Constitutional Attorney Talks About FDA Corruption

Activist Post

The FDA continues to be one of the most dangerous government agencies in the United States. The sheer scope of people it affects with its corruption is staggering. As Jon Rappoport has highlighted, the FDA’s own webpage admits that the drugs it certifies as safe contribute to over 100,000 deaths per year.

And as you’ll see in the video interview below with constitutional attorney, Jonathan Emord, not only does the FDA routinely approve drugs over objections from its own medical reviewers, but the FDA does zero independent medical testing of its own. It is a system built upon conflicts of interest that leaves consumers completely in the dark about the true consequences of taking Big Pharma products.

As the newly inflamed vaccine debate rages across America, the fundamental role of the FDA in disseminating false information and flat-out covering up widespread health dangers must be examined more fully. Here are two key articles from natural health author, Catherine J. Frompovich, which add to the information presented in the following video:


Subscribe to the 100th Monkey Channel where this video appeared.

  • Ferd Waring

    The following article shows how the propagandized criminal media is in the tank for the Pharma construct. Despite all of the misinformation about the Measles outbreak (the fact that a good portion if not a plurality are vaccinated) and the Measles vaccine (MMR) has killed more than 100 victims since 2005, whereas noone has died from the measles, it gets even more Orwellian.

    Here are two presstitutes obtaining about the Measles outbreak and their insistence that in certain instances some things require Big Brother:

    http://tinyurl.com/q5yydgo

    By Big Brother, did they mean the FDA? Or The CDC?

  • desertspeaks

    It is the considered opinion of a self professed CONstitutional attorney, that the CONstitution and laws apply to everyone.. Can he prove it??

    Everyone has been told that the CONstitution and law automatically apply to everyone. it’s everyones opinion that it applies, everyone feels it applies, everyone believes it applies, everyone assumes and presumes it applies. HOWEVER;
    hearsay, opinions, feelings, beliefs, assumptions and presumptions aren’t proof of a damn thing.

    What factual, first hand, irrefutable evidence can anyone offer that proves that their CONstitution and laws apply to the private person simply because they are physically in what we commonly refer to as a state.

    Keeping in mind that slavery and involuntary servitude is illegal. Further, no private person is a party to their CONstitution nor is any private person a signatory to their CONstitution, nor has any private person sworn an oath to be bound by or to obey the CONstitution and laws.

    If you attempt to proffer evidence that it does apply to everyone.
    Your proof MUST be factual and first hand, your proof/evidence shall not be comprised of hearsay, your opinions, beliefs, feelings, assumptions, presumptions, hypotheticals, conjecture, sophistry, fraud, lies, scenarios or what if’s. Good luck!

    I would further point out that the only factual parties to the CONstitution are the States and the United States governments.
    When one is not a party to an agreement, compact, contract etc. One cannot be forced to abide by or obey or agree to something they are not a party to.

    Indoctrination is defined as follows: “to teach somebody a belief, doctrine, or ideology thoroughly and systematically, especially with the goal of discouraging independent thought or the acceptance of other opinions”.

    When everyone thinks alike, everyone is likely to be wrong.
    A crowd yields to instincts which an individual, acting alone, represses.
    People instinctively follow the impulses of the herd.
    A crowd never reasons, but follows its emotions; it accepts without proof what is “suggested” or “asserted”.

  • Hp B

    Everything from A – Z is corrupted in the phony baloney US of Everything Is Rigged, Illegal (or pending)

  • Something I have been stating frequently in the vaccine debate, is that people continue using FDA/CDC as a sources to make health decisions, that are corrupt. People are allowing themselves and their children to be lab rats.

    I saw a comment posted, but have not had time to confirm this:
    I’m going to try to put this to rest for you here and now. The CDC is renewing their call for MMR vaccines. Even Obama (not a medical expert) is telling everyone to line up and take their shot-in-the-dark.

    Did you know that the measles shot only covers one strain? Well, what you won’t hear from the mainstream is that the CDC ran the genotype of the latest Mickey Mouse Measles strain and lo and behold – it is not the one in the MMR vaccine! It is strain “B3” and the MMR only contains the “A” strain. The MMR will not give you any kind of protection for the other strains of measles and only offers limited protection (if any at all) against the type A strain.

