![]() |
| Muslim Brotherhood - Western Proxies |
Activist Post
One would expect allegedly "outspoken" critics of the US and Israel to represent the antithesis of any joint US-Israeli foreign policy, especially when it involves mass-murdering large numbers of fellow Arabs to expand Western hegemony across the Middle East. Yet the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood has done the exact opposite, after a long campaign of feigned anti-American, anti-Israel propaganda during the Egyptian presidential run-up, the Muslim Brotherhood has joined US, European, and Israeli calls for an "international" intervention in Syria.
Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak recently called for international intervention in Syria citing the alleged Houla massacre, echoed by Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood spokesman Mahmoud Ghozlan who stated the same. The Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood has been involved heavily, leading in fact, the US, Israeli, Saudi, and Qatari-backed sectarian violence that has been ravaging Syria for over a year. In a May 6, 2012 Reuters article it stated:
Working quietly, the Brotherhood has been financing Free Syrian Army defectors based in Turkey and channeling money and supplies to Syria, reviving their base among small Sunni farmers and middle class Syrians, opposition sources say.While Reuters categorically fails to explain the "how" behind the Brotherhood's resurrection, it was revealed in a 2007 New Yorker article titled, "The Redirection" by Seymour Hersh, as being directly backed by the US and Israel who were funneling support through the Saudis so as to not compromise the "credibility" of the so-called "Islamic" movement. Hersh revealed that members of the Lebanese Saad Hariri clique, then led by Fouad Siniora, had been the go-between for US planners and the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.
Hersh reports the Lebanese Hariri faction had met Dick Cheney in Washington and relayed personally the importance of using the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria in any move against the ruling government:
[Walid] Jumblatt then told me that he had met with Vice-President Cheney in Washington last fall to discuss, among other issues, the possibility of undermining Assad. He and his colleagues advised Cheney that, if the United States does try to move against Syria, members of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood would be 'the ones to talk to,' Jumblatt said. -The Redirection, Seymour HershThe article would continue by explaining how already in 2007, US and Saudi backing had begun benefiting the Brotherhood:
There is evidence that the Administration’s redirection strategy has already benefited the Brotherhood. The Syrian National Salvation Front is a coalition of opposition groups whose principal members are a faction led by Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian Vice-President who defected in 2005, and the Brotherhood. A former high-ranking C.I.A. officer told me, 'The Americans have provided both political and financial support. The Saudis are taking the lead with financial support, but there is American involvement.' He said that Khaddam, who now lives in Paris, was getting money from Saudi Arabia, with the knowledge of the White House. (In 2005, a delegation of the Front’s members met with officials from the National Security Council, according to press reports.) A former White House official told me that the Saudis had provided members of the Front with travel documents. -The Redirection, Seymour HershIt was warned that such backing would benefit the Brotherhood as a whole, not just in Syria, and could effect public opinion even as far as in Egypt where a long battle against the hardliners was fought in order to keep Egyptian governance secular. Clearly the Brotherhood did not spontaneously rise back to power in Syria, it was resurrected by US, Israeli, and Saudi cash, weapons and directives.
PR Roll-out of Orchestrated Regional War
To the general public, the violence in Lebanon seems to have "spilled over" from Syria, with characters like Saad Hariri, a leading figure in an effort at fueling regional bifurcation between Sunni and Shi'ia Muslims, being suddenly "involved" in the ongoing violence. To the general public, because of a willfully deceitful mass media, the Muslim Brotherhood's sudden backing of US-Euro-Israeli and Gulf State calls for foreign intervention seems like a spontaneous reaction to the so-called Houla massacre.
In reality, for those who are informed regarding the true backstory of the geopolitical reordering of the Arab World, it is nothing more than the public roll-out of an orchestrated conspiracy years in the making, with each actor having long practiced their roles backstage together before coming out on stage and being introduced to the audience. Indeed, the Muslim Brotherhood and Saad Hariri have been working together with the United States, Israel, and Saudi Arabia for years. The Muslim Brotherhood's political resurrection was solely owed to the US-engineered "Arab Spring" and torrents of cash and backroom diplomatic support.The US State Department on record had been preparing since at least as early as 2008, with Egyptian protest leaders flown to New York, trained, equipped, and funded courtesy of US taxpayers before being sent back to destabilize Egypt beginning in 2010 and culminating in the 2011 "Arab Spring."
