San Bernardino Shooting Gun Grab Propaganda Focuses on “the man who bought the rifles”

sbgungrabBy Bernie Suarez

With a very pronounced and distinct awakened global community observing both domestic and world events unfold in real-time, we are now able to record amazingly clear observations about all the propaganda and deceptive techniques being used to enslave humanity. We are now being showered with concrete examples of propaganda, lies and deceit in a way that could make some laugh, while making others cringe in more solemn disbelief. Now is the time to tone down your emotions and observe. Take in the knowledge and believe that there is a purpose for all of this. Don’t forget the rules. The clearer the agenda in play, the greater the resistance will be.

Anyone paying attention to the propaganda being put out by Western mainstream media as they continue to squeeze every ounce out of the most recent false flag shooting in San Bernardino to use for their own gun grab agenda, should be in awe at how hard the establishment is trying.


In the most over-the-top state-sponsored gun grab propaganda article yet put out by mainstream media titled “The man who bought the rifles” the New York Times puts out irrelevant details about “Enrique Marquez” in an attempt to accomplish multiple agendas. The main agenda being to tell us how he went about obtaining the rifles supposedly used in the shootings in San Bernardino. The article specifically focuses on the process of actually obtaining the guns as if America should care that the process itself is to blame for the false flag shooting. The propaganda article, which as usual is conveniently written by a team of writers in order to protect the writers, assumes from the start that NOT having a gun would somehow prevent mass shootings. The supposed team of writers which include “Jack Dolan, Zahira Torres and Paloma Esquivel” carefully paint the gun purchasing process itself as the incriminating act which would have prevented the event.

The gun grab propaganda is summarized in one paragraph:

Enrique Marquez Jr. purchased two military-style rifles several years ago that Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik used in the attack that killed 14 people at the Inland Regional Center, according to federal authorities.

Be not fooled. This “purchase” is what the Western cabal’s team of New York Times writers want you to focus on because they need you to give up your guns now so that only government will have guns and all of humanity can be crushed under their tyrannical force.

Anyone still suffering from intellectual autism and focusing on the gun purchasing process is completely asleep in the matrix of lies. This is propaganda from the same government that has been caught arming proxy armies, terrorists and drug lords. Gun control is an agenda against freedom and nothing else.

The propaganda article inserts several important subtle messages that everyone should note:

“A 24-year-old Wal-Mart security guard, known to friends as a shy cycling enthusiast who wanted to join the military, has emerged as a key figure in last week’s terror attack at a San Bernardino social services center.”

“Marquez, who had attended prayers at an Islamic center in recent years, lived next door to Farook on Tomlinson Avenue in Riverside for many years.”

“Marquez attended prayers at the Islamic Society of Corona-Norco four or five years ago.”

“We’re trying to figure out how he got converted. Who converted him?” he asked. “Because obviously he’s Hispanic and converted Muslim…”

“He has a really nice smile, he’s really welcoming,” she said

Conclusion? People with really nice smiles who pray and happen to be Muslim or Hispanic and like to work out and contemplate joining the Military could be dangerous terrorist supporters. Therefore, they should not be allowed to buy guns.

The Covert Guide to Concealed Carry (Ad)

It should be noted that not only is the article source hidden behind many layers such as multiple writers and “federal officials” speaking on condition of “anonymity because the probe is ongoing,” but most of details are given by one woman, Vivian Ramirez, a “friend of Marquez’s and fellow student at Riverside Community College” who bonded because they both wanted to join the military. Interestingly Ramirez’s exclusive views are presented as the final word in what was happening in Marquez’s life. A notion that could very easily be false.

Ultimately it doesn’t matter much. Ramirez’s account could be accurate or not. The real trick here is it gives authenticity to the topic. The comments she makes about Marquez actually just serve to fill in the article with aimless details. In the end, the goal of propaganda is to engage your mind mostly in the headline.

Interestingly the very end of the article offers an almost conflicting view of Marquez:

Despite Marquez’s links to the terror suspects, Ramirez said she doubts he would have done anything to help Farook and Malik if he knew what they had intended to do with the weapons.

Ramirez is hosting a Christmas party this weekend and said she would still gladly welcome Marquez into her home.

“He’s never done anything mean. A lot of newspapers call me and want me to talk bad about him,” she said. “He is a really good person.”

