By Aaron and Melissa Dykes
Compulsory abortion. Under-the-skin birth control implants. Government authorized reproduction. A Planetary Regime to regulate the population and ration food and resources. A sterilant added to water supplies or food staples. The expansion of mandatory family planning and government enforced population restrictions.
All of this and more is discussed frankly in the 1977 textbook, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, written jointly by John P. Holdren, Paul Ehrlich and his wife Anne Ehrlich (the follow up to the Erlichs’ 1970 text Population, Resources, Environment: Issues In Human Ecology, which essentially has a lot of the exact same passages…).
For years, overpopulation alarmists have dreamed of a day when the population would be forcibly controlled in a widespread manner.
Now it would seem they are passively getting their wish.
Is it a happy accident, or a clever second-hand scheme?
As Natural News recently reported, a new U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) study published in the journal Scientific Reports has shown that birth control hormones taken by women in this country are being flushed down the toilets and making their way into waterways and winding up in our drinking water. Fish exposed to these hormones are now struggling to reproduce, and are negatively impacted for three generations out the study has shown.
We’re talking about things like a 30% reduction in fertilization rates and offspring struggling just to survive. A 20% reduction by the third generation. These effects are not short term.
And if it is doing that to fish, imagine what it is doing to the population who drinks, cooks, and bathes in tap water replete with the stuff on a daily basis.
No one has studied the bioaccumulative effect this situation has had on the human population here; and since population control seems to be a government national security effort, we aren’t holding our breath on one any time soon.
Considering that fertility clinics have popped up everywhere in the last decade to become a booming business, we can pretty much guess. It’s a $2 billion industry in the U.S. each year, and business is booming.
According to The Guttmacher Institute, a Planned Parenthood ally, more than 9.7 women in the U.S. take birth control pills on a monthly basis — over 16% of the female population aged 15-44. That’s a lot of hormones being dumped in municipal water supplies every day. Traditional filtering methods employed at most water treatment plants don’t remove pharmaceuticals including these hormones. Synthetic hormone 17a-ethinylestradiol, or EE2, is the common birth control pill additive that people are consuming in tap water supplies daily without even realizing it. Traditional drip water filters will not get this drug out, either.
It’s safe to say a large portion of the population — men, women and children alike — is essentially drinking a sterilant on a daily basis, and that’s before even getting to the potential widespread feminization of men. (On a side note, were you aware there was a plot during World War II to feminize Hitler by adding estrogen to his water?)
“Fertility control agents in water supply” was exactly what was listed in the horrifying leaked memo written to Bernard Berelson, president of the Rockefeller-founded Population Council, by Frederick S. Jaffe, vice president of Planned Parenthood – World Population, found in “Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S.” dated 3/11/69 under the heading “Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce U.S. Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact”. So were things like “encourage increased homosexuality” and “alter image of ideal family size” (overpopulation propaganda, anyone?) alongside forced abortions for out-of-wedlock pregnancy and “Compulsory sterilization of all who have two children except for a few who would be allowed three”.
Measures that would be impossible to do through government policy due to public outrage is happening on a population-wide scale as a de facto side effect of our drugged society.
While it may not technically be forced mass drugging, the leached chemicals are difficult if not impossible to avoid — particularly for average Americans, who have been told to drink 8 glasses of water per day. Kind of eerie, particularly when you consider how giddy it must make those who have quietly advocated these measures for decades.
Instead of being able to forcibly add sterilants in the water, people like the Rockefellers through their foundation have spent millions developing birth control pills and pushing them on women across the country and around the world for decades now through family planning programs. The byproduct? Sterilants in the water.
(And a society with no future…)
They finally did it.
Aaron and Melissa created TruthstreamMedia.com, where this article first appeared, as an outlet to examine reality and the news, place it in a broader context, uncover the deceptions, pierce through the fabric of illusions, grasp the underlying factors, know the real enemy, unshackle from the system, and begin to imagine the path towards taking back our lives, one step at a time, so that one day we might truly be free…
So now it is contraceptives in tap water, not Roundup/glyphosate in food, water and air cutting down US fertility by 30%?
Both. And more.
I was going to make a joke saying Monsanto is off the hook b/c now we believe our fertility is down b/c of contraceptives. But you are right, it is both. I am following a TV series on History channel, Aliens. In one episode they said ET’s harvest our DNA b/c they can’t reproduce. Soon we won’t either. Roundup is everywhere. Except of Russia, they banned it. So I guess Earth will be populated by Russians only, in the future. *L*
Government, controlled by the banksters, is about to fail. It is parasitic by nature. Good riddance to it.
