9/11 Affidavit By John Lear, Son Of Learjet Inventor

JOHN LEAR, of full age, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. I am 65 years of age, a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with over 19,000 hours of flight time, over 11,000 of which are in command of 3 or 4 engine jet transports, have flown over 100 different types of aircraft in 60 different countries around the world. I retired in 2001 after 40 years of flying.

2. I am the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, and hold more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certificated airman. These include the Airline Transport Pilot certificate with 23 type ratings, Flight Instructor, Flight Engineer, Flight Navigator, Ground Instructor, Aircraft Dispatcher, Control Tower Operator and Parachute Rigger.

3. I flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983.

4. During the last 17 years of my career I worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor. I was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman. I have extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011.

5. I checked out as Captain on a Boeing 707 in 1973 and Captain on the Lockheed L-1011 in 1985.

6. I hold 17 world records including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966 and was presented the PATCO (Professional Air Traffic Controller’s Association) award for Outstanding Airmanship in 1968. I am a Senior Vice-Commander of the China Post 1, the American 

Legions Post for “Soldiers of Fortune”, a 24 year member of the Special Operations Association and member of Pilotfor911truth.org.

7. I have 4 daughters, 3 grandchildren and live with my wife of 37 years, Las Vegas business woman Marilee Lear in Las Vegas, Nevada.

8. No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors. Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted for the following reasons:

A. In the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun ‘telescoping’ when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center. The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

B. The engines when impacting the steel columns would have maintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building. One alleged engine part was found on Murray Street but there should be three other engine cores weighing over 9000 pounds each. Normal operating temperatures for these engines are 650°C so they could not possibly have burned up. This is a photo of a similar sized engine from a McDonnell-Douglas MD-11 which impacted the ocean at a high rate of speed. You can see that the engine remains generally intact.(photo, www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/27/world/main546355. shtml)


C. When and if the nose of an airplane came in contact with the buildings 14 inch by 14 inch steel box columns and then, 37 feet beyond, the steel box columns of the building core the momentum of the wings would have slowed drastically depriving them of the energy to penetrate the exterior steel box columns. The spars of the wing, which extend outward, could not possibly have penetrated the 14 inch by 14 inch steel box columns placed 39 inches on center and would have crashed to the ground.

D. The argument that the energy of the mass of the Boeing 767 at a speed of 540 mph fails because:

a. No Boeing 767 could attain that speed at 1000 feet above sea level because of parasite drag which doubles with velocity and parasite power which cubes with velocity.

b. The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.

E. The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed 39 inches in center, at over 500 mph. This

fuselage section would be telescopically crumpled had it actually penetrated the building as depicted in the CNN video. It is impossible for it to have then re-emerged from the building and then fallen intact and unburned as depicted.

F. The Purdue video fails because no significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine thereon could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground. The Purdue video misrepresents the construction of the core of the building and depicts unidentified parts of the airplane snapping the core columns which were 12″x36″. The Purdue video also misrepresents what would happen to the tail when the alleged fuselage contacted the core. The tail would instantaneously separate from the empennage (aft fuselage). Further, the Purdue video misrepresents, indeed it fails to show, the wing box or center section of the wing in the collision with the core. The wing box is a very strong unit designed to hold the wings together and is an integral portion of the fuselage. The wing box is designed to help distribute the loads of the wings up-and-down flexing in flight.


G. My analysis of the alleged cutout made by the Boeing 767 shows that many of the 14-inch exterior steel box columns which are shown as severed horizontally, do not match up with the position of the wings. Further, several of the columns through which the horizontal tail allegedly disappeared are not severed or broken. In addition, the wing tips of the Boeing 767 being of less robust construction than the inner portions of the wings could not possibly have made the cookie-cutter pattern as shown in the aftermath photos. The wing tips would have been stopped by the 14 inch steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

H. The debris of the Boeing 767, as found after the collapse, was not consistent with actual debris had there really been a crash. Massive forgings, spars from both the wing and horizontal and vertical stabilizers, landing gear retract cylinders, landing gear struts, hydraulic reservoirs and bogeys oxygen bottles, a massive keel beam, bulkheads and the wing box itself cold not possibly have ‘evaporated’ even in a high intensity fire. The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.

9. My opinion, based on extensive flight experience both as captain and instructor in large 3 and 4 engine aircraft is that it would have been impossible for an alleged hijacker with little or no time in the Boeing 767 to have taken over, then flown a Boeing 767 at high speed, descending to below 1000 feet above mean sea level and flown a course to impact the twin towers at high speed for these reasons:


A. As soon as the alleged hijackers sat in the pilots seat of the Boeing 767 they would be looking at an EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) display panel comprised of six large multi-mode LCDs interspersed with clusters of ‘hard’ instruments. These displays process the raw aircraft system and flight data into an integrated picture of the aircraft situation, position and progress, not only in the horizontal and vertical dimensions, but also with regard to time and speed as well.

