Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Staging World War 3 For A Mutually Desired Outcome

War Mind
Anthony Freda Art
Eric Blair
Activist Post

I watched the movie Pearl Harbor last week and it struck me how impossible it would be for Japan or anyone to pull off such an attack today.

In the age of satellites that can read license plates from space, the days of a fleet of aircraft carriers sneaking up on anyone are long past. In fact, there will never be another battle like Normandy where thousands were killed while storming forward directly into the enemy's line of fire either.

That type of warfare is as obsolete as brigades lining up in formation as they did during the Revolutionary War in America. Even occupations like Iraq and Afghanistan are proving to be completely ineffective and outdated.

Additionally, because of advanced weaponry, the entire idea of conventional war seems utterly ridiculous.

It’s pretty well established that nations like the United States, Russia, China, and the European block all possess amazingly advanced weapons like weather weaponry, nuclear weaponry, chemical and biological weapons, EMP bombs, robotic drones, and space-based weapons like “Rods from God” just to name a few.

And, surely, there are ultra top secret weapons that make these advanced weapons seem antiquated. Thus, it would appear that conventional warfare with bullets and bombs is like using sticks and stones compared even to the weapons we know to exist.


So, what gives? Why do we continue to believe that ragtag nations like Iran pose a threat to powerhouse nations with sci-fi weaponry? And why does anyone still believe battles with sticks and stones are even necessary at all?

Conventional war may make some sense for minor conflicts in isolated areas of the world where one group of violent thugs wants to seize power and wealth from another group of violent thugs.

But if Iran were to launch a significant assault on any of their enemies, they would likely be turned into a parking lot in 30 minutes from these weapons. So they're restrained by their own self-preservation and therefore pose absolutely no threat to anyone.

Similarly, after Japan struck Pearl Harbor it was rumored that Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto said "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant." Shortly thereafter, America stunned the world by dropping atom bombs on Japan (even as evidence has shown that it was U.S. policy to provoke an attack by Japan, then deliberately allowed it to happen).

Since then, no nation will dare confront the United States, China, Russia, or European block with a military assault. So the idea that a conventional World War III between these powers would ever be necessary is as idiotic as Iran posing a threat to the West.

No nation is stupid enough to launch a nuclear attack on another nuclear power, as a swift and equally devastating response would be a certainty. Furthermore, no one would benefit from such an exchange. And when there is no benefit, there is no war. Top-level war orchestrator, Zbigniew Brzezinski has said repeatedly in his writings that it is preferable to have small-scale conflicts that are manageable. This has been the ongoing method of globalists since the last world war, where regional conflicts have become so widespread that their effects are felt globally, offering a de facto WWIII without the nukes or the announcement of global conflict. The posturing rhetoric of all-out global war is theater meant to keep everybody scared of perceived enemies and to keep the military-industrial complex flush with fear-driven profits.

What's more, these powerful nations are too interdependent economically to be so foolish as to attack each other. Their leaders are too obsessed with power and control to let it happen. Their economies are so fragile that one domino of disruption could spur a domestic revolution that can threaten their power -- including inside the United States.

Of course, history tells us that when a nation's back is against the wall economically, the leaders rally the desperate people around a common enemy and use war as the engine of new economic output. This is happening now with the so-called War on Terror which is increasingly an excuse to spend money on surveillance of domestic populations.

Modern warfare is fought at the highest levels with economics through currency battles, sanctions, and tariffs; through small proxy forces like we saw in Libya and now in Syria, and increasingly in the cyber world. On this stage, World War III has already begun. Yet, as these tactics are exposed, they look more and more like mafia hits; or, dare I say, terror attacks than a "just war" to defend a nation state, its people, or its constitution.

In every case, the battles are about gaining more wealth and power for those who are initiating the war. It's hardly ever been about defending national sovereignty and freedom, especially now that national sovereignty is nearing extinction due to the globalized economy. However, patriotism is still used as a tool to keep the facade of the war machine going.

The fact is, there are no real enemies or real threats to the superpowers, and therefore no real reason to fight conventional wars any longer.  In my opinion, the prospect of a conventional World War III is ludicrous, and the only way it would happen is if it was coordinated between supposed enemies to be controlled for a mutually desired outcome.

