Friday, January 25, 2013

Goldman Sachs Made 400 Million Betting On Food Prices In 2012 While Hundreds Of Millions Starved

Michael Snyder, Contributor
Activist Post

Why does it seem like wherever there is human suffering, some giant bank is making money off of it? According to a new report from the World Development Movement, Goldman Sachs made about 400 million dollars betting on food prices last year.

Overall, 2012 was quite a banner year for Goldman Sachs. As I reported in a previous article, revenues for Goldman increased by about 30 percent in 2012 and the price of Goldman stock has risen by more than 40 percent over the past 12 months. It is estimated that the average banker at Goldman brought in a pay and bonus package of approximately $396,500 for 2012. So without a doubt, Goldman Sachs is swimming in money right now. 

But what is the price for all of this "success"? Many claim that the rampant speculation on food prices by the big banks has dramatically increased the global price of food and has caused the suffering of hundreds of millions of poor families around the planet to become much worse. At this point, global food prices are more than twice as high as they were back in 2003. Approximately 2 billion people on the planet spend at least half of their incomes on food, and close to a billion people regularly do not have enough food to eat. Is it moral for Goldman Sachs and other big banks such as Barclays and Morgan Stanley to make hundreds of millions of dollars betting on the price of food if that is going to drive up global food prices and make it harder for poor families all over the world to feed themselves?

This is another reason why the derivatives bubble is so bad for the world economy. Goldman Sachs and other big banks are treating the global food supply as if it was some kind of a casino game. This kind of reckless activity was greatly condemned by the World Development Movement report...

Goldman Sachs is the global leader in a trade that is driving food prices up while nearly a billion people are hungry. The bank lobbied for the financial deregulation that made it possible to pour billions into the commodity derivative markets, created the necessary financial instruments, and is now raking in the profits. Speculation is fuelling volatility and food price spikes, hurting people who struggle to afford food across the world.
So shouldn't there be a law against this kind of a thing?

Well, in the United States there actually is, but the law has been blocked by the big Wall Street banks and their very highly paid lawyers. The following is another excerpt from the report...
The US has passed legislation to limit speculation, but the controls have not been implemented due to a legal challenge from Wall Street spearheaded by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, of which Goldman Sachs is a leading member. Similar legislation is on the table at the EU, but the UK government has so far opposed effective controls. Goldman Sachs has lobbied against controls in both the US and the EU.
Posted below is a chart that shows what this kind of activity has done to commodity prices over the past couple of decades. You will notice that commodity prices were fairly stable in the 1990s, but since the year 2000 they have been extremely volatile...

The reason for all of this volatility was explained in an excellent article by Frederick Kaufman...
The money tells the story. Since the bursting of the tech bubble in 2000, there has been a 50-fold increase in dollars invested in commodity index funds. To put the phenomenon in real terms: In 2003, the commodities futures market still totaled a sleepy $13 billion. But when the global financial crisis sent investors running scared in early 2008, and as dollars, pounds, and euros evaded investor confidence, commodities -- including food -- seemed like the last, best place for hedge, pension, and sovereign wealth funds to park their cash. "You had people who had no clue what commodities were all about suddenly buying commodities," an analyst from the United States Department of Agriculture told me. In the first 55 days of 2008, speculators poured $55 billion into commodity markets, and by July, $318 billion was roiling the markets. Food inflation has remained steady since. 
The money flowed, and the bankers were ready with a sparkling new casino of food derivatives. Spearheaded by oil and gas prices (the dominant commodities of the index funds) the new investment products ignited the markets of all the other indexed commodities, which led to a problem familiar to those versed in the history of tulips, dot-coms, and cheap real estate: a food bubble. Hard red spring wheat, which usually trades in the $4 to $6 dollar range per 60-pound bushel, broke all previous records as the futures contract climbed into the teens and kept on going until it topped $25. And so, from 2005 to 2008, the worldwide price of food rose 80 percent --and has kept rising.
Are you angry yet?

You should be.

Poor families all over the planet are suffering so that Wall Street bankers can make bigger profits.

It's disgusting.

Many big financial institutions just seem to love to make money on the backs of the poor. I have previously reported on how JP Morgan makes billions of dollars issuing food stamp cards in the United States. When the number of Americans on food stamps goes up, so does the amount of money that JP Morgan makes. You can read much more about all of this right here: "Making Money On Poverty: JP Morgan Makes Bigger Profits When The Number Of Americans On Food Stamps Goes Up".

Sadly, the global food supply is getting tighter with each passing day, and things are looking rather ominous for the years ahead.

