Wednesday, August 1, 2012

The Neoconservative War Criminals In Our Midst

Paul Craig Roberts, Contributor
Activist Post

The State Department has an office that hunts German war criminals. Bureaucracies being what they are, the office will exist into next century when any surviving German prison guards will be 200 years old.

From time to time the State Department claims to have found a lowly German soldier who was assigned as a prison camp guard. The ancient personage, who had lived in the US for the past 50 or 60 years without doing harm to anyone, is then merciless persecuted, usually on the basis of hearsay. 

I have never understood what the State Department thinks the alleged prison guard was supposed to have done–freed the prisoners, resign his position?–when Prussian aristocrats, high-ranking German Army generals and Field Marshall and national hero Erwin Rommel were murdered for trying to overthrow Hitler.

What the State Department needs is an office that rounds up American war criminals.

They are in abundance and not hard to find. Indeed, recently 56 of them made themselves public by signing a letter to President Obama demanding that he send in the US Army to complete the destruction of Syria and its people that Washington has begun.

At the Nuremberg Trials of the defeated Germans after World War II, the US government established the principle that naked aggression–the American way in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Pakistan, and Yemen–is a war crime. Therefore, there is a very strong precedent for the State Department to round up those neoconservatives who are fomenting more war crimes.


But don’t expect it to happen. Today, war criminals run the State Department and the entire US Government. They are elected to the presidency, the House, and the Senate, and appointed to the federal courts as judges. American soldiers, such as Bradley Manning, who behave as the State Department expects German soldiers to have behaved, are not honored, but are thrown into dungeons and tortured while a court marshall case is concocted against them.

Hypocrisy is Washington’s hallmark, and all but the most delusional are now accustomed to their rulers speaking one way and behaving in the opposite. It is now part of the American character to regard ourselves as members of the “virtuous nation,” “the indispensable people,” while our rulers commit war crimes around the globe.

Whereas we have all been made complicit in war crimes by “our” government, it still behooves us to know who are the active war criminals in our midst who have burdened us with our war criminal reputation.

You can learn the identity of many of those who are driving the world into World War Three, while their policies result in the murder of large numbers of Arabs and Muslims in Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq, and Lebanon, by perusing the signatures to the contrived letter to Obama from the neoconsevatives calling on Obama to invade Syria in order to “rescue” the Syrian people from their government.

According the the letter signed by 56 neoconservatives, only the Syrian government is responsible for deaths in Syria. The Washington sponsored and armed “rebels” are merely protecting the Syrian people from the Assad government. According to the letter signers, the only way the Syrian people can be saved is if Washington overthrows the Syrian government and installs a puppet state attentive to the needs of Israel and Washington.

Among the 56 signatures are a few names from the Syrian National Congress, believed to be a CIA front, and a few names from dupes among the goyim. The rest of the signatures are those of Jewish neoconservatives tightly allied with Israel, some of whom are apparently dual-Israeli citizens who participate in the formation of US foreign policy. The names on this list comprise a concentration of evil, the goal of which is not only to bring armageddon to the Syrian people but also to the world.

The letter to Obama is part of the propaganda operation to demonize the Syrian government with lies in order to get rid of a government that supports Hizbollah, the Muslims in southern Lebanon who have twice driven the vaunted, but cowardly, Israeli army out of Lebanon, thus preventing the Israeli government from achieving its aim of stealing the water resources of southern Lebanon.

Not a single sentence in the letter is correct. Listen to this one for example:
The Assad regime poses a grave threat to national security interests of the United States.
What utter total absurdity, and the morons who signed the letter pretend to be “security experts.”

How do we evaluate the fact that 56 people have no shame whatsoever and will lie to the President of the United States, telling him to his face the most absurd and obvious false things in order to advance their personal agenda at the expense of not merely the lives of Syrians but, by leading to wider war, of life on earth?

This same neocon architects of armageddon are also working against Iran, Russia, the former Soviet central Asian countries, Ukraine, Belarus, and China. It seems that they can’t wait to start a nuclear war.

