Clinton Emails Reveal Plan To Destroy Syria, Target Iran, Threaten Assad’s Family

7_1_2015_b3-napo-hillary-war8201By Brandon Turbeville

Author’s Note: The quotes for this article were provided by virtue of a Wikileaks release of the trove of emails belonging to Hillary Clinton. While Wikileaks merely provided the “email” text, the quotes are actually from an article written by James P. Rubin for Foreign Policy entitled “The Real Reason To Intervene In Syria.” Thus, the email is not an email at all, but a published article most likely in Clinton’s inbox by virtue of someone having mailed it to her or having signed up for Foreign Policy’s newsletter. While the quotes in this article are not Clinton’s words nor are they an email communication, the article will remain posted due to the fact that the quotes are indeed real and thus, an important statement coming from one of the premier organizations involved in the creation and implementation of U.S. foreign policy planning. Still, Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State undoubtedly represented an implementation of the very strategy described in Rubin’s article. Regardless, the mistake made in this article was entirely accidental and we apologize for any confusion that has taken place as a result. 

The Hillary Clinton emails have recently been released by virtue of Clinton’s use of a private email server, WikiLeaks, and the Freedom of Information Act and they stand as potentially one of the most damning sets of emails ever exposed to the light of day. With 30,322 emails having been written or received by Clinton and the fact that Clinton herself has been so heavily involved in untold amounts of treachery during her tenure as Secretary of State alone, the emails are a veritable treasure trove of both incriminating information for Clinton and vindicating information for those who have been critical of her in the past.

One email alone regarding the Syrian crisis demonstrates the veracity of what many who have been labeled “conspiracy theorists” have claimed for years – namely, that the United States has organized, directed, and supported the destabilization of Syria for its own geopolitical goals as well as those of Israel.[1] It also confirms the methodology and geopolitical goals behind the destabilization as well as cynical and brazen attempts by the Clinton State Department and Obama White House to go so far as to put Assad’s family in danger in order to intimidate him into abandoning his post.

The email reveals how the United States was determined to destroy Syria both for its own geopolitical purposes but also in order to cripple Iran and Hezbollah, both for the United States and Israel’s benefit, with the essential encirclement and weakening of the Iranian position being one of the goals. Whomever authored the text is clearly in favor of a direct U.S. military assault on Syria and all of these objectives, according to the emails, were worth risking a military confrontation with Russia.

For instance, in regards to the question of the possibility of Israel launching a “pre-emptive” attack on Iran, the email, as posted by WikiLeaks, read:

The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad. Negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear program will not solve Israel’s security dilemma. Nor will they stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program — the capability to enrich uranium. At best, the talks between the world’s major powers and Iran that began in Istanbul this April and will continue in Baghdad in May will enable Israel to postpone by a few months a decision whether to launch an attack on Iran that could provoke a major Mideast war.

The email continues by explaining the real reason Israel would like to see the Iranians weakened, albeit still propagating the lie that there was ever any evidence to suggest that the Iranians were actually moving toward a nuclear weapon to begin with. Still, it manages to blow the lid on the biggest open secret in the Middle East – the fact that Israel is indeed armed with nuclear weapons. The email reads,

Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. For Israeli leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader launching an unprovoked Iranian nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of both countries. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly. An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today. If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself. Back to Syria. It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security — not through a direct attack, which in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel has never occurred, but through its proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed and trained by Iran via Syria. The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

Of course, Israel might find itself in a much better situation across the Middle East if it did not consistently provoke its neighbors, threaten warfare, and destabilize the region. It might find its situation more stable if it did not constantly violate the borders of its neighbors. It might find its reputation better if it were not engaged in a systematic attempt to eradicate the people whose land Israeli settlers stole years ago and continue to steal today.

The author is somewhat honest in their presentation of the reasoning behind the attempt to destroy Assad, however, when he/she points to the fact that the destruction of Syria would result in the severance of the Shiite crescent” and the arc of resistance to Anglo-American/Israeli imperialist and geopolitical agendas. The author writes,

Speaking on CNN’s Amanpour show last week, Defense Minister Ehud Barak argued that “the toppling down of Assad will be a major blow to the radical axis, major blow to Iran…. It’s the only kind of outpost of the Iranian influence in the Arab world…and it will weaken dramatically both Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza.” Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted. Right now, it is the combination of Iran’s strategic alliance with Syria and the steady progress in Iran’s nuclear enrichment program that has led Israeli leaders to contemplate a surprise attack — if necessary over the objections of Washington. With Assad gone, and Iran no longer able to threaten Israel through its, proxies, it is possible that the United States and Israel can agree on red lines for when Iran’s program has crossed an unacceptable threshold. In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.

