Microbes: The Environmental Solution to Chemtrails

chemtrail_biological_2-1024x547By Allan Buckman and Peter A. Kirby

The megatons of toxic garbage routinely raining down upon the Earth and its biota are probably responsible for mass plant deaths, disruptions of the food chain, the resulting mass animal deaths, and diseases of all sorts. These things are ‘probable’ because the people responsible for the New Manhattan Project have not been so kind as to inform us of its biological impacts. The people responsible for history’s greatest scientific endeavor are probably very busy recording every aspect of the fallout from their activities, but, since they don’t want to be responsible for their actions, none of these studies are public.

The good news is that when the enemy comes in like a flood, the Spirit of the Lord will lift up a standard against him. In this case, that standard is microbes.

Microbes are microscopic organisms as small as a single cell which are absolutely everywhere. Earth’s most accommodating and most inhospitable environs are teeming with them. They are inside and all over our bodies. They live floating around in the stratosphere, in the deepest depths of the oceans, and even in outer space. They are the oldest forms of life on this planet. Only a tiny fraction of them have ever been officially discovered and categorized.

In the context of the chemtrail phenomenon, we concern ourselves with microbes because they can remediate the environmental damage done. Microbes can consume and neutralize the toxins which have been so unceremoniously dumped upon us and our world. This may very well happen naturally. As the chemtrail spray proliferates, so will the microbes which feast on it. This may also happen by acts of man. We can produce and disperse beneficial microbes in a concerted effort to remediate our environment. However it happens, the best case scenario is that the spraying be stopped so that beneficial microbes are given a chance to work their magic without being overwhelmed.

Chemtrail activist Allan Buckmann has been working with microbes. He recently wrote a short piece which is presented here:

“I do not profess to be a microbial expert, however in the microbial business for soil, water, and plant production I found out a lot about these little creatures that make up most of our lives, and without them cause deficiencies.

“There are countless microbial species on this planet that fill every niche of the ecosystem. They are known to be present everywhere and within their collective capacity eat everything… including radioactive materials.

“Some are known and used, but most (trillions) are still undiscovered for what they eat, defecate, or exchange. We are most familiar with those that cause disease, or are used for health, or agriculture. Those used for environmental treatments are all known beneficial species.

“The human body carries billions of microbes and most people don’t know it. We have specialists in our armpits (generally a determining factor for body odor), in our glands, eyes, intestines that aid digestion, and in every other area. We have evolved with microbial modifications in our systems and they are an important part of us.

“They are also important for ‘healthy’ soil and agricultural or forestry production and are the difference between high value, colorful, and tasty fruits and vegetables like we can raise in our own gardens with good humus (rich with healthy microbes), and the bland crops grown with artificial chemicals. They are the difference between fertile and infertile soils. Mycorrhiza species were found to stimulate root development and increase nutrient uptake, and that the roots also interacted with other plants for nutrient and genetic exchange. From such studies it was found that combinations of species could enhance overall production and that they work together best in social mixes.

“So, yes I have been promoting the use of microbial products for bio-remediation of soil and plant deficiencies, and discovered that jet clouds and jet exhaust particles falling to the earth, and other particulates do not stop microbial actions as of this date.

“As the past president of Microbe Tech, I became familiar with and had many applications using a line of microbial products formulated by Hugh Muir (deceased) and still manufactured here in the United States, and I still use these products. We have successfully treated soil, water, and plants with great results. This is in spite of any accumulation of metals in the environment so it is possible to counteract the effects of pollution.”

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, writer, and activist. Check out his comprehensive exposé Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project available exclusively at Amazon.com and the CreateSpace estore. https://www.createspace.com/6305947

Follow him on Twitter @PeterAKirby or visit his website PeterAKirby.com.

  • chris

    That’s a great news, but mainly for the soils, and waters.. Regarding our bodies, it is way more difficult, since the ‘chemtrail fallout’ in form of nanoparticles, biomaterials, possibly even foreign DNA, has the ability to cross our skin directly, to bind to DNA directly, certain chemicals, like glyphosate can cross the cell membranes, crosslink (according to Dr. Samsel) the proteins within our bodies, giving rise to entirely knew, undigestable s.c. peptoids, possibly playing essential role in Morgellons disease. But no worry, The ORIGINAL NATURE is always with us, some reports say, that essential oils in the right amount (clove, oregano, cinnamon, red thyme, lemon and rosemary) can heal the wounds and deceased skin within hours..

