“The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another.” — Henry Kissinger, “Henry Kissinger On The Assembly Of A New World Order”
“[P]art of people’s concern is just the sense that around the world the old order isn’t holding and we’re not quite yet to where we need to be in terms of a new order that’s based on a different set of principles, that’s based on a sense of common humanity, that’s based on economies that work for all people.” — Barack Obama
“We reiterate our strong commitment to the United Nations (UN) as the foremost multilateral forum entrusted with bringing about hope, peace, order and sustainable development to the world. The UN enjoys universal membership and is at the center of global governance and multilateralism.” — Fifth BRICS Summit Declaration
“We support the reform and improvement of the international monetary system, with a broad-based international reserve currency system providing stability and certainty. We welcome the discussion about the role of the SDR in the existing international monetary system including the composition of SDR’s basket of currencies. We support the IMF to make its surveillance framework more integrated and even-handed.” — Fifth BRICS Summit Declaration
Here is where many political and economic analysts go terribly wrong in their examination of current global paradigms: They tend to blindly believe the mainstream narrative rather than taking into account conflicting actions and statements by political and financial leaders. Even in the liberty movement, composed of some of the most skeptical and media savvy people on planet Earth, the cancers of assumption and bias often take hold.
Some liberty proponents are more than happy to believe in particular mainstream dynamics. They are happy to believe, for example, that the growing “conflict” between the East and West is legitimate rather than engineered.
You can list off quotation after quotation and policy action after policy action proving that Eastern governments, including China and Russia, work hand in hand with globalist institutions like the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Bank and the U.N. toward the goal of global governance and global economic centralization. But these people simply will not listen. They MUST believe that the U.S. is the crowning villain, and that the East is in heroic opposition. They are so desperate for a taste of hope they are ready to consume the poison of false dichotomies.
The liberty movement is infatuated with the presumption that the U.S. government and the banking elites surrounding it are at the “top” of the new world order pyramid and are “clamoring for survival” as the U.S. economy crumbles under the facade of false government and central banking statistics. How many times have we heard over the past year alone that the Federal Reserve has “backed itself into a corner” or policy directed itself “between a rock and a hard place?”
I have to laugh at the absurdity of such a viewpoint because central bankers and internationalists have always used economic instability as a means to gain political and social advantage. The consolidation of world banking power alone after the Great Depression is a testament to this fact. And even former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has admitted (at least in certain respects) that the Federal Reserve was responsible for that terrible implosion, an implosion that conveniently served the interests of international cartel banks like JPMorgan.
But the Federal Reserve is no more than an appendage of a greater system; it is NOT the brains of the operation.
In his book Tragedy And Hope, Carroll Quigley, Council on Foreign Relations member and mentor to Bill Clinton, stated:
It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.
In “Ruling The World Of Money,” Harper’s Magazine established what Quigley admitted in Tragedy And Hope — that the control of the global economic policy and, by extension, political policy is dominated by a select few elites, namely through the unaccountable institutional framework of the BIS.
The U.S. and the Federal Reserve are mere tentacles of the great vampire squid that is the new world order. And being a tentacle makes one, to a certain extent, expendable, if the trade will result in even greater centralization of power.
The delusion that some people within the liberty movement are under is that the fall of America will result in the fall of the new world order. In reality, the fall of America is a necessary step towards the RISE of the new world order. The Rothschild-owned financial magazine The Economist reaffirmed this trend of economic “harmonization” in its 1988 article “Get Ready For A World Currency By 2018,” which described the creation of a global currency called the “Phoenix” over three decades:
The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate — and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate — would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case.
…The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.
We are now on the cusp of the “prediction” set forth by The Economist over 27 years ago. The BRICS nations, including Vladimir Putin’s Russia, have all consistently called for the formation of a global reserve currency system under the direct control of the IMF and predicated on the basket methodology of the SDR. This new global system, as The Economist suggested, requires the marginalization of existing power structures and the end of sovereign economic control. Governments around the world including the U.S. would be at the fiscal mercy of the new financial high priests through the use of insidious debt based incentives given or withheld at the whim of the IMF.
China is set to be inducted into the SDR basket in 2015, with specific economic changes to be made by September 2016, a development I have been warning about for years. The “vote” is in and the decision has been finalized. While some in the mainstream media are playing off the rise of the Yuan as meaningless, IMF head Christine Lagarde presents the shift as a major event, not for China, but for the IMF and the SDR which she proudly refers to as the “currency of currencies”.
