Saturday, March 31, 2012

The End of Entropy: A Look at Our Entropic World and the Evidence Supporting How We Could Change This

Amaterasu Solar
Activist Post

Entropy. That measure of disorder that increases as energy is dissipated into unusable forms effects many aspects of our present human condition.  It is easy to grasp the principle as it pertains directly to heat.  We see the energy of a fire heat our food, but we also can see a great deal of heat going out unused and unusable.  This extra heat can be seen as increasing the disorder, as the molecules affected move more rapidly and more disordered.  A more difficult aspect to see is the entropy inherent in our social structure.

In Jeremy Rifkin’s seminal work Entropy, published in 1980, he does an excellent job of demonstrating that because energy is at the base of life itself, entropy can ripple through society, creating disorder even as we try to clamp down and control the order of things.  In fact, he paints a very grim picture of what we can expect as we consume more and more energy, explaining that fascist tendencies are most likely to crop up in the efforts to overcome entropy in our society.  Today we see more and more signs of encroaching fascism.

The reason why energy and its entropy are tied in to our social structures is made clear by Rifkin in his work (p. 89):
…  Every time we add our labor to a product or perform a service we expend energy and increase the overall entropy of the environment.  Every time we exchange money for a product or a service, the legal tender we use represents payment for previous energy that we expend.  Money, after all, is nothing more than stored energy credits.

If money is merely the accounting of the available energy, it becomes clear that should an energy source come along that has the properties of being effectively infinite, available from anywhere, and negentropic (from “negative entropy”), the need for money dissipates.  “Infinite money” has no social application.

In fact, because of our limited available energy and the money system developed to account for it, it is clear why we have a “power” elite, as well as poverty and exploitation.  Rifkin explains (p. 57): 
Energy is the basis of human culture, just as it is the basis of life.  Therefore, power in every society ultimately belongs to whoever controls the exosomatic [external] instruments that are used to transform, exchange, and discard energy.  Class divisions, exploitations, privilege, and poverty are all determined by how a society’s energy flow line is set up.  Those who control the exosomatic instruments control the energy flow line.  They determine how the work in society will be divided up and how the economic rewards will be allocated among various groups and constituencies.
Given this, it becomes clear that if such an infinite, available, negentropic source of energy were to be introduced, power over others would give way to individual autonomous power over self but no others.  This can be seen as a major shift in consciousness on this planet.

This all sounds hypothetical, a waste of time to contemplate even, to the average individual who has been told that we are stuck with the many entropic sources of energy we presently use (which also are sources we have to pay for).  “Where is this miracle source?” they might ask.

And here is where I bring up the “Dark” Energy that is now heralded all over science shows about physics and cosmology.  This energy, which has been called “radiant energy” and “cosmic rays” (Tesla), “orgone” (Wilhelm Reich), “Zero Point Energy,” and many others, is pervading space.  It is within you and within me, around all of us, and is present anywhere we go.  Interestingly, though we are told of this energy (usually as “Dark” Energy), no mainstream media (MSM) outlet has asked the most logical question:  Can we extract this energy in usable form?

In fact, back in the 1950s, the science of electrogravitics was being discussed openly in the aerospace literature, an industry that was studying electrogravitics at all the major players:  Martin, Convair, Lear, Raytheon, Sperry, and many others.  

The discussion vanished in the latter part of that decade; it just wasn’t discussed anymore, despite the fact that so many companies had been drawn into the electrogravitics arena.  Reports were that, “They want it secret for now.”  Electrogravitics could draw on this energy and create overunity – free energy, in other words.  So why was this a threat?

The reasons for these occurrences – that the media never ask if we can draw on the Dark Energy, that electrogravitics became highly classified – become clear when we look at the fact that those presently in power would have to give up their power over others (having already power over themselves). From the perspective of those few, they would “lose.”

Such an energy source would represent, at least, a virtually infinite source that is available to all.  Any attribution of a negentropic aspect comes from reports from a number of sources suggesting that cold, not heat, is the defining characteristic of drawing on this source.  These reports and the surrounding research and data have surely been suppressed – at least to the extent of not reporting on it and never, ever asking whether we can get something usable from “Dark” Energy.  It would be a na├»ve position at best to expect the present power elite to ignore and not suppress and disparage any efforts to develop this source in usable form.

And, so, it would appear that we have had methods of extracting usable forms of energy from the “Dark” Energy pool, called the plenum (opposite of “vacuum,” from a root which means “empty” – “plenum” means “full”) for at least 100 years (Tesla seems to have developed such methods).  And we might conclude that the power elite wish to remain in their place of power over others, else they would have released the means to extract usable energy to the public.  (There is strong evidence of suppression of many “free” energy devices, from hydrogen-from-water devices through magnetic devices, as well as the Plenum Energy methods.)

