Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Kissinger: ‘Terrorists are really people that reject the international system’

Kissinger’s definition of terrorism might surprise you.

Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton
Activist Post

Then again, it might be exactly what you thought it would be.

The clip below is from a 2007 AKBank convention in Instanbul, Turkey held right before the annual Bilderberg Meeting which took place there that same year. In it, former National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, (as well as member of the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and Bohemian Grove among others) Henry Kissinger can be seen giving the following speech:
In the Middle East, we live in a different world. The nations do not represent historic entities in the same sense that European nations did. Turkey of course does, and Iran in a considerable extent does. But in the region in between, the borders were drawn by the victors of World War I on the basis largely of what would facilitate their influence. So therefore, the identities of these countries, and of their borders, can be challenged more easily. 
What we in America call terrorists are really groups of people that reject the international system, and they’re trying to regroup it to a radical Islamic fundamentalists kind.
Clearly Kissinger is saying that, because many Middle Eastern countries do not have what appears to be in his view the ‘historical significance’ of older countries, they are wide open for attack, regime change and re-ordering.

Only a few years later, we have witnessed the Western-backed Arab Spring, which has turned over numerous North African and Middle Eastern nations. After nearly two years of semi-covertly arming al Qaeda fighters in Syria, most recently Western support and provision of arms for Syrian Rebels (who admittedly used their own chemical weapons) are becoming public knowledge now that a mythical ‘red line’ has supposedly been crossed by Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.

Remember how America ‘freed’ Egypt and Libya? Well Syria is wash, rinse, repeat.

On top of that, Kissinger is also saying the word “terrorist” is really someone who would reject the “international system” — a new world order. Part of that order appears to be American empire building and the spreading of our nation’s brand of “democracy” throughout the rest of the world…whether they like it or not.

How do you think someone with Kissinger’s perspective would see American patriots who reject the United Nations or central banking system? Surely, he sees them as “terrorists” as well. Further, if the State held similar views and used the “terrorist” label — which is used in this country like screaming “fire!” in a theater to circumvent the Constitution on a daily basis — such resistors to the new world order would be instantly criminalized, marginalized and marked for imprisonment or death.

Aaron and Melissa created, where this article first appeared, as an outlet to examine the news, place it in a broader context, uncover the deceptions, pierce through the fabric of illusions, grasp the underlying factors, know the real enemy, unshackle from the system, and begin to imagine the path towards taking back our lives, one step at a time, so that one day we might truly be free...


This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


mijj said...

lol .. Mass murdering War Criminal Kissinger lecturing us about how he would like to define the word "terrorist"

Hide Behind said...

lol @american patriots.....
They are wearing the newest cammo, yuppy converted who made theirs as progressives into the new preppies.

Anonymous said...

Why is this git still living !

Anonymous said...

The U.S. has been determined to reshape the Middle east for years as was pointed out in (Which Path to Persia)The Saban Center for Middle East Policy at The Brookings Institute. 170 pages/2009 pdf www.Land Destroyer report Oct. 12, 2011.the same goals as the former necons PNAC or Plan for New American Century." The U.S. has a new credibility." What we say goes." President George Bush NBC Nightly News, Feb. 02, 1991.

Anonymous said...

"There will be a new World order and it will force America to change its perception." Henry Kissinger. In 2007, Zbigneiw Brzezinski endorsed Barack Obama. he stated that Obama recognizes that the challenge is anew face, anew sense of direction, a new definition of America's place in the world.

Anonymous said...

"Comply to our will or be labeled and treated as a terrorist!"
Words like these come from the mouths of terrorists...sick, twisted, demented political terrorists...otherwise known throughout history as tyrannical dictators...that IS what you are doing Mr. Kissinger...DICTATING...
Might I suggest you do your tating to some other dic like yourself.

Anonymous said...

A New World Order = America's continued #1 in the world. The NSA spying (as revealed by Snowden, prism etc) and what is meantioned in this post are just symptoms of a machine trying to secure its place in the competitive world.

If you seek change we need an alternative. Removing people like Kissinger off influence won't change anything - all of this is deeply rooted in our system.

To learn more how the machine looks like from THEIR view watch "Fog Of War" - if you seek an alternative system build upon the ideas of the zeitgeist movement, as in here:

Anonymous said...

Here's your culprits: Committee of 300 - The Aristocracies of Europe & the Giant DRUG-RUNNING Cartels. They OWN everything on this planet - EVEN GOVERNMENTS! Kissinger is a member of this group.

The Bilderberg Group has been meeting secretly behind closed doors at irregular intervals, once or twice each year since its formation. Its purpose is the same as the CFR—to remove independence from all countries and permit the aristocracies tyrannical rule from behind the military might of the United Nations (U.N.)]

The Committee of 300 is the ultimate secret society made up of an untouchable ruling class, which includes the Queen of the United Kingdom (Elizabeth II), the Queen of the Netherlands, the Queen of Denmark and the royal families of Europe. These aristocrats decided at the death of Queen Victoria, the matriarch of the Venetian Black Guelphs that, in order to gain world-wide control, it would be necessary for its aristocratic members to "go into business" with the non-aristocratic but extremely powerful leaders of corporate business on a global scale, and so the doors to ultimate power were opened to what the Queen of England likes to refer to as "the commoners". Through their illicit banking cartel, they own the stock of the Federal Reserve, which is a private for profit corporation that violates U.S. Constitution and is a ROOT of the problem.

Anonymous said...

Some notable members of the Committee of 300 include: The British royal family, Dutch royal family, House of Hapsburg, House of Orange, Duke of Alba, Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh, Lord Carrington, Lord Halifax, Lord Alfred Milner, John Jacob and Waldorf of the Astor Illuminati bloodline, Winston Churchill, Cecil Rhodes, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen Juliana, Queen Beatrix, Queen Magreta, King Haakon of Norway, Colonel Mandel House, Aldous Huxley, John Forbes, Averill Harriman, William and McGeorge Bundy, George Bush, Prescott Bush, Henry Kissinger, J.P. Morgan, Maurice Strong, David Rockefeller, David and Evelyn Rothschild, Paul, Max and Felix Warburg, Ormsby and Al Gore, Bertrand Russell, Sir Earnest and Harry of the Oppenheimer Illuminati bloodline, Warren Buffet, Giuseppe Mazzini, Sir William Hesse, George Schultz, H.G. Wells, and Ted Turner.

Post a Comment