Saturday, November 10, 2012

Bill Gates Malaria Vaccine Flops In African Trials

Dees Illustration
Brandon Turbeville

In what may prove to be a minor public relations setback for vaccine pushers like Bill Gates and GlaxoSmithKline, the much touted Mosquirix malaria vaccine recently rolled out in Africa has been officially demonstrated to be only 30% effective in babies.

Results from the final-stage trial administered by GSK appeared to demonstrate that the vaccine only provided “modest protection” for babies aged six to 12 weeks, with a reduction in the contraction of the disease by only 30%, a much lower number than what had been touted by those promoting the jab in the industry and the corporate media.

Reuters also reports that for children after the age of six months, a 65% rate was established. For children of five to 17 months old, the researchers claim a protection of around 50%.

In response to what Reuters has dubbed a “surprisingly poor result” for the vaccine, Bill Gates stated, “The efficacy came back lower than we had hoped, but developing a vaccine against a parasite is a very hard thing to do.”

Indeed, Gates is correct in suggesting the difficulty for creating a vaccine for a Protozoan, the type of parasite which causes malaria, This is because vaccines are supposedly designed to protect against viruses. Thus, the Mosquirix vaccine enters into the growing science of DNA vaccines – a research field which is expanding but also one in which the science is still very much out in regards to effectiveness, safety, and even possibility.

Nevertheless, GSK has announced that it will not be giving up in the attempt to develop Mosquirix into a more “effective” vaccine, and will be working with governments and international groups in order to fund the operation. GSK claims it does not plan to make a profit from Mosquirix, although it admits that it will be charging a 5% profit margin on the product. The funding for the development and rollout, of course, will be coming from the governments and international groups mentioned above, meaning it is the cash-strapped taxpayer who must shovel out the cash for yet another eugenics program aimed at poor Africans.

Interestingly enough, it was Bill Gates himself who once stated, “The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

Of course, it bears noting, especially in this context, that the results of the GSK study show only a 30% efficacy rate yet the companies, governments, and international “groups” behind the push are continuing to move forward with plans for yet more vaccination programs whose harmful effects have not been properly studied.

Yet, even the 30% itself is highly suspect considering the fact that there has never been a study proving that vaccines are either safe or effective that itself was not connected to a vaccine maker or pharmaceutical company.[1]

The fact that the ineffectiveness of the malaria vaccine is being announced openly by the corporation that created it as well as one of the most notorious vaccine pushers in the world is striking. With this in mind, one could be led to suppose that the real percentage of efficacy might be even lower if non-politicized science were applied to it.

In the end, the real goal of such vaccine programs as those currently being funded in Africa is a eugenics-based, population reduction philosophy that permeates governments, corporations, NGO’s, and academia. Unfortunately, it is for this reason that open the open failure of the malaria vaccine will do little to deter the expense of more money, more time, and more propaganda being spent toward the goal of vaccinating and reducing the vast majority of the population of Africa.

[1] Flu and Flu Vaccines: What’s Coming Through That Needle. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny.
Part 1 -
Part 2 -

Read other articles by Brandon Turbeville here.

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor's Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of three books, Codex Alimentarius -- The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, and Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident. Turbeville has published over 175 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville's podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at)


This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Ernest M. Trionfo said...

A baby is dependent on the mother’s immunoglobulin for defense against disease during the first 4 months of life.

Maternal gamma globulin in the baby's blood starts out at 1 gram per 100 milliliters, then declines to almost zero after about 4 months.

The baby does not start to produce its own gamma globulin until the end of the first month after birth. The level increases to 0.5 gram per 100 milliliters in 4 months, then reaches about 0.65 grams per 100 milliliters by 8 months - only 65% of the maternal amount of gamma globulin it had to start with.

Ernest M. Trionfo said...

If you want to protect babies from disease you vaccinate the mother and get her to breast feed.

The mother's antibodies are transferred to the baby through breast feeding.

"In developing countries the most dangerous period of a child's life begins with weaning when the protection of the breast milk vanishes
and often heavily contaminated food is introduced."

Human milk: Defense against infection.

"During pregnancy, the mother passes antibodies to her baby through the placenta, and these proteins circulate in the infant's blood for weeks to months after birth.

Breast-fed infants gain extra protection from antibodies, other proteins and immune cells
in human milk.

At around four months of age babies will start to produce some of their own antibody
protection but the developing immune system is not fully functional until a child is around
two years of age. "

How breast milk helps baby's immune system

Lamargo Petersen said...

All well and good until you realize that Gates et al are looking to bring down population growth, NOT to allow more population growth through healthcare. Gates and Pharmaceutical companies depend on profit for their stockholders, Gates included.To see that profit, yes cash strapped taxpayers are expected to divvy up. The companies pay no taxes or ship their profits offshore. Billionaires want to become trillionaires and not see one cent go into the infrastructure of their own city,country. They use the power, the roads, the gas and oil and WATER and expect the lowly blue collar worker to foot the bill. Shameful!

lakristinita said...

Never use vaccines and dont encourage anyone that you care for to get them either. Pregnant women should never get vaccines as the fetus is then exposed to all the toxins that the vaccine has and can cause damage to the fetus. It can cause lots of damage at certain developmental stages. Its always better safe than sorry. If you want to know more about the toxins that vaccines have then check out Sherry Tenpenny's web site. Good luck to all of us, its a scary world out there and it shouldnt be,

Anonymous said...

Give Gates his own vaccinations. That sob

Anonymous said...

Too bad gates does not really care about Malaria as he does population control. What were they really injected with?

Anonymous said...

If you want population reduction you introduce new and inventive ways of convincing people that you want to help them.......then you inject them with poison so they can't reproduce. Phuc you Bill Gates.

Anonymous said...

If you want to kill off populations without any convictions of wrongful death than Billy Boy and the drug/chemical company have to keep doing the vaccine thing. Bill Gates and GlaxoSmithKline are up for that task and they are gleeful in doing it. Their friends and contributors all think they are just dandy people who help to reduce life on earth. They are into death. They are getting more successful in their agenda with each vaccine.

Anonymous said...

Yes. Perfectly fitting.

Anonymous said...

I sometimes wonder about the moment of death- you know - that final point - the people engaging against their fellow humans/nature/world are going to have something of a difficult time of it when they reach that point, aren't they? Imagine? Yr last awareness is of how much horror/pain/fear& distress you caused? And there will b no avoiding it.

Anonymous said...

It`s unfortunate we can`t develop a vaccine against parasites like Bill Gates.

Anonymous said...

But of course the goal was never really to stop the disease...the goal is to sterilize brown people. We'll just have to wait and see if these children can have babies in 15 years.

Anonymous said...

Gates finally said something I agree with: "developing a vaccine against a parasite is a very hard thing to do.” - We're working on it Billy Bob.

okey dokey said...

GOD made Mankind...Mankind made...DDT! For those who oppose GOD...remember Matthew 18:6!

Post a Comment