    • somitcw

      Just how much will “deceased skin within hours” remove or shrink my healthy skin?
      Is decreasing skin a disease?
      I’ll delete my comment when you translate your comment to English.

  • And the corporate clowns rush in. Again, and again. Over and over.

    This is why THEY aren’t worried about Global Warming. Ever since the industrial revolution, which is the willy-nilly reason we’re in this fix to begin with, we’ve been determined to prove that for every organic, ecological, environmental, biological, etc. problem there is a chemical, biological and/or technological solution. That mentality in itself is bone-headed bad enough under way too many scenarios. But that we are almost always so confident in the cure that we never consider either the possible side-effects, ramifications, consequences or the need to vet-test these solutions to figure out if they don’t really just make things worse. Or create their own problems in the process. Just ask the hundreds of thousands of Pharmaceutical consumer lab rats. Just read their medical disclaimers…

    I’m not against finding solutions, or things to help toward solutions. Technology can be a very good thing. Chemistry and biology can find solutions. But we rarely show any prudent caution or due diligence when it comes to making sure a particular solution will indeed perform as claimed. And with no dire consequences of its own.

    A stark example of such a large scale chemical solution to an environmental disaster was applied in 2010. When BP spill millions of gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico. Where I live. Their solution to the spill was to dump and/or spray another millions of gallons of chemical dispersants. It wasn’t a remedy however, as we quickly began to suspect. And are still trying to discover in detail. it was a pretty good attempt at a corporate cover-up of criminal intent. In the process much more environmental damage was done. Some, maybe, even much or most or all of it may be found to be irreversible. I don’t eat fish anymore.

    • somitcw

      Haven’t you heard?
      Both the coming-ice-age and global-warming are dead.
      It is now called climate-change which has been with us for over 4 billion years.
      .
      P.S. If any was human-made then it could be human unmade.

    • Fred Rouse

      Man vs. nature is the great religious war in western society. Your post is so true.
      There are those among us who believe any mess we create, no matter how toxic, can be whisked up with the next-gen tech. And there are those so cynical that they only see the downside to any “great leap forward.” Neither viewpoint is based on reason; both are hope or faith or fear-based.
      Increasingly, and sadly, I find myself tilting more toward the pessimistic view re: our ability to pick up after we lay waste to vast swaths of Earth.
      We’ll see. And if we don’t, our kids will. And they might not feel like hanging pictures of us on their wall.

  • somitcw

    A deceptive article.
    True, microbes can break-down poisonous compounds and some of the poisonous compounds may be converted to non-poisonous compounds, or not.
    .
    Microbes can consume radioactive elements just like people do.
    Neither microbes nor people can make the elements non-radioactive or change even one atom.
    Microbes and people can consume elements like mercury but not one atom of mercury is lost.
    Mercury can be combined with other elements to create mercury compounds that may be less poisonous or they could be more poisonous.
    .
    Microbes can help us to separate poisonous elements from the environment but we are still needed to separate the microbes with our poisons in them from our soil.

  • DmaxD

    Microbes are wonderful, but they do nothing to stop the damage being done to us by the new Manhattan Project.

  • sallyM

    Nice to know some folks are actually working towards saving he place.
    Reminds me I should go get some yogurt. TY.

  • ace

    That’s kinda been my hobby for a few years now. Improving the microbial content of my backyard soil so in a few years time I can have more tasty open pollinated fruits and vegetables. Because can’t find much work otherwise I prance back and forth shirtless and barefoot with my short shorts in my backyard with my pick or hoe after I gather some leaves or twigs, or pine needles, or straw and constantly incorporate that into my soil.

  • Pyra Gorgon

    So what is this about? Making GMO microbes to eat atmospheric aerosol fallout? If they have only discovered a few and there are ‘trillions’ of various sorts of microbes, then how will you know which one to produce and disperse? More importantly, what are the health effects of these microbes on humans? Not all are benign, especially when given a super diet of tons of food and wide-range vectoring.

    A better solution is to stop atmospheric aerosol spraying programs pronto.

    • somitcw

      Eating elemental aluminum, barium, and mercury does not add or delete one atom.
      Eating radioactive iodine, cesium, and strontium does not increase or decrease radioactivity.
      .
      Microbes can put elemental atoms into different compounds. That moves some elements from the soil to microbes that are in the same soil and maybe back to the soil. Some processing would be needed to instead of removing the new compounds from the microbes or the soil.
      .
      Smoke and mirrors.
      Without a specific case that explains the entire cycle, be skeptical.

Thank you for sharing.
Follow us to receive the latest updates.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Send this to a friend