The addition of China to the SDR, I believe, is the next trigger event for the continuing removal of the dollar as the world reserve currency. The monetary shift may explode with speed if Saudi Arabia follows through with a possible plan to depeg from the dollar, effectively ending the petrodollar status the U.S. has enjoyed for decades.
This is, of course, the same IMF-controlled SDR system that Putin and the Kremlin have called for, despite the running fantasy that Putin is somehow an opponent of the globalists.
Everyday Carry Gear – 11 Items You Should Always Have on You (Ad)
Putin continues to press the “U.S. as bumbling villain” narrative, while at the same time supporting globalist institutions and the internationalization of economic and political governance. While many people were overly focused on his “calling out” of the U.S. and its involvement in the creation of ISIS in his recent speech at the U.N., they seemed to have completely overlooked his adoration of the United Nations and the development of a global governing body. Putin often speaks at cross purposes just as Barack Obama does — one minute supporting sovereignty and freedom, the next minute calling for global centralization:
Russia is ready to work together with its partners to develop the UN further on the basis of a broad consensus, but we consider any attempts to undermine the legitimacy of the United Nations as extremely dangerous. They may result in the collapse of the entire architecture of international relations, and then indeed there will be no rules left except for the rule of force.
Dear colleagues, ensuring peace and global and regional stability remains a key task for the international community guided by the United Nations. We believe this means creating an equal and indivisible security environment that would not serve a privileged few, but everyone.
Putin also proclaimed his support for the UN’s fight against “climate change”, the same climate change which Secretary of State John Kerry argued was a “contributing factor” in the crisis in Syria and the rise of ISIS. I have written in the past on the fraud of “man made climate change (global warming)” and will not enter that tangent here now, but the point remains that Putin is fully on board with said fraud like all other puppet politicians around the globe:
…One more issue that shall affect the future of the entire humankind is climate change. It is in our interest to ensure that the coming UN Climate Change Conference that will take place in Paris in December this year should deliver some feasible results. As part of our national contribution, we plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions to 70–75 percent of the 1990 levels by the year 2030.
It is indeed a challenge of global proportions. And I am confident that humanity does have the necessary intellectual capacity to respond to it. We need to join our efforts, primarily engaging countries that possess strong research and development capabilities, and have made significant advances in fundamental research. We propose convening a special forum under the auspices of the UN to comprehensively address issues related to the depletion of natural resources, habitat destruction, and climate change. Russia is willing to co-sponsor such a forum.
Indeed, it has been Putin’s intention all along to support and defend the internationalist framework while at the same time participating in the theatrical East versus West false paradigm:
In the BRICS case we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests.
First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank’s decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this.
The Chinese support the same agenda of an IMF managed economic world:
The world economic crisis shows the “inherent vulnerabilities and systemic risks in the existing international monetary system,” Gov. Zhou Xiaochuan said in an essay released Monday by the bank. He recommended creating a currency made up of a basket of global currencies and controlled by the International Monetary Fund and said it would help “to achieve the objective of safeguarding global economic and financial stability.”
It is rather interesting how the desires of the BRICS seem to directly coincide with the designs of international bankers. This Hegelian dialectic is perhaps the most elaborate public distraction of all time, with the ultimate solution to the artificially engineered problem being a single “multilateral” but centrally dictated world economic system and world government, i.e., the new world order.
Again, the globalists at the BIS and the IMF require a diminished U.S. dollar, greatly reduced U.S. living standards and a much smaller U.S. geopolitical footprint before they can establish and finalize a single publicly accepted global elitist oligarchy.
If you cannot understand why it seems that the Federal Reserve and U.S. government appear hell-bent on self-destruction, then perhaps you should consider the facts and motivations at hand. Then, you’ll realize it is THEIR JOB to destroy America, not save America. When you are finally willing to accept this reality, every disastrous development since the inception of the Fed a century ago, as well as all that is about to happen in the next few years, makes perfect sense.
This is not to say that the ultimate endgame of the new world order will result in victory. But the cold, hard, concrete evidence shows that internationalists do have a plan; they are implementing that plan systematically; and all major governments around the world are participating in that plan. This plan involves the inevitable collapse and reformation of America into a Third World enclave, a goal that is nearly complete, as I will outline in my next article.
As the U.S. destabilizes, we are not escaping the clutches of the Federal Reserve system, only trading out one totalitarian management model for another. It is absolutely vital that the liberty movement in particular finally and fully embrace this reality. If we do not, then there will truly be no obstacle to such a plan’s success and no end to the tyrannies of the old world or the new world.
You can read more from Brandon Smith at his site Alt-Market.com. If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com
In my opinion the opposite will prove to be true. Once the silent citizens allow Sewer Nation to consume itself with corruption/greed/evil the world will have a MUCH better chance at stopping Kissinger’s/the synagogue’s “New World Order”
What one single nation, (still under the control of the “City of London’s” global Central Bank parasites), has oppressed/enslaved/planted Central Banks in virtually every nation on earth? Factor in the +/- 700 combat-ready military bases in +/- 135 nations around the globe, then factor in who the Judas Class in D.C. grovel before and the answer should be obvious. Sadly, long before the self – described “exceptionals” of same Sewer Nation realize they’ve been had, they’ll all be worshipping from the Talmud, speaking Yiddish, farming and emptying bed pans for their brand-new owners.
On the other hand, with the disappearance of their “attack dog” a multitude of the nations held captive by same will rise up and vomit out what was forced upon them by the “land of the mental, home of the dupable”.
I sincerely hope you’re right about people rising up. The rebellion has to come from the bottom up. Even if non western leaders enjoying their elite status begin to resent their role as NWO prostitutes, a top down rejection of the NWO would be nearly impossible due to the stealth methods of economic, social, biological, and environmental devastation in the hands of the apex parasites.
I don’t know.
I’m a man of hope but more over I am a man of reality.
I see no signs of us rising to the challenge of this very detrimental corruption.
Our lack of action, and in many cases complete silence, is seen as consent whether we mean that or not. What is said of a nation of people who do nothing in the face of evil right in front of them?
What more blatant infractions need be incurred to convince us?
Or, is it more of our own denial?
Need we hit absolute bottom before we act appropriately, and if we do act, is it out of necessity of survival, or better should it be from good conscience.
I think the later if we have any courage wisdom and resolve, but once again…
I NEED PROOF.
There should be arrests of known criminals in our highest office but I do not even see charges.
We are supposedly a nation of laws but many are ignored.
IF THE LAWS DO NOT APPLY EQUALLY TO EVERYONE, THEY ARE NO GOOD FOR ANYONE.
Putin will do what is best for Russia. If he can use the globalist West’s own rope to achieve it, he will. It doesn’t mean he is in cahoots with the Globalists. Globalist NATO/State Dept. didn’t wrest control for Ukraine because of dumbocracy, but to eliminate Russia’s Black Sea Fleet in Crimea. Hence the ongoing US/NATO military exercises in Eastern Europe to put pressure on Russia and thereby attempt to keep Russia out of the ME/Persia/N. Africa where US/NATO/State Dept. is attempting by various means to transform it and bring it into the Globalist Integrating Core.
Russia may be lead by Globalist/International events, it does not mean it is part and parcel of the Globalists… but a reaction to it.
How can you be sure? The globalists intend to dismantle all nation states. The conflict in Ukraine could have been a smokescreen to fracture it, the way Iraq is being fractured as long planned. This past June, the Rothschild owned The Economist wrote an analysis about the inevitable fracturing of Russia. This year the WSJ floated the proposition the US would be broken up. A 1940s US govt map shows the US divided into 10 regions. The elites have been working on their project for generations. TPTB supported the Bolsheviks, put Stalin into power, and propped up the Soviets through the 70s. Yelstin is believed to be a CIA project. Top bankster Larry Summers engineered the deep economic capture of Russia in the 90s, Summers also dismantled Glass Steagall. TPTB have become extremely deft at n-dimensional chess and more powerful than they were in the early 20th century.
Agreed, but here is something to ponder to help us not fall into the quagmire of second guessing everything.
A simple quote – “I never saw, or even heard of, anyone who could outsmart the truth”
My take is, the enemy of my enemy is my friend, until he proves by his actions otherwise.
Yes, it could be a plot within a plot, but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, if you get my meaning.
Stay alert and sharp. Time will show them for what they really are, whoever they are.
You make good points, but fighting tyranny with tyranny doesn’t add up to liberty esp. if we are the ones being played. Domestic politics is a fractal of geopolitics, the RINOs and DINOs spar in theatrical bouts but they won’t annihilate each other leaving Libertarians and other independents to live in peace. They operate like a mafia, sometimes battling over turf but always banding together for their own interests. My mind always goes back to how Putin engineered a series of false flag attacks in 1999, apartment bombings pulled off by the FSB (KGB) and caught in the act. Yet these false flags were used to rationalize the bombing of Russia’s Chechens and the passage of anti-extremist laws shredding civil liberties. That kind of duplicity against your own people says something about loyalties. I’m thinking, given the high stakes and the apex elites’ modus operandi, this most definitely is many plots within plots, or, ironically, the Russian dolls metaphor.