Water distillation units are cheaply available; 4.5 litres per session.
This will remove pretty much everything from the water you drink.
they are not very effective against many chemicals without carbon filtering. Make sure the carbon filter is replaced.
Carbon filters don’t do much at all except change the taste. They don’t remove such chemicals as sodium fluoride; the particles are too small. Distillation and reverse osmosis, however, do.
the taste changes because the filters remove chemicals. Distillation removes structuring of the water. Only structured water enters your cells. Youcan be bloated while still being cellularly dehydrated. Look into the research of Dr. Gerald Pollock. Carbon filters are not effective by themselves, you misread my post. reverse osmosis filters come with particulate filters and carbon filters in front of the reverse osmosis module.
Only structured water enters your cells? I’ve been drinking non-filtered distilled water for decades and it seems to hydrate me pretty well, nor am I bloated. No different from rain water. Distillation is very effective without filters. It becomes extremely pure after the boiled water vapor is cooled down in the baffling system to become water again. Adding a filter to the water before it gets to the distiller will make it a bit easier to clean the scale build up in the distiller which will be a little less, but the distillation is what purifies the water, not the charcoal filters. If it’s a choice between a strict distillation system and a strict filtering system, I’ll take the distiller every single time, and you can have the filters. ‘Nuff said.
Yes, only structured water enters your cells. Try drinking it and see how much water you eliminate compared to unstructured water. Far lesswater enters your cells if it is not unstructured when you drink it, as the body has to structure it, in order for it to enter the cells. Try drinking distilled water on a fast, and try drinking structured water on a fast to see the difference. You have misunderstood my comments about the filters.
Female hormones were known to turn male cod into female cod back in the seventies.Can anyone work out why the increase in homosexuals has increased since the 60’s?Before anyone starts I don’t care whether anyone is straight or gay ,just do your own thing IN PRIVATE .
It’s more the propaganda that the media serves than the chemicals, which were not all over.
I must throw this out there. We will have to use our brains at some point and figure out a plan to control our own population in order not to see a “bust”… overpopulation leading to lack of resources, and a major die-off that won’t be pretty. Our planet is only so big, the sun only gives us so much energy for plants to harness. Just like any mammilian population, without natural predators or other factors keeping our pop in check, we will hit a brick wall at the peak of this multi-millenial “boom” and enter the “bust” phase. Face it. Any ideas, o well informed ones?
Population isn’t the problem,overcrowding and the wasteful huge corporations are the problem. You could fit the entire world population in the borders of Texas. Corporations love the overcrowding, as it lowers the cost of labor through oversupply, and increases dependency. Corporations also waste huge resources, especially water, and they produce the non nutritious foodstuffs that plague the human race.
With planning and minimal effort, the U.S. state of Texas is large enough to hold and support the entire current world’s population.
We have the know how.
Alaska is even larger and then there would be no issue of too much heat and more of an opportunity for geo-thermal energy production.
I’m not suggesting that we move all people to one area but just saying that over-population is a long long way away.
It would be nice to now start better planning to improve sanitation, have better food available, and allow opportunities to all.
Just reduce overcrowding, and outlaw corporations.
Overcrowding is a choice, it is not inevitable.
The lack of water is a choice, it is not inevitable.
The lack of healthy food is a choice, it is not inevitable.
In the U.S.A. and other parts of the world, there are miles and miles of miles and miles. That is to say we have open land.
The overpopulation scare is just another scare to try to control us.
The disease scare is just another way to sale non-therapeutic vaccines.
The false flag attacks like the Reichstag fire and 9/11 are another way to sell government control.
Some people seem to not like choice, so they defer to government.
My own preference is for a maximum global human population of 5 billions. But my family uses filtered weate (29 times for purity).
This planet can easily support 30 Billion people, in luxury for all, with incredibly vast expanses of beautiful natural forest teeming with exotic wild life.
Just drop this idiotic, infantile, useless expenditures on aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines,
thousands of squadrons of mindless, single seat, fuel guzzling military flying junk and the psychotic politicians who perpetuate this idiocy.
It is not the quantity of the population that is the problem. It is the quality of the freaks who claw themselves into political control.
Mr Stevens, thank you for your prompt and insightful comment. Notwithstanding, I would still prefer a global maximum of 5 billions of people — I honestly don’t see the need for more than that.