And while the Muslim Brotherhood is busy feigning hatred and belligerence toward the US and Israel, they in turn have feigned fear and displeasure at the Brotherhood's rise amidst political destabilization the West itself created and perpetuated solely to place the Brotherhood back in power. This gambit is perhaps best exposed with the rise and fall of another Western-backed proxy, Egypt's Mohamed ElBaradei.
Those who "hate" most...
In fact, the more unreasonable and frothing one's anti-American, anti-Israeli rhetoric becomes, the more likely they are in fact working directly with the West and using such rhetoric as a smoke screen. Mohamed ElBaradei, for example, attempted to ride the wave of anti-Western sentiment by regularly pointing out the odds he was at with America over Iraq and Iran. Israel and the US in turn accused him of being an "Iranian" agent, and ElBaradei would regularly threaten to make war with Israel, should he be elected president of Egypt. We will see just how absurd this entire charade really is.
In reality, ElBaradei sits as a trustee of a US corporate-financier funded think-tank, the International Crisis Group (ICG) along side convicted criminal and billionaire Wall Street speculator, George Soros, geopolitical adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, suspected financial criminal Lawrence "Larry" Summers, and Neo-Conservative Richard Armitage. Additionally, sitting around the same table with ElBaradei is the President of Israel, Shimon Peres, Stanley Fischer who serves as governor of the Bank of Israel, and former-Foreign Minister of Israel Shlomo Ben-Ami.
Beyond even this evidence, and before the "Arab Spring" even unfolded, another US corporate-financier funded think-tank, the Council on Foreign Relations, pointed out the necessity of manipulating public perception to maneuver client regimes into power. In a March 2010 article titled, "Is ElBaradei Egypt's Hero?" published in CFR's "Foreign Affairs," it stated:
Further, Egypt’s close relationship with the United States has become a critical and negative factor in Egyptian politics. The opposition has used these ties to delegitimize the regime, while the government has engaged in its own displays of anti-Americanism to insulate itself from such charges. If ElBaradei actually has a reasonable chance of fostering political reform in Egypt, then U.S. policymakers would best serve his cause by not acting strongly.Clearly, both Western and Israeli press not only refrained from "acting strongly," they feigned immense displeasure at ElBaradei's rise in Egyptian politics, while simultaneously showering his enemies and opponents with support to taint them in the eyes of an emotional, and apparently easily manipulated global public.
In this light it is hard to take ElBaradei's feigned anti-Western sentiments as anything more than an absolute coordinated deception, to mask the fact that he indeed is a direct representative of these very insidious manipulators.
Likewise the Muslim Brotherhood is playing a double game, capitalizing on carefully cultivated hatred verses America and Israel, while in reality leading sectarian extremists toward fulfilling rather than balking Western machinations. Not only is this apparent in the propaganda game played by both the Brotherhood and their counterparts in Washington, London, Doha, and Tel Aviv, but demonstratively as the Brotherhood's agenda now overtly converges with that of the US and Israel verses Syria, as stated would happen in 2007 by Seymour Hersh. It seems almost unimaginable that any Arab, regardless of their opinion of Iran, Syria, or Hezbollah in Lebanon, could believe that eliminating this countervailing force vis-a-vis the West and Israel will be to their advantage, especially as it becomes clear their "new" "Arab Spring-installed" leaders are in fact working with, not against Western hegemonic expansion across the Arab World.
Arab Spring Brings Western Client Regimes.
In addition to the Muslim Brotherhood's rise in Egypt and Syria, in Tunisia serving Western interests is the recently installed Moncef Marzouki, formally of the Tunisian League for Human Rights, a US National Endowment for Democracy and George Soros Open Society-funded International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) member organization. Marzouki, who spent two decades in exile in Paris, France, was also founder and head of the Arab Commission for Human Rights, a collaborating institution with the US NED World Movement for Democracy (WMD) including for a "Conference on Human Rights Activists in Exile" and a participant in the WMD "third assembly" alongside Marzouki's Tunisian League for Human Rights, sponsored by NED, Soros' Open Society, and USAID.
In neighboring Libya, Marzouki's counterpart, NATO-installed Prime Minister Abdurrahim el-Keib is listed as a "Professor and Chairman" of the Petroleum Institute, based in Abu Dhabi, UAE and sponsored by British Petroleum (BP), Shell, France's Total, the Japan Oil Development Company, and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company. Both Marzouki of Tunsia and el-Keib of Libya have vocally supported Western efforts at regime change in Syria, with Libya additionally supplying cash, weapons, and fighters drawn from the US State Department-listed terror organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).