    Can anyone confirm this? I’ve seen this a few times now on different sites.

  • Curly Byrd

    There is also the matter of the revolving door between the public and private sectors. Does anyone actually believe that pharmaceutical insiders, moved into governmental positions, can be objective in their analysis?

  • Abe

    I can shit in your water and it will be proven “Safe and Effective” by the FDA.What I like is when one ad is recalling something and the very next ad the presstitutes are pimping is the very sane drug!!

  • guest

    There was a problem with the MMR that was the focus of the NIH Emergency Workshop on SV40 in 1998. The meeting was in Washington. At this there were representatives of all the major US government health organizations and of the vaccine manufacturers. The discussion was was led by Dr. Khan on RT viruses in vaccines. Dr. Khan represented the FDA.

    ‘Today I would like to present an update on the reverse transcriptase [RT] activity that is present in chicken cell derived vaccines.’

    Dr. Khan was reporting the result of a just concluded two-year investigation into the safety of MMR led by the World Health Organisation. She explained that this was initiated in 1996 after the discovery in MMR of RT; an enzyme whose presence they believed could well indicate that retroviruses had contaminated the vaccine. This had greatly alarmed them as some retroviruses are thought to cause cancers – and AIDS.

    WHO had then quietly, without telling the public, without withdrawing the vaccine, organised MMR safety studies at various laboratories to see ‘whether this RT activity was associated with a retroviral particle, and even more importantly, whether this retrovirus particle could infect and replicate in human cells.’

    What they then discovered confirmed their worse fears. Dr Khan continued: ‘The RT activity is found to be associated with retroviral particles of two distinct avian endogenous retroviral families designated as EAV and ALV.’ Now ALV stands for Avian Leukosis Virus. It is associated with a leukaemia
    cancer found in wild birds, so definitely was not wanted in the vaccines. EAV was however less dangerous, at least for birds as it is natural for them to have it.

    Khan added that they had also found another possible danger; ‘There was a theoretical possibility that the virus [ALV] could … infect the [human] cell’ thus integrating its genetic code ‘into the human DNA’ to cause cancer. The only reassurance she could give was that her team had watched vaccine cultures
    for a full ‘48 hours’, and, in that time period, no merger of viral and human DNA had been observed. I thought this much too short a period to guarantee safety. Cancers develop over years.

    Dr Khan then warned; ‘there is a possibility that there could also be potential pseudotypes (merging between) … the measles vaccine virus and the retroviral sequences’ – meaning there was a risk that bird viruses might combine with the measles virus in the vaccine to create dangerous new mutant viruses, They had not seen it, but it could happen.

    Extract from Chapter 7 of Fear of the Invisible by Janine Roberts

    Roberts is an award winning investigative journalist who attended high level government vaccine meetings & conferences in the US & the UK for over a decade. In her books, Fear of the Invisible and The Vaccine Papers she documents the meetings, names sources and provided links to FDA transcripts. Chapters online can be found at: http://reaids.com/fearoftheinvisible (dot) com/introduction-to-the-book.html

  • chilller

    This exact same scenario is playing out in every aspect of our lives. The corporate vultures who feed on the US public view us as only a meal ticket. Be it big pharma, banks, utilities, taxes, energy, etc…etc…

    • John C Carleton

      Looking at what is called government today, I can find NOTHING government dose that is not evil, predatory and parasitic.

  • Beth Aaron

    Domesticating animals thousands of years ago, became the path for every war, learned domination, and abhorrent cruelty humans learned FIRST, from doing it to animals. Here’s a very good Ted Talk explaining it ;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0VrZPBskpg

  • Javier Torres

    And yet- the greatest medicine for anything from Cankers to Cancer- is not only illegal to most of us, very expensive to many of us and almost free to an even smaller group of us- is still after decades of incarceration, humiliation, rehabilitation, extortion, lies, deceit, hypocrisy, racism, assault, insult, division, classism, and the denial of the truth the U.S. has a PATENT on Cannabis for medical reasons- our beloved plant is still considered to be as dangerous and deadly as an Elephant tranquilizer- PCP or by it’s cutesy name- “Angel Dust”. THEY get the benefits- why do WE get the poison?

  • sjsrana
Thank you for sharing.
Follow us to receive the latest updates.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

Send this to friend