This conclusion should remind us that when it comes to propaganda, it’s about the headline. Anyone falling for this gun grab propaganda would tune out the fact that we’re talking about what sounds like an otherwise average nice guy who has likely done no wrong. Once again, the lure of the propaganda message here is first that nice guys can be secret terrorist supporters and that terrorist supporters can be disguised as nice guys. Second, it also sells the idea that since unassuming nice guys could be terrorist supporters they should all be banned from buying guns. Finally, we’re being sold on the ongoing idea that somehow banning guns or making it difficult to get a gun or rifle will somehow decrease mass shootings.

All of this is modern times super propaganda being pushed by the ruling elite who are attempting to destroy America, disarm Americans and establish their global government. Anyone still blind to this clear agenda is a danger to themselves, to freedom and to America as a whole, even if they mean well.

The irony of all the latest and usual Western media gun control propaganda is that the truth is exactly opposite of the propaganda being sold here. The only way to secure the prospect of a free state is if the people are armed … and the bigger the weapons the better. Even if that means dealing with a mass shooting every single day of the year. Of course statistics prove that where people are armed there are no shootings whatsoever and if all Americans were armed that would almost certainly end all mass shootings.

The time is now to realize that the police state is a fraud. They never have kept America safe and they never will. Resist the gun control tyrannical agenda based on ongoing false flag crisis actor shootings and annoying political rhetoric against guns that always follows these events. Remind yourself that as a species we are of far superior intellect than the monkeys who write these articles and the politicians who artificially push for gun control as if tyranny is preferable to freedom and as if disarming the public will solve our problems.

If you agree please share this message with others.

Bernie is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations.


Activist Post Daily Newsletter

Subscription is FREE and CONFIDENTIAL
Free Report: How To Survive The Job Automation Apocalypse with subscription

7 Comments on "San Bernardino Shooting Gun Grab Propaganda Focuses on “the man who bought the rifles”"

  1. Great article, as usual, Mr. Suarez. Keep punching- THEY are starting to feel it.

  2. This is such a wonderfully written piece that I now feel compelled to go out and purchase a hat in order to be able to tip my hat to this writer.

  3. “The propaganda article, which as usual is conveniently written by a team of writers in order to protect the writers, assumes from the start that NOT having a gun would somehow prevent mass shootings.” Thanks for that one, Bernie.

    Serious though the topic is, I had to laugh. Perhaps these writers think that giving up their cars would help reduce hit-and-run driver incidents. And lest anyone bring up the tired old saw that this is an unfair argument because “a gun is designed for only ONE purpose,” I might counter that actually I can think of FIVE, that don’t involve shooting innocent people. Four of these apply to motor vehicles as well.

    And, however many false flags and hoax shootings they may broadcast, I doubt that Jack Dolan, Zahira Torres, and Paloma Esquivel could argue that there are more shooting victims in any given week than there are hit-and-run incidents. The LAPD reported 2,500 hit-and-runs in the year 2012, alone.

    Shooting innocent people is a crime, smashing into them with a motor vehicle and driving away is a crime. One difference between these two crimes is that a legally armed and trained citizen actually has a chance to prevent the former. Another difference is that in most major crime-ridden cities, it’s a lot easier to obtain a car than it is a gun.

    • Government is attempting to make all these fake shooting events about the dangers of people having guns. Our Second Amendment wasn’t created for hunting or self defense, it has to do with the population having the ability to take back control of the government by force. It’s no secret our government is angling to disarm us.

      Some worthless government agency is deleting my comments daily. Our rogue self serving government knows that you can’t win a war playing defense. So ask yourself this;

      1.Has the government declared war on us?
      2.Has the government taken an overly aggressive posture against the public?
      3.How much longer is the American pubic going to sit around and play defense when everything our ancestors fought and died for is being stripped from us by unaccountable lawless control freaks on an agenda to enslave us all?

  4. scream and holler jump up and down – hold yer gold collar scum breath until…
    the more fake shootings the more firearms are bought – works for me.

  5. I was hoping the article would include the link to the rifles having been purchased for a police department as revealed on video by Republican presidential candidate, Carly Fiorina.

  6. Geez, I’m a criminal.

    I own several!

    What is the MATTER with me? Clearly I’m a sick damn person! Send someone out to GET me! I have guns and power saws! I have an axe, dammit! And a four wheel drive vehicle! You can’t imagine the terrorist damage I can do! Get right on the phone!

Leave a comment