Thursday, December 13, 2012

'Zero Dark Thirty' Falling on the World

John Galt
Activist Post

Kathryn Bigelow is once again drawing attention; this time for the follow-up to her award-winning movie The Hurt Locker. The focus of her new movie is on the role torture has played in American foreign policy in a post-9/11 world. Namely, the hunting of Osama bin Laden and his subsequent death.

America's torture doctrine is now enshrined, as courts at all levels have concluded that it is best for the military to decide American morality. The latest insult comes via Jose Padilla's family who have had to appeal to an international human rights tribunal for basic protections that their son should have been afforded within the U.S. legal system as a natural-born American citizen.

The sweeping net of counterterrorism has subjected innocent people to medieval cruelties ... and these people have had their unjust suffering fall on deaf ears. Who would extol such barbarous acts as justified? Hollywood, of course.

Now to the big screen comes a faint echo of what has been crafted in depth across cable TV series' like 24 and Homeland: there are real bad guys out there who have their finger on the button of imminent nuclear Armageddon and the U.S. Cavalry must by any means necessary ride in to save the day at the very last minute.

It is intriguing, sort of like comic books can be -- heroes and villains battling behind the scenes to destroy or save common and unaware humanity -- but, like comic books, the narrative is often black and white, having been created by minds who have a very sound ability to tell stories, and a very limited ability to go beyond the confines of narrative fantasy.


Zero Dark Thirty is set for studio release on December 19th, but is already generating controversy for its opening thirty-minute depiction of torture.

According to the official description:
For a decade, an elite team of intelligence and military operatives, working in secret across the globe, devoted themselves to a single goal: to find and eliminate Osama bin Laden. Zero Dark Thirty reunites the Oscar(R) winning team of director-producer Kathryn Bigelow and writer-producer Mark Boal (The Hurt Locker) for the story of history's greatest manhunt for the world's most dangerous man.


If we can put the melodrama aside for a moment, we'll clearly see that some very substantiated facts point to an entire myth still being created around the character of Osama bin Laden - the perfect bogeyman to initiate the endless global war on terror. And, according to Zero Dark Thirty apparently, the myth is extended to torture having been implemented as a last resort to catch (then execute) this prince of darkness.

Nothing could be further from the truth, since, as Keith Johnson detailed in May, 2011, there is much evidence that shows Osama bin Laden -- a CIA creation from the beginning -- very well might have died in Tora Bora back in 2001. As Johnson writes:
But don’t just take my word for it. Top terror experts, intelligence analysts, academicsgovernment officials, and even major political figures around the globe tend to agree that, “All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.”
Zero Dark Thirty clearly goes beyond poetic license into the realm of political license to offer up support for torturing real people in order to find ghosts.

Regarding the portrayal of torture itself, Andrew Sullivan offers the following screed in his criticism of the movie's stated plot, and his assertion that Kathryn Bigelow has outed herself as a torture apologist and propagandist:
If Bigelow is calling torture 'harsh tactics' she is complicit in its defense. And lies do have an agenda, whatever Bigelow says. They pretend that the law allows torture, they violate the historical record, and they make war crimes more likely in the future. Yes, it makes for a more thrilling ride if we start with a torture scene in a movie drama. But actual torture, authorized illegally by war criminals, is not fiction and is far too grave a matter to be exploited as a plot device. It is illegal because it is evil and because it provides unreliable and often false leads, not real ones. Bigelow cannot argue that her movie has no agenda, or duck behind the excuse that this is a 'movie' and not a 'documentary'. If it lies to promote the efficacy of torture, it has a very real agenda. And that is a defense of barbarism as entertainment, and as the law of the land. (Source)

With Osama bin Laden's choreographed death, the Islamic world supposedly has been given a martyr, justifying the expansion of Al-Qaeda in particular. This would seem to justify continuing the war on terror and, yes, the torture. And the narrative will be helped along with this movie; propaganda that the establishment will likely reward with another Oscar nomination for Bigelow.

The new mainstream American value of torture is steeped in self-deception, legal rewrites, and propaganda embraced and emboldened by Hollywood. We idolize torturers in our favorite TV programs, and are happy to see our enemies (real and imagined) vicariously taken apart in order to protect our beacon of freedom. It is an Orwellian undertaking.

Only a massive propaganda effort and a healthy dose of self-delusion can maintain torture's legitimacy when it has been proven to be completely unreliable in true intelligence gathering -- not even when working against a ticking bomb, or "the world's most dangerous man."

Read other articles by John Galt Here



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

If all South Africans, especially the men and especially the Afrikaners had stood up in a fury and demanded that the then Government of South Africa arrest, try in open court and HANG the police who tortured Steve Biko to death in East London - just imagine how the World would have admired them! Just imagine! And just imagine how different South Africa would be today. It would be so much better than it is now.

"Saint" Mandela, who was a terrorist setting off bombs in SA - unlike Steve Biko who was not a terrorist at all - would not have been used to bring SA back into the fold of the Commonwealth and in the tight grip of the banksters as it is now.

Imagine if all Americans had stood up and said "NO! Not in our country and not in our name." when Bush made torture legal and when people were shown those terrible pictures of Afghans in orange.

Imagine, how much South Africans would have been admired, No one would have been able to take their country away from them and they would not have been subjugated once more in the Commonwealth. And they could have done it quite easily because they had organizations such as The Ossewabrandwag and others and the Government would not have dared to deny them.

Amerikkka has made the same mistake and is now despised and hated every where and the people have lost their country - all for the lack of just a little courage, compassion and ordinary human goodness.

It is so immensely sad. I do now know why the South Africans were so weak and selfish about the brave and good Steve Biko. I think that they had cowed by the Jewish press in South Africa and around the World which had been criticising them endlessly for years and I think they had lost their confidence.
Why America was so weak and selfish and cruel I do not know except that they were so terribly shocked and numbed by 9/11 that they could not think straight let alone FEEL.

I want to add that Mandela at least did try to help the Libyans over Lockerbie and he did not betray Gadaffi who had befriended him and South Africa. Zuma did betray Gadaffi and should be ashamed of himself. He is no proud, strong dignified Zulu. He is not a good Zulu and it is a miserable shame - all of it.

Anonymous said...

Just shows what a joke Hollywood is. Turn off the TV and don't enter a cinema - ever! You'll feel a whole lot better.

Anonymous said...

Wow, a movie script ... about a movie script. And hollywood is NOT working with the military?

Nemetron 2000 said...

Torture being depicted as a necessary evil is everywhere it would seem. The conditioning of the public to the necessity of torture serves two purposes. One, obviously to get people to condone its use. Secondly, to frighten those that are more aware of what is really going on into staying silent because 'you could be next'. Depicting the torture tactics used by the US in movies and videogames is kind of veiled threat by the government aimed at the more outspoken truthers out there.

Anonymous said...

Of course Hollywood is a propaganda machine! The MPAA (Motion Picture Arts Association)flat out censors what the public is exposed to. However, thanks to the internet (youtube, vimeo) anyone can produce or find films that would never be distributed through Warner Brothers, MGM, 21st Century/FOX, etc. Don't let Bigelow's propaganda movie, with it's melodramatic title, bother you. It is meant for the same people who watch Fox News and own Ford F150s and think they are blessed by God because they have money and are free Americans. Hollywood is just a trash machine, designed to sell you ideas you don't need, just like advertising is designed to sell you things you don't need. Great books go out of print and you can't find them, but go into Barnes and Noble and look at the piles of mindless reading you can find.

Post a Comment