Read other articles by Eric Blair HERE


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

...yea like the population reduction program...

Anonymous said...

i can think of one reason: global depopulation. they can nuke the world while lavishing comfortably in their underground condominiums.

Anonymous said...

Isn't that a phrase that turns your stomach... ...seeking a "mutually desirable outcome"...? Sick, eh?

Regards,

RJ O'Guillory
Author-
Webster Groves-The Life of an Insane Family

Anonymous said...

I have to disagree while agreeing with the author here, the U.S missile shield program is the game changer.

Once the missile shield comes online Russia loses use of it's doemstically positioned nuclear forces for anything other than last-ditch efforts to repel invaders within the Russian interior itself.

If the U.S were to make the first strike and take out the Russian expeditionary nuclear forces in subs, ships, missile bases(in Cuba) and such that would pretty much leave Russia impotent, unable to retaliate.

And no doubt the U.S military knows if not the precise locations at least the rough locations of all such Russian nuclear forces at all times around the globe and could likely eliminate them in a coordinated attack in mere minutes.

Mutually Assured Destruction no longer exists once the missile shield becomes fully operation.

Though I personally think it's just propaganda it may be true that Russia already has missiles that can bypass the missile shield systems, but even if so once built and operational the missile shield becomes very easily upgradable to eliminate any such Russian advantage.

And the U.S government knows this all very well, eliminating the ability of Russia to retaliate against a U.S nuclear first strike was a big part of the reason it was originally approved for funding and initiated development.

From Russia's perspective once the missile shield program becomes fully operational, or upgraded to counter any Russian technology, they become fish in a barrel waiting for the U.S.A/NATO to pull the trigger and nuke them back to the Stone Age.

The Russians really would have no choice but to initiate a nuclear strike first, before the U.S.A could eliminate their expeditionary nuclear forces.

And those aware of certain Catholic mystic's prophecies about Russian sub's bombarding North America and other parts of the world with nuclear weapons and "winning every battle" for several years... well it makes me nervous.

The U.S.A is purposefully putting Russia in a position where it has no choice but to become the big, bad aggressor that can be blamed for starting a nuclear war, or become totally neutered and submissive to the U.S.A/NATO power.

Beware a cornered and wounded Russian Bear, they are very dangerous, especially when led by visions of their former glory.

Peace.

baz said...

The main worry I think is a crazy attack by Israel on Iran

Anonymous said...

"Anon" you are complete and total moron ! US beat up Russia BS! will never happen there is no use is better then Russia or has better weapons then Russia or any of it. These countries have Weapons that are beyond what people even know. What they do is create proxy wars using religion and race to distablize a country from with in. Then they create an enemy they can fight so the Corporation can make tons of money fueling that proxy war.

Really nations have been at war with each other for quite a while it's called weather war!

Anonymous said...

@ Baz - Although I'm sure the coming Israel/U.S.A attack on Iran will be the final and most major catalyst for WWIII such a conflict will still only be a regional conflict.

All of the wars of the past 100+ years including the last 2 World Wars were paving the way for the next one, which should be the last by their NWO plans.

All of the minor regional conflicts that this article talks about are part of the build-up for the larger war, to set the stage by pushing the pawns(whether willing or not) into the positions they need for their plans to work out.

Israel/Iran/Syria will be the 'final straw' that launches us into that global conflict in my opinion, but it is the Russian Bear that is being levered into the position of being the initiator of the whole damn thing - whether they want to be or not.

If you removed Russia and to a lesser extent China from the picture even an Israeli nuclear attack on Iran and/or Syria would not provoke a global war.

Russian Bears and Chinese Dragons are the cause of nightmares for many, and they are the key aspects in the whole Big picture.

There is a reason the elites of the world like the chess-board checkerboard symbolism for they may be callous and heartless and maybe even downright Evil, but they are also undoubtedly brilliant.

And just like Hitler when he chose to open the second front against the Soviets, Russia may be forced to make a mistake it knows it should not make and will be it's undoing.

Hitler stated that opening a second front would lose them the war long before doing it and he admitted even as he signed the orders to do it that it was a mistake.

But sometimes your opponents are so clever they force you into a position where knowingly making a mistake is simply the only option you have left to take for survival.