Clearly with regime change on the table since the first Gulf War during the 1990s, specific calls for regime change as early as 2002, and an articulated conspiracy to use sectarian militants to overthrow Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon and in turn, undermine and destabilize Iran, on record since 2007, all hinged on the creation of a front of Western client-regimes across the Arab World. The US-engineered "Arab Spring" has demonstratively created such a front, which in turn has demonstratively contributed to the goal of isolating, undermining, and violently overthrowing Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.
For the Arab World, it should be clear that the "enemy of my enemy" is most certainly not "my friend," especially when that "enemy" is the result of an artificial strategy of tension created by those posing as "allies." Sunni Muslims share a common enemy not only with their Shi'ia neighbors, but with all peoples, races, and religions from Africa to Asia. That enemy is Anglo-American imperialism which has perpetuated itself for centuries by nothing else other than its ability to divide, destroy, and conquer nations pitted against nations, north verses south, one religion verses another, one tribe against another. This is how they subjugated huge swaths of Africa, Central and Southeast Asia, and this is exactly how they are now conquering the Arab World.
Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here.
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW



11 comments:
The so-called, very masonic sounding, "brotherhood" has the same parent companies as the terrorists invading Syria: the MI6 and the CIA. So it's no surprise at all.
muslim brotherhood was created by the british to serve british prasites interests jsut liek syrian free army is a terorrris organisation started and funbded by rbtiish english with money stolen from the arabs.
Amazing, and unfortunately, how easy it is to hoodwink the masses, both in Egypt and worldwide. In usa, we'll choose between programmed agenda 1 or 2, both favoring the zionist entity. Think its supposed to happen in Nov. Rob
Operation Cast Lead should have prompted international intervention against "the adversaries to all men."
i had a premonitional dream about this.... last night. 10 minutes before waking up i heard " recent violant masscre in syria. then what i see in the dream is a over head isometric image at about 50 feets of the ground. of where the massacre took place. as i was watching, all i saw was 2 jeeps with grenade lunchers and submachine guns pulling in a crowd of people and tearing up random target to shread. it was terribly disturbing to see people being blown up.
I would like to see the end of the term Zionist to describe the right wing Israeli ruling party.
It is not the Jewish identity but the far right fascist government of Israel that must be destroyed for peace to have a chance in the MIddle EAst.
The term Zionism is associated with far right fascist racial attacks, when in fact it is rightwing fascism , in the form of the current Israeli ruling regime, which is the problem.
Zionism is a historical reality, as is the form of anti-Semitism which calls itself anti-Zionism. I wish to avoid the term and association; so I urge others to call out party and not the people or the nation, the rightwing
neo-con war hawk party that currently rules Israel. The problem is not a movement of the 30's but the current fascist regime.
Since the fall of Saddam in 2003, Israel has been pressurizing the US to effect regime change in Syria. The Israel Lobby in America has duly complied. Israel and it's lobby often pressurizes America to act in ways not in line with America's interests. Now it seems Israel is getting it's way on Syria. After the US presidential elections are out of way, we may well see another 'humanitarian intervention' in Syria.
A destablised, Muslim Brotherhood run, Al Qaeda infested Syria is not in Israel's or America's long term interests. Yet Israel is paranoid about Iran and it's influence. The Iraq war only benefited Iran. Likewise regime change in Syria will backfire.
No one seems to genuinely care about the Syrian people.
Read Daniel, Chapter 11, beginning at verse 36, sub-head The King Who Exalts Himself. Daniel 11 -vs- 39 "He will attack the mightiest fortresses with the help of a foreign god and will greatly honor those who acknowledge him. He will make them rulers over many people and will distribute the land at a price." A closer look at these verse's should turn on a light. The Arab Spring... Egypt, Libya, Sudan (Nubians) and that Jordan did not succumb. The North (Russia) and East (China) U.N. Veto enrage him. Sounds like Obama to me...