The question now becomes, what would happen if we had this energy available to all of us?  The answer depends on how we, as a planetary society, approach the matter.

Since we’re examining society, it helps to understand that it moves and emerges in fractal expressions from a relatively small seed set of parameters. Up until now, the fractal seeds of all societies in history have included scarcity of energy (which is reflected in the scarcity of goods and money), and thus we see emerging greed, conspiracy, poverty, power elite, wage slavery and many other ills.  If we look for a seed that gives an overarching structure for a society’s development in the advent of having such a source of energy available, and take advantage of what media we can to raise awareness to the tipping point of the goals and precepts we define, the society that fractalizes out of that seed will be strong, healthy, and unrestrictive – provided the seed is geared to that end.

The key things that must be addressed are:

  1. A code of conduct.
  2. Our approach to the Earth and how we bring forth the abundance she has to give.
  3. How open we will be on code and programs for our machines.
  4. How necessary work gets done.
  5. How we communicate and identify the primary issues.
  6. What focus in life should be stressed.
If we seed our society with a code of conduct, calling to the fore the three Laws – which are:
    1. Do not willfully harm or kill another Being.
    2. Do not willfully take or damage another Being’s property.
    3. Do not willfully defraud another Being.
    This sets one parameter of the seed to ethics. 

    If we insist that all farming be organic – in its true sense, and not some trumped-up legal definition – our food will grow ever better.  If we insist that mining is done with a conscious awareness for retaining beauty and structure, our impact will be small and reparable.  If we insist that manufacturing be done such that it is free of pollutants, our planet will remain healthy and abundant.  If we are using the Plenum Energy, the energy we use will be clean (and fracture drilling, oil pumping, coal mining, rain forest clearing and other nasty behaviors and consequences associated with petrofuels will be eliminated).  If we set this parameter of the seed with the drive to be thoughtful of our planet, our planet will thrive.

    If we demand open-source in all technology, we remove fears of machines “taking over.”  Code can be looked at, published on the Web – and better code will be worked out by those whose bliss it is to program things.  A distrust of proprietary code (or any other hidden thing) should be promoted.  Such a setting in this parameter of the seed will bring forth the best we can create.

    By creating robots to do all the necessary work no one (or not enough people) wants to, we release ourselves to do what we enjoy – we are released from slavery, having cast it off onto our machines.  This seed parameter is one only now available to humanity.  Never before in our history have we had the option to create mechanical slaves for every “dirty job.”  Therefore, it, along with the addition of a negentropic energy source, will provide a frame for unique emergence, a new societal framework, a new consciousness.

    With a central website, in forum style, to address major issues – divided into local sections, regional sections and global sections, with “votes” at a certain level elevating the problems and solutions to the next level to be voted on by a greater number – we can collectively coordinate to solve the issues of this planet.  Social responsibility will be seen as spending 15 minutes a day (or more) reviewing the issues on this site.  This seed parameter will see an emergence of human unity as a race and as a planet.

    Setting a focus of fulfilling one’s own bliss, exchanging the “work ethic” for a Betterment Ethic, will see very much happier people, and far better results of efforts made – a job is done far better by someone who loves to do it than by one who feels compelled against their main desire.  No job will be required to live well, but any job one wants to do is open to be done.  I quote again from Rifkin’s Entropy (p. 210) to illustrate the differences between the scarcity paradigm and the new abundance paradigm, as it relates to work:
    … [T]he authoritarian structure of the workplace robs the individual worker of a chance to join in a community with his fellows to make decisions and develop his talents.  Unable to join with others to explore his potential and creativity, the individual is forced to retreat into a shell in which he has neither meaningful rights nor responsibilities at his work.  All he is left with is a job, a place to make money, and a degrading environment to which he must submit, eight hours of every day.
    Thus we can see how a seed parameter of encouraging one to follow one’s bliss – since in this new paradigm one can – uplifts each one of us and increases the value of consciousness in society.

    Having described the seed, how might it be expected to manifest?  One of the first products that is likely to be seen are “power boxes,” which will be sold, initially.  These would be units that had a mechanism to draw on the Plenum Energy and outlets to plug in our air conditioners, stoves, heaters, refrigerators, freezers, and so forth.  This would allow us to move anywhere and bring our comfort items with us.  We could “go camping” and still have our amenities, and many will.  Eventually these items will each have their own units within.

    As the cost of energy is removed from the production line at every stage, things will become less and less expensive, and at some point, will be given freely. 

