Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts

Sunday, September 21, 2014

"Climate March" Hides Real Culprits and Real Solutions

Climate march is silly at best - dangerously counterproductive at worst. 

Tony Cartalucci
Activist Post

Big business and the big political parties and politicians they own have converged in what is being disingenuously called the "People's Climate March."  MSNBC would report in an article titled, "The largest climate march in history kicks off in New York," that:
They’re calling it the largest mobilization against climate change in the history of the planet. On Sunday morning, protesters from all over the United States and the world are converging on Manhattan to demand that global leaders take action to avert catastrophic climate change. Earlier this week Bill McKibben, founder of the environmental group 350.org, projected that the march would consist of “hundreds of thousands” of participants.
Not surprisingly little in terms of actual solutions are mentioned by the organizers and instead the march is meant to set the stage for political and financial deals to be made at the 2015 Climate Change Conference in Paris, France. Organizing the march are institutions funded by the very governments and corporate-financier special interests that have helped create devastating environmental and socioeconomic disasters across the planet over the past several decades in the first place.

Friday, September 19, 2014

UN climate change: 1000 scientists say no

image source
Jon Rappoport
Activist Post

Read it.

It’s a shocking 321-page report assembled by The Climate Depot:

“More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims.”

It names names. It lists reasons for the dissent.

Reality is engineered consensus. But when that doesn’t work, “experts” just assert there is a consensus when there isn’t.

“What the hell, let’s just say that ‘everybody agrees’ manmade warming is destroying Earth and we have ten minutes to solve it, and let’s get our friends in the press to shut out the naysayers. You know, media blackout.”

Science is supposed to be about evidence and proof, not consensus. But that idea is now laughed out of court. Science is about PR and who sits on the important thrones.

Saturday, September 6, 2014

Latest Study into the Possibility of Megadroughts Ignores Much of the Real Science of Climate Change

Chris Carrington
Activist Post

A new study in the Journal of Climate Science warns that decades-long drought may become the norm for the Southwestern United States.
“A drier Southwest is also a Southwest at risk of a megadrought,” said study author Toby Ault, a climate scientist at Cornell University.
Of course, the study implicates global warming as the cause of these future droughts; it does not take into account the planet hasn’t actually warmed at all since 1998.

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Obama Set to Sign UN Climate Change Agreement WITHOUT Congress

Melissa Melton
Activist Post

The New York Times is reporting that the Obama administration is working behind the scenes to “forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions,” without seeking approval from Congress whatsoever:
In preparation for this agreement, to be signed at a United Nations summit meeting in 2015 in Paris, the negotiators are meeting with diplomats from other countries to broker a deal to commit some of the world’s largest economies to enact laws to reduce their carbon pollution. But under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.
To sidestep that requirement, President Obama’s climate negotiators are devising what they call a “politically binding” deal that would “name and shame” countries into cutting their emissions. The deal is likely to face strong objections from Republicans on Capitol Hill and from poor countries around the world, but negotiators say it may be the only realistic path. [emphasis added]
Notice the statement didn’t say climate change “rules” to be enacted, but “laws” to reduce carbon pollution.

Thursday, August 7, 2014

Neil Young: Chemical Factory Farming Threatens the "Garden of the World"

Neil Young 2008 Firenze 02Heather Callaghan
Activist Post

While people have been torn over beloved astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson's recent comments on genetically modified organisms, another beloved Neil took a stand - largely unnoticed.

While Tyson claims he never took a side, he still holds that genetic engineering is no different than what we've been doing for tens of thousands of years. One gets the impression from his view that corporatism and science become one for survival - despite negative consequences - and anyone who objects can go back to...being backward? Neil Young took an entirely different point-of-view, putting himself in the boots of that oft-forgotten group that gets left holding the bag in this mix: the farmer! Did his speech inspire them? Not at first...

Did he really suggest that Monsanto, the chemical conglomerates, industrialists and the big bankers are responsible for...? His argument below is unique, to say the least.

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Why Everyone is Wrong about Climate Change

Tony Cartalucci
Activist Post

Assigning blame for climate change that will happen with or without human activity on Earth constitutes a disingenuous discourse. The climate changes, and nearly everything on Earth and beyond it effects that change. From geological processes to biological evolution, to changes in the sun's output, to yes, even human activity - absolutely everything has an impact on the climate for better or for worse.