The author then moves on to the question of ensuring that Assad is swayed by the fact that his family is threatened. The author says,

The rebellion in Syria has now lasted more than a year. The opposition is not going away, nor is the regime going to accept a diplomatic solution from the outside. With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.

The author of the email also writes about how to literally turn the Syrian crisis into Libya 2.0. The author states,

The Obama administration has been understandably wary of engaging in an air operation in Syria like the one conducted in Libya for three main reasons. Unlike the Libyan opposition forces, the Syrian rebels are not unified and do not hold territory. The Arab League has not called for outside military intervention as it did in Libya. And the Russians are opposed. Libya was an easier case. But other than the laudable purpose of saving Libyan civilians from likely attacks by Qaddafi’s regime, the Libyan operation had no long-lasting consequences for the region. Syria is harder. But success in Syria would be a transformative event for the Middle East. Not only would another ruthless dictator succumb to mass opposition on the streets, but the region would be changed for the better as Iran would no longer have a foothold in the Middle East from which to threaten Israel and undermine stability in the region. Unlike in Libya, a successful intervention in Syria would require substantial diplomatic and military leadership from the United States. Washington should start by expressing its willingness to work with regional allies like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar to organize, train and arm Syrian rebel forces. The announcement of such a decision would, by itself, likely cause substantial defections from the Syrian military. Then, using territory in Turkey and possibly Jordan, U.S. diplomats and Pentagon officials can start strengthening the opposition. It will take time. But the rebellion is going to go on for a long time, with or without U.S. involvement.

The author then turns her sights upon the potential war with Russia her foreign policy might cause as the email states,

The second step is to develop international support for a coalition air operation. Russia will never support such a mission, so there is no point operating through the UN Security Council. Some argue that U.S. involvement risks a wider war with Russia. But the Kosovo example shows otherwise. In that case, Russia had genuine ethnic and political ties to the Serbs, which don’t exist between Russia and Syria, and even then Russia did little more than complain. Russian officials have already acknowledged they won’t stand in the way if intervention comes. Arming the Syrian rebels and using western air power to ground Syrian helicopters and airplanes is a low-cost high payoff approach. As long as Washington’s political leaders stay firm that no U.S. ground troops will be deployed, as they did in both Kosovo and Libya, the costs to the United States will be limited. Victory may not come quickly or easily, but it will come. And the payoff will be substantial. Iran would be strategically isolated, unable to exert its influence in the Middle East. The resulting regime in Syria will see the United States as a friend, not an enemy. Washington would gain substantial recognition as fighting for the people in the Arab world, not the corrupt regimes. For Israel, the rationale for a bolt from the blue attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities would be eased. And a new Syrian regime might well be open to early action on the frozen peace talks with Israel. Hezbollah in Lebanon would be cut off from its Iranian sponsor since Syria would no longer be a transit point for Iranian training, assistance and missiles. All these strategic benefits and the prospect of saving thousands of civilians from murder at the hands of the Assad regime (10,000 have already been killed in this first year of civil war). With the veil of fear lifted from the Syrian people, they seem determine to fight for their freedom. America can and should help them — and by doing so help Israel and help reduce the risk of a wider war.

Not only is it incredibly frightening to envision a Secretary of State, much less a President, who so indifferent to such a potentially catastrophic consequence of her actions. If the author of the email was indeed Clinton herself, it is quite telling since she clearly asserted that the Russians would simply not respond and would knuckle under when faced with the might of the United States. Regardless, how very wrong the author was.

At worst, the email shows a an individual knowingly working toward the destruction of a secular reformist and sovereign government with the acknowledged result of mass civilian deaths for the benefit of geopolitical interests of both the United States and other nations with little concern for the fact that such military action could very well provoke a third world war scenario with a nuclear power. At best, the author of the email is unmatched in  incompetence since he/she was willing to provoke a war with Russia for their own agenda, believing that Russia would not respond. If the author was Clinton, neither of these portrayals qualify her for anything other than a prolonged stay at a psychiatric hospital or prison. If the author was someone else, then Clinton’s circle of friends and advisers is as every bit eaten up with madness as Clinton herself.


[1] UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794498 Date: 11/30/2015

Image Credit

Brandon Turbeville – article archive here – is the author of seven books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Turbeville has published over 650 articles on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s radio show Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. His website is He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at)

  • Jesus Christ Superstar

    Brandon Turberville, Tony Cartalucci, and Paul Craig Roberts, three fins on the surfboard of journalistic integrity.

