Activist Post
As population reduction, in all its covert forms, begins to litter the landscape of mainstream media, overweight teenagers are being classified as having lower IQ simply because of their size, according to a new study. This blanket determination called the “metabolic syndrome” suggests that obesity in children is linked to their brain function and cognitive capacity.
Simply put: fat kids are stupid.
The study asserts that MRI scans revealed that differences in the brain structure among overweight children are significant when compared to other children. Dr. Antonio Convit, lead author, correlated his findings with other psychiatrists, as well as worked in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to concoct a proactive diagnosis that could label children with metabolic syndrome under five “warning signs”:
• Abdominal obesity
• Low cholesterol
• High triglycerides
• High blood pressure
• Pre-diabetic levels of insulin resistance
Convit wants to use these methods to develop a classification for overweight children in America so that the psychiatric industry can work together with the pharmaceutical corporations to develop drugs. He estimates that 54% of American teenagers are overweight or obese and that 40% struggle with weight-challenges based on metabolic syndrome.
Some of the classification criteria during the study indicated the test subject’s economic background, ethnicity, gender, and place of residence.
The NIH released a study showing that “the prevalence of obesity among urban children has touched 10 to 20 per cent which is very high. Also, we have noticed that it is greater in children from private schools than in the government schools, making it clear that kids from the middle or higher socio-economic families are more prone to obesity than those from lower middle or lower socio economic groups,” according to B. Sesikeran, director of NIH.
The NIH study blames watching television for more than 3 hours a day and a lack of participation of household activities as direct causation to weight issues.
According to a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), obesity rates will reach 42% of the American population by 2030 unless there is an intervention.
After the publication of this study, the First Lady, Michelle Obama, called this “epidemic” a “national security threat.” Michelle Obama said:
Military leaders tell us that when more than one in four young people are unqualified for military service because of their weight, childhood obesity isn’t just a public health threat, it’s not just an economic threat, it’s a national security threat as well.The World Health Organization (WHO) has collected data on obesity since 2005, employing scientists to analyze the average global body weight as 137 lbs. However, WHO also points out that these averages are dependent on region. WHO admonishes North America’s average body weight at 178 pounds.
WHO complains that America is the fattest nation and a drain the rest of the world’s resources. Ian Roberts, professor and co-author of the WHO study, said:
If every country in the world had the same level of fatness that we see in the USA, in weight terms that would be like an extra billion people of world average body mass.
WHO asserts that the lack of “surveillance systems and monitoring” of over-weight people are not “integrated into national health information systems”. They demand that obese people be surveilled by the healthcare industry and governmental agencies to reduce “behavioral and metabolic risk factors” in low-income communities.A new study claims that by 2050 an expected 2 billion more people will be added to the world’s population and there will not be enough food available to feed them. The UN and Oxfam are preparing for a global food crisis.
Oxfam projects food prices to rise and civil unrest will result from panic in nearly 28 countries in regions like North America, Africa, and Latin America.
Dr. Glen Stream, the president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, states that “our American culture is always looking for an easy fix, a pill for every problem.” Stream believes that American’s reluctant attitude toward becoming healthy is to blame for the obesity epidemic in the US.
In response, Lorcaserin, developed by Arena Pharmaceuticals, works against serotonin receptors that correlate with appetite signals in the brain and cause the patient to become less hungry. Touted as a medical enhancement to type 2 diabetes treatments, it reduced the weight of participants in clinical trials by 5 – 10%.
Braasch Biotech LLC has been working to develop a vaccine to curb eating and deal with the psychological issues that surround obesity.
Scientists assert that somatostatin, a peptide hormone, inhibits the action of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor, both of which increase metabolism and result in weight loss. The vaccine would modify somatostatin by engineering so that the chemical inhabitation is removed and antibodies are created against somatostatin.
Because somatostatin is secreted in the digestive system, the hormone would eventually be carried to the brain where it would have a great likelihood of interacting with the chemical makeup of the brain and thereby have an encompassing psychological reaction.
Since the global Elite see 90% of the world’s population expendable eaters that need to be reduced, this attack on food makes complete sense. Of course we should be conscious of our caloric intake, however, considering that this assault comes from the Elite’s science-based answer by altering the bio-chemical makeup of the general public there is an obvious ulterior motive being played out.
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW
18 comments:
This is nonsense. I've been overweight a major part of my life, and the weight gain happened when I was exposed Aspartame, MSG, and other chemicals that food manufacturers use to make you want to eat and buy more. My IQ is rather high. At one point (pre-Scotch) I testes in the top 1/13.000th of one percentile.
