Red Blood Cells and Smart Meters

smart_meter_bloodBy Catherine J. Frompovich

For those who wonder if there are any health issues or problems from exposure to Smart Meters and the electromagnetic frequencies they emit, here is a short video which shows three samples of blood examined using a Darkfield Microscope.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=y4JDEspdx58#t=5


The video is self-explanatory, as the samples clearly show morphological responses or reactions. That kind of constant exposure with apparent human cellular morphological reactions—as will happen when a Smart Meter is placed on a dwelling—undoubtedly occurs, as EMFs/RFs are emitted 24/7/365. Consequently, it will be only a matter of time, depending upon each individual’s electromagnetic sensitivities threshold, before adverse health consequences materialize.

Below is a chart created by EMF researcher Ronald M. Powell, PhD, which is self-explanatory? [3]

exposure chartThe above graphic shows that 67 peer-reviewed, repeated studies show significant health issues (e.g. cancer, tumors, infertility) at levels far below the government safety standards (gray line). The yellow line is what the standards should be if public safety is considered. Source

In another paper, “Electronicmagnetic Field Interactions With the Human Body: Observed Effects and Theories,” (NASA, April 1981) presented to the Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, on page 23, we find this:

Adverse, Benign, and Curious Effects

The effects listed and/or discussed in this section relate to at least three of the five senses (touch, hearing, and sight) and nearly every system of the human body (including circulatory, digestive, nervous, and muscular). Many of them are temporary; however, some result in death and persistent disease. Some are better understood and more widely accepted than others. [1] [CJF emphasis added]

In 1981, NASA knew of numerous health problems, which are now classified as “Non-Thermal Health Effects,” which were cited on page 30 of that report:

  • Headaches
  • Eyestrain
  • Fatigue
  • Dizziness
  • Disturbed sleep at night
  • Sleepiness in daytime
  • Moodiness
  • Irritability
  • Unsociability
  • Hypochondriac reactions
  • Feelings of fear
  • Nervous tension
  • Mental depression
  • Memory impairment
  • Pulling sensation in the scalp and brow
  • Loss of hair
  • Pain in muscles and heart region
  • Breathing difficulties
  • Increased perspiration of extremities
  • Difficulty with sex life

And, on page 59 of that same report, this most enlightening comment appears:

Physical and Physiological Foundations

A great variety of theories have been developed to help understand the effects described in the preceding sections. In this section, the theories are presented roughly in order of how homogeneous the human body is assumed to be. At one extreme, it may be regarded as a simple shape (e.g. a prolate spheroid) with a single set of electromagnetic constants (permittivity, permeability, and conductivity). In that sense, the body is a simple antenna or probe capable of intercepting a certain amount of electromagnetic energy, which is converted entirely into heat. At the other extreme, the body may be regarded as a collection of countless electronic microcircuits, each one corresponding to an individual cell or part thereof. Electromagnetic energy somehow finds its way to individual microcircuits and influences the electronic functions there. These functions include various communication and control processes essential to life and its activities. [CJF emphasis added]

That the human body is “a collection of countless electronic microcircuits” seemingly is disregarded totally by those who should know better or catalog medical-science information, e.g., Public health agencies, states Public Utility Commissions and the various public utilities the PUCs regulate, whose mission statements often include “to provide safe services.” What’s “safe” about making people exposed to EMFs/RFs that cause health problems? Utilities are forcing EMF/RF-producing Smart Meters on to consumers’ and customers’ residences with total disregard, plus dis-abandon even for those who come under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

For bureaucrats at states’ public utility agencies and electric, natural gas, and water utility companies’ corporate executives and legal departments, here’s a quick primer on the human body being an electromagnetic entity, whose ‘wires’ get crossed when impacted by microwave EMFs and RFs.

