Activist Post
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) are focusing on population control through their Global Health Development Programs. By using citizens in underdeveloped nations, like Africa and India, as guinea pigs for their research and development for “new interventions such as vaccines, drugs and diagnostics”, these globalists hope to ensure their family planning schemes are effective.
Melinda Gates has made family planning and the population control agenda her personal mission. She justifies her cause by claiming that 100,000 women die in child birth from unintended pregnancies. Although this statistic has no scientific basis, since it sounds good and mainstream media does not check facts, it has helped the BMGF team up with the British government to raise more than $4 billion to fund depopulation programs under the guise of bringing contraceptives to underdeveloped nations.
The BMGF assert that by 2050 “the global population is expected to grow to over 9 billion people” and this is unacceptable to them. By applying pressure to social programs and resources, the BMGF want to use family planning as an investment for all national governments globally.
Strategies to accomplish their goals include:
- Using financial influence to force governments and policymakers to implement their family planning schemes.
- Empower NGOs who promote family planning propaganda.
- Coerce the integration of family planning into all “humanitarian” efforts by using funds from the UN Global Fund.
- Pour money into efforts that further family planning through national policy controls that adhere to the UN’s Millennium Development Goals.
The injectable Depo-Provera is being sold to underdeveloped nations and is being administered by healthcare workers and nonmedical providers, or by the women themselves. Policy and training systems are underway to ensure these drugs are utilized in areas like the sub-Saharan Africa. By using these areas as testing grounds for new fertility drugs, as well as forcible sterilization schemes, the BMGF are focusing on preventative situations over dealing with abortable pregnancies that have complications.
On July 11th, the BMGF will attend the UK’s Department for International Development Family Planning Summit (FPS). Ministers of State and leaders from over 60 countries will join with major non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the private sector to make firm commitments to addressing the global short-fall in family planning provisions to be agreed upon so that population growth issues can be dealt with by the global Elite.Prior to this summit, the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), the modern version of the eugenics program founded by Margaret Sanger and Bill Gates’ father in the 1950s, will focus their efforts on coercing young people into supporting their family planning scheme by debating teenage pregnancy, unwanted births and maternal morality as defined by the eugenics ideal.
According to the FPS agenda:
young people have to be at the heart of driving forward the ambitious developments in family planning provision which the Summit sets out to stimulate.Babatunde Osotimehin, executive director of the UN Population Fund, described the proposals at the FPS as the agenda to “transform” family planning into a global movement. Population control, with the assistance of the BMGF and their funders will build an army of coercive tactics that aim to reinvent the movement to ensure its success.
Osotimehin claims that family planning:
enables women to take charge of their lives and for young people to plan their lives. It empowers a woman to do what they want to do in terms of the number of children they want to have and can afford.
While an estimated 40% of pregnancies in the developing world are classified by BMGF as “unwanted” they are focusing on eventually eliminating this number to reduce the world’s population. Africa, a big focus for the BMGF is being targeted along with Muslim nations.The BMGF are admonishing the global community to support their efforts with the backing of the UN. They want full commitments by which they can hold countries accountable if their guidelines are not fully carried out. While claiming to provide “voluntary” family planning, they assert that with fewer children to care for, the poverty rates in underdeveloped nations will lower.
However, they are simply advocating less people be available to use natural resources, which is a qualm of the global Elite.
Having hijacked a movement, the BMGF and the UN are successfully beginning the process of controlling population growth in underdeveloped nations. As their popularity grows and their agendas are met, those same measures will make their way to developing nations like the US. Right now, women in the US have control over their ability to procreate. And while organizations like Planned Parenthood are working to trick women in believing that the mark of a woman is to have the opportunity to abort an unborn child, the choice is still up to the individual woman.
If the BMGF have their way, that ability to choose will soon be revoked.
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.
You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE.
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW



11 comments:
Well, you can pretty much expect the governments of these targeted nations to succumb to the globalists' agenda, but we all know that the government of a nation does not make the nation.
It will be up to the people of those nations to not succumb to the globalists' agenda and realize that their power structure (all power structures) has been compromised by a pack of psychopaths that want their nation's natural wealth for themselves.
I cannot believe in the idea, often peddled by the Roman Catholic Church amongst others, that this planet can support an unlimited population for an unlimited period at unlimited levels of consumption.
It is actually simple mathematics. An unlimited number cannot be divided into a limited number.
You have this all wrong, not only is Gates distributing vaccines, he is also feeding ethnic groups which have already overpopulated their bioregion to the point of desertification.
What do you think the logical conclusion will be of continued aid to a culture where 12 or more children is the norm. Do the math.
I cannot believe in the idea, often paddled by the Gates and Malthus amongst others that we have to kill untold numbers of human beings to make things more comfortable for a select few.