As a former member of the US military (not career, though), I am reminded of the saying, “rich man’s war, poor man’s fight”; I think that the US is being pushed into a war it can’t win, so that the well-off can enrich themselves. I live in the Philippines, not the United States, so I don’t expect to be affected (unless the Chinese are stupid enough to invade the Philippines). I expect the American economy to continue to deteriorate at an acceleating pace, as private-sector Gross Domestic Product declines in absolute terms, and the national debt continues to increase.
You can contact me directly any time at “caballafamily[at]yahoo.com”.
Mr Laibow, I cannot see how any person, group, institution, government
or psycho-freak banker cabal with their CFR and Brookings Institute type venom disseminating satellites can even begin to own themselves the right to decide on limits of the global population.
What is required is that all available resources are directed to preparing the environment for life to exalt. Every pregnancy is a person with a right to exist in luxury and freedom where behavioral control is a personal obligation to the other kind people around the individual.
All sentient humans must have time and resources available to bring a sound moral understanding to all the people around them.
The contemptuous wasting of trillions of dollars every year is a roaring indictment on this grotesque political dominant, their mindless bureaucrats
who maintain inane systems and the catatonic masses who are so easily duped into offering their lives and their children’s lives for some other greed mongrel’s monopoly wars.
I maintain, there is no need to limit the population. The space and resources are virtually infinite. The question is how do we crash this aberrant political super structure?
Mr. Stevens, thank you for your kind and insightful remarks, which accurately describe human nature. In his 1934 work of fiction, “The Shape of Things To Come”, the late Mr. H. G. Wells described an optimum human global population at 2.5 billions; I feel he underestimated the capacity of the globe’s resources, and I think that 5.0 billions is more realistic.
Just as I’d really like one of my works of fiction to be greenlighted for a major project by Universal Studios (my favorite motion picture studio (the current Comcast ownership notwithstanding), that doesn’t mean it’s going to happen in my lifetime or yours. In the same sense, yes, I’d like to see a maximum global population of 5.0 billions; that’s not likely to happen.
I see an ongoing decline in the global economy through the middle of the current century, with a transfer of wealth to SE Asia (I live in the Philippines) froim North America and Western Europe. The continuing decline of US gross domestic product in absolute numbers and in relation to an increasing national debt will mean an ongoing upward redistribution of wealth (you might care to read President Obama’s Executive Order 13603 of March 16, 2012 if you are not already familiar with it), and the probable dissolution of the present federal union. After mid-century, there will probably be a return to a relative prosperity here in Asia, but a continued worsening in North America and Western Europe. Just because we don’t like these things, doesn’t mean we want to see them happen, or that they are preventable..
I think that, a century or less from now, the two major superpowers will be a Chinese Hegemony (including Russia, India, North and South America), and Shiite Islam, which will include Sunni Islam and Western Europe.
The recommendation I make to my American and European internet correspondents is that if they don’t like what they see around them, they should relocate to a country they’ll like better, preferably in SE Asia.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my views. Please feel free to contact me directly at anytime, at “caballafamily[at]yahoo.com”.
Mr Laibow, thank you for sharing your interesting perspective and I will refrain from adamantly defending my population projection except to say that I firmly believe that the Universe is infinite in all respects and we do not need to constrain healthy growth and, as a means of expressing our gratitude, we could at least assist and facilitate consciousness to increase and enlighten. Culture is the most important aspect. For instance, a culture of
torturing animals by trapping, the contemporary culture of industrial live
stock production or the culture of target shooting at animals. These are
certainly not conducive to benevolent reciprocation from Nature. “Nature” in
all its connotations.
I am familiar with 13603 and in my opinion it as a definitive determinate increment in the Bolshevik style take over that America is imminently facing. I see this deliberate extinguishing of wealth in North America and Western Europe and the transfer of the economic dynamo towards SE Asia and I’m not too sure that we will have to wait another three decades ( to mid century) to see USA collapsing under the apathetic indifference of its populace.
I am very concerned that this psychotic “banker cabal” is planning to soon initiate their crowning global conflagration.
In my view there is only one political “super power” on this planet and everything else is diversion, confusion and entertainment.
This super power was unequivocally established between 1910 and 1920 with the destruction of Germany, the complete subjugation of Russia with transfer of its wealth and the establishment of the USA Federal Reserve.
The final blow to independence and sovereignty culminated with the utter annihilation of Germany, Italy and Japan in the 40s.
The “cold war” between Nato and Soviets was only a mechanism to beguile the masses and more importantly to indelibly establish the global military
industrial complex.
