US Navy’s Own Report Indicates Washington Is Looking For A Pacific Fight

By Ulson Gunnar

The Pacific Ocean is large. Since World War II, weapon systems operating in this theater have required special provisions regarding extensive range, long duration performance and relative self-sufficiency during operations.

From America’s Gato-class submarines and PBY Catalina flying boats used to fight the Japanese and reassert American hegemony across Asia-Pacific during WWII, to America’s continued presence in Japan, South Korea and islands throughout the region, it is clear the lengths the US has gone through then and now to remain “engaged” in the Pacific.

More recently, a report by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA), commissioned by the US Navy titled, “Restoring American Seapower: A New Fleet Architecture for the United States Navy,” obsesses over not how to defend American shores, but how to remain involved in Asia-Pacific despite the immense distances between there, and America.

The report’s introduction includes:

Great power competitors such as China and Russia increased their military capabilities over the last two decades and now appear willing to challenge the international order.

However, the report never addresses Chinese or Russian forces landing on American shores, or even threatening to do so. Rather, the report revolves around maintaining hegemony within spheres of influence much more appropriately (and likely inevitably) Chinese or Russian.

The report coins a term, “deny-and-punish” to describe the use of US power abroad to “stop aggression,” not in defense of America itself, but in “adjacent theaters.” Ironically, the report cites Iraq as an example, a nation the US, not China nor Russia, invaded, occupied and destroyed with considerable, unchallenged “aggression.”

A more specific point in the 162-page report picked out by The National Interest in an article titled, “How to Guarantee America’s Aircraft Carriers Can Fight China in a War,” involves long-range air sorties of up to 2,000 miles.

The article elaborates:

…a 2000-mile mission would strain human endurance and an unrefueled range of more than 10 hours would require an enormous aircraft that might not fit on a carrier flight deck. Thus, the CSBA proposal calls for a smaller aircraft that would be supported by a tanker.

In other words, in order for the US to project considerable force beyond its own borders, across the Pacific Ocean, and within China’s logical, proximal sphere of influence, it needs not only drone aircraft capable of 10 hour sorties, it needs drone tankers to refuel them.

Defense contractors surely welcome the report’s findings, since it will require the development of not one new aircraft carrier-based vehicle, but two, including the tanker.

The CSBA report concludes by stating:

To be deterred in the 2030s, aggressors must be presented with the possibility that their goals will be denied or that the immediate costs to pursue them will be prohibitively high.

In reality, the “aggression” the United States fears is not the unjust encroachment on other, innocent nations, but rather the undoing of every aspect of its own global order, put together piece by piece through just such aggression. It is an order constructed not within any rational US sphere of influence, rather, one spanning the globe, so far from American shores combat pilots lack the endurance to fly the sorties required to “deter” other nations from reversing America’s grip upon it.

The US seeks to “deter aggression” that may potentially diminish or extinguish entirely America’s systematic and decades-spanning violation of Beijing’s “One China” policy regarding Hong Kong and Taiwan, China’s claims in the South China Sea or regimes the US puts into power along China’s peripheries to admittedly confound regional stability at Beijing’s expense,

Students of history will recognize much of this as a modern-day continuation of European colonization throughout Asia, where sophisticated and overbearing military might was used to corner China and its neighbors across the region, divide and conquer them, as well as prevent them from ever rolling back any of the gains colonial expansion gifted Europe and eventually America in the late 19th century.

The CSBA report is just one of many US policy papers that openly and repeatedly admits that China is not a threat to the United States as a nation, but a threat to the hegemonic order that nation attempts to maintain globally well into the 21st century.

And while the US seeks drone forces to bridge the vast distances between American territory and the territory it seeks to continue dominating, China and Russia are likewise developing weapon system to make those vast distances greater still. While the CSBA report places urgent imperative in preventing China or Russia from exerting influence within their own territory or along their immediate peripheries, the final conclusion of this new arms race in long-range weapon systems may force the US to accept a reality in which the only region it dominates is the US itself. But the obvious question remains, why isn’t that already the case?

Ulson Gunnar, a New York-based geopolitical analyst and writer especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”., where this article first appeared.


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

6 Comments on "US Navy’s Own Report Indicates Washington Is Looking For A Pacific Fight"

  1. “….US policy papers that openly and repeatedly admits that China is….. a threat to the hegemonic order that nation [the U.S.]attempts to maintain globally….”

    China should give the U.S. just a few decades of “working time”….to self-destruct economically.
    No need for an arms race at all !
    .
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/974bd2569adec4a6d6a4cefc7137c8c9ef9f776e202da202adf2e35c249d9b9e.jpg

  2. More geopolitical Kabuki that flies in the face of China expanding its role in the UN’s global military and police actions to include sending Chinese military assets to Syria under the cover narrative of combating thousands of Chinese Uighurs flooding into Syria to join the jidahis.
    >Also, UK based Financial Times is reporting this week Chinese forces are in Afghanistan working on “joint counter-terrorism operations” with Kabul. https://www.ft.com/content/0c8a5a2a-f9b7-11e6-9516-2d969e0d3b65
    >Eric Prince has been meeting with China seemingly to advise in the creation a new Chinese industry of global mercenaries in the mode of Blackwater, said to protect Chinese global business interests.
    http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/blackwater-founder-is-reportedly-working-to-set-up-a-private-army-in-china/
    https://www.ft.com/content/2a1ce1c8-fa7c-11e6-9516-2d969e0d3b65
    >Global military meme expands as Iraqi jet fighters bomb ISIS targets in Syria and Sputnik reporting Turkey Ready to Press Deeper Into Syria After Al-Bab Victory.

  3. Note to the Pentagon: the American people are sick and tired of war and empire. We want a vastly scaled down military, no more regime change adventures, and for pete’s sake no war with Russia or the Chinese. War with Russia or China is complete lunacy! Concentrate on protecting America’s geographic borders.

Leave a comment