Smart Meters pulsed-microwave-energies, which are sent into a home over its electrical wiring system, create what’s called “dirty electricity”, i.e., much higher Hz than the house electrical wiring is designed to handle. Here, though, is some information pertinent to pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs):

PEMF stands for Pulsed ElectroMagnetic Fields, which are widely used these days to improve circulation and cell metabolism. The body can become accustomed to nonmoving (or static) magnetic fields, which are generally unable to deeply penetrate the body. A pulsed electromagnetic field, however, is quite dynamic, is able to penetrate all the way through the body, and creates a cascade of effects within the body. [2] [CJF emphasis added]

And, consider this, which is the all-important differential:

It is important to distinguish between the electromagnetic fields we use for [medical] therapeutic purposes, and other man-made electromagnetic fields from power lines, microwave ovens, cell phones, etc., which can cause damage to our bodies. [2] [CJF emphasis added]

Note that Smart Meters operate using microwave technology, the same high tech of cell phones and cell towers to transmit and receive information from utility companies 24/7/365 which produce very high EMF pulses every 15 seconds—per a meter test I personally observed—of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year. You can turn off a cell phone, but you can’t turn off your electric, natural gas or water Smart Meter.

Lastly, here’s a tell-tale graphic of how microwave (cell phone/tower, Wi-Fi, and Smart Meters) EMFs affect children’s brains:

brain imagesChildren’s brains absorb much higher amounts of microwave radiation than adults because of their thinner skulls. Their nervous systems are also easily damaged by EMF because they do not yet have the protection afforded by nerve cell myelination. [3]

References:

[1] http://www.emfanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NAS-report-on-EMF-effects-on-human-body.pdf
[2] http://drpawluk.com/education/new-to-magnetic-fields/
[3] http://www.emfanalysis.com/research/

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

  • abinico

    Supplementation with vitamins/minerals is important – not with whey – 50% of people have allergic sensitivity to whey.

    • gozounlimited

      Allergic sensitivity to whey protein would suggest one has acquired leaky gut syndrome. Whey Protein Isolate…… Bovine Colostrum…… are both beneficial for reversal of LG syndrome. Sensitivity may also be a reaction to low quality whey protein (that is not an isolate). If looking for development of red blood cells…. Whey Protein Isolate does the job.

      • abinico

        Yeah, one acquires LGS because of consumption of dairy like whey. Dairy product sensitivity is the number one cause of food related reactions. Milk is great food, for a baby cow that is – for humans, well not so great.

        • gozounlimited

          Whey Protein Isolate contains NO dairy but is chalk full of glutamine the protein that heals LG syndrome. Whey …. manufactured post cheese ……is trash.

          Causes of Leaky gut……

          food allergies

          excessive amounts of aspirin or ibuprofen

          certain antibiotics

          excessive drinking

          compromised immune systems

  • abinico

    A flippant conclusion could be that as our exposure to EMF has increased over the last 100 years so has human lifespan. The reality is that EMF really poses no health issues – if you need a cause to pursue then how about GMOs – GMOs pose a really threat to not only health but the entire viability of our planet.

    • Mary

      Really? May I ask what scientific evidence you have that proves that EMF poses no risk to health? I would be very interested to see the basis for this statement that refutes what 1000s of studies going back for decades show. Have you looked at the NASA report that is referenced in this article? Does the fact the GMOs are a threat negate the fact that EMFs are too? I don’t think so.

      • abinico

        Are you a shill for Monsanto – I mean Monsanto would love it if everybody thought EMF was more dangerous than GMOs.

    • GMO’s poses no risk to humans or the environment! The opposite is the fact, GMO’s is a great benefit to us all in the coming decades as the temperature on earth decreases ..

      • Lucia

        When i read your comment i thought this person either is interested in this topic but very naieve or is paid to comment such nonsense. I’ll go for the latter and tell you why if you really had an interest in the topic and believed in ” Holy Me ” this is what mon santo means, ironically, then you would have known that the same people who progagate the GMO as the solution are also pushing the global warming principle . In your comment you are talking about a temperature decrease or don’t you know that a decrease means a global cooling , they should instruct you guys better in this way you’re only making a fool of yourselves.

        • Global cooling, that is right. GMO is good and healthy food 🙂

          More information? See my other comments in this section.