IF I WERE ASSAD, I WOULD RESIGN AND TAKE MY FAMILY AWAY FROM SYRIA. BETTER THAT THAN BEING DEAD LIKE GADDAFI AND HAVE YOUR MURDER ON YOU TUBE. JUST LOOK WHAT HAPPENED TODAY? EVERY COUNTRY IN THE EU, PLUS CANADA, AUSTRALIA EXPELLED THE SYRIAN DIPLOMATS WITHOUT ANY PROOF OF THE GOVERNMENTS INVOLVEMENT IN THE LATEST KILLINGS. JUST FAKE BBC PHOTOS ARE ENOUGH TO EXPEL SYRIAN DIPLOMATS. EUROPE AS DEGRADED INTO A CESSPOOL OF NWO STOOGES WHO WANT TO DESTROY EVERY REGIME IN THE MIDDLE EAST EXCEPT THEIR PUPPET FRIENDS. SYRIA IS FINISHED JUST LIKE LIBYA.
PART ONE
"The problem is not a movement of the 30's but the current fascist regime."
A proper research will indicate that Zionism is not a new ideology and political movement since it was created in the 1890s. The first two paragraphs below were taken from Wikipedia:
"Zionism is a form of nationalism of Jews and Jewish culture that supports a Jewish nation state in territory defined as the Land of Israel. Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity and opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be liberated from anti-Semitic discrimination, exclusion, and persecution that has occurred in other societies. Since the establishment of the State of Israel, the Zionist movement continues primarily to advocate on behalf of the Jewish state and address threats to its continued existence and security. In a less common usage, the term may also refer to non-political, cultural Zionism, and political support for the State of Israel by non-Jews, as in Christian Zionism."
"In the 1890s, Theodor Herzl infused Zionism with a new ideology and practical urgency, leading to the First Zionist Congress at Basel in 1897, which created the World Zionist Organization (WZO). Herzl's aim was to initiate necessary preparatory steps for the attainment of a Jewish state. Herzl's attempts to reach a political agreement with the Ottoman rulers of Palestine were unsuccessful and other governmental support was sought. The WZO supported small-scale settlement in Palestine and focused on strengthening Jewish feeling and consciousness and on building a worldwide federation."
From the Jewish Virtual Library:
"The national movement for the return of the Jewish people to their homeland and the resumption of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel. Has come to include the development of the State of Israel and the protection of the Jewish nation in Israel. Zionism avocated, from inception, tangible as well as spiritual aims. Jews of all persuasions - left and right, religious and secular - joined to form the Zionist movement and worked together toward these goals. Disagreements led to rifts, but ultimately, the common goal of a Jewish state in its ancient homeland was attained. The term “Zionism” was coined in 1890 by Nathan Birnbaum."
PART TWO
On December 2, 1948 Einstein co-signed a letter with 27 other famous New York Jews telling the US government not to support the Israeli Zionist Prime Minister of the time, Menachem Begin, for this reason: "the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the Freedom Party (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine."
http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/study_res/einstein/nyt_letter.html
About your conclusion: "The problem is not a movement of the 30's but the current fascist regime", all Israeli governments since Ben Gurion's, in 1937 (11 years before the creation of Israel), have been Zionist in all ideological, political, diplomatic and military aspects. The great majority of Israeli prime ministers came from the Israeli army (from the first Israeli secret army, the Irgun, that fought the British from 1945 to 1948, up to the latest version: Tsahal, the Israel Defence Force, where they held the position of General). That would make Israel a military State, wouldn't it?
If you really want a clearer perception of Zionism in the words of the said Israeli prime ministers, presidents and various ministers, I suggest you google "Zionist Quotes". Here is a link: http://monabaker.com/quotes.htm. You'll get first-hand view of the political goals of the Israeli heads of State, but also the ideology behind Ehud Barak's decisions as the Defence Minister in the infamous Cast Lead military "operations". All Israeli leaders have been using military savagery to steal Palestinian lands, and now they're still trying to show to the world that they're victims of terrorism, to the dismay of the growing Israeli pacifists, humanitarians and opposition to Zionist views and actions. The civilian population is right in fearing another war with neighbouring countries, including Iran if Israel can't refrain itself and goes ahead with attacking that peaceful but well armed country.
TWO QUOTES:
"We must expel Arabs and take their places."
-- David Ben Gurion, 1937, Ben Gurion and the Palestine Arabs, Oxford University Press, 1985.
"I would have joined a terrorist organization."
-- Ehud Barak's response to Gideon Levy, a columnist for the Ha'aretz newspaper, when Barak was asked what he would have done if he had been born a Palestinian.
Post a Comment