Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Obama's Climate Task Force Is a Treaty Trap

Dees Illustration
Cassandra Anderson
Activist Post

Obama's new executive order (EO) that creates a global warming task force, The Council on Climate Preparedness and Resilience, is a tool to implement Agenda 21, which is the blueprint for totalitarian control through the United Nations. The new task force utilizes corrupt science that comes directly from the the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that is the source of countless scandals. Obama's strategy is designed to bypass Congress in order to lockdown land use and control water resources. And there are hidden UN and World Trade Organization treaties lurking in the background.

The threat of global warming is used as an excuse to force unnecessary, costly and tyrannical regulations on the public. Man-made global warming is a hoax and the Earth has been in a cooling phase over the last 15 years. For documented evidence of the hoax, click here for James Corbett's analysis of the United Nations' IPCC.

Obama uses executive orders to circumvent Congress in addition to bestowing unconstitutional powers on executive agencies under his control.

A current example of agency overreach is playing out right now as the EPA is trying to extend its jurisdiction over all bodies of water by changing the definition of 'water' in the Clean Water Act. The EPA does have jurisdiction over 'navigable waters' and is trying to expand its control by claiming that all bodies of water fit into that category because water has a common source under the Earth's surface.

Obama is including state and local governments in his task force because the the feds must get agreement from the states to implement federal regulations that fall outside the scope of federal powers listed in the Constitution. Obama's task force targets the states' natural resources and local governments' control over land use through planning and building permits.



According to Obama's EO, the task force will "create incentives" in order to implement their schemes; this is a code phrase that means that the federal government will bribe state and local governments for control over them or, conversely, the feds will withhold funds when opposed to bring state and local governments back in line.

The President's Climate Action Plan

The President's Climate Action Plan that was published in June 2013 is a playbook for the new task force.

The action plan calls for more 'free trade' treaties and agreements through the World Trade Organization (WTO) that forces governments and businesses to comply with legally binding regulations, which is the opposite of free trade. WTO treaties often bolster monopolies that favor large multinational corporations.

The President's action plan also calls for a UN treaty agreement that will have full legal force. Following the UN climate summit deal in Durban in 2011, the US and China agreed to set legally binding emission targets by 2015 through a Kyoto-like treaty.

Some of Obama's international goals are disturbing, for example, his action plan intends to push "drought resistant seeds". Using this phrase is a covert way to promote seeds that are specifically engineered to be resistant to droughts, without identifying them as genetically modified organisms (GMO) because there is so much opposition to GMOs. The US has a vested interest in spreading GMO seeds across the globe as they are business partners with Monsanto and co-owners of a patent.

Obama is promoting worldwide expansion of nuclear power because the carbon emissions are low. However, nuclear power is exceptionally dangerous, the risk of another Chernobyl or Fukushima-type accident is high, and radioactive contamination lasts for thousands of years.

Obama's international goals push natural gas energy, which is touted as being cleaner than coal because it has lower carbon emissions, but there is no mention of how frack-drilling with chemicals for the gas causes groundwater pollution. Obama has his eye on expanding US frack-drilled natural gas exports.

The Senate has the power to ratify or reject any proposed WTO and UN treaties and many would vote in favor of unconstitutional treaties, therefore, it is time to throw them out of office in favor of Constitutional candidates.

You can read more from Cassandra Anderson's at her site MorphCity where this article first appeared.




BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.

5 comments:

Seen2013 said...

2 cents:

"Obama's strategy is designed to bypass Congress in order to lockdown land use and control water resources."

For readers who do not quite grasp the gravity here, the ability to seize control of land-use and water resources are derived by three specific interests:
1). Both combined enforces the Agenda 21's determination that the populace in and of itself is the property of the government who regents over the supranational institution's charter. Land-Use and control of water sources seize control of the pillars of civilization.
2). Land-use makes the land the property of the government to determine what you may or may not do with it. It means that you own no real property of value, and renters should know landlords often place a restriction of perceived dangerous pets or items. To put it another way, if you do not own your castle, castle doctrine does not exist. Self-defense is thus non-existent. All one needs is a badge or position of authority, and they can do whatever they want with you.
3). Control of Water resources is a defacto control of food production. If one controls food and water, they can enforce their will on the populace; this is a must. Bismarkians will have no qualm stepping back from castle doctrine to have this puppy after all relinquish your castle doctrine and get fed or keep it and they'll wait til you starve.

"WTO treaties often bolster monopolies that favor large multinational corporations."

Naturally, they are already in partnership as well as enforces the power of the supranationalism, which has waned since World War II.

"Using this phrase is a covert way to promote seeds that are specifically engineered to be resistant to droughts, without identifying them as genetically modified organisms (GMO) because there is so much opposition to GMOs."

Most Activistpost readers should be well aware of this one. For those, who are new to the class; this means that after 20-22 years of heavy ingestion develop cancer heavily, which is then used in chemo that kills the body. This makes the life expectancy in the ballpark of about what would be considered middle aged or the oldest average person around 50. These not only cause cancer but are nutrition deficient, so you're actually looking at junk food. Cardboard would be healthier for you.

"Obama is promoting worldwide expansion of nuclear power because the carbon emissions are low. However, nuclear power is exceptionally dangerous, the risk of another Chernobyl or Fukushima-type accident is high, and radioactive contamination lasts for thousands of years."

It also produces radioactive isotopes, and these isotopes are not just radioactive that these possess intense heat. In short, dear readers, the earth is estimated to be 4.5 billion years old because? The Earth is estimated to be 4.5 billion, and it couldn't sustain complex organisms because?

Anonymous said...

Radioactive isotopes?

Anonymous said...

All the oil billionaires are already purchasing natural water resources.I recently found out nestles owned by France has bought several major water sources in California. The Bushes bought aquifers in Paraguay, T Boone Pickens water resources in Texas and more. Look up who owns all the bottled water companies.

Anonymous said...

Look, we just need to get simple, use a little of the adversary's tactics and RE-LABEL things we always repeat for people to really get the whole truth of the idea.

Try this: The "Communist Agenda 21", or the "Communist New World Order". Use these words together and they have a strong, but simple meaning that cannot be misunderstood.

It does not matter that maybe its more fascist than communist, or that is does not come from the official Communist party! In fact that is a huge distraction for the slower reasoners & thinkers among us to leave the underlying communist principles unmentioned. Whether it is technically correct or not, is not the point! The point is that we are dealing with the strictest communist proposals imaginable.

Even the slowest thinkers will get the message fast. Agenda 21 is bad, communism is bad, the new world order is bad, all for the same reason which is COMMUNISM, not socialism! We know this word, do we accept Communism in the Corporate US?

Why are we so afraid of using the most descriptive word we can, that even a-sleeple's can and will understand?? Are there some mysterious anti-freedom editors that wont allow the word to be used in politically-correct-talk?

Thank you very much for the Communist Agenda 21 article! In every way that the proposals are communist, and really only benefit the few, I oppose the Communist Agenda 21 comrades, and I hope that you will mention Communism whenever you recognize it! We must either choose it or oppose it, AGAIN AND AGAIN! But please, call a spade a spade, and tell the truth for people to see and hear.

Anonymous said...

How about the Satanic Communist Agenda 21. That's the ticket!!!!

Post a Comment