The text is not far from truth. However the project is irreversible. All was planned in the Protocols of the Learned elders of zion.
Nonsense.
This is the defeatists mindset.
The only failure is when you give up.
Whatever that is DONE can be UNDONE.
What was written by pike was a plan and only a plan.
It will fail as all others throughout time have. This greed for a few men to rule the world is nothing more than a passing fever.
That’s one of the craziest books I’ve ever read. The level of intelligence need to wrote such a book is not human. How does 1 speak about manipulating the world like that. It’s genius. But evil
Much of what is being said above is true. We are being directed to the IMF as our “savior?” That could be true but I question it as well. The direction of power has always been towards the IMF being the head of a “one world government”. We talk of the U.N. as though it will still exist. It won’t because they will not represent governments that no longer will exist. Countries will be like “counties” or “states” in a worldly structure. The NWO and IMF will be the same organization. The Rothschilds, London and the Vatican will lead the thing. Nothing we see or hear in the mainstream media is true when ic comes to the things to come. Most people are truly ignorant of what is to happen. Even those of us who communicate our beliefs as to what is going to happen may also be off; only because we do not have all the picture at this moment. But things condtinue to move forward with the majority of the people in the world oblivious of what is truly happening. The only thing I can say at this time is to be cognisant of what changes are occuring in your neck of the woods and in the world as well. Whether we realize it, everything going on truly affects us all. Fear is the tool actively being used against us. We need to, as a world, as well as our nation, to prepare for standing up against the oppression that is currently creeping in. The bombers seem to be the ones standing out, but it’s the things that we may not be seeing that are the more deadly to all the world. Keep your eyes and ears open and don’t take the words you hear of pictures you see to be the true issues. Be aware and be dilligent.
The years have made you wise and the parasites know this.
They have broken up the family to keep good counsel from them and make them easier targets.
No longer are there grandparents with a wealth of knowledge to guide them.
Society conditions them to despise the older generations with the purpose of making them ignorant.
Keep planting seeds my friend.
Your knowledge and experience are much needed now more than ever.
For those who are prejudiced against the seniors in our society, know this, you are prejudice of your future selves, for age is just moment in time you are fortunate enough to pass through.
One day, God willing, you will be the senior
We aren’t only facing additional loss of sovereignty and civil rights, we are heading into complete control and monitoring. Hence the rise of the surveillance state, Smart Grid, Smart Cities, drones, tracking, biometric IDs, the plan to eliminate private property, and Elite control over ALL resources, water, energy, food, housing, etc.
I too have noticed that Russia and China seem to be paying homage to international bodies like the UN. My take on that is a little different though from the author’s. It is likely that both Russia and China are wisely exercising the old adage, “choose your battles”. It is quite possible that they are merely paying lip service to the globalists’ hobby horses, like climate change, just to appear to be “with the program”.
They seem to have their eye on the jugular — monetary reform, getting us back to a commodities-based economy, such as a gold and silver standard. That would level the economic playing field for all countries. They have been working towards that aim for at least a few years now.
They need to get as many countries supporting them as possible. Hence, they cannot upset the entire NWO apple cart at once. Therefore acknowledging current international bodies is okay for now.
Choosing one’s battles is very critical, especially in a quagmire such as what planet earth geopolitics has become.
That being said, I am motivated to some extent by a desperation for some glimmer of hope. Without hope, all is lost.
The idea of Russia and China transparent and responsive to their people having generous civil liberties playing “the great game” of adopting economic neoliberalization would be a huge relief. However, it’s the opposite situation with less transparency, no democracy, more surveillance, control, and cronyism than the west. They are headed into the 1984-esque techno Matrix a few to several steps ahead of us. That’s terrifying and depressing. The final Technocratic program is exactly mirrored in China’s newly completed Social Credit Score system of monitoring everyone 24/7 and rating them on who they know, their work, their online surfing and commentary, what they read, what they buy, every freakin’ thing they do. That’s exactly what the Technocrats (spawned from global elite tank tanks in the 1930s) planned out, later formulated into the modern day agenda by Trilateralist Brzezinski. It was Brzezinski in the Carter admin who spearheaded the transformation of China into what it is today, an economic behemoth and model NWO Technocracy. It’s the big beta test. The Chinese are human like we are, that’s why when the western plutocrats brought Mao to power the Chinese were unable to stop their tyrannical overlords from murdering tens of millions in the purges. Humanity needs to a major consciousness shift, we need to evolve.
You’re bringing up an excellent point, that I really cannot argue with.
