Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Unanswered 9-11 Questions Vetted on New Open-Source Debate Website

Activist Post

As we remember the horrific events of 9-11 on this 11th anniversary, it's an excellent opportunity to remind people that many unanswered questions remain about the day that changed everything.

Nearly anyone who takes an honest look at the official explanation of 9-11 realizes it's at best incomplete, and at worst a complete fabrication.

Many theories have sprung up in an attempt to answer the glaring questions like: How did Building 7 crumble to the ground at free fall speed without having been hit by anything? Or how could jet fuel turn the twin towers into dust? Where is the plane wreckage from Shanksville? Or how did untrained Al Qaeda fighters make nearly impossible flight maneuvers? Or why did America's air defense stand down?

And many more questions expose the official story as bogus.

You won't see any mainstream media outlets address these questions or even acknowledge any controversy at all despite the obvious discrepancies. Thankfully many independent researchers and the alternative media are doing their best to uncover the truth. But now there is a new platform that allows anyone to contribute their research, theories and evidence to help answer these questions.

A recently launched open-source website has created a user-friendly digital battlefield for the debate over these types of controversial and fiercely contended issues. IssueVet.com has developed an innovative "vetting" software similar to Wiki, designed to break through the Internet clutter and force both sides of an issue to engage in a fair fight and show all of their work.

IssueVet's open-source interface allows the world to use its collective intelligence and knowledge to work like a team of investigators laying out all of the arguments on their side of an issue and not let the other side get away with lies, manipulation, oversimplification, speculation, empty conclusions or unreliable evidence.

On this anniversary, truth activists should flood this website and others like it with the real information about 9-11 before the government and their crony handlers fill it with their propaganda.

Go to their Vetting September 11th channel to contribute.

Read other articles by Activist Post HERE

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

my initial impressions: very lame. sorry. To offer false claims to present the anti-truth position is dishonest.

Ayelyah said...

1.3 million Iraqi's ignored real victims of 9/11. ..zionist corporate media monopoly was the weapon of mass manipulation they used to frame the blame on Islam... when NOTHING could be further from the truth...the result of highest level criminals with unlimited access to weapons of media mass manipulation...unabated zionist manufacture of wars throughout Islamic nations that have escalated since the 9/11 fully orchestrated covert operation...masses are waking up fast and there will be no hiding place for all in collusion with 9/11 and its fully intended aftermath..

Anonymous said...

There is no known force that could cause a building to fall like that!

Only a planned destruction of it's foundation would make it fall.

Anonymous said...

"Only a planned destruction of it's foundation would make it fall."

Agreed, but that alone would have caused a much different result than was witnessed.

To bring them down as they did would have required charges on multiple floors above ground level to cut some secondary structure at the same time that the core columns would have needed to be cut into numerous pieces from the sub-structure/foundation levels up to the top floors.

With the core successfully dismantled the rest of the building designed to buttress into the core columns for support would have had no choice but to 'collapse' into itself as secondary charges cleared all major resistance below.

The 'crackling' sound some witnesses reported right before the large explosions that beckoned the 'collapse' of both towers was likely explosive charges pulverizing the core columns from the foundations to the "impact" floors of the towers.

That after the mysterious explosions heard in the sub-levels that likely severed or at least severely weakened the base of the core.

It all sounds quite complex but in reality for a trained demolitions team it would not have been too difficult.

Though keeping an open mind other theories such as Dr. Judy Woods' theory of DEW can also be considered which could theoretically cause the molecular de-bonding of materials(dustification) and in some cases are specifically designed to target the core structure of a targeted building.

Though how the sounds of explosions and such that witnesses report fit with a DEW explanation I'm not sure, perhaps to be safe multiple methods were used in conjunction with each other?

Anonymous said...

The ONLY debate should be - when will a new investigation and the trials of the people like Bush, Cheney, Mossad and all people who carried out plus the following cover up, begin. This is truly one of the saddest stories of our modern history.
Most people really don't want to hear or see the truth which is also pathetic. How times and events have changed in just a few short years and they are being allowed to get away with it because their controlled media refuses to report the truth. How must these people feel when everyone including their families and friends know they are puppet liars. We need some real help. There must be a few honest politicians left. If not we are all hooped and that hurts. All the best. Ken R

Anonymous said...

Why would Mohammud Atta drive from Boston to Portland in order to turn around and take a flight from there to Boston the very next morning?

Why not just remain in Boston and not risk missing his flight out with a close connecting?

Even though his baggage was not transferred onto the departing flight from Boston, why would he prepare a suitcase with his Will in it if he had planned on taking that bag on the same plane he was alleged to have crashed?

Anonymous said...

mucho grande cui bono ?


A group of "American" business and political leaders are building a pro-Israel media "war room" in Washington, D.C. The group will be called "Emet" —which in Hebrew means "truth." Emet will try to address biased media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and also make the case that the conflict, while serious and important, pales in comparison to the larger geo-strategic threat posed to the United States and the West by Iran and Iraq, both of whom are trying to build and/or acquire weapons of mass destruction. Funding Emet is Leonard Abramson; he sold U.S. Healthcare to Aetna in the mid-1990s for $8.9 billion. Abramson has recruited a powerful board of directors, including Bernie Marcus, founder of Home Depot; Les Wexner, founder of The Limited; Edgar Bronfman Sr., who once owned Seagram's; and Lou Ranieri, a major Wall Street player who now co-owns one of Israel's largest banks. Also joining the board are Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, and Jack Kemp.


Post a Comment