You can find the names of some of humanity’s worst enemies here: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32021.htm

You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE

This article first appeared at Paul Craig Roberts' new website Institute For Political Economy.  Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His Internet columns have attracted a worldwide following.


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

This bothers me (Dale): PCR wrote..............

"Among the 56 signatures are a few names from the Syrian National Congress, believed to be a CIA front, and a few names from dupes among the goyim. The rest of the signatures are those of Jewish neoconservatives tightly allied with Israel, some of whom are apparently dual-Israeli citizens who participate in the formation of US foreign policy. The names on this list comprise a concentration of evil"

That's good Jews and evil in the same paragraph.

At http://lewrockwell.com/rozeff/rozeff388.html, this count:
7 Middle Easterners
22 pro-Israel Jews
27 "goyim"

PCR sees only "few" non-Jews and the vast majority Jews. I will put it bluntly: when you are anti-Semitic (and not merely anti-Zionist or anti Israeli neo-cons), you see Jews everywhere!
There are many Jews signing the letter but still the majority of signers are not Jews.

And why even count Jews? I'm sorry but that's so Nazi. Why not just say pro-Israeli which would include all 56? What has ethnic background got to do with anything.? This is about ideology....the neo-con mission.

The obsession with the ethnic background of members of an intellectual elite can do little else than play into the anti-Semite"s favorite pasttime: counting Jews, blaming Jews...identifying Jews with evil.

I understand that the Israeli neo-cons and the US neo-cons have everything in common, but that is definition by ideology, not race. What's race got to do with it?



The neo-con letter to Obama was not written mostly by Jews, as PCR claims, but it was written by men of various backgrounds who all agree on promoting war on Syria (then Iran).

I don't care if you are Syrian or Jewish or Catholic; I do care that you are war-mongering.

It's time to stop counting the evil Jews. It's time to stop blaming Jews for everything. It's time to stop appealing to the anti-Semites, Dr. Roberts. Your distortion of the truth reveals a dark side to your desire to stop a criminal war.

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous:

It is rather unfortunate that labeling something or someone anti-semitic is now seen as a pitiful and pitiable attempt to forestall debate on a topic of keen interest and critical to the general community, but where overwhelming Jewish crimes have been or may been committed, but where criticism must be forestalled because it is considered so dangerous to a group of criminals so rapidly circling the wagons, who regularly fraudulently invoke and abuse historical sympathies in order to defend that criminality. In essence, the strategy for invoking the defamatory accusation of anti-semtism, in too many instances, is to prevent constructive discussion, criticism of and inquiry into Jewish crimes and Jewish criminality. It is a very simple strategy generally used by criminals, and obscenely abused by Jewish criminals. It is a play the victim defense.

Please review the following video, which will place the anonymous defamatory comments within the context of an understanding of this defamatory construct which is simply used for the reasons identified above:

http://tinyurl.com/ntk2xv

Use of the term anti-semitism has no legitimate use anymore because it has been overly misused by a number of criminals to deflect serious inquiry into criminal acts committed by Jews.

The burden of the use of such a defamatory term in such a defamatory, fraudulent defensive act is on the person making the accusation. One must assume that when a person relies on such a defamatory, fraudulent tactic, that they are guilty or are defending guilt, because they do not wish to have facts presented in a clear manner to determine the reality of the situation.

Let us put away defamatory, fraudulent defenses and have serious inquiry into these issues, regardless of race, religion or otherwise, and if the application of facts take us to some uncomfortable discussions of Jewish criminality, then let us seek to be sensitive, but extremely vengeful in prosecuting the clearly criminals acts.

Anonymous said...

The Nuremberg Trials was a farce, a kangaroo court, setting the dangerous precedent that the victorious may execute defeated military officials by claiming "war crimes" that were in fact committed by both sides. Had Germany won, I wonder who might have been executed for Dresden.

Post a Comment