According to the United Nations, global food reserves have reached their lowest level in nearly 40 years. Global food reserves have not been this low since 1974, but the population of the world has greatly increased since then. If 2013 is another year of drought and bad harvests, things could spiral out of control rather quickly...
World grain reserves are so dangerously low that severe weather in the United States or other food-exporting countries could trigger a major hunger crisis next year, the United Nations has warned. 
Failing harvests in the US, Ukraine and other countries this year have eroded reserves to their lowest level since 1974. The US, which has experienced record heatwaves and droughts in 2012, now holds in reserve a historically low 6.5% of the maize that it expects to consume in the next year, says the UN. 
"We've not been producing as much as we are consuming. That is why stocks are being run down. Supplies are now very tight across the world and reserves are at a very low level, leaving no room for unexpected events next year," said Abdolreza Abbassian, a senior economist with the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).
The world has barely been able to feed itself for some time now. In fact, we have consumed more food than we have produced for 6 of the last 11 years...
Evan Fraser, author of Empires of Food and a geography lecturer at Guelph University in Ontario, Canada, says: "For six of the last 11 years the world has consumed more food than it has grown. We do not have any buffer and are running down reserves. Our stocks are very low and if we have a dry winter and a poor rice harvest we could see a major food crisis across the board." 
"Even if things do not boil over this year, by next summer we'll have used up this buffer and consumers in the poorer parts of the world will once again be exposed to the effects of anything that hurts production."

We desperately need a good growing season next summer, and all eyes are on the United States. The U.S. exports more food than anyone else does, and last summer the United States experienced the worst drought that it had seen in about 50 years. That drought left deep scars all over the country. The following is from a recent Rolling Stone article...
In 2012, more than 9 million acres went up in flames in this country. Only dredging and some eleventh-hour rain kept the mighty Mississippi River from being shut down to navigation due to low water levels; continuing drought conditions make "long-term stabilization" of river levels unlikely in the near future. Several of the Great Lakes are soon expected to hit their lowest levels in history. In Nebraska last summer, a 100-mile stretch of the Platte River simply dried up. Drought led the USDA to declare federal disaster areas in 2,245 counties in 39 states last year, and the federal government will likely have to pay tens of billions for crop insurance and lost crops. As ranchers became increasingly desperate to feed their livestock, "hay rustling" and other agricultural crimes rose.
Ranchers were hit particularly hard. Because they couldn't feed their herds, many ranchers slaughtered a tremendous number of animals. As a result, the U.S. cattle herd is now sitting at a 60 year low.

What do you think that is going to do to meat prices over the next few years?

Meanwhile, the drought continues. According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, this is one of the worst winter droughts the U.S. has ever seen. At this point, more than 60 percent of the entire nation is currently experiencing drought.

If things don't turn around dramatically, 2013 could be an absolutely nightmarish year for crops in the United States. If 2013 does turn out to be another bad year, food prices would soar both in the U.S. and on the global level. The following is from a recent CNBC article...
The severe drought that swept through much of the U.S. last year is continuing into 2013, threatening to cripple economic growth while forcing consumers to pay higher food prices. 
"The drought will have a significant impact on prices, especially beef, pork and chicken," said Ernie Gross, an economic professor at Creighton University and who studies farming issues.
So let us hope for the best, but let us also prepare for the worst.

It looks like higher food prices are on the way, and millions of poor families all over the planet will be hard-pressed to feed their families.

Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs will be laughing all the way to the bank.

This article first appeared here at the Economic Collapse Blog. Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogs The American Dream and Economic Collapse Blog. Follow him on Twitter here.


This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Anonymous said...

The Wall Street Ceo's should all be prison by now. Thank this Anti-Christ President Obama and the supercomputer matrix. The rich will weep and wail.

Anonymous said...

Goldman Sach's made $400 million betting on what/?
Who was the sucker bookmaker/?
Goldman Sach's most likely lost their underwear betting on magic dust.
AND :-
This is part of their DAMAGE CONTROL SPIN.
Talking up the company.
There is nothing like a ruthless, relentless, we would stop at nothing, image to inspire confidence.
The alternative is INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY & they CLOSE DOWN.

Anglo Saxon said...

The photograph of the emaciated Ethiopian child that heads this article is unnecessary, misleading, and yet another example of "bleeding liberal heart" bullsh*t.

The issues of malnutrition in the Horn of Africa have been with us for several decades already, and have nothing whatsoever to do with the criminal activities of Investment Bankers operating out of the Talmudic-Jewish financial centres that dot the geography of this sick world.

The Activist Post Editor would have demonstrated honesty and maturity if he/she had included a photograph of the soup kitchens now operating across the length and breadth of America, or of those now suffering malnutrition in certain parts of Europe (including Britain). These are new developments fully in synch with those speculative activities described in the article.

We shall expect better from Activist Post in future.

Anonymous said...

Inside traders and speculators on the NYMEX are manipulating commodity futures in food.

New legislation regulations needs to be introduced and passed by the U.S. congress to eliminate insider trading and limit speculation in commodity futures.

The margin requirements on commodity futures contracts must be raised and the amount of commodity futures traded must be limited.

