Jon RappoportActivist Post
The brief explosive video is posted at autismmediachannel.com on the home page: “CDC Whistleblower William Thompson on Thimerosal.”
Beyond admitting to fraud in a 2004 CDC study that exonerated the MMR vaccine, Dr. William Thompson, a CDC scientist, asserts there is a connection between mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines and autism.
Thompson states that giving a vaccine containing mercury to a pregnant woman is something he would never do.
Couched in science-speak, Thompson winds up his remarks with this: “There is biologic plausibility right now to say thimerosal causes autism-like features.”
For a scientist at the CDC to make this admission, after millions and millions of dollars have been spent by that agency and the US government to conclude mercury has no connection to autism…it’s extraordinary, to say the least.
Experts and other con artists will try to parse Thompson’s words, but the meaning is clear.
Only a mindless idiot or an overt killer would inject a vaccine containing mercury into a human being.
Meanwhile, the major media blackout on Thompson’s revelations continues. The collusion in a vast crime is their mission.
Jon Rappoport is the author of two explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed and Exit From the Matrix, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
You Might Also Like
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW
If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.
30 comments:
As of 12:53 PST on 04 Sept I'm getting "Server not found" for http://www.autismmediachannel.com/.
Buy and learn to use a crock pot. There, fixed it for 'ya!
Uhm - i'm very much a dude, and i and my older son cook most of the meals. During the weekend as puttering and centering - life balance - my wife does more of it, but i help. Doesn't have to be just the woman, get the family to help.
Grew up with 8 kids, blind mother, father working multiple jobs and put us through private school with an 8th grade education. Amazing man.
We did chores. We helped, and we got out of them as much as we could too, lol. We ate together - lots of beans, rice, low cost meals. But our family spent more man hours together in the late 50s, 60s, and early 70s each week than most families spend in a couple months now for face time.
My husband and I and 5 kids have breakfast and dinner together nearly everyday. I cook breakfast in the morning and dinner at night. I am able to because I made it a priority. It can be done, where there's a will there's a way.
It amazes me that they only interviewed "females" unless they have given up the concept of a multiple parent family...Bottom line, Ms. Callaghan nailed the problem: "But the crux of the food problem is the economy. Without good jobs for a
long time (thanks "free trade," thanks Wall St.), access to healthy
foods and the time to prepare them is shredded, making it that much
harder to withstand the face of food monopolies." Hooray for the truth! and a bit more with Hooray for: research results....."are a thinly veiled attempt to influence Americans to keep their place,
eschew their families for the societal family and get used to austerity." I did get mixed up for just a second with the Pharma drug trials, you know, the ones that test drugs for women on only men....
Could it be that IS IS means "ISrael IS going to false flag more trouble somewhere in the world and lay the blame on another country? Remember the USS Liberty, 911, Oklahoma City and many more of their actions.
The trail of devastation always leads back to America.
"....while a declared “World War” may never come to pass, what will
effectively unfold will be a global backlash against Western aggression
underpinned by a true moral imperative, pushing it back behind its
borders and dismantling its accomplices beyond them." As we in the US watch helplessly and ignorantly the end of our Constitutional Government at the hands of the corrupted in every Branch and level of Government, I've often thought that only an action such as this will give the People of the United States an opportunity to begin to build a Constitutional Democracy of possibly sovereign States, and the "Republic"? We'll see.
Sage advice. Thanks.
How does the 2nd amendment protect US from stupid pigs high on sugar and caffeine when the rules of engagement allow military e-weapons?
Ans: It doesn’t because that legal weapon you have is traceable and ineffective. How do you take out a swat team at your door?
Who you gonna a call SWATbusters?
It's intentional genocide. It is time for mass arrests of these murderers.
Rick Scott, the nation's worst Medicare criminal, says:
". I think I can speak for all Floridians and all Americans when I say that the time for a strategy is now, and part of that strategy needs to include destroying them"
He does NOT speak for all Americans (this is the hubris and presumption of a psychopathic personality) and what he does not realize is that the original attempt to destroy al Quada only mulitiplied it; a strategy of destroying ISIS will, in the same manner, only create more extremisists.
That is what bin Laden's strategy was: cause the US to overreact and bankrupt itself though fighting myriad wars (all unwinnable, since the war on terror actually creates more terrorists, as we have learned) on borrowed money.
There is no strategy to undermine bin Laden's strategy, which is now being played out by ISIS, that involves more of the same.
The only strategy is to profoundly change American assumptions, learn the lessons of recent history, and create a foreign policy which is not based on military power but diplomacy and disarmament.
The US sells the vast majority of weapons throughout the world, and a Harvard study years ago looked at 2000 arms races throughout history and found that in 98% of the cases, the result was war.
Until the US overthrows the MIC, the oligarchy, and the crony capitalism (another word for fascism), and the rule of the 1%, nothing will change.
To change foreign policy, to change the world's perceptions (US is the most violent and dangerous of all nations), we must first have a revolution in America which, at long last, establishes democracy and dismantles the war economy on which the oligarchic rule rests (banks, energy, and weapons all profit from war--and have vast control over government decisions).
