I think it is a stupid response, but to a pro-vaxxer it makes sense. Using Nuremberg weakens our arguments. If there are other parts of international law that require patient consent for orthodox medical treatment, those laws would be a better talking point.

Leave a comment