Had they murdered the pilot with a box knife as alleged there would be blood all over the seat, the controls, the center pedestal, the instrument panel and floor of the cockpit. The hijacker would have had to remove the dead pilot from his seat which means he would have had electrically or manually place the seat in its rearmost position and then lifted the murdered pilot from his seat, further distributing blood, making the controls including the throttles wet, sticky and difficult to hold onto.

Even on a clear day a novice pilot would be wholly incapable of taking control and turning a Boeing 767 towards New York because of his total lack of experience and situational awareness under these conditions. The alleged hijackers were not ‘instrument rated’ and controlled high altitude flight requires experience in constantly referring to and cross-checking attitude, altitude and speed instruments. Using the distant horizon to fly ‘visually’ under controlled conditions is virtually impossible particularly at the cruising speed of the Boeing 767 of .80 Mach.

The alleged ‘controlled’ descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of ‘controlled’ flight.

Its takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the “EFIS” (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent. The Boeing 767 does not fly itself nor does it automatically correct any misuse of the controls.

var linkwithin_site_id = 557381;

linkwithin_text=’Related Articles:’

Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

9 Comments on "9/11 Affidavit By John Lear, Son Of Learjet Inventor"

  1. Just another non-scientist who thinks he knows everything about airplanes, physics and structural mechanics just because he can fly one. Flying a plane in no way makes someone an expert or even slightly more knowledgeable than Joe Six-Pack when it comes to understanding the physics of what occurred on 9/11. This guy is deluded with his own arrogance.

  2. Interesting. The complete affidavit has since been removed or lost, so this is all we have for now. As VeteransToday has shown on a few occasions, Mossad, as led by Mike Harari, has claimed responsibility for the 9-11 event, and it is now believed that the mini-nukes believed to be part of the Sampson Option were used to take down the towers. 9-11 was an inside job, and I hope that people now understand it. It was another false flag attack on America used to shut down more constitutional protections and to get American military involved in another undeclared war. The federal government is no longer an American government. The American empire is rapidly going down, and I hope its Zionist controllers in Tel Aviv and in London go down at the same time. We will never know peace as long as we have Zionist and sympathetic sociopaths controlling our country.

    • If the towers were taken down by nukes the seismic data would have shown this, but it didn’t.
      the seismic data and magnetometer readings point to something else being used, Judy Wood has the best evidence, many failures have been made trying to refute her evidence! people usually just result to name calling because they have no real ammunition

      • Like all false flag events, evidence of the fraud is destroyed by the guilty parties, which, in this case, is at least the CIA and Mossad. But, having noted that, seismic data (all collected by government) is probably not the best indicator of nukes. The best indicator of nukes would probably be radiation problems and the years of cancer incidents in the NYC population.



        I’ve reviewed JudyWood’s material, and prefer the VT material and explanation over hers.

      • Apparently, I am not allowed to post URL links, so my earlier response to your question was not posted. Suffice it to say that if you do a search of “VeteransToday Nukes Mossad 9-11” you will find several articles that go into lurid detail.

        I have reviewed Judy Wood’s material some years ago and did not find it as credible as the VT articles. Also, check on NYC cancer rates since 9-11.

        • Well lets just agree to disagree then, I dont want to get into a mud slinging contest about what caused the towers to go down, I do know for sure the thermite theory was setup as a limited hangout headed by a shill named Steven e jones, who has a past in covering up free energy, I agree with you mossad where involved, As well as certain individuals high up in the US government, do you know about hurricane erin? a little strange huh?

          • highlanderjuan | November 24, 2017 at 8:53 pm |

            Mud slinging not required, just research. Regarding the hurricane problems, it is my belief that comes from the military which has controlled the weather for many years.

          • Well we agree on Hurricane Erin aswel then, It was too much of a coincidence where it was on 9/11 and the fact that on the day of 9/11 the media was eerily silent about it,
            I believe the hurricane was needed for the electromagnetic field it possessed, the directed energy weapon needed it for it to take effect in the way intended.It is pretty obvious to me given the direction the hurricane was headed it was used for 9/11, its not just another coincidence.

  3. I am retired flight engineer and my theory has always been those Arabs were part of the exercise that day and were patsies. The whole operation was compartmentalized and I think the aircraft were taken over remotely in flight. As for the lack of engine parts at crash site. I also find that a bit of a mystery. Basicaly an aircraft fuselage skin if flimsy and would shatter into a million pieces however as Lear stated, the landing gear and engines would have survived. Still whatever, there is NO fucking way that this was an operation carried out by 19 Arabs. Total bullshit

Leave a comment