Monday, March 3, 2014

Navy Veteran Goes Ballistic on Unconstitutional Gun Laws: "I will not comply!"

YouTube

Connecticut Navy Veteran/Firefighter John S. Cinque Says "I Will Not Comply" to Unconstitutional Gun Laws.



Connecticut Patriot Forewarned Lawmakers about Gun Registration: "I Will Not Comply"
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/03/con...

Famed Sandy Hook Connecticut State Policeman Says Opposing Gun Grab Is Un-American
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUxjuz...



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

22 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't understand how this not an ex post facto law. Seems cut and dry to me.

Kitchie Kuhns said...

I don't understand why they are violating their Oath of office and are being trespassers of the law!!

Anonymous said...

Call the Sheriff He is there to protect your constitutional wrights.He is voted into power by you and he is there to protect your constitutional wrights. GOOGLE it he has the power to kick the FEDS out. HE is law of the land.

Anonymous said...

"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." ~~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

Anonymous said...

I refuse to comply with Obamacare and these upcoming gun laws ...both infringe on our constitutional rights. I am glad to see that this man posses the fortitude to speak out and act on his words. What I want to see is an organized nation movement of the masses that refuse to comply with these insideous infringements on our constitutional rights.

Anonymous said...

They are guilty of Sedition and High Treason. Period. The Right to keep and Bear Arms SHALL NOT be Infringed. Period. The Court that upholds the overthrow of that is guilty of Treason, The Politicians are Guilty of Treason, the Mafia Thug Cops that ENFORCE the TREASONOUS Laws are Guilty of Treason.

Anonymous said...

I'm from Sandy Hook, everybody knows it was a Fed false flag operation w actors. This is not a gov, a gov is for the People. This is a mafia, a mafia is for itself.

Anonymous said...

While arming militants everywhere up to their teeth ...

Terry Ehlert said...

How can their state law supercede National laws......but on the flip side California passed legal hemp laws and the Federal Government is cracking down on pot stores.

Hide Behind said...

I am an admirer of Martin Luther king but he was an asshole and was selling out the true fighters for Racial Equality, and of course some dead brained southern dickheads shot the sob.
The Blacks got a dead civil Rights leader by the Jewish and upper crust Ivy league New England political elites children, who once the man was dead they made him into a Black
Martyr and Messiah.
Then they found a man they could use to resurect Mr. King and that he livedin South AFrica it
was easy to hide the fact that Mandela was a part of a movement and was under the China little red book where three prongs are needed political, grassroots agitators and Mandella led guerrila group the violent miitary arm.
Those who had been fighting got to go get free stuff, Donned new suits and ties lots of colleges had tons of jobs for them and all kinds of non profit fed pay opportunitys opened their doors and other than skin color, they found they had become respectable white men , lower case.



Before you go fn ballistic not a word I wrote was an original of mine but portions and accumulated thoughts in written and speeches of mostly prominent dead but some still active black civil rights leaders.
Not here to argue over king Legacy, but damn tired of cowards hiding behind the mans works and the life of Ghandi wanting fo peacefull means and deeds, and while doing so do no more
than suck wind and blow stale at both ends when it comes to standing up and putting their own asses on line for Civil Liberties.
This mans words unafraid was not going "Ballistic" he was firmly and unequivocly stating his refusal to break or support the breaking by others of his 2nd Amendments and constitutional Rights.
Freely stating his resons to disobey the gun laws has now placed himself as a marked
man and that is a very rare courageous man; The suits up front do not give a fuck if he goes violent as they and the pacafist will be hiding behind bullet proof armed police forces.
Most in that room may protest but most not and if he dies the cowards will crocodile weep and
not make a martyr of him, they need someone of their own but hell they abandon an 80+ year old nun that is infederal prison.
When come the day some men may stand upon principles but Of this nations millions damn few will ever stand with them, and that is why liberty and freedoms are done and only the calm peacefull ones will fill the sheep pens and goat stalls bleating on the down low.
Once men talked the talk and then they walked the walk no matter the dangers they clearly see lay ahead.
He. Must be if he is dead and they still live.
Violence gives them a lot in return for not resisting , they lack any credible purposes except to hide from life. thr violence to body and soul of those who believe in freedom and are ready to die while living in it instead of abject cowRds who find excuses to edify themselves.