  • Lucia

    First of all this is not a contest of the most dangerous item on the planet in 2015 but let me attempt to inform you. The WHO has changed it’s ruling on all wireless products, producing EMF’s, from harmless to possibly carcinogenic and there is an appeal of 100 scientists from all over the world to classify it as being carcinogenic. Furthermore the Lloyds of London, the greatest insurance company in the world, has taken the longterm risks of wireless equipment out of their insurance policies , tree’s are dying from exposure to EMF’s , animals are also effected, it’s now been proven by research that those people who are EHS are not making it up, it exists so do not think it’s harmless, there is quite some research from universities on the internet on this subject, especially in Europe. Also take into consideration that there is a cumalative force at work here too , if you live in an appartment you are bombarded with all your neighbours equipment.
    We are talking real life here, when they do the tests it’s only with one EMF source, they don’t zoom in on the cumalative factor.They know it exists but hey there is a lot of money involved, so why bother. They don’t want too much of us around anyway. While they have a common goal and are organized, we are fighting against ourselves about which is worse GMO’s or EMF’s they can both f… kill you, so start bounding and stop the silly fighting over small stuff. While we are fighting over whose marble is more beautifull , they are actively spraying the air we breathe , poisoning the water we drink and the food we eat, poisoning us by the med’s we take .Get out of this stupid lethargy right now!!!!!

  • Lucia

    I do agree with you that we are being poisoned from different directions and sources .They are all wrong and more or less depending on exposure they can be deadly. If you would live on a farm in the middle of nowhere, your greatest concern would not be EMF’s but might be mandatory vaccinations and i get that but living in an overpopulated city in an appartment, i think your biggest risk is EMF’s so it all depends on circumstances and your point of view on the matter….. nothing is absolute only death. Meanwhile now that we have established that we are in various ways lab-rats, we could try to find a way out or quarrel about who is treated worst and is “Miss Lab -rat “, I would go for the first option.

  • NASA can’t be trusted, ref. man made global warming scam, as we know they are contributing to, with made up, adjusted and fraudulent data and graphs. This article is therefore worthless and probably just as fraudulent.

    • CB

      Roald, please supply a source of information you think isn’t fraudulent.

      Please exclude from any list the blog that you wrote.

      • Let’s do it in a bit different way, let us pretend people actually can think for them self. When it comes to the global warming scam, as in; Man made global warming, or man made climate change, we can use different methods to falsify the hypothesis. First, when did you last see a “green” company skyrocketing in the stock market?

        Bet you haven’t .. Why is that? Don’t professional investors like to make money? Don’t they have resources to investigate the potentials? Are they low on cash so they are not able to get the best advice, best people, best knowledge about the “green” potentials?

        Do they all lack money for such advice?

        Another way to falsify the AGW hypothesis is by looking at historic facts. You do not have to understand science at all to end the dishonest scare, just look at the news. Example, we know (the dishonest alarmists and activists have been telling us for years) a warmer world will cause more hurricanes, tropical cyclones etc. One of the more known pathways for those storms are from west of Africa and over to Carribean and the south states of the US and the Mexican gulf. What has happen? The storm activity are at record low, not a category 3 or higher hitting the US in 10 years, we need to go back to the Civil War for anything like it, – why?

        And a third method is to look at what the UN has been doing. COP21 just finished in Paris. What actually came out of the “agreement” was worthless, basically just a shopping list, or a Christmas wish-list .. Why?

        Wasn’t there suppose to be a huge problem to solve?

        Lastly, at least in this post, if there really was a problem with the climate, there would never have been any such “meeting” in Paris this year at all, – simply because the world would have come together years ago, made massive agreements, built huge amounts of nuclear power plants, instead of 1000’s of coal power plants, as we see are being built all over the world today, and really made huge sacrifices in order to solve the problem.

        Why don’t we see any of that?

        Do you want to say it with me? .. because ..

        It’s all about the money!!

        • CB

          …or I could just scan your post for a reference, notice you haven’t provided one and dismiss you as a paranoid-delusional conspiracy theorist…

          Why is that the path you’ve chosen for yourself in life?

          • To ask for you to point out any mistakes in my post will be pointless, by now you, i am sure, have come to realize you didn’t manage to find any errors. Logic (and science) is, and will always be, hard for activists. Must be frustrating to be beaten with facts, logic and science by me so many times 🙂

            That’s the reason for your desperate, shallow name calling and patronizing tone .. I take it as confirmation that the message hit home.

            What is your motive for acting like a dishonest activist? Why hide behind a picture of a girl? Don’t you “believe” in what you are preaching?

            And what’s with the desperation, even the notorious dishonest Greenpeace / WWF aka IPCC have proven there’s nothing to worry about in their “agreement” in Paris (COP21) only a few days ago.

Thank you for sharing.
Follow us to receive the latest updates.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Send this to friend