Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Gun Control Advocates Refuse to Advertise Their Homes as "Gun Free"


Posing as "Citizens Against Senseless Violence," we visit the homes of journalists working for Westchester Journal News, MSNBC, and the Star-Ledger. We also visited the home of Eric Holder. None will take our signs that say "THIS HOME IS PROUDLY GUN FREE."

Since these reporters and editors did not consider it a violation of the privacy and safety of others to reveal which homes have guns and which homes don't, we went to see which of them would be willing to put a sign up publicly declaring their homes to be gun-free zones. While we didn't find any members of the media with the strength of their convictions, we did find quite a few guns, and some good explanations for why they might be necessary . . . Guns for Me, but not for Thee.

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Anonymous said...

Typical State loving gun grabbing Pussies

Anonymous said...

This is the most beautiful thing I've seen in a VERY long time.

Taxpayer and Aware Citizen said...

Beyond hypocritical. Everyone should stop buying their crap and do not visit their websites. No Ad revenue for laying MSM puppets.

Great job exposing them for what they are...bravo!

Anonymous said...

Absolutely brilliant!

Anonymous said...

I love the husband of the publisher state that he "moved to Canada because I hate guns". Is there any possibility of an agenda...??

(Yes, that is a completely rhetorical question. It's just rare for it to be admitted like that)

Paul Panza said...

I am a gun free individual, because true "Freedom" is being free from the domination of weapons. I urge the military to set the same example and prove that planetary citizens are free from warfare and that people everywhere support the victims of warfare and their right to life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness without the fear of weapons. "Free you mind and your ass will follow".

Anonymous said...

The freedom to own a gun or not to own a gun is supposedly at stake here.

If someone chooses not to own one, why should anyone else (hello gun nuts allegedly fighting for free choice) have a right to demand that they put up a sign on their front lawn declaring their views?

Do you have to put up a sign to say you drink beer, or oppose beer, or marijuana? Do you need to put up a sign to say if you favor unions or corporations? WTF?
You gun nuts sure do love to tell other people what to do, and sure get offended when you are told the same things........... Hypocrites.

Anonymous said...

The Founding Fathers
"A free people ought to be armed."
- George Washington
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they
should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of
independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would
include their own government."
- George Washington
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson
"Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self defense."
- John Adams
"To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe."
- Noah Webster

Anonymous said...

We need take the fight to these press prostitutes directly if they take part in destroying the Consitution. We vastly out number them so they own all the media outlets and hire a few monkeys to saturate the airwaves with their propaganda.

Our fight has always been about information and taking it to the hired guns directly means fewer and fewer will be able to hide behind their darkened studios and cubicles and launch attacks against the Constitution.

This is a very encouraging development in strategy.

OKEY-DOKEY said...

This non-journalist doesn't have an issue with saying that he's a citizen of the State of Mississippi with respect to firearm owership!MS CONSTITUTION OF 1890:Article3;Section12"The right of every citian to keep and bear arms in defence of his home,person,or property,or in aid of the civil power...shall not be called into question,but the legislature may regulate[C.C.W.]!

okey-dokey said...

1.At least 40 of the 50 states have a right to 'keep and bear arms',except Minnesoda and New York(the latter does have in contast a massive article named,'Public Welfare'!)

okey-dokey said...

BTW,In c.1871 the State of Mississippi Legislature(made of c.2/3 former black slaves) added this to the MS CONCT.:Artile 1;Section 15:'All persons shall have a right to keep and bear arms for their defence'! I guess Obummer's out of touch with both blacks and whites!

okey-dokey said...

I'll say state lastly,what the State Constitutions of Mississppi of 1817 and 1832 state:(the wording is the same)"Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defence of himself and the state

okey-dokey said...

QUESTION:What is in your State Constitution?

Post a Comment