All of it premeditated and by design.
What I’m saying, in my opinion, is that China is also controlled and it will gain dominant “super power” status only if the principal dominant decides to make China its lair. Any vestige of sovereignty of Islamic states is being neutralised in this decade.
All those countries who think they are “republics” are definitely not. They are all subjects of the dominant.
To me it appears that there is a gradual take over around the entire globe and I suspect there might be a complete clamp down on the entire human race in the not to distant future. Who or what the principle agency is to engineer this is above me.
I certainly will contact you soon but I am posting this as a reply as a continuation of the thread purely for interest sake.
Mr. Stevens, thank you for your kind and thoughtful response. It’s nice to learn that someone else is familiar with EO 13603, and sees its implications in the same light that I do. I think an important difference is that as an American living abroad (in SE Asia), my wealth ahd person are beyond its reach (if Ayn Rand were to land at Manila Airport today, she’d be denied entry as a Bolshevik redistributionist; my wife and I are on the fringes of a politcally powerful family, and I’ve gotten to know some politically powerful people; what passes for a “iberal left” in this country would be considered ultra-reactionary in the U.S.
I hope I’ll hear from you at “caballafamily[at]yahoo.com” in the near future. In the meantime, my advice to you is to relocate your family, your portable wealth, and yourself to another country with as little delay.
Get rid of government. it won’t happen overnight, but it can be done. The present school system must be abolished. It focuses on conformity and compliance. They can’t possibly control all of us, so they get us to police ourselves. The only true capital any government has is the cooperation of the populace. Stop cooperating with them, and the system folds like a house of cards in a windstorm. They depend on us. Stop using their money to the greatest extent possible. Self sufficiency is their enemy. Voting changes nothing. It merely provides the appearance of legitimacy.
Again I do agree with you, but those freaks in control have all the resources to assembly giant mercenary armies to obliterate and terrorise any form dissent or non-compliance. (Like they’ve done in Libya where they have gone on to spitefully destroy the vast water reticulating system that was even referred to as the 8th wonder of the world)
Without some form of directed coherence “governing” the masses it will be an impossible task to resist this overpowering, Borg like freak show that is currently in control over the globe.
They depend on our cooperation. It is the only true capital they have.
You need to begin attacking liberal establishments. have you tried burning down the home of Nancy Pelosi yet?
Nancy Pelosi is just a tool. There’s plenty more where she comes from. I thought you objected to people depriving others of their property, but apparently it is fine with you if the person deprived of their property can be falsely labelled as a liberal. Pelosi is not a liberal. She is an authoritarian collectivist shill. I don’t advocate arson or vandalism. what were you saying about insidious cancer and mental illness?
The destruction of ill gotten gains from a piece of scum like Pelosi is not depriving others of their property. I would prefer to see her properties burned to the ground and her family wiped from the face of the earth.
The less liberals, the better.
Typical neocon. Just as bad as the neolibs. Destroy the other side. Envy based action. You still don’t know what a liberal is. Or a conservative.
Silly liberal, thinking you are intelligent because you can utter inanities.
When an idiot like you can’t answer a question, they just think the other person doesn’t get it. i believe in tending to my own needs without interfering in the affairs of others. how is that liberal?
When you can ask an intelligent question, I will gladly answer it for you. Until then, I just have to laugh at your stupidity.
I did ask one, twice, and you ignored it the first time, and lied the second time. How is it liberal to believe in tending to one’s own needs without interfering in the affairs of others?
It is not, however, that is not the point. Liberals are a scourge on humanity.
Yes, it is the point. You don’t understand what a liberal is. Liberals believe in no class distinction. It is socialists that you are actually objecting to.
Silly word parsing does not negate the fact liberals are socialists. Wake up.
You don’t understand yourown language. You’ve been programmed, droid.
Yes, it is. you just don’t think anyone who disagrees with your cowardly view of the world has any rights.
I would have camps and gas chambers for liberals. Some of your organs could be farmed for people who deserve them.
You would pay for that? You expect others to pay for it, just like those you claim to hate for expecting others to pay for their benefit? If you did pay for it, then maybe they could harvest a functional brain for you, except you don’t deserve one. you don’t use the one you have.
Harvesting their organs and videos of the executions could pay for the operations.
Just like the Chinese, who execute people for their organs. you’re a psychopath.
Why? Liberals who run planned parenthood are already doing it?