Image: Climate change, and even exceptional global warming is nothing new. Even if humans managed to negate any impact they were having on the environment, ice ages, rising seas, and off-the-chart CO2 levels and temperatures are inevitable. All we can do is build civilizations and sanctuaries that can weather the climate, no matter what it does. 
The climate has been in a constant, linear state of change, long before human beings evolved, and even throughout the relatively short period of time humans have inhabited the Earth. This continuous change may have within it temporary cycles, but at no two points in Earth's natural history has the climate been the same.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

UK Test Finds Biodiversity Loss Ignored in Climate Change Shadow

Forest upHeather Callaghan
Activist Post

There is a funny cult featured in the show Parks and Recreation that call themselves the Reasonablists. Because anyone criticizing them would seem unreasonable. That's how I feel about the renaming of Global Warming to Climate Change - and using the term "Climate Change denialist" to smear someone who questions that narrative.

Of course the climate is always changing so it would seem unreasonable to deny that, but I have not heard denial from people who oppose chemical aerial spraying and carbon taxes. I hear better solutions offered, rather than punishing people financially and damaging the entire ecological system with jet plumes - over a theory.

Researchers from the UK noticed that in the recent flood of frenzied Climate Change hype, something crucial was lost.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Commodifying Nature: Stealing the Jungles?

Joan Dark
Activist Post

According to ecological groups, a climate change programme at the United Nations, called REDD, may be facilitating the theft of the earth’s remaining reserves of forest and jungle.

A recent ecological conference in Chiapas, Mexico, raised concerns as to REDD involvement in indigenous issues, as related to forests and climate change. The conference, which took place in San Cristobal de las Casas in the first week in May, was entitled Escuela de la Sustentabilidad de Amigos de la Tierra de América Latina y el Caribe and was one in a series of open and public conferences allowing discussion and input on the ongoing work of a number of affiliated ecological groups.

The focal point of the first day of open meetings pinpointed the UN program, REDD, which is an acronym for “Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation.” According to the UN, REDD has been developed to protect the forests in pursuit of reducing carbon emissions which come from deforestation:
The UN-REDD Programme supports nationally-led REDD + processes and promotes the informed and meaningful involvement of all stakeholders, including Indigenous Peoples and other forest-dependent communities, in national and international REDD+ implementation.
However, the reality of REDD is something quite different from its website pronouncements. Case after case has been cited where REDD has been used as a mechanism to speciously rob indigenous communities, living in jungles or forests, of their rights to their land.

Saturday, May 31, 2014

On Record: The Canadian Gov’t Is Researching Geoengineering with Chemtrails

Melissa Melton
Activist Post

People continue to deny that chemtrails are being or will be sprayed into the atmosphere under the guise of fighting climate change, despite the fact that there are both tacit and overt admissions that governments are messing with the environment everywhere, including a recent NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory video where a scientist talks specifically about using a plane to spray aerosols into the stratosphere for this very reason (and what would happen if a rogue scientist were to hijack the planet with this technology — a possibility NASA is apparently very concerned about).

Now through a freedom of information request, former British Columbia premier Bill Vander Zalm has revealed that Environment Canada is researching the use of aerosols to fight climate change.

Monday, May 19, 2014

Who’s Mucking With The Weather?

image source
Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

The YouTube video below verifies that someone is mucking around with the weather, I think. What’s your take on it?

Where is the demand for an investigation, plus accountability, into what’s going on in the skies above us with chemtrails and other ‘conspiracy theory-type activities’ that are occurring and apparently being attributed to Mother Nature?

Sunday, May 18, 2014

Weird "WorldFest" Event Pushes Global Warming Apocalypse

Bernie Suarez
Activist Post

The promo video for "WorldFest" will grab you. Both the tackiness and deception. The first two seconds tell the story: "U.N. has warned us on climate change" one second later:  "2 Degrees Celcius Will Kill Us". (Yes, they actually misspelled the word Celsius) seconds later: "If we act today we see 2050".

The rest of the fifty-two second video shows bands playing and lots of people drinking alcohol. Yes alcohol. In a pathetic attempt to seem like fighting to prevent the end of the world can be done in a fun way, it is clear that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the U.N. are desperate to raise money in any way they can by throwing these "save the world" events to attract brainless Americans simply looking to get out and drink beer for a day.

Thursday, May 15, 2014

We Only Have ’500 Days Left to Avoid Climate Chaos’

Melissa Melton
Activist Post

Have you gone green? Stopped guzzling resources? Planted a tree? Paid your carbon taxes? Given yourself over to the smart grid for total control of your otherwise climate murdering life?

Well, if you haven’t bought your copy of Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth and properly flipped out and run around screaming over the fact that climate change is about to implode the planet and it’s all the personal fault of you and everyone you know, you’ve still got a few days left.