  • Archie1954

    Madame Clinton is a dangerous warmonger. Nowhere in her diatribes does she even mention the human cost of constant war in the Middle East. Libya was a complete and ongoing disaster and she wants to repeat that disaster over the whole Middle East. She speaks of not supporting the tyrants in the area yet she supports the worst of the worst being the Saudis, you know the purveyors of extremist, Wahhabist Islamic doctrine that desires constant jihad. She is not a person you would want running a major nation like the US. Such a terrible mistake would create a very real potential for WWIII. The information in this article should become fodder for the election campaign!

    • John Cook

      Yeah, I noted where she said ” the Libyan operation had no long-lasting consequences for the region” completely blanking out/lying about what Qaddafi was doing re the gold Dinar which would have freed African countries from the tyranny of the IMF, and his ‘Underground River’ which was the greatest irrigation project ever implemented and that would have turned Libya into the food basket of Africa.
      They took great care to obliterate it, even destroying the factories that were built to produce the specialized 24ft diameter pipes it used.

      • Richard Arlen

        in reference to the under ground river .the propaganda put forth during the days when ghadafi was being demonized during the 80/90/and early 2000 .the said it was his military that was being transported trucks tanks etc .to conceal his military from bombings .if that were true how come he didn t use it?/and the stupid american morons completely forgot that part.worst possible people on earth americans spoiled rotten and arrogantly stupid!1

      • GStorm

        The Dinar reason was in yet another email.

  • Cypher

    I fear the future for my kids living in this imperialistic nightmare. I welcome advice on where to live off the grid away from this insanity.

    • Brett

      I feel you, friend. I have plans for similar things, however, it will be short lived im afraid. No one will escape these demons. The idea is to destroy your freedom, so dont think for a minute they will want you living in complete harmony ‘off the grid’. They will start making that prospect impossible once everyone else starts doing it. Very perilous times ahead…

  • Fantazine Davol

    This is the kind of diplomatic peacekeeping that I expect from my American Secretary of State. All those Secretaries of State were doing it all wrong before Hillary came along to show them how this office of diplomacy is supposed to be run.

    • OldeSoul

      Hahahaha…. so Hillary is YOUR Secretary of State? Congratulations. She’s all yours.

  • BILLY Bob

    Hillary Clinton is in the pocket of the salivating zionist lizards who control banking and created Israel, also control Great Britain and the United States Imperialist machine. She recently put on a real warmonger show for the AIPAC. She can’t wait to spill blood.

    • Brett

      Yep, spilling blood is a part of their worship. They are not human. How could they be, really?

  • Edgardo L. Perez-De Leon

    It was hard for Russia to intervene in the Serb/Kosovo because the atrocities that occurred previously; as was hard to intervene in Libya given the Gahdaphi’s approach to geopolitics and Russia’s maritime defense. In plain English there was no interest invested for Russia save neither Milesovic nor Ghadaphi. Syria is different, specially after seeing Germany, US, France and the UK salivating with their achievements in the Balkans and North Africa, emboldening Turkey and Saudi Arabia with eyes in Russian Caucasus and oil/gas. Our “future” commander in chief miscalculate the Russians interest and patient and if a nuclear war has to be waged it is better for Putin to be prepared.While is insane what Hillary did as Secretary of State, I do not believe that she belongs to a mental institution. She belongs to prison for crimes against humanity, but if that is not possible, at least for her dam emails. to paraphrase Bernie Sanders. She wants to lead us into the WW III as loyal puppet of the British Empire and Wall Street. Conspiracy to annihilate humanity must be punished.

  • Follow the dots

    Oops a daisy…

    Pluto – Zionists Support for Hillary Clinton

    Hillary Clinton And The Syrian Shoah
    “The best way to help Israel…is to…overthrow Assad.”

    HIllary is just a psychopath employed as a good shabbeth goyim to do the bidding of the Yinon plan. NWO = JWO.

    • Yoch

      Zionist support of Clinton? Surely you jest! Only the radical left that hates Israel supports Clinton.

  • Presto30

    This is a REAL ISSUE… among others…. yet Donald Duck has everybody yelling Immigration Immigration Immigration Immigration……. pure idiocy & the people that are rooting for it.

  • Mark

    She clearly believes she’s doing the right thing. That’s the scariest thing of all.

    She’s got to be stopped.