It’s a simple matter of technological advancement. If you allow the creation clean energy, you no longer destroy ecosystems. If you allow advancements in micro engineering, you can desalinate water and tap 97% of the world’s most abundant resource.
What I really cannot believe, is how anyone listens to a person without any shred of honor simply because they have a whole heaping mound of little pieces of paper or computer digits saying they are the height of humanity. They're people, just like those sickening fools in Sub Saharan Africa they try to control.
Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps all this does not spring from some kind of evil, sinister conspiracy...but in fact from good intentions, such as the desire to lessen the suffering of people who are dying unnecessarily from hunger and disease? Are you aware that it's estimated as many as one in every three people on this planet is already going hungry and that 15 million children die every year from hunger (malnutrition/starvation) alone? If you oppose any and all family planning measures, then what you're essentially implying (whether you realize it or not) is that you consider slow death from hunger to be an acceptable, ethical, or even desirable thing.
Granted, human beings have developed technology (such as aquaponics and hydroponics) which conceivably might provide sufficient food and water to an even larger population than we currently have if it were implemented on a large scale...but it's not especially wise to attribute to evil what can be attributed equally well to stupidity. It's more likely that what's really holding people back from doing this is lack of creativity and imagination combined with resistance to change (and probably also a certain degree of selfishness, such as the desire to maintain all the lavish and egregiously wasteful creature comforts of Western society and the ever-larger profits needed to sustain them) rather than a deliberate, malicious, and systematic plot to reduce the population. Like it or not, we live on a finite planet of finite resources -- and unless or until we reach the point at which we either begin colonizing space on a large scale or manipulating matter at the quantum level to make it become whatever we want, that means infinite growth is not only not sustainable but not possible and that there is a finite number of people that this planet can potentially support.
Yeah, what she said!!
Science of Overpopulation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD-yN2G5BY0
OVERPOPULATION IS A MYTH
With the obvious exception for warntorn areas, most nations in Africa have more than enough resources to support the population. This is in stark contrast to some "rich" countries such as The United kingdom, or Saudia Arabia. Should we start the culling there?
The Gates' are either complete morons or something much more sinister. They are not the only Rich and Shameless that are obsessed with reducing the amount of "useless eaters" of "poor" (as per their own definition) countries.
Ted Turner mentioned a 95% reduction, the Georgia stones says "maintain a population below 500 million" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones).
One explanation for this obsession has been presented by the bosom bodies of the Gates Foundation:
"Africa is now the last frontier in terms of arable land,” said James Nyoro, the Rockefeller Foundation’s managing director for Africa. “With the population growing to 9 billion, the rest of the world will have to depend upon Africa to feed it.” http://www.activistpost.com/2012/05/corporations-descend-on-africa-to.html.
(An interesting observation is that the Rockefeller foundation were also behind the Women's liberation movement in the United States and subsequently the rest of the Anglo-American world. Think about that for a moment.)
Anyone with brain cells on active duty needs to connect the dots and ask the question "Cui bono?"; who benefits?
(Aside: "They're people, just like those sickening fools in Sub Saharan Africa they try to control". What sickening fools? The governments that the Rich and Shameless have enslaved through debts and corrupted beyound recognition? )
Birth control was practiced for years in China, Europe, USA ____ If central banks of most countries were Public banks (not privatized like the actual Fed) There would be no problem for having good health care, clean water access, schools etc... for food, remove production quotas, and protein can be produced from bacteria in vegetable oil. ____ REF: webofdebt.com/articles - Book: Design for the real world, by Victor Papanek
of course the globalists don't have good intentions. They have a racist agenda which is plain to see. Look at the world's current state of affairs: wars, conflicts, starvation, famine, etc. Does it all make sense to you?
Arm sellers like Lockheed and BAE Systems benefit from wars and conflicts, while charities and big pharma companies benefit from suffering and death.
btw, the world doesn't need to be depopulated, prisons do!
It is not for the likes of Bill and Melinda gates to decide who lives and dies and who has babies. People die too , no one takes that into account, people, especially in Africa and India where the mortality rate is high, they die too , they are not just born but they have people dying, babies dying. Bill gates is one of the largest shareholders in Monsanto, he has already taken care of staples all over the globe according to him, there is the codex code in the food we feed our kids, all ot depopulate. I dont' think they have a right to force women into abortions, I don't think it should be funded with UN money, thats our money, I won't fund murder. anyone who thinks its the trendy green thing to do should do it themselves, to their own pregnancies and to their own husbands genitals , see if you would like it first hand. Just the word Global elite makes me sick, my grnadmoither cleaned houses when she came here and reaised tow children alone, because her husband died, she was more elite than these bums.Bill Gates is not playing with a full deck, David Rockefeller has been nuts for years, but because they have money they can play with peoples food supplies and lives, soemone ought to play with thiers, see they have no more elitist offspring, they are dangerous and should be stopped. period.
Post a Comment