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Top Climate Researcher Urges Nuclear Power to Thwart Geoengineering

Geoengineering vs. nuclear power is like watching two grim reapers playing chess.

Dees Illustration
Kevin Samson
Activist Post

It is becoming increasingly difficult to write off geoengineering as conspiracy. We already have numerous White Papers from think tanks, official documents admitting to climate control plans, and many public admissions from scientists and politicians alike.

This week geoengineering has been launched further into the mainstream. First we saw Riley Duren, a Chief Systems Engineer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Labs, caution against rogue geoengineers and mad scientists using climate control as a potential weapon. Curiously this is the exact same concern that was expressed by geoengineering's leading proponent, Harvard climate scientist, David Keith. Keith likened geoengineering to nuclear weapons ... and the subsequent race to acquire that technology. These concerns are centered around structuring the proper international governance to ensure that geoengineering is carried out correctly.

Ironically enough, after the parallel drawn between the power of weather modification to the power of nuclear weapons, one of the "foremost climate researchers" is also confirming the reality of geoengineering, while reinforcing the "rogue geoengineer" meme; but he is suggesting that nuclear power is the solution to the inevitable need for geoengineering.

Friday, April 11, 2014

Domed Future: “Climate-Controlled” Cities to Stop Global Warming

Aaron Dykes
Activist Post

It’s the ultimate control grid, and some see it as the solution to climate change concerns – living in “climate-controlled mega-cities.”

Populations, their behavior and consumption and the very air they breathe could all be controlled via closely-managed city centers that would be scientifically tweaked to meet the latest demands of climate change, global warming, or other environmental crises.

Could such an Agenda 21 future – where global “sustainability” means behavior modification under artificial scarcity economics and compact city populations – go so far as to encompass sci-fi-esque “Dome Cities”?



Thursday, April 3, 2014

John Kerry Says Denying Climate Science Is ‘Malpractice’

Melissa Melton
Activist Post

The sky may not exactly be falling (yet), but the climate is definitely changing enough to screw us all and it’s all our fault on top of it according to the latest report released by the scaremongerers scientific cabal over that the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The laundry list of ever-growing threats now includes more death, more natural disasters, more poverty, catastrophic food and water shortages and even potential wars, all because of what they are 95% sure is man-made global warming.

Upon the report’s release, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry made a statement on how dire things really are:
Unless we act dramatically and quickly, science tells us our climate and our way of life are literally in jeopardy. Denial of the science is malpractice.
He continued:

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Getting Hotter or Getting Colder? Either Way You Need to Step Up Your Preps

Lizzie Bennett
Activist Post

Climate change is the one subject that can polarize the guests at a dinner party in one minute flat, but what many people fail to recognize is that both scenarios require us to step up, and in some cases look in a different way, at how we prepare for the future.
  • Both warming and cooling will lead to food insecurity issues.
  • Both warming and cooling will cause a massive die off of the population due to ill health and malnutrition.
  • Both warming and cooling will require us to think carefully about how we insulate our homes: Either to keep the cold out, or to keep the heat out.
  • Both warming and cooling will affect the way our children are educated, how we earn our living and how we travel around during our everyday lives. Poor infrastructure cannot cope with extreme heat or cold on a long-term basis.
  • Both warming and cooling will affect aging and ailing power grids across the western world as they fail to cope with increasing demand to either heat or cool our homes, workplaces and schools.
Preparing for two scenarios that are on the surface at least, total opposites sound like an impossibility, especially to those new to prepping.

The key is to look at the similarities as well as the differences.

Monday, February 17, 2014

Request for an Investigation of Documented Weather Modification

Jerry Leonard
Activist Post

I’m an engineer residing in the suburbs of Charlotte, NC and I have been documenting large-scale, aerial chemical-dispersals from aircraft over the city through time-lapse photography.

Here is a time-lapse video of a massive, all-day dispersal on Sunday 1/26/14.



Here it is sped up by 2x, for those pressed for time: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh1aJsr4DcM

Photos and real-time video of the skies over Charlotte being nearly completely covered in a chemical haze on this same day can be found here (from various spots around the city).

These spraying operations can change a clear blue sky to a chalky white sky, from horizon to horizon, in a matter of hours.

My research to understand the reasons behind these chemical dispersals over my house and city (through what looks like jet contrail amplification) has led me to propose that these jet-aerosol spraying events are a sub-project of a global “geoengineering” program known as “solar radiation management” which is being conducted through so-called “stratospheric particle injections.” (“Geoengineering” is the large-scale manipulation of earth’s physical systems.)