  • Wulver

    Clinton is fully aware that all military aid to Israel is illegal under the Symington Amendment.

  • Robert

    What a criminal this c*nt is.

  • L Garou

    Pretty sure that’s all top three on the Geneva Convention’s list of No-No’s.
    Premeditated war might even be #1.

  • Typical secretary of state thinking. What did you think they do in their ivory towers?

  • immak

    Trump is saner than clinton. I’m voting for trump if Bernie doesn’t get the nomination.

  • Joe

    Of course, Israel might find itself in a much better situation across the Middle East if it did not consistently provoke its neighbors, threaten warfare, and destabilize the region. It might find its situation more stable if it did not constantly violate the borders of its neighbors. It might find its reputation better if it were not engaged in a systematic attempt to eradicate the people whose land Israeli settlers stole years ago and continue to steal today.

  • enriqueferro

    This isn’t odd as far as Clinton is concerned. She is indeed a dangerous warmonger, and I find it perfectly consistent that she would target Assad’s family. You all remember how hillarious she found the vicious lynching of Gaddafi, but there is more: the fever of extermination of all his family, as NATO’s bombers bombed houses and places where Gaddafi’s relatives were present. Aisha, his daughter, who managed to survive, lost her father, husband, child, siblings… Most of Gaddafi’s sons were tracked down and murdered. Exterminating Gaddafi’s family was sort of an exciting sport, and few managed to escape. And as a result of all that, Libya has remained in ashes and ruins, and is in the hands of thugs. Hillary got her job done!

    • Brett

      Any person votes Clinton in will get what they deserve. The rest of us? Lock and Load!

  • AntiLieGuy

    Iran will be the trigger for WW3 that will destroy America.
    The entire government are evil treasonous criminals. The day of the next false flag using the nuke they stole in 2007 and blamed on Iran, America will be destroyed by Russia, China and the SCO. This is the war of Armageddon and you can know it is now because of Planet X and the toxic chemtrails that hide it every day. Planet X will end the war when it rips the earth apart again but 90% of Americans will be dead already. All planned by your evil government.

  • Yoch

    Clinton supported the fall of Mubarak and the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood. Along with Libya, had she succeeded there as well as giving an open invitation in Syria of Iran and Hezbollah, Israel would be on fire right now. It is insane to suggest that Clinton “did it for Israel” Assad and Mubarak both kept the radical nuts in line. Clinton also bragged about brokering peace with Hamas while they were reigning thousands of rockets down on Israeli citizens. This article suggest that this is something Israel wanted. Far from it. Clinton is a danger not just to Israel, but to the entire world.

    • Jc Plancarte

      It is not the article that suggests that, it is Clinton herself. It is very plainly written in her e-mail. Did she not get an ovation at the AIPAC speech? Anyways, the zionists are making great friends with the wahhabi saudis. They are both training and supplying arms to the terrorists in Syria, Israel is helping the Saudis bomb the Houtis in Yemen, there is even talk that the Panama Papers show evidence that the House of Saud bankrolled Netanahu’s election campaign.

  • Richard Arlen

    don t you just cringe when you see/hear these morons on msm s telling how great hillary would be as president!! their all horrible but she is the worst.

  • danielistical

    Sounds like a middle east problem on the other side of the world to me PEACE has broken out in this country and it can stay that way too WE THE PEOPLE have NO INTEREST in the middle east CORPORATIONS DO,,let them hire their own army to protect THEIR PROPERTY and business interest over there and THEIR KIDS can die there too

    There is no money in peace for the rich all the money gets spent on everyday common people. Wars are a way of gathering up a countries riches in one location (mic) and then be divided by those who create the war while the ones who made the riches are sent off to die in the war

    • Jc Plancarte

      These criminal interests did hire an army, namely the CIA and the hordes of terrorists mercenaries who are destroying Syria. The CIA is too happy to train and arm the terrorists with TOW missiles, after all the Saudis are paying for everything. Hillary is grateful for the $10million she got from the Saudis for selling them $billions in F-16’s and bombs to murder Houti civilians in Yemen. The Saudis, Qataris, and Emirates are hiring mercenaries, form all over, to fight their wars of islamic extremism expansion in Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, Nigeria, Mali, Libya, Syria, Phillipines, etc.. They are even employing ex-soldiers from Colombia, Chile, Honduras, etc..for $2K per month while training plus bonuses for actual fighting in Yemen. They are probably hiring BlackWater and Israeli military for training their hired terrorists.

Thank you for sharing.
Follow us to receive the latest updates.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Send this to friend