However, we have to start somewhere. If we can get the global economy gradually back on to a sound money standard, that would be a major step in the right direction. At least, the bankers’ derivatives scams and their infinite wars and infinite government spending could be reined in. From there, perhaps a “major consciousness shift” could gradually take root.
EROI = Energy Returned on Energy Invested. If it takes 1 barrel of oil energy to get 31 barrels of oil out of the ground, you are golden! If it’s 1:11 , or 1:4 for tar sands oil, it becomes precarious. The sweet days of 1:31 oil are gone and the oil that’s left is harder to get and increasingly in hostile territory. When EROI reaches 1:1 all the rest of the oil will stay in the ground. Oil isn’t a non sequitur, it powers everything we have that makes us modern. I laugh at all the alternatives in wind, solar, etc, which all require intense oil inputs in order to function.
That’s very true. I took a deep dive into the peak oil meme abyss ~12 years ago, reading countless books and papers and the prominent establishment gurus would conclude that the “solution” was totalitarian rationing, an exact fit to the NWO endgame. You have to wonder though if the control freak psychopaths really are keeping us from decentralized energy sources that might have a lower ERoEI but are plentiful enough for us to escape their chains. James Corbett is putting together a new podcast that goes over the history of how Big Oil squashed alcohol fuels and there are some tantalizing reads on the net.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_alcohol_fuel
livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe50s/crops_05.html
End the Fed and all zentral banks. Rico act to all bankers that have stolen from humanity for the last hundreds of years. Should the ww3 be fought – it would be a good time to rid the planet of the parasites.
The fall of PRE-1787 America signaled the rise of the New World Order.
There was no New World Order in 17th-century Colonial America whose governments of, by, and for God were established upon Yahweh’s unchanging moral law. The New World Order is impossible under God’s
law-order.
When the late 18th-century founders replaced the 17th-century Colonial governments with their own humanistic government based upon capricious man-made Enlightenment and Masonic concepts, the
New World Order became all-but an inevitability–among a number of other atrocities and abominations:
“…3. Every problem America faces today can be traced back to the fact that the framers failed to expressly establish a government upon Yahweh’s immutable morality as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments. (Would infanticide and sodomy be tolerated, let alone financed by the government, if Yahweh’s perfect law and altogether righteous judgments were the law of the land? Would Islam be a looming threat to our peace and security if the First Amendment had been replaced with the First Commandment? Would Americans be in nearly as much debt if usury had been outlawed as a form of theft? Would crime be
as rampant if “cruel and unusual punishment” had not been outlawed and criminals were instead punished with Yahweh’s altogether righteous judgments? Would we be on the fiscal cliff if we were taxed with a flat
increase tax rather than a graduated income tax?)….”
For more, Google blog article “5 Reasons the Constitution is Our Cutting-Edge Issue.”
Then find out how much you REALLY know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the right-hand sidebar and receive a free copy of a book that EXAMINES the Constitution by the Bible.
Psalm 2Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
Psalm 2
1 Why do the heathen rage,
and the people imagine a vain thing?
2 The kings of the earth set themselves,
and the rulers take counsel together,
against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying,
3 Let us break their bands asunder,
and cast away their cords from us.
4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh:
the Lord shall have them in derision.
5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath,
and vex them in his sore displeasure.
6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me,
Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance,
and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron;
thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings:
be instructed, ye judges of the earth.
11 Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry,
and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little.
Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
This has been planned for centuries. Is that “frog” cooked yet?
I guess one thing that author has missed to put light on is new world order is highly based on the delusion of life events. i.e. it needs a kind of world population that has crave for money and more money, that loves shopping and spending.
The more the busyness and involvement in life means more junk. So as per new world order, there should also be a global religion called “Do what you desire”.
This was a great read and answered a lot of my questions. I only just found out that the Brics Bank was drafted in NYC and Washington and thus fact raised a red flag for me. I always thought that the brick were trying to fight against the Roth child Zionist but now it seems clear to me that they are working with them. I am however still a hit hopeful. I believe that this banking currency system is our only chance if peace. That is only if each nation sits at the table of the Bank/currency and has equal voting rights. If however it is still controlled by the Roth child’s and each nation is a slave to this system as it is now to the Fed then we are in big trouble. I hope Putin is just working to get the best deal he can. I highly doubt that he is with them. But I’m an optimist. God help us
“As the student builds this temple, this wonderful soul, he will learn to live not only in harmony with his own soul, but in harmony with all souls; his discriminating faculty will become keen, clear, penetrating, yet always tempered with the warm atmosphere of his loving heart.”
Matthew 6:24
No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.
2 Timothy 3:
1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.