At present you can buy a $10,000 contract for example in crude oil futures at 20% down or for as little as $2,000 down.

The margin requirements should be raised to 50% down which would have the effect of dampening speculation.

For anybody that is a broker for the commodity exchanges, it should be against the law for them to speculate in commodity futures for their personal gain or for that of the investment banks that they work for.

The investment banks are only suppose to derive their incomes from commissions and interest that they charge their customers.

When the 2/3rds majority of the 535 members of the U.S. congress repealed the Glass Steagal Act that deregulated the banks, they let the fox into the hen house.

The stock and commodity exchanges have become a gigantic gambling casino and a den of thieves!

anti-gerry said...

No, it isn't moral. You are absolutely right. Its costing many lives. The question is how many. Its certainly hundreds of thousands, but more likely millions. Banks funding corporate buyouts of companies also puts up costs of those businesses, with similar effects. What is most disturbing of all is this money belongs to investors, who in most cases are unaware of the devastation their investment is causing. See X-ECONOMICS. We need more people high lighting this stuff who have been in 'the industry'.

Anonymous said...

Yes, it is financialization itself that is destroying the rest of us. And Obama's mysterious rise to power was closely connected with it - not that he's unique in any way. But look at his rise to power in Illinois and you see both a creation of banking and a particular interest in commodities and futures. Our next president will be at least as bad, so I don't mean to call him out other than to point out that his rise to power meshes nicely with his pick of Holder and Breuer to take their turn at running the corrupt justice department that drove Bush's getaway car so ably.

The confluence between political power and profits is what those in the WOT like to call an existential threat. Our nation is being destroyed, but the monstrous squid is not even on defense's to-do list. They only concern themselves with chemical, biological and non-authorized radiological threats. Vaporizing a functioning economy? Not a threat.

Look at each problematic area: above all healthcare, but housing, education, and Wall Street itself. Then apply the hypothesis that organized crime has overtaken each one and you will find much evidence to uphold that hypothesis. Then you, too, can become a financialization conspiracy hypothesizer.

Anonymous said...

I forgot maybe the biggest organized crime takeover, and that is municipal financing leverages the bejesus out of ordinary municipal bonds, ripping off financial districts from sea to shining sea.

In short, the reason the people's economy is not recovering is the TAX levied on us by all the organized crime buying indulgences from our criminal congress daily. Oh damn, I'm pretty sure such thought make me a potential domestic terrier. But, of course, if any of the institutions living off tax dollars where actually keeping their obligations to us, we wouldn't even be having these internet conversations.

anti-gerry said...

This is one of the most informative posts Ive seen. But why isn't it on the front of Telegraph, Daily Mail, Sun etc. Don't worry, I know , they wouldn't allow it !

Anonymous said...

Hi, Mr. Snyder, it's me again, but you asked, "Are you angry yet?"

Let's not forget the TAX called insurance. You have medical insurance in your auto policy, the guy that hits you probably has it or is covered through the levy for uninsured motorists. Your employer has liability insurance. His employer has liability insurance. You have medical insurance through that employer or on your own. The other driver has insurance. The street you're on is insured by the city's liability. Every manufacturer of every part up to and including the car is insured for health, liability and even teroroism. Insurance every step of the way, YET almost everyone is one medical event away from bankruptcy, because despite layers of insurance, most people are not actually insured against bankruptcy from medical bills. We pay over a trillion more per year than any other developed country, yet they have coverage and we don't.

When the insurance exchange kicks in next year, the bronze coverage will be for about 60% of healthcare's cost should you need to use your overpriced policy because all because the colluding cowards of Washington refused to focus on the cost drivers. Clue: think of the patient as a pass through. Old people aren't sucking up healthcare dollars. If you have a hernia operation it makes no difference to your health outcome whether it costs $900 or $90000. Meanwhile the Wall Street industry cares not about the outcome, only how many tax and premium dollars it can siphon out of the economy.

It's a tax, a financialization tax. A tax on healthcare, a tax on education, a tax on housing via both mortgages and rents, it's even a tax on taxes with pensions and derivatives driving up state and local costs. The fat tick of finance gets bigger and the economy gets weaker. Anyone think bailouts and all the other euphemisms is going to fix that? The host, the ordinary economy, isn't going to get better until the money circulates through it instead of the tick.

anti-gerry said...

To anonymous,
Your question "Who was the sucker book maker?"
It could be any one of us who have any type of investment. Any one with a pension fund, an endowment mortgage account, or any kind of insurance. The people doing the gambling are using our money ! Give it a bit of thought and you will work it out. As long as the banks keep gambling, they can all win ! At the investor's expense. The book maker is us. This is why we have to stop giving them our money !

Anonymous said...

Its called should really educate yourselves as to what motivates this kind of action. You can really thank you government. Give "credit" where "credit" is due.

Post a Comment