They’re not liberals. You’re a seriously conflicted person who thinks collectivism is wrong foor others, but right for you. What a selfish, insecure, uninformed twob you are. There’s nothing special about your hypocrisy. It’s not any different from the other collectivists you mistakenly refer to as liberals. Too bad you never educated yourself, and merely accepted your programming out of fear.
The overcrowding needs to be eliminated, as well. spreadthe populace out to give the people some room, and the crime rates will drop dramatically. Restore the water cycle, and the planet will flourish. But you’re right: getting rid of the military and the government that depends on them must be a priority.
Yes, overcrowding can be a problem but even where people do
live in crowded conditions it is still possible to organize the habitat to be productive, pleasing and comfortable. All it takes is some mental lucidity and political accessibility.
Slum conditions and crime are direct results of the scarcity and corruption system that is forced on the global population from a very malevolent, covert political dominant…. Identify and neutralize.
There are millions of square miles of desert available for terraforming
and settlement projects, and yes, I agree there is more than enough water.
they’ve done studies on rats that show overcrowding results in violence and even cannibalism. It has nothing to do with politics, which only makes things worse. It is not scarcity that is the cause. the deserts can be transformed if the water cycle is fixed. Overcrowding seriously hampers the water cycle.
I’m largely in agreement with you but I’m hoping that humans can be coaxed into more sophisticated behavior than rats 🙂
Politics becomes relevant the moment there is an assembly of more than one person. Even rats express political behaviour albeit quite scrappy. Much like the politics of the aberration that has slithered and crawled into dominant position over the last 200 years or so.
If you have to ‘coax’ someone into behavior, then manipulation is going to result. I have no idea how you can see politics in rats.
O.k let me rephrase the “coax” concept. If a “human” acts like a rat and rapes and kills a child you go FCK him up. That will tend to deter other humanoid appearing rats from endangering children. No manipulation . . . .just fck him up.
You obviously have not studied a group of rats intimately. Or monkeys. There is definitely a political structure that vaguely resembles human society. It cannot be disputed.
I asked you to explain how, not to restate your position. You failed to do that. Instead you resort to a straw man.
I don’t know what you mean.
If it is my thesis you require then you might have to wait a few years. Maybe a few decades…….possibly a few centuries.
Few…..are the chances in actual fact.
Ok, since you have some comprehension issues, here is what I wrote:
I have no idea how you can see politics in rats.
OK, what is the political aspect of rat behavior? Your posts aregetting more and more incomprehensible.
The subject is too complex to discuss here as I attempted to indicate in my previous reply.
Rats have hierarchical systems that resemble human culture. This hierarchy is continuously challenged and different groups form for political protection. There are jocks and nerds, or A and B type, rat personalities. Females bring even greater complexity in their mating and nesting behaviour. It is all very subtle but it is observable. Monkeys display more overtly human like political behaviour.
Again I say – go do the observation if you really are interested. If not then continue parrying with Americadies.
So all hierarchical systems that resemble human culture are political? Where did you get your definition of political? How is being a jock or nerd political? And then you bring up my discussion with someone else as if it was pertinent to this discussion, like a politician. Try learning some formal logic before you do any more ‘observation’. You don’t even understand your own language.
Everything has to do with politics. Everything!
Where more than one human is assembled you will find politics.
Your incessant argumentative rhetoric is just your expression of your own slightly confused politics.
You cn’t even maintain a coherent argument. You don’t know the difference between social constructs and politics. So you consider nyone who understands their own language to resort to ‘incessant argumentive rhetoric’. You resort to straw men, and change context from one sentence to the next. Try studying formal logic, and present a reasoned position. You’re just spewing alphabet soup. I don’t have any politics. you’re the one who is confused. Try looking up the definition of politics before you make yourself look even stupider when you respond.
More incessant argumentative rhetoric…..
O.k. . .. You win. . . . . .
and I’m bored…..
Pedantic idiot. Now you just repeat yourself because you can’t back up anything you say. you make foolish statements and duck out with this crap, because you think you are entitled to the last word. What a tool.
You are frothing at the mouth. . .calm down.
I’m calm. If you think that’s frothing at the mouth, you must be afraid of your own shadow. You calm down. And try replying with some logic, instead of the ad hominem garbage. You look foolish when you can’t support your statements.
I repeat your boring babble has become trite.
Yes, you keep repeating yourself. If you are bored, why don’t you try doing something else. You might want to try learning English. It will probably baffle you completely. You’ve already run out of words.
You continue to be boring and unimportant. It is obvious you are filled with a sense of self importance. But you are really just a small minded liberal who knows nothing.