I personally dont see what's wrong with this. Fatties are a definite drain on the system. They're always on public assistance, physical disability, medicare, medicaid, etc... They blame the rest of the world for a situation they put themselves in due to a life of over-eating and poor decision making. Taking care of gluttons shouldnt fall on the heads of people who actually take care of themselves.
I'm not saying they should be re-moved from the population (as this author has somehow jumped to the crazy conclusion of). I just think that they should be ineligible for public assistance, as they clearly arent taking care of themselves in the first place.
As far as them being stupid, tough to argue with that. Anyone who willingly shortens their lifespan by decades due to over-eating is already pretty retarded in my mind.
Sounds like there was very weak use of the scientific method in this study with no clear sense of cause and effect. It could very well be the fact teens raised by poorly educated parents grow up in an atmosphere where critical thinking is rarely applied to general learning tasks including understanding the role of diet in health.
With the potential for several confounding variables, one cannot conclude that overweight kids are physiologically predisposed to lower intelligence. Even crazier is to go one step further and suggest that dispensing meds is the next logical choice of action when what needs to be corrected, the core of the problem, is to stop or circumvent the deliberate dumbing down social protocol.
Get kids and their parents to turn off their television sets and spend that time reading well chosen books, learning practical skills, and staying physically active outdoors.
Isn't that the whole point? This is not an accident. We now have a huge segment of the public that requires medical/pharma intervention. Bonus time! Problem-reaction-solution, yeah? Yeah. You've got entire industries that depend on obesity, as well as cancer, heart disease, etc, not to mention the billions in charity that go to perpetuate the myths around these conditions. They don't want to solve it, they want to treat it, endlessly.
They make it so people can only buy crappy phude (not food) that is laden with corn syrup and soy, corn is what they feed cattle to fatten them up fast and soy is full of estrogen which makes you fat; and then blame children for being fat. Then they want to drug the children.
I guess the fluoride, GMO phude that makes its own pesticide, mercury and virus laced vaccines, and aluminum-laced chemtrails aren't sterilizing or lobotomizing people fast enough?
When the word: cancer is substituted for 'fatties' can you see how callous you have become to your own species?
The WHO and the Tri-Lateral Commission along with Rockefeller wants to kill all of the useless eaters. US INC is in league with them. Learn Nutrition and avoid the poison and learn to recognize the poison all around you. -LibertyTreeBud
I personally don't see what's wrong with this. cancer victims are a definite drain on the system. They're always on public assistance, physical disability, medicare, medicaid, etc... They blame the rest of the world for a situation they put themselves in due to a life of failure to maintain the immune system, failing to eat nutritious foods and avoiding poisons and poor decision making. Taking care of cancer victims shouldn't fall on the heads of people who actually take care of themselves.
I'm not saying they should be re-moved from the population I just think that they should be ineligible for public assistance, as they clearly aren't taking care of themselves in the first place.
Actually there was a study years ago that found fatter kids were more intellectually advanced. Since it did not fit the paradigm, funding was cut for it. Of course that was years ago. We know environmental toxins and stress can cause weight gain. If this study isn't completely faked, it is probably that weight gain is just another symptom of an underlying cause. Treating weight w/o the cause is like trying to cure measles by erasing spots. P.S. I have been fat since birth and was always in advanced everything! Would LOVE to go head to head with the moron who did this study! "I have never had a problem with my weight that wasn't caused by other people!"
Isn't this just one more justification for increasing the drugging of our children?
The question I have to ask is this: What part of our societal demographic hates the rest of us enough to want to increase the poisons they feed us?
You cant really portray cancer victims in the same light as obese people. Cancer victims in most cases have the disease despite all their best efforts to erradicate it. Obese people are overweight due to their own choices, mainly unhealthy diet and lack of exercise. One group creates the problem for themselves, the other does not. Unless you're looking at lung cancer, and someone who has been smokng all their lives. In that case, I would agree their self-destructive behavior should not come at the expense of people who take care of themselves.
If you want to over eat your whole life, and not exercise, you should not expect others to take care of you when you didnt take care of yourself in the first place.
Those of you who think fat people cause their own problems aren't thinking very clearly.
If the food you can afford to eat makes you fat, is that your fault? Or is it the fault of those who profit from the sales of such foods?
Blaming the food they can afford to eat... Another obese person refusing to take responsibility for their own state of life. Yes, it is completely their fault, and it's their responsibility to fix it. Only you are accountable for what your life is, quit trying to find scapegoats to absolve yourself of responsibility.