    Other observables will include:
    • Money falling into disuse 
    • Motivation from the heart as opposed to profit 
    •  “Greed” becomes meaningless 
    • Peace 
    • Abundance for everyone 
    • Elimination of corruption 
    • Power over others supplanted by power over self 
    • Elimination of GMO’s 
    • Great reduction in violence 
    • Creative pursuits increased greatly 
    • A healed planet 
    • Reduced or eliminated hoarding 
    • Value placed on human-created art, textiles and products 
    • Focus on cures, not patentable chemicals that sicken for profit motive 
    • Human interaction with only those whose company is enjoyable (reduced social friction) 
    • Robotic stewardship of the planet 
    • Increased love and compassion 
    • Greatly reduced stress 
    • Wondrous works 
    • “Live and let live” behavior 
    • Most “laws” become unnecessary 
    • Corporate power eliminated 
    • Products made to last – no “planned obsolescence” 
    • Waste reduced to virtually nil 
    • Food nutrition increased for all 
    • One’s reputation becomes the “coin” one uses 
    • Personal responsibility for one’s own behavior 
    • Spiritual growth 
    • Slavery (outright or wage-slavery) abolished 
    • Human dignity encouraged 
    • Increase in charitable behavior 
    • Self autonomy 
    • Things are done because someone cares – from raising children to caring for others
    From this list, it is clear that many issues we now face will be solved.  Wealth will be measured in richness of character, rather than in deposits to a bank account.  And we will spend our time doing what we like to do, being with the people we like and share interests with.  Inventions, rather than being suppressed, will flourish, and the “Star Trek universe” may be within our grasp, with things like transporters and replicators emerging.

    And spiritual growth and communication will be encouraged as we find a greater amount of our time available to pursue the exploration of our inner dimension.

    And though this is not a solution to every issue arising from human interaction – we will always have our personal disagreements – the overall health of society, and the individuals within that society, will skyrocket.  Yes, we may still argue with others over the smaller issues in our lives, and some may choose to behave violently, but the numbers of occurrences will drop to a level we would consider statistically insignificant.  Definitely a vast improvement over what we see today.

    When you consider what I present here, ask yourself these questions:

    Does this threaten a pet vision – passing laws, say, to solve a problem you see, or a view of striking it rich – that you have of your future?  Does this scare you?  Do you look for reasons that it won’t work?  (All you envision as barrier issues – are scarcity paradigm views).

    Then ask yourself why working towards what I present here won’t solve the issue you want to solve; why you wouldn’t be rich in what I show to you; why it wouldn’t fulfill your idea of heaven; why you are afraid; and/or why you look for reasons it won’t work – rather than apply the proactive will to make this happen.

    If we each choose to create this, since we have all it would take, consciously co-creating towards this goal, what I present would happen.  It would take enough of us reaching a tipping point before it would all be downhill, and you may choose your future behavior.  Speak for abundance, or reduce the chances that this will ever happen by keeping silent.

    In closing, I recommend any who work for someone else and also are privy to information (such as methods of extracting usable energy from the plenum) give strong consideration to coming forth with what is known.  In the end, you and all of us will be better off – and even today’s power elite will retain their lifestyle, if not their power over us.

    Further reading:
    The Abundance Paradigm, by Amaterasu
    Another Letter from the Future, by Amaterasu
    Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion, by Dr. Paul A. LaViolette
    To sign a petition for the release of electrogravitics technology:


    This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


    If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


    Anonymous said...

    This reminds me of Steve Martin's "How to make a million Dollars and not Pay Taxes" ......

    First you make a million dollars, then ....

    What a boring future!

    Anonymous said...

    Rubbish. Entropy is a false paradigm based on the fraudulent 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. This is all part of 'controlled science' ie; the science the public is allowed to see. The hidden science already knows about the unified field and the abundant source of energy that pervades the cosmos - and leveraged by the key factor 'the creativity of the human mind.'

    I suggest you all read Lyndon LaRouche and his excellent work on this fraud of 'entropy'.


    Anonymous said...

    LaRouche is right. Human creative reason is anti-entropy. This article is nothing but a continuing effort to brainwash hopelessness into the sheeple. Hopeless people are easily enslaved and controlled

    Anonymous said...

    There is no such thing as a free lunch. Entropy is, in human psychology, the most damaging of phenomena. There is an almost unlimited supply of oil and gas left in the US and Canada. We will keep using it, burning it, ad infinitum.

    Paul Panza said...