I still find you boring and quite uninteresting.
Do you ever think?
Yes. I think for myself, unlike you. Do you ever respond with reason, or are you always a knee jerk reactionary,, spouting the party line?
I have to laugh when I read silly diatribes like yours.
The democratic party was a fan of Hitler, loves Sanger, wanted to and still does think social engineering is an answer.
Delusional.
you have yet to make a rational statement, laughing tool. You’re the worst enemy of the side you are on.
LOL! Poor liberal trying to sound intelligent.
Try answering this question, which you have ducked, like the cowardly bootlicker you are: I believe that nobody is entitled to the fruits of anyone else’s labor. How is that liberal?
If you really believe this, how can you support entitlements, welfare, Obamacare and other wasted wealth redistribution?
All are stupid liberal failures.
I don’t believe in any of that. You’re just making this up. You have no logical basis for this bald faced lie. Quote me where I said I was in favor of any of that, you lying twob.
Do you support them or not?
Idiot. No, I don’t. What is your problem with reading: I believe in tending to my own needs, without interfering in the affairs of others. Now, show me where I ever stated I believe in any entitlement programs, or admit you’re just a jackass liar. Or take your usual, cowardly way out and avoid the subject.
Now, if you do not believe in these programs, I will accept you mean that and apologize accusing you of that. Now did you vote for this clown Obama?
No, I didn’t vote for the puppet. Look at his voting record as the junior senator from Illinois: he voted present more than he voted for or against bills. He was almost certainly told to do so in order to provide quorum, without taking any stance that he would not have to defend any position that might alienate his potential supporters.
no, I didn’t, and a$$hole disqus censors deleted my response. Obama is just another lying worthless politician. OK, now, I’m asking you: why do you keep making such baseless claims? Are you really this stupid that you have to resort to straw man after straw man? Do you think everybody that disagrees with you must be an Obama supporter.
No, I didn’t vote for the puppet. why do you make such irrational claims instead of addressing the position logically? Are you really this delusional? Do you think that anyone who disagrees with you is an Obama supporter? You’re programmed to the hilt. Wake up and try thinking for yourself. You’re as bad as the fool Obama supporters you seem to blame everything on. Get a clue.
please note the question, “Now did you vote for this clown Obama?”
You actually are starting to bore me with your mundane irrational babbling.
I answered, in English. Here it agin. I did not vote for Obama. How hard is that to understand. I already said I didn’t vote for the bozo. you don’t even understand your own language. No wonder you get ‘bored’ so easily.
Check your spelling, it proves again how small mined and unimportant you are when you try so very hard to sound intelligent.
“Check your spelling, it proves again how small mined”
What were you saying about checking my spelling? Other than the fact that only someone who has nothing else to support such foolishness as you spout, the next thing you do is not even take your own advice. So, you have by your own standard, resorted to a small minded, unimportant response in an attempt to sound intelligent. some serious focus issues on your part. Yet another hypocritical response from you. Keep trying. Sooner or later, you might get lucky and typesomething that makes some sense. I’ll be here, waiting. I know you can’t help yourself from replying. I would have thought you might at least check your spelling if you weregoing to resort to criticism of my spelling, but, thenagain, with an attention of less than a few seconds, that was hopelessly optimistic.
Touche.
What does this have to do with anything I wrote, you delusional psychopath? Doyou think I support any of that? How about you address what I wrote, and quit with the straw man garbage?
Man, can you babble
Not compared to you. You start making things up, and duck any questions.
Polly want a cracker? I bet you love it when someone gives you enough attention that you feel important.
Can’t focus long enough to answer any questions, or do you just do this to avoid looking like the hypocrite you are?
You have asked no questions except the same stupid ones. When will you get to the point?
If the questions are stupid, then why are you incapable of answering them? Is it because you are an idiot, and the questions are beyond your intellectual capacity? How can somebody get a point across to you if you can’t focus long enough to reply coherently. You make a spelling error complaining about spelling errors.
Tell you what, what are your questions, I’ll answer them.
Use of nuclear weapons in areas in the middle east could help with over crowding.
What were you saying about liberalism being a mental illness? Not that you understand liberalism. You’re a psychopath.
War should lead to the eradication of our enemies. Killing every man woman and child leaves one with no enemies to fight. Kill the men, the army dies, kill the children, no new soldiers rise, kill the women, no new children rise to become soldiers.
Nukes would kill more quickly and leave a residual radiation to keep growth down.
You are simply too stupid to realize how wars should be fought.