No one ever got fat eating lots of vegetables, lean meats, and exercising. Physical activity is free... If you want to eat like crap and blame the food, at least you can burn off the calories.
This caught my eye because I used metabolic syndrome as an example in a graduate pathophysiology course that I taught last semester. I spend the first lecture talking about the philosophy of science and the scientific mode of inquiry, which always astonishes the students because they have never had a scientific education, just indoctrination.
Metabolic syndrome is a good example of why we must never stop questioning and how wrong the "experts" can be, especially when the government gets involved. Metabolic syndrome has been ascribed to fat intake and the lipid hypothesis. But, that has never made any sense, except in the mind of the government backed "experts." The government pushed the low fat diet that has resulted in the epidemic of metabolic syndrome. Low and 0 fat food is unpalatable. So, to make it edible, sugar is added. Same thing with "fortified" cereals (unpalatable & requiring sugar coating).
Table sugar is 1/2 fructose & 1/2 glucose. HFCS is the same. It turns out that humans have a very limited ability to process fructose and our livers treat it as a toxin. It does not provide metabolically usable calories. Quite the opposite, ATP is depleted breaking it down, resulting in an increase in uric acid, which raises blood pressure and has also been causing fructose induced gout.
In the process of breaking down fructose, fat (esp. VLDL) is produced, which results in a "bad" lipid profile (low HDL, and high LDL, lipids & cholesterol). High fructose intake has been causing non-alcoholic fatty liver and central obesity. Furthermore, fructose causes insulin resistance.
Everything listed as defining metabolic syndrome has been well demonstrated across the board from the genetics of metabolism to well designed clinical studies as clearly attributable to fructose.
The lipid hypothesis has been based on very shoddy "science," mainly cherry picking to produce the illusion of a correlation between fat intake and metabolic syndrome and then ignoring the fact that correlation does not equal causation.
Bottom line is that the government proclaimed the lipid hypothesis dogma, resulting in Americans getting sick and big pharma getting rich from prescriptions that only make the sufferers sicker.
60minutes did a pretty good overview of the problems with fructose (search for "is sugar toxic?" and then search out the doctors they interviewed to source the science).
MDPhD
I am not sure that weight has anything to do with intelligence but i do know if more people would read the labels on the grocery product and pay attention to the amount of saturated fat and trans fat their health would improve.High Fructose Corn Syrup is found in many products. None more so than soft drinks.It wouldn't take much research to find which foods are good for you and which to avoid.
Ironically, I was not overweight until I was injured in AFghanistan. I could not exercize, had no sunlight time and could only eat institutional foods . Back in the US I had hospital food. once I was able to prepare my own food the weight fell off because it was not processed foods. The food in the hospital was supposed to be within a certain calorie frame, once out I didn't count calories but ait real food. I still cannot exercize and am on a very limited income. I bought cheaper foods to try to make ends meet and guess what. The weight started going up again. I will try to find a different way to save money. Processed foods kill.
It is all in the game folks,keep the ordinary people at each others throats,and CONTROL,any-one who takes psychciatry as a "science"deserves to be in an institution themselves,unfortunately the broad mass of people these days are so dumbed down that they wil believe anything,hysterically.When people attack each other ,they are doing the nwos work,enslaving themselves for free,beit on the grounds of health,poverty or political outlook,and the world population ,and the americans in particular have bigger fish to fry,with the latest edition of the new world order agenda about to be unveiled in november,by which ever puppet is elected for you,trust each other and lock and load.
Yeah right, just what everybody needs more meds. Take the subsidies off corn and push up the price of soft drinks and packaged oil and salt/sugar loaded treats, that will cut calories. Push up the price of gasoline, that will increase exercise. Then put the money into sustainable organic farming practices that will substitute real nutrition to build bones, muscles and brains instead of all the empty calories and preservatives kids are sucking up now.
The hatred and bile coming forth against obese people is startling. If you look at the 1970's and you look at today, people are BIGGER. I'm not fat, by no means, but I have fat on me. In the 1970's I would be as skinny as a rake. I would be that way now if it wasn't for the horrible amount of sweets and fats put in our food. We were encouraged to drink corn syrup and eat fake food. I eat fresh when I can, I can't afford to grown a farm and control the food I eat. That's the crime.
Fat people are stupid?
Or. Stupid people are more likely to eat processed food like the TV tells them to, and get fat as a result.
Either way, corporate America wants dumb fat people, so the government helps facilitate the process with laws, policies and lies.
All very sad.
Post a Comment