Tony Cartalucci, Contributor
Activist Post
As if there was any doubt, NATO's official "Alliance News Blog" has confirmed that the US is committed to the overthrow of Syria's government and is "already committed to helping [President Bashar al-Assad] fall," but is "merely looking for the least violent, lowest cost way to get there." The April 9, 2012 blog entry features an op-ed titled, "US 'already committed to helping Assad fall'," and fully admits that the US is equipping the so-called "Free Syrian Army" which has received weapons, leadership, and cash from the NATO-backed Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) terrorists led by notorious mass-murderer Abdul Hakim Belhaj.
Image: NATO's official "Alliance News Blog proudly reports that the US is already committed to helping "Assad fall" and is simply using the lull in fighting brought on by Kofi Annan's disingenuous "peace plan" to rearm, reorganize, and redeploy their terrorist proxy forces against Assad. The op-ed featured on NATO's blog was featured in the LA Times and written by CFR member Doyle McManus. (click image to enlarge) Additionally, NATO admits that the Kofi Annan brokered "peace deal" is merely a ploy stating, "if the pace of the killing slows, that could buy time: time for economic sanctions to undermine the regime, time to cajole Russia to switch sides and help pull the rug out from Assad, but also time for the opposition and its new army to organize themselves into a more effective force."
This confirms what the Fortune 500-funded US policy think-tank Brookings Institution said regarding Kofi Annan's plan. In Brookings' latest report, "Assessing Options for Regime Change" it is stated (emphasis added):
An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to end the violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done under Annan’s leadership. This may lead to the creation of safe-havens and humanitarian corridors, which would have to be backed by limited military power. This would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for Syria and could preserve Asad in power. From that starting point, however, it is possible that a broad coalition with the appropriate international mandate could add further coercive action to its efforts. -- page 4, Assessing Options for Regime Change, Brookings Institution.
Image: Brookings Institution's Middle East Memo #21 "Assessing Options for Regime Change (.pdf)," makes no secret that the humanitarian "responsibility to protect" is but a pretext for long-planned regime change.
Not only has the US and NATO been lying to the world with the United Nations fully complicit, but they now are openly admitting as much - that their feigned aspirations to end the bloodshed in Syria is merely a ploy to buy time for their faltering proxy terrorist force to reorganize itself and finish dividing and destroying Syria as NATO-proxies have thoroughly done in Libya.
NATO admits that military intervention is not a matter of "if" but a matter of "when" depending on a predetermined number of objectives that must be achieved first. These include the Syrian opposition getting better organized, assurances that military aid wouldn't fall into the hands of "radical Islamists," and for Turkey, just as Brookings previously stated, "to establish safe havens for the opposition along its border with Syria."
Certainly, openly conspiring to wage a war of aggression, when Syria has in no way threatened any NATO member nor the national security of leading NATO-member, the United States, is a Nuremberg offense - a crime against humanity. The chaos unfolding inside Syria today is not the result of a government wantonly killing its own population, but a documented case of a government fighting an overtly foreign-funded armed group, carrying out atrocities on par with anything the Syrian government has been accused of - this according to the West's own Human Rights Watch. Compounding their criminality is the fact that instead of taking advantage of a ceasefire to broker a peace deal and begin reconciliation, they are instead using the lull in fighting to prepare the next round of bloodshed they are fully prepared to fund and arm.
Far from speculation, the conclusion that NATO is guilty of crimes against humanity is based on the West's own United Nations which stands in violation of its own laws stemming from World War II, Nazi aggression, and the conclusions drawn from the Nuremberg trials (description of Nuremberg counts begins on page 23 of the .pdf). Failure in Syria by the forces of NATO and their accomplices in the UN would ultimately undermine permanently their authority, their legitimacy, and their perceived moral superiority. Expect them to stop at nothing to topple the Syrian government -- regardless of how tenuous their position increasingly becomes.
Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report. Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here.
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW
3 comments:
When the west states a position on something, we all understand what they say isn't true. Why are we lending credibility to their words by giving them careful consideration and serious rebuttal?
Their modus opirandi is to repeat the big lie often enough until people actually believe it. We can interrupt that process and put an end to it if we see their words as jokes that deserve a good laugh.
At least we would be letting the liars know we "get it" by laughing in their face and I'm guessing that repeating the same "joke" over and over would soon stop.
The same can be said about many of our court judges. Why do we address them as, "Your Honor"? Where's the honor in ruling that American citizens have no standing in a case involving our Constitution? It's OUR Constitution!!
The court rulings are laughable in many cases but we are conditioned to call those who make these rulings, "Your Honor". Respect should be given to those that deserve it.
We need to stop acting like Pavlov's dog and use our God given intelligence.
The best resistance I can think of to what's going on is laughter. It would anger our trainers when we do it, but it would stop them cold. No more repeating the lie ad nauseum until we believe it.
Laughter is also non-violent. Let's not stoop to the level of our trainers by using violence.
Some thoughts on the laughing idea.
How would the government stop people from laughing at what they say? Make laughing without a permit a felony? Beat up people for laughing? Make political speeches a no-laughing zone? I'd love to get some photos of those warning signs posted around the perimeter!
This might be the only kind of resistance they can't stop. Except by telling the truth, that is. No need to laugh at that.
Any attempt by government to stop citizens from laughing at them would humorize the government in the eyes of the world. But that would just get the whole world laughing at America, as they should.
Maybe this would work...
NATO,s mission is to defend a member nation from the attacks of an outside country or enemy ____ U.S. now make it work in REVERSE ____ NATO is now the Predator attacking any country where U.S. decides to enforce its ruining market economy banks and multinationals.
Post a Comment