No, you’re too stupid to see that wars are the work of the banksters, and they depend on loudmouth tools like you to beat the drums. Good thing less people are listening to idiots like you.
” Killing every man woman and child leaves one with no enemies to fight.”
It leaves nobody. Not even you, unless you are not a man, woman or child.
Goodness you are dense, bombing a country like Iraq or Syria out of existence does not affect me or mine. I favor killing every man, woman and child in all ME countries, same as Africa, reducing the parasitic societies is simply an improvement to humanity.
It is like your silly overcrowded premise, the parasitic multiply like wild animals knowing they can not provide for their droppings yet they do.
I like the idea of moving the poor to deserts, lets just not waste money on water.
Sure, just have someone else bomb people you don’t even know, as long as you are not affected. What a craven coward you are. If you think this should be done, do it yourself. Expecting someone else to take care of your ‘wellbeing’ is exactly what you claim to oppose. You are the parasite you claim to despise.
Silly liberal, first, I do not own any B2 Bombers or nukes, if I did I would bomb those countries. As far as someone providing for me, how silly, my life is sustainable very comfortably with no one helping me.
It is called self sufficient.
How did you get this stupid?
So, you want to use the resources of others to do the work you can’t afford. Sounds like the same crap you castigate ‘liberals’ for. and you call me a liberal, even though you can’t explain, without lying, how my belief in tending to my own needs without interfering in the affairs of others is ‘liberal’. Expecting someone else to bomb your boogie men is hardly self sufficiency, idiot. I’m not stupid. you can’t even answer a simple question.
Doofus, the military is for protection of all Americans. If our military eradicates all Muslims in the ME it would be in our best interests.
Idiot. How would nuking the middle east not kill the non muslims? How does presenting a threat to everyone that you would nuke, regardless of whether they are musim or not?
Killing lots of people in the ME ends centuries of war between all parties. No loss there.
What a stupid statement. Since you advocate death so much, why not try it for yourself? See if you find peace that way. No loss there, either. Net gain for humanity. the average IQ would go up.
Why do you expect others to labor for your benefit? sounds like your definition of a liberal. A conservative certainly wouldn’t expect someone else to do their work. If you feel so strongly about this, then man up and have at it. you’re all talk, no action.
This is tired nonsense.
you can quit anytime you want. You don’t bother answering anything. If you’re tired of looking the fool, why not just stop?
You crave the experience of conversing with your betters.
You’re not conversing. You’re just replying randomly to duck having to admit you can’t come up with a coherent response when questioned about your illogical double standards. You’re certainly nobodies ‘better’ if you have to resort to this. Thought you said you were bored? Why do you keep responding? Have you given up on learning English?
More babbling
Same old tired reply. Learn a new trick. Maybe improve your vocabulary.
Look!, the poor baby is still whining.
you could start improving your vocabulary by looking up whining. It’s probably too big of a word for you to start with, but give it a shot.
Go back to sleep, maybe?
Are you still around babbling?
I wasn’t babbling. That’s another word you should look up. You are still responding randomly. Maybe your medication needs to be adjusted. Maybe you should question what you would have been responding to, based on your question. If I hadn’t replied, what would you have been responding to? Those are some more questions that i am sure you will avoid answering.
Peabrain, your ideas are hardly shared by all Americans.
Boring.
Just stop responding. You just keep ducking.
Why should I stop responding to you, you learn a little each time. Did you know you are boring or did you think when people cease talking to you it was because of your perceived brilliance?
No reason for you to stop. No amont of reasoning will ever convince you of anything, from what I see. What makes you think people stop talking to me? You certainly haven’t stopped, so your ‘reasoning, as usual, is invalid. You don’t even listen to yourself. Why would anyone take you seriously?
More babble.
Apparently,you have run out of words. You’re down to two. What was yourpoint calling me boring? Is this your idea of interesting?
Do you need more words from me to tell you, you are tiresome, repetitive, uninteresting and trite?
No, I was looking for words to indicate that you are rational and capable of expressing yourself coherently. your continuation of the conversation only indicates to me that you do not find it boring.
See article today on Breitbart. I wish I had read this first so I could link it in my comment over there. Perfect timing. You news types, get together and make a coordinated push!
This is terrific news. The Ehrlichs are my heroes – they saw the population disaster approaching way before anybody else did. As for all these supposed deliberate and accidental attempts to forcibly curb the population, they sure ain’t working very well. Clueless breeder scum are still popping out armies of dimwitted rugrats at an alarming rate, and soon 8.5 billion jobless. brainless clowns will be fighting each other over rapidly dwindling resources. Abortion should be compulsory, sterilization should be free and easy (and always voluntary), and pregnancy itself should be a crime.