    It's the effects of the "warrior gene" we need to overcome, as well as the hypnosis factor the alien/military/corporate/government. As far as there being "almost unlimited" supplies of radioactive, hazardous, toxic and expensive so called fossil fuels to burn it's your lack of the realization that there happens to be an infinite supply of solar/wind/water and geothermal that will always be available to anyone willing to make the effort to harness it. The grand delusion is not of entropy but the conscious design of PR. For example we are all brainwashed into loving the military and paying respect to these murderers in uniform. These deluded creatures of this mislabeled "volunteer army" aren't worth the cost of the chemicals that make up their birthday suits. It's not entropy it's stupidity, it's not climate change due to false arguments and junk science, it's global warming due to magnetic disruption and the depletion of the ozone layer by the operation of man-made mechanisms such as the HAARP and the development of atomic weapons and the so called "peaceful splitting of the atom". Free your mind and your ass will follow.

    zendeviant said...

    Bravo! You have articulated magnificently what I call the "gift economy." Abundance v lack.

    "Tis better to give than recieve." So why not do that? I haven't worked for money since 2002. Eliminate the middleman: you say you need money for rent, baloney, you need a place to live. You say you need money for food? NO, you need something to eat!

    The american means of judging effectiveness by seeing how much was "spent" is absurd, encourages theft and corruption.

    A health care bill? HOW come it's administered by the secretary of the treasury?

    I used to hear "Do what you love, the money will follow." HA! IF you are doing what you love, money is irrelevant, immaterial, superfluous.

    If we make "The Economy" our [false] god, then it is only cost effective to eliminate wasteful and capricious humanity. HOW about making something else our priority?

    Suggestions: Love, light, laughter, creatuivity, bliss, enlightenment--you know all that hippy stuff.

    Thank you, kudos, waytogo, attaboy, well said...

    Shine Bright.

    Anonymous said...

    Open systems will become more random and closed systems will wind down and stop.Its a balancing act.

    Anonymous said...

    Have you noticed that since 50's there's been no true advancement in the field of physics? We have seen only the developments of the 'better mouse traps' and an astounding amount of science fiction. How's your wormhole working today? Is it making energy or money for you? Are you getting lots of return from parallel universes? Is dark matter working hard for your retirement? You see how physics has become nonsense of purely mathematical constructs disconnected from reality. Kind of like the mathematics of the Wall Street that crashed the economy. But unlike the economy, the physicists still suck the taxpayer money dry. All this coincides with the advance of government money into physics and the firm establishment of the peer review.

    For those who don't know, the peer review (in physics) was established in late 1800's under the assumption that everything that is to be found in physics, was found. There is nothing new in the Universe. From that it follows that whatever experts we have today will be enough to judge any new theory.

    The proponents of peer review say that it weeds out bad apples. Virtually every major advancement in physics was a bad apple at the time. It's human nature. People who are paid to maintain status quo (and receive hefty government money for it) will not budge. Or to put it plainly, it's hard to make someone understand something, if his salary depends on him not understanding it.

    The theories of Einstein and Heisenberg were published at the time when every paper was published (in the two major German journals, Annalen der Physik and Zeitschrift fur Physik). There was no peer review beyond making sure that someone doesn't claim that God makes it all happen. Of course, lots and lots and lots of garbage was published. But a few breakthroughs were published as well. This is how the physics was built. You can't have true advancement in physics if everything published must appease to everyone. Physics is not a democracy, it's not a popularity contest. The popularity contest works fine in politics, but the Universe is not that forgiving. You're either right, or you're not. The Universe will not give you Presidency just because you're popular, eloquent and know how to legally smear others.

    The peer review today means that anybody with a revolutionary idea will be shut down, in the name of not being too upsetting. Derogatory and insulting terms such as 'crackpottery' are used. In reality, without upsets, there is no progress. Our own tax money is being paid to the physics establishment to promulgate what's essentially a church dogma.

    This dogma says that if your work is not in concert with Einstein (and a few other demigods), it can't be right. No one in particular is presiding over this. There is no Pope in physics. Just hundreds and thousands of physicists who get their fat salaries to keep things as they are. Why? Because if there is an upset, many of them would lose jobs to make room for better theories. This would happen because most jobs in physics depend on government grants, so much so, that approximately 90% of their salaries come from government grants. What would happen if better theories were found? Grants would go somewhere else. You do the math.

    Think better energy sources will be found? Think humanity will ever find true safety by going out among the stars? Want to have a sense of wonder about the future and its discoveries? Not so fast, and not with the physics as it is today, not with the people in charge of it. Sorry. The future of humankind is sacrificed for the cushy jobs of a few physicists - that you pay for yourself. Congratulations everyone, good job!

    Anonymous said...

    Wouldn't be great to live that universe? I believe though that our timeline is the one that gets fucked up in the end. Who knows? Maybe my parallel self will live these times, travel to stars and galaxies, grow intergalactic hemp and have a nice time.

    Post a Comment