At 73, I do not expect to see any such revolution. But then again, I never thought the US public would embrace legalization of marijuana, marriage equality, a black President (sadly disappointing), etc). When change comes, it comes suddenly. So we must never give up, never give up the struggle to transform the US into a truly democratic and peaceful nation, which treats other nations as equals.
That is what the Declaration of Independence asserted...........and which has been ignored, buried, or perverted ever since.
Ok, this is just shallow libertarianism, inveighing against "collectivism."
I tried to get into it but then the code words began to appear and the assumptions about them took over the argument.
Individualism vs collectivism is a dated duality which is based on stereotypes, abstractions, and assumptions. In reality, individuals, taken apart from their communities (collectives of family, town, workplace, religion, nation), are abstractions. Likewise if we look at the basic institutions of society, such as the family, the army, the school, the business, they are all collectives, people working to advance the whole enterprise, not just themselves.
A truly independent individual would be a psychopath, with no fellow feeling, no sense of community.
We need to get beyond these sterile abstractions and deal with people as we encounter them, complex social beings who would not survive without the support of the community/collective.
Drop the junk political philosophy and bring new ideas, new paradigms, new
holistic thought forms which integrate the individual and the community, the self and the greater whole of which it is a part. We waste our time repeating that collectivism is the enemy of individualism instead of seeking to understand and advance the relationship.
Therein lies the problem!!
Well, I liked the article overall; although the question "Do you have the skills to survive without a job? Without money? Without on-grid utilities? Without consistent aid from others?" seemed odd to me. I think the point would be to prevent others from forcing one to live like this in the first place. That would be worth fighting to hold on to. If that fight was lost... I mean some people could survive these conditions while others could not - but so what? This is not the sort of life that I want. I want more than mere survival. People sould aim to thrive, not merely survive.
I am inclined to agree with Larken Rose. He posits we ought to not protest. Instead we ought to ignore government.
It is morally just to disobey unjust laws. Our government invades other countries and kills in our names. They use money to enslave and keep people ignorant to use as fighting chattel.
How about the next time our vaunted _leaders_ decide to wage war, no one shows up to fight it? We can all be busy engaging in learning green energy production, gardening, husbandry of organic grazed cattle, weaving baskets. You can pick something aside from war, or what serves its ends, death.
Protests and voting do not change a thing. If we ignore them, we remove our consent to be well, _led_. Who are _leaders_ going to lead if we're all busy living as best we can being moral and just ourselves because it is the right way to be?
Ever wondered about that? Why are they called leaders? Where do they lead you, why? I wonder more and more each day. Eventually, I'll quit wondering because I know. They lead us to death.
Let us remember, it is our lives, not theirs. And you can even ignore me. I'm just some fool idiot what awoke and started thinking.
Wouldn't you wonder why western nations allow muslim immigration into their countries? I've seen so many videos on line of how their violence affects the lives of citizens in Sweden, England, Belgium, Germany, Holland and so many other places. Do bees invite hornets to be part of them, swallows don't participate with robins and lions with tigers. Each in it's insect, bird or cat family but the species remains separate. Too bad people are blind to such common wisdom.
Look up Ubuntu Contributionism. I believe it seems to be a path of merit. I concur with both points of this argument, yours and article writer's.
That is to say I believe people, self inclusive, do need to be learn more independence. I also believe you're correct too, we need to realize community has its place and value. Not to sound Hegelian, but the idea I presented seems a synthesis.
Excuse me, off to watch educational videos for tomorrow. Late evening here, it's what I do along with sleep, reviewing, meditation in no explicit order.
I liked this article and the message it explained. I believe people will need these skills to survive what is in our near future, somewhere between now and the next year or two. Groups will have the best chance of survival, covering each others back side, each person giving what they have to give, staying independent, yet learning and teaching to elevate each other as they/I/we progress down the road of life together. Thanks for a good informative piece, that might help those who might be lost, to find a way of being/thinking, and gain a little independent thinking. J. Clark
Jeez - enough with the fear porn.
thanks for the tip on Ubuntu Contributionism.
I compared these two visions of an alternative foundation for society:
“Let each citizen contribute their natural talents or acquired skills to the greater benefit of all in the community.” Michael Tellinger.
"From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs." Commonly attributed to Karl Marx, but going back nearly a hundred yrs before, to the utopian thinker Morelly, who promoted an egalitarian, libertarian (no police), community based on abolishing the concept of property (beyond a person's personal needs), on which the money system, capitalism, is based and replacing it with the concept of equality, which is the foundation of both utopian socialist and Marxian social vision (as it was with Jefferson, at least in principle, if not practice..he had 200 slaves but "all men are created equal...")
This original libertarianism rejected the tyranny of the state, the church, and the propertied (the corporations) and developed an alternative concept of society rooted a concept of contributionism and entitlement. In 1755, only those with titles had power, but utopian thought seized the privilege of the aristocracy and gave it back to the people.