The world stage has been set by regional conflicts and all the pawns are almost in position, now it's just time for the checkmate.

Unless somebody comes along and turns the board upside-down and screws up all their plans first.

Tom Gambill said...

Leading to fake Armageddon and then to the real WWIII.

Peace covenant: and when they say peace and safety then comes sudden destruction:

"World War III is to be fomented, using the so-called controversies; by the agents of the Illuminati operating under whatever new name; that are now being stored up between the political Zionists and the leaders of the Moslem world. That war is to be directed in such a manner that all of Islam and political Zionism (Israelis) will destroy each other while at the same time; the remaining nations, once more divided on this issue, will be forced to fight themselves into a state of complete exhaustion; physically, mentally, spiritually, and economically.

August 15, 1871 - "Now can any thinking person doubt that the intrigue now going on in the near Middle and Far-East is designed to accomplish that satanic objective? Pike himself foretold all this in a statement he made to Mazzini on August 15, 1871. Pike stated that after World War III is ended; those who will aspire to undisputed world-domination will provoke the greatest social-cataclysm the world has ever known. Quoting his own words taken from the letter he wrote to Mazzini and which letter was catalogued in the British Museum in London, England before Rothschild took control of the library; he said:

"We shall unleash the nihilists and the atheists and we shall provoke a great social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to all nations the effect of absolute atheism; the origins of savagery and of most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the people will be forced to defend themselves against the world minority of the world revolutionaries and will exterminate those destroyers of civilization and the multitudes disillusioned with Christianity whose spirits will be from that moment without direction and leadership and anxious for an ideal, but without knowledge where to send its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer brought finally out into public view. A manifestation which will result from a general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and Atheism; both! conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Anonymous said...

WW3 would be great, it will settle the scores once and for all.

Anonymous said...

Mostly agree with you that the big powers are allies in maintaining their own power. But Israel is using us in a dangerous gambit to increase its own power in the ME.

Notice that Iraq is unraveling again, and consider that it relates to the destabilization of Syria. Israel wants the whole ME to embark on a war between Sunni and Shia, and Kurds, among other natural fault lines. If they get Syria kicked off, Iraq and Lebanon are going with it. Iran can't stand by and watch, and neither can Turkey.

Wars are much easier to start than stop, and no one knows where it will lead.

Wulfrano Ruiz Sainz said...

It's a fine, logical analysis of the talked about WWIII. However, one piece in the jigsaw puzzle is missing. It's Factor X. That is, Lucifer who is the one to press the hot red buttons.

Luke Nichols said...

I have to agree and disagree with this article. While it would seem an attack on the US is unachievable, and that conventional war seems an outdated concept, the global elite follows a playbook; one set in place a long time ago. Their celebrated Freemasonic overlord, Albert Pike planned for 3 world wars; the 3rd one pitting radical Islam against political Zionism. Or, the Muslims vs the Israelis. And in keeping with this plan, I don't think America will be part of the final plans. Now these 3 world wars suppose to happen before New World Order will come. I had a dream on July 27th, 2012, that America does, in fact does sustain a major nuclear attack. I haven't had a dream that vivid since I dreamed of buildings falling 2 days before 9/11. Whether we do get attacked, or not, I don't know, but I do know they are following Pike's plan to the letter. And this 3rd world war would happen before New World Order will come. To see that dream and more of my dreams, go to my website.

apeman2502 said...

A WWIII economically obliterating the US leaving China and Europe with all the marbles.

Anonymous said...

Pearl Harbor was not a sneak attack, it was a false flag under the McCollum Memo:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCollum_memo

http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/pdf/futurecalling3.pdf

Anonymous said...

As the world population increases the limited natural resourses decrease. The population bomb is the largest threat to the survival of mankind. The planet can only sustain so many people. World war 111 is the last card that the global banking cartel has left to play. Their agenda is population reduction and control of the resourses. Wars are seldom fought over humanatarian principles, they are fought over business interest. A justifiable genecide war is a form of bith control or euphanasia. The global elite have off-shore refuges with underground bunkers to survive. After the smoke clears they will rise up like a phoenix from the ashes.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, but this is another laughable article by Eric Blair. Pearl Harbor was stagged/allowed to happen, Eric. War has been going on forever on the planet, and this guy tells us that there won't be any more conventional wars because he says so. Hilarious.

