Activist Post
In 2008, using the toxic industrial chemical melamine in liquid infant formula, 6 babies died while more than 303,000 became deathly ill from exposure in China. At the time, the UN Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) had allowed for the maximum limit of 1 milligram per kilogram of formula. Now the CAC has revised that maximum to 0.15 millgrams per kilogram of formula.
Melamine is a dangerous chemical used in the manufacturing of dishes and kitchen cookware. The Chinese used the chemical in a watered-down solution in infant formula under the guise that it tested positive for protein enrichment. However, using a man-made chemical in consumptive sources does not make sense when nutritional value is a concern.
Chinese rice and wheat gluten also contain melamine and was found in concentrations of dangerous levels when pet food exported from the region was tested in 2007. The cats and dogs that ate the food died from kidney failure, says WHO.
Reports have also concluded that melamine has caused the development of kidney stones and other kidney damage in adults.
The CAC is a UN intergovernmental body made up of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), and 170 international governmental representatives including the European Commission. Under the CAC, the UN seeks to take over food prices internationally by controlling food trade and reforming consumer health.
They oversee international food standards and make sure that governments implement them with the influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
Right now, in Rome, Italy, the CAC are having their 35th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. On their agenda is the Draft Codex Strategic Plan 2014-2019 where the CAC are developing a “science-based and globally applicable international standards for food and promote use of these standards by countries.”
At the meeting, the CAC decided on maximum uses of the toxic chemical ractopamine, an MRLs, which enhances the leanness of livestock meat. Separate permits for beef and pork will be established to “take down any trade barriers caused by an improper ban on the use of ractopamine,” according to US representatives.
Imported beef into the US contains residue of ractopamine.
The CAC is priming themselves to be the “effective, inclusive, and trusted global leader in setting food standards” where they will have complete control over “food safety, quality, and food trade”. In conjunction with WHO and the FAO, the CAC will have exclusive oversight “to track progress toward [the] accomplishment of the goals” of the UN to securitize food globally.
Between 2014 – 2019 the Strategic Plan of the CAC is intended to be fully implemented by international mandate “to meet the needs” of their stakeholders and members. The specifics of the Strategic Plan, adopted by resolution by WHO will be enforced by the UN agency. FAO will be tasked with “[improving] quality and safety for food at all stage of the food chain.”
CAC believes that with population growth, climate change and “the growing demand for food” four strategic goals must be implemented with the global vision reflected by:
- UN standards on food
- Based on science
- Compulsory participation of the international community
The CAC exclusively bases their food standards on scientific developments to protect public health and the global food trade. By exchanging financial support from member states for scientific research and development, they will ensure that food can be created for the consumption of developing nations.In these developing countries, the CAC demands participation by financial blackmail with monies from the Codex Trust Fund. They promote governmental allowance of UN programs and structures in line with sustainable national funding by the UN.
Earlier this year, President Obama announced that Codex Alimentarius would be the foundation of his new initiative to merge the pharmaceutical corporations and the US government to identify new uses for drugs that have already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
It was admitted that:
- There may be need for new human trials, putting the general public at a health risk.
- Genetic engineering will be used to discover exclusive pharmaceutical needs for all new and old diseases.
- The vitamin supplement industry will be systematically phased out
The US Senate gave their approval of this UN takeover of our food, vitamins and medicinal substances with the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, S. 3187. This allows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to charge “user fees” to drug corporations to create what they call “safety and efficiency reviews”. After the pharmaceutical companies quietly buy their FDA-approved reviews, their drugs are given the green light and introduced into the general public. This financial relationship with the US government and the drug corporations, in conjunction with the UN, is a deception that will lead to declines in health and well-being of the general public.
But, remember, this is what this scheme was designed to do. The global Elite want 90% of the world’s population dead because a small group is easier to control.
Please read Brandon Turbeville's essential 7-part series about the history of Codex Alimentarius and health tyranny HERE.
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.
You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW
6 comments:
Matters NOT what Codex does.
We can disqualify them in less than 30 seconds just from the wording of their Charter.
Anyone being hassled or charged with any offences by the Codex people or their "agencies" can contact
Legitimate claims only please.
Dale opines:
Posel, who formerly represented herself as an Occupier as a front for her radical right wing agenda, has a habit of drastic exaggeration. A law proposed in California for families with more than 2 parents, she described as "Government taking over our Children."
In this article she totally distorts a source (WHO) by stating:
"Chinese rice and wheat gluten also contain melamine and was found in concentrations of dangerous levels when pet food exported from the region was tested in 2007. The cats and dogs that ate the food died from kidney failure, says WHO."
So all the dogs and cats died. If you go to WHO, her source, you find something rather different:
"Melamine alone causes bladder stones in animal tests. When combined with cyanuricacid, which may also be present in melamine powder, melamine can form crystals that can give rise to kidney stones.
These small crystals can also block the small tubes in the kidney potentially stopping the production of urine, causing kidney failure and, in some cases, death"
There is a world of difference between her claim that "The cats and dogs who ate the food...died, " and the Who statement, from which "derived" her claim that the melamine, if combined with other ingredients and which can form crystals and which MAY potentially cause kidney failure...and IN SOME CASES causing death.
This kind of falsehood is common in her hastily written, often badly spelled articles. Her research is so shoddy and dishonest that she expects her reads to be too stupid to actually check her sources. I advise others to check all her sources and find for themselves how she frequently distorts sources and often uses sources which are in freefall over the lunatic precipice.
Exercise great skepticism before embracing her claims.....too often they are simply fabricated with no relationship to fact or source.
I invite Posel to refute me on the details of this critique and explain why she no longer advertises herself with the tag Occupy Corporatism, a seemingly leftwing association, when many of her articles embrace far right partisan issues (such as the article on Fast and Furious which merely repeated the lies of Darrel Issa, as well as the claim that a bill recognizing existing 3 parent families (such as the biological father and his ex-wife and her new husband, is a "government takeover of our children."
This kind of twisted alarmist rhetoric is common in propaganda, inducing fear in order to shortcircuit critical thinking with an emotional response. Oh my God, they are taking over my children! That is how propaganda works, and Posel has shown herself to be prone to such manipulations, as in this article.
Factory CEO's were put to death due to the infant deaths all over the world, and in China where there is a strict one child policy. That negates most all skepticism and propaganda is something the MSM and all the alphabet agencies are stellar at.
Why is so much of our food so terrifyingly disgusting? We really need to clean up our act guys. Local is the way!
For the person questioning the author's credibility, you focus on a single point in a pretty lengthy article which we can all admit was stretched to say the least.
That being said, the rest of it is gold. The body of the article is very informative. Next time I'd like to hear a full review from your opinionated and brainwashed self.
If you think this is propaganda, you're looking at it from the completely wrong perspective. The author did not have the intention of scaring people to produce an emotional response, she was just caught exaggerating which people are prone to doing every so often.
There are so many famous and highly regarded journalists that literally spew biased shit out of their mouths day in and day out. At least, like I said, the majority of the article is VERY INFORMATIVE and she is writing for the right reasons.
Wouldn't be surprised if your job consists of visiting various sites and trying to attack the authors and their articles.
But most likely you are just too PROUD(greatest sin of all), of your great spelling and ability to find one embellished statement, to really get the big picture.
Get your head out of your ass.
Fact is: Codex is implemented by the WTO,
which is about???
Making as much money as you can in the least amount of time, with the least amount of effort and regardless of the consequences...
I rest my case here.
Post a Comment