See my reply to David A Laibow above.
But, please lead the way and abort yourself first. What we don’t need are deviant
little psycho Brats with their clueless superiority complexes. This is precisely the kind of mind
set that is bringing destruction to the world.
They sure didn’t work in your case, but if you feel so strongly about depopulation, let’s see you put your money where your mouth is. The problem is overcrowding and lack of education caused by the banksters and their government, which runs a school system that prevents education in order to indoctrinate the witless tools like you.
Kill yourself and start the trend.
I don’t take advice from programmed tools. Take your own advice. And you might want to learn how to read with comprehension. I don’t think overpopulation is the problem, as I stated in my reply.
You think the world is over populated and yet you won’t help? Hmm…. seems typical liberal, do as I say not as I do.
Please kill yourself and any of your family members who could reproduce.
Idiot. Go back and read what I said. I said overcrowding was the issue, not overpopulation. I said overpopulation wan not the problem. You said overpopulation was the problem. You should follow your own advice, imbecile. If you can even understand yourself. you don’t seem to understand your own language. And once again, you call me a liberal. You don’t have a clue. I hope you did not reproduce. You sound like you’re drunk. What an idiot you are.
So your premise of overcrowded means the parasitic are not spread out enough? So you support the redistribution of land and property for these parasitic?
I guess my 100 acre ranch would be broken up in your feeble mind?
Do us all a favor, give up your spot and commit suicide.
If there wasn’t overcrowding, how far do you think the recipients of entitlement programs would be able to travel to get them?
I don’t care about your imaginary ‘ranch’. There’s plenty of land. Divide the total opulace by the amount of land before you make such stupid irrational claims. And why are you such a coward that you can’t stand the thought of anyone who is not as tupid and hateful as you living on the same planet? And why don’t you take your own advice if you don’t like the size of the population? Because you are a follower who expects others to take care of you, you parasite.
My but you are stupid.
Tell me how to populate the Mohave Desert. I agree with you, it is roughly 48,000 sq. miles has a population of about 5 million people. So, could you tell how you will make it wholly livable? What do you do with the reservations there now.
Here is some help; http://persquaremile.com/2012/08/08/if-the-worlds-population-lived-like/
I can not wait to hear your brilliance shine through.
You think that’s the only available land? You have no right calling anyone stupid. You have made stupid statement after stupid statement, and you duck out when you are asked simple questions.
Come on moron, how will you populate the Mohave? How will you accommodate the existing 5 million people? Where will you get the water?
What a fool when you don’t even have a plan.
Why would i try to populate the Mojave? this is just a straw man. Try making a logical argument before you call anyone else a moron or fool, you idiot. Morons and fools are your intellectual superiors.
“There’s plenty of land. Divide the total opulace by the amount of land before you make such stupid irrational claims.”
“The problem is overcrowding and lack of education caused by the banksters and their government”
“Just reduce overcrowding, and outlaw corporations.”
These are your words. I will stay away from your “structured water” drivel. This idea of population control and land distribution has been around for a long time. It has been a strawman of the social left for decades.
All of it sounds nice but is wholly impractical. I do not plan on letting immigrants or other useless parasitic move on to my ranch and occupy it.
Stop your babbling and trying to sound intelligent.
You’re the one babbling, here, baboon. And the mojave reference is a straw man, not the open land issue. I didn’t mention the mojave, you did. If you understood formal logic at all, you would know that. Well, at least you stopped misusing the term liberal. pretty soon, you might evenstart understanding English. I never suggested giving up any of your land, that is a straw man. You’re an imbecile. Grow up.
Moron
Yeah, don’t have much hope for this. They have promissed to curb the population for a long time, but can’t seem to accomplish it. Europe is an overpopulated shithole and they don’t do anything about it. At least stop giving out free Health-care and stop immigration FFS!
And to all of you Zombie Child-worshipper: Get a clue. The government loves overpopulation because it lowers the price of work. It reduces your value and rises theirs.
In my opinion the eugenicists should practice what they preach upon themselves and let the rest of us figure out a way to help the rest of humanity and mother nature thrive. The wealth of our world would no longer be in a select few’s hands. Perhaps without them we could quit spending the bulk of our wealth on weapons used to destroy humanity and our Earth for something better for all of Earths occupants.