Anonymous said...

Russia has scalar weapons and the USA has Haarp check them both out. Major depopulation coming. 1/3 of mankind will die. It's in the bible. And. No- a pre- trib rapture is. Not going to save you. Only being close to the Lord and lots of prayer will see you through. This must happen before the Antichrist comes

Anonymous said...

He mentions that Pearl Harbor was a false flag for people who can't read past the first couple paragraphs. But it is a stretch to think that there won't be some sort of physical world war with conventional weapons. The good news is we're about to find out.

Mayor of New York City said...

Before the day Hell-fire raged
Man's leaders spoke of peace.
A deceptive harmony achieved by the premise
Of a mutually desired and assured demise.

Men totally soma-nized by trivial videos,
High-speed Internet and designer jeans,
Didn't questioned their leaders’ genocidal scheme
And were blind to the nature of its satanic theme.


Instead Men were completely enchanted,
By their systems' so promising prospects,
Of the worker's state new five-year plans,
And the capitalist's stock market returns.

On that dawn before Hell-fire raged
The leaders were well prepared,
They took to their cloistered shelters
To await the final trumpet's blares.

As workers toiled, and children played,
As lovers smooched, and others prayed,
The demonic command was issued that day
Which unleashed Hell-fire's rage.

Worldwide as the people fried,
Their leaders regrettably cried:
'Alas there will be no great profits to be had,
Nor political dissenters or anarchists to harass.'

For their sanity and of the unlucky remaining few,
The psychopathic leaders tried to justify
The necessity of their deadly nuclear moves,
'For through war they maintained comes peace'

'Once peace is achieved' they proclaimed,
'Reconstruction of society can begin.
For a new order will rise from the ashes
And spread to all the lands of the world.'

But on the evening after Hell Fire raged,
Mother Earth curtailed their rebuilding plans,
For She rocked and rolled, shook and rattled,
Till all her wrath exploded forth,as she explained:

'You failed to heed the words of the Man from Galilee,
Thus you deserve no more from me then cosmic dust!

Anonymous said...

If say, the US, performed a first strike against Russia, China and whoever else they wished to annihilate, then once the Hydrogen Bombs started blowing up, the atmosphere would fill with plasma and electromagnetic radiation. This would prevent the second wave of ICBMs to function properly, as the guidance systems would fry and/or just not work. All successful strikes after that would have to involve involve bombers.

The US has bombers all over the World, and Russia and China do not. The US is protected by two oceans and two allied countries, while Russia and China are not. The US could definitely win a full scale nuclear war and not suffer too much collateral damage.

Anonymous said...

Fukashima already got us all, idiots. A nuke war would simply be icing on the cake. Not to worry your grandkids will show the effects. Unicorns, minitaurs, mermaids, goony goo-goo's Gus.

Gordon Logan said...

The Sendai earthquake was a huge covert act of nuclear war and not many people have noticed. The globalists got away with it. The HAARP installation at Gakona, Alaska was activated on 8th March at 2.5 hz and deactivated at 9am on 11th March. NASA detected a high degree of ionospheric heating within the same time frame. The former Japanese finance minister, Heizo Takenaka, had previously complained publicly about American threats to use the seismic weapon in 2007. The contamination caused by the Fukushima attack makes it by far the worst environmental disaster in human history.

Anonymous said...

No need for nuclear war anymore. They're killing us already, slowly, through the air we breathe, the water we drink, the GMO's in our food and medications, mercury vaccinations, prescription drugs, aspartame, and bovine growth hormones in our dairy products, just to name what we're aware of.
We can control what we eat by avoiding GMO's to the best of our ability, even though they're not labeled, also aspartame, even though it is at times labeled under "natural flavors", avoid vaccines with mercury and other adjuvents, and only buy organic products when we can. But we can't control the air we breathe. Our bodies are filled with heavy metals. Go to a lab and get tested. Most people find that they are hosting at least a hundred metals such as aluminum, barium, and mercury. Take a look at the sky on any given day, and watch them spray those chemtrails that find their way down to our level on the street. And there's not a darn thing we can do about HAARP. Hurricane devastation on the east coast the week before election day?

Post a Comment