Anonymous said...

Never confuse the following:
GOD GIVEN RIGHTS
CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS
and STATE GRANTED RIGHTS

AWAKEN

Anonymous said...

Isn't it interesting that they can find law abiding Americans and "Try" to take the guns away, but can't find the illegals in this country and deport them? It is about control.

Anonymous said...

We should live by "codes" not laws. Laws can be manipulated. Codes of honor are cut and dried with no loopholes. Live by them and all is well. Break them and you must pay the price.

tomas rader said...

Yea? And when every second counts to protect your family's lives and your property the cops are only minutes away. SCOTUS ruled a few years back that the popo can't protect you and have no liability to do so. INEQUALITY ... the 2% hire bodyguards who carry concealed .. this does include congresspersons. A symptom of how bad its getting or how close we are to SHTF is when you observe the wealthy and politicians hiring personal body guards. Next it will be judges.

tomas rader said...

Where did MLK plagarize that from?

tomas rader said...

Like Mao said ' real power comes from the barrel of a gun'.

Hide Behind said...

Every time I watch our Federal or State legislators and see or hear the words; "The Honorable gentle man or woman from the moths of the most corrupted bastards to ever be in any of the peoples houses or seated in courts; I cringe.
God I would love to see a day when someone sent by the people will dare to stand and call the Speakers to prove up on the Honorable part.
I hope there are still enough of we who knew the true value of a handshake to be telling our youths what the term honorable means.
A mans honor had no bearing upon his economic station in life, be he poor or weLthy it wS his conduct in regards to his affairs with his fellow man.
Did he keep his word once given to another and not seek excuses to break them, no matter the personal cost or labors?
Was his personal conduct at the highest standards of agrreed upon by society as being righteous, and fair; and his demeanor in regards to the necessessity of all those performing civic obligations to be held in trust?
It is odd, to my senses at least, when upon being introduced to not profer a handshake, it is an old test of the mettle of a man, a limpid cold clammy touch but no pressure being that of milksops and people of nefarious and low chzracter.
In order to be Honorable you need to have strength of character, while we have loads of characters running and foppishly worshipping those in power, it is odd to hear and see an honest man today.
If I had been there at end of this mans declaration I would of gladly offered a hand in support of his convictions.
That is the difference between your school b ook defined leaders in gov or buisness, those appointed by superiors, theirs, and those whom men choose to follow without being told to.
The scum in politics and military command structures need to be thrown out as chaff and dross, So that once again men of integrity can prove up to the title of "Honorable".




Anonymous said...

The general misconception is that any statue passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement . It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid.

Anonymous said...

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
" Where rights are secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491

Anonymous said...

"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection ; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442

Anonymous said...

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statue, though having the form and name of law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for aby purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177, late 2d, Sec 256

Anonymous said...

One Juror can stop tyranny with a "Not guilty vote! He can nullify bad law in any case, by Hanging the jury !
"We the people," must relearn a desperately needed lesson in civics. Consider the following : " The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy." John Jay, 1st Chief Justice U.S. supreme court, 1789

" The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts." Samuel Chase, U.S. supreme Court Justice, 1796, Signer of the unanimous Declaration

" The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both law and fact.". Oliver Wendell Holmes, U.S. supreme Court Justice, 1902

"The law itself is on trial quite as much as the cause which is to be decided.". Harlan F. Stone, 12th Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court, 1941. We need informed jurors, as this gun law would be thrown out as "bad law" and therefore uphold the Constitution ! A bad law is in essence, no law !

Post a Comment