|Afghan women line up to receive food donations in Kabul
© AFP/File Shah Marai
WASHINGTON (AFP) – The office that oversees billions in aid to Afghanistan will be without a chief for the second time this year, as its leader announced Thursday he was stepping down.
Herbert Richardson, acting special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction (SIGAR), said he will take a job in the private sector after he leaves his government post on September 2.
“After more than 37 years of public service, I’ve decided to accept an opportunity in the private sector at a time when I’m convinced SIGAR has changed course, is producing results and is being led effectively by the new leadership team that I’ve put in place,” said Richardson.
The organization’s previous manager was dismissed in January after lawmakers criticized SIGAR for failing to properly uncover misuse of the aid money.
A SIGAR report published last month revealed that funds Washington poured into Afghanistan for aid could be financing corruption and going to extremist groups because the money was not traceable.
Richardson stepped down as a new report by the International Crisis Group (ICG) think tank highlighted major problems over foreign aid in Afghanistan, which it said has totalled $57 billion since the US-led invasion in 2001.
Ahead of a deadline for the withdrawal of overseas combat troops by the end of 2014, the ICG warned Afghan state bodies remain weak, including the country’s army and police which have received over half the total aid.
“The impact of international assistance will remain limited” unless donor countries take swift action,” it added.
It urged countries — particularly the United States, the largest aid donor to Afghanistan — to tackle corruption, better monitor how aid is implemented and separate aid from counter-insurgency goals.
“In their haste to demonstrate progress, donors have pegged much aid to short-term military objectives and timeframes,” the ICG report said.
“As the drawdown begins, donor funding and civilian personnel presence, mirroring the military’s withdrawal schedule, may rapidly decline.”
This would undermine “oversight and the sustainability of whatever reconstruction and development achievements there have been,” the report said.
© AFP — Published at Activist Post with license