Here is the root of democracy, equality, and an economy based on the value of human beings rather than the value of money. Sadly, today we have oligarchy, extreme inequality, and the rule of money (plutocracy), which instantly becomes kleptocracy.
Reading it now.
"As we progress with this introduction, you will see how the UBUNTU Contribution system provides everything to everyone at all times. Once again I remind you that this is not a crazy utopian dream, but rather the natural order of things that we have been denied"
This is exactly what the French critic/utopian said: his major work was The Code of Nature, as he intuited that the whole social system built on property and money was a denial of the natural order. His utopia, eliminating churches, police, bourgois property (ie hoarded or used to make money, beyond personal need), and money.
The way I view it, this vision is not an invention so much as the recovery of a lost memory. When Columbus first encountered the Arawak tribe, he found them (from his diary) gentle, intelligent, healthy, friendly and , willing to share anything they had, and with no concept of private property.(so he enslaved them and tortured them) This is the natural hunter-gatherer social norm, what Engels called primitive communism. The Western money-driven mind sees this natural social order as crazy, utopian, "against human nature." But it keeps coming back, because it embodies a liberation from the modern slavery of a system based on money and wealth and power rather than value and equality and shared existence.
This idea deflates the ordinary libertarian paradigm of individuals vs collectives to a shallow and simplistic dualism and it keeps alive the idea Jefferson expressed when he wrote that "all men are created equal."
We are all individuals which why one solution will never
fit all. We dont all see life the same way. All situations dont affect us the
same.
I.E. Take divorce, to one it cant happen fast enough &
another can be devastated....& laws, for some they cripple growth for others
they are protection, safety nets & lets not forget power over
others.
Whenever anyone measures who they are and their self
esteem via anything outside themselves, create a very insecure life for them self which colours everything in their life. Why because they always have defend their status from other insecure individuals trying to build theirs for the same reasons.
So those striving for power, money, bigger this and that
make life very hard for themselves (and everyone else lol)
Its never wise to measure who you are by something that
can be taken or stolen from you and the higher you climb the longer & harder the fall.
Those who climbed higher & use these anxious insecure opportunists, have no compunction about using & abusing then deeming them to be excess to
requirements.
Doesnt this sound like another fruitless endeavour the powers indulge in? The billions of dollars we spend bigger harsher and more dangerous technology etc. & what for. We pay for this in so many ways.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2fUOn1yycc
It is also each individual's illusionary comfort zone known as being a faceless, anonymous safe member of the unthinking 'Herd' that each of us must resist. Each of us is unique and unrepeated throughout Creation and so each of us must cherish and protect that uniqueness.
Orthodox jews make a yearly pilgrimage to the grave of r. Simon ben Yohai, who advocated the extermination of the Gentile races.
These are the people who ultimately own the pharma companies which dispense these poisons to the goyim.
So yes, these individuals may reasonably be described as overt killers.
As always, the true model for all behaviour is the Lord Jesus Christ. He was an absolute individual, yet never a psychopath, because He was always subordinate to His father. "I do always those things which are pleasing in Thy sight". He was not conformed to this present evil world; but transformed by the renewing of His mind. He stood before hostile and murderous crowds, and the rulers of this world, and never, ever, forsook the Truth; and for this, ultimately, He was murdered.
Only a spiritual rebirth; "Ye must be born again", will suffice. Only then can we obey the Commandments, outside of which which we perish.
"It is not in man that walketh to direct his steps". Fashions come and go, but truth is eternal.
"Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall not pass away".
Two words must guide us.
Firstly, "Every one that is of the truth hears My voice".
Do you hear His voice?
And secondly; "Behold, I stand at the door and knock; if any man hear My voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with Me".
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and to depart from iniquity is understanding".
Thus has it always been; thus will it ever be.
Let me get this stright, Russia takes over Crimea and it's OK, not imperialistic or anything. It sends troops into Ukraine and is justified. You do have some points but since you can only see one side (pro Iran and thus Russia and Shiitie) this is hardly a balanced article. Hezbollah is good so thier killing of people is OK, but resisting Hezbollah is wrong. Counties shouldn't meddle in the internal affairs of other counties, but if Syria, Russia, or Iran do it it's OK. Hmmm, could you just be a mouth piece for Iran?
I'm all for folks joining in teamwork, but this is very different from allowing others to think for you.
I generally agree but fail to see why this is a response to my post, which sought to distinguish the original libertarianism, which rejected both state and private tyranny, from the current
pro-corporate tyranny which objects to state power but supports corporate tyranny (justified by putting property rights above human rights) and ignoring the fact that the corporations have taken over the state. With 5 corporations owning 90% of the media, we already have a form of nearly universal propaganda, with our most critical thinkers relegated to the sidelines and banned from the MSM.
Collective action, such as the labor struggles which led to the 8hr day, safety rules, and the right of collective bargaining, as well as collective struggle such as the Civll Rights Movement, as well as workers coops, all are rejections of letting others think for you and embrace the concept of self--government (democracy).
Religious propaganda is at the root of much evil. You buy the religious nonsense while ignoring the ethical teachings of Jesus, which survive without the supernatural overlay.
Post a Comment