A major decision will soon be made which will ultimately determine whether or not a known hazardous chemical will continue to inhabit food products, plastic packaging, personal care products, and an abundance of other common items.
By March 31, the United States Food and Drug Administration will decide if toxic chemical bisphenol-A (BPA) will continue to be used in wide-scale production.
In 2010, Canada was one of the first nations to take a large step in the fight against BPA. Even in the face of industry opposition, Canada has declared BPA to be a toxic substance. Although in 2009 the American Chemistry Council filed a formal notice of objection in labeling BPA as toxic, under the argument that it is indeed safe, the objection was rejected on July 27 2010. More recently, French lawmakers decided to ban bisphenol-A from being used in all food packaging. Maybe the U.S. will catch up in protecting public health from bisphenol-a on March 31, or maybe not.
While the ban may potentially occur shortly after the decision made by French lawmakers, the FDA says that the potential U.S. ban of BPA is being prompted by a 2008 lawsuit filed against the FDA by the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
Months before the lawsuit, the NRDC filed a petition with the FDA requesting that BPA be banned from food packaging. No more than 180 days can pass before the FDA legally has to respond to written petitions, but according the NRDC, the FDA failed to meet the deadline, and therefore filed suit to force a response.
Although the FDA is now finally answering, it took court intervention just for the organization to do its job.
'Now, the FDA has agreed to give us an answer — 41 months after the petition was filed,' the NRDC’s Sarah Janssen wrote in a Dec.
Meanwhile, other nations have been taking a stand against BPA:
- The European Union, Turkey, and other countries banned BPA from baby bottles in 2008.
- In 2007, Canada banned BPA from baby bottles.
- Denmark banned BPA in baby food products.
- The Japanese can industry no longer uses BPA for can linings.
The chemical is so ubiquitous that it has been found in the urine of nearly 93 percent of Americans. BPA levels are undoubtedly higher in those who consume food from a can, with a Harvard study finding that eating canned soup can spike urinary bisphenol-A levels by 1,200 percent compared to fresh soup.
Perhaps on March 31 the FDA will finally act on the BPA epidemic. Until then, and until BPA use is truly avoided by companies, it is imperative to educate yourself on how to naturally reverse the effects of toxic BPA.
- EPA Considers Launching BPA Investigation
- 4 March Superfoods to Optimize Your Health
- Popular Plastic Chemical BPA Linked to Wheezing in Children
- Toxic Hormone-Mimicking BPA Now Linked to Diabetes
- Mammograms Ineffective, Promote Cancer | 3 Natural Breast Cancer Solutions
- Reclaiming Health: BPA Ban Passes California State Senate
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW