Friday, February 17, 2012

Washington DC: FBI Foils Own Terror Plot (Again)

FBI's nation-wide stable of patsies can be switched "live" at any moment

Tony Cartalucci, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has once again proven that the only thing Americans need fear, is their own government, with the latest "terror attack" foiled being one entirely of their own design.

USA Today reports that a suspect had been arrested by the FBI who was "en route to the U.S. Capitol allegedly to detonate a suicide bomb." While initial reports portrayed the incident as a narrowly averted terrorist attack, CBS would report that a "high ranking source told CBS News the man was 'never a real threat.'"

The explosives the would-be bomber carried were provided to him by the FBI during what they described as a "lengthy and extensive operation." The only contact the suspect had with "Al Qaeda" was with FBI officials posing as associates of the elusive, omnipresent, bearded terror conglomerate.

The FBI, much like their MI5 counterparts in England, have a propensity for recruiting likely candidates from mosques they covertly run.

This is but the latest in a string of national terror plots carried out from start to finish by the FBI, who has made a business of approaching likely candidates and grooming them to carry out terror attacks. In September 2011, another FBI terror operation targeting the Capitol was "foiled," involving a patsy who believed he was to take part in an assault that would involve multiple gunmen and even a drone bomber provided to him by the FBI.

And perhaps the most dubious of all, was the December 2010 Portland "Christmas Tree Bomber," who was also approached by the FBI, provided demolition training, including a demonstration with live explosives performed in a Lincoln County park, and a van within which the patsy believed his handlers had provided him a bomb. The van with the inert device was parked next to a crowded Christmas tree lighting ceremony where the patsy attempted to detonate it remotely before being arrested by FBI agents.

It would later turn out that Portland had heroically withdrew from the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force, (JTTF), with the operation then being carried out behind Portland Mayor Sam Adam's back only for its conclusion to humiliatingly catch the mayor off guard. The city of Portland would eventually rejoin the JTTF after the fallout from the FBI's own terror plot.

The FBI is carrying out what is essentially a campaign of entrapment fueling what alternative news outlet Media Monarchy appropriately calls "terronoia." And while it is true that these incidents are being used to foment a climate of fear to justify the ongoing "War on Terror," there is a more sinister implication readers must be aware of.

In 1993 the FBI was carrying out an identical "sting operation" in New York City. The target was the World Trade Center, the weapon of choice would be a bomb-laden van that, like the above-mentioned attacks, was supposed to contain an inert device. Helping the FBI was an Egyptian informant, Emad Salem, who over the course of the investigation grew suspicious of the federal agents and began recording his phone conversations with them.

From these recordings released by the New York Times, it turns out that the FBI switched out the inert device for real explosives at the last moment resulting in an attack that killed 6 and injured over a thousand. Despite this evidence, the 1993 bombing is still to this day attributed to "terrorists" with the FBI's involvement muted if ever mentioned.

The implications are, of course, that with the FBI's current nationwide stable of patsies being trained, directed, and provided material support to carry out attacks the FBI then "foils," at any given moment, any one of these operations can be switched "live" just as in 1993. The resulting carnage can then be used to manipulate public opinion just as it was in 1993, 2001, on 7/7 in London, and in Madrid, Spain in 2004.

The risk rises exponentially now with Israel being confirmed to be training, arming, and directing US State Department-listed terrorist organization, the People's Mujahedin of Iran, also known as Mujahedeen e-Khalq (MEK). The US has also played an extensive role in supporting MEK who is currently carrying out a campaign of terror inside of Iran.

This is part of a plot by the US indicated in its own policy papers, openly conspiring to provoke a war with Iran. This is best encapsulated in this often cited quote from US policy think-tank, Brookings Institution: would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be. Of course, it would be very difficult for the United States to goad Iran into such a provocation without the rest of the world recognizing this game, which would then undermine it. (One method that would have some possibility of success would be to ratchet up covert regime change efforts in the hope that Tehran would retaliate overtly, or even semi-overtly, which could then be portrayed as an unprovoked act of Iranian aggression.)  --Brookings Institution's 2009 "Which Path to Persia?" report, pages 84-85.
The same report would go on to say:
In a similar vein, any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context—both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians 'brought it on themselves' by refusing a very good deal. --Brookings Institution's 2009 "Which Path to Persia?" report, page 52.
Clearly those in the West intent on striking Iran realize both the difficulty of obtaining a plausible justification, and the lack of support they have globally to carry out an attack even if they manage to find a suitable pretext. Brookings would continue throughout their report enumerating methods of provoking Iran, including conspiring to fund opposition groups to overthrow the Iranian government, crippling Iran's economy, and funding US State Department-listed terrorist organizations (MEK) to carry deadly attacks within Iran itself. Despite these overt acts of war, and even considering an option to unilaterally conduct limited airstrikes against Iranian targets, Brookings noted there was still the strong possibility Iran would not allow itself to be sufficiently provoked:
It would not be inevitable that Iran would lash out violently in response to an American air campaign, but no American president should blithely assume that it would not.
The report continues:
However, because many Iranian leaders would likely be looking to emerge from the fighting in as advantageous a strategic position as possible, and because they would likely calculate that playing the victim would be their best route to that goal, they might well refrain from such retaliatory missile attacks. --Brookings Institution's 2009 "Which Path to Persia?" report, page 95.
With this in mind, and with the 1993 World Trade Center attack as a historical precedent, it is almost a certainty that the West and Mossad are carrying out the current global wave of bombings now being blamed on Iran. This includes two failed bombings in India and Georgia, and a more recent incident in Bangkok, Thailand.

Law enforcement officers across America may be witnessing the FBI conducting through their JTTF what they believe to be a "sting operation" that may end up being the next major terrorist attack on US soil -- and the pretext for certain war with Iran.

The fears of Portland Mayor Sam Adams were well founded, and it took an act of terror to strong-arm him and the people of Portland into capitulating to the federal JTTF program. Local law enforcement, for the safety of themselves and the people they are charged to serve and protect, would be wise to keep an eye on the FBI -- apparently the most likely source from which terror plots both "foiled" and "successful" are hatched.

Tony Cartalucci's articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at 
Land Destroyer Report.   Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here.


This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.


If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.


Anonymous said...

LOL... right, the FBI stages everything. Hey, go live in Iran where you can be safe.

Anonymous said...

Of course the FBI stages everything, check out the Oaklahoma bombing and world trade centre bombing in the 90s. You Americans are completely wacko thinking your government is there for "YOU". They, and the bankers are your biggest enemy!

Anonymous said...

yea, this really makes me wonder.... especially with the recent, unpopular passing of the national defense authorization act.. just a ploy to justify and sway public opinion

Anonymous said...

We all have no control of the game unless we are the elite. Living this life is beautiful, and just understanding that there is no way for us to play the game like they do is no reason to give up. It gets easier to maneuver this maze the longer you are in it. We can accomplish great things together. We can cure our disease through diet. We can all be friends at the party. All walls will fall.

Anonymous said...

"It is fortunate for the governments that the masses don't think." Adolf Hitler Read the free book with illustrations.


There you have it, the government is the terrorist.

Anonymous said...

The only thing significantly less credible than the government and its various agencies(as incredibly low as that is) is the Republican party and its election primaries.

Anonymous said...

The person who made the first comment on this article will be the one running for the fema bus thinking,I'm going to Disney land! YOU JUST CAN'T FIX STUPID. KEEP LAUGHING DUMB-ASS

Unknown said...

We need to understand the methodology. The FBI case workers in mosques (usually criminal elements from the muslim community) latch on to a dimwit, or someone with immigration problems, or as with the London 7/7 attacks, a group of young people who really care about their country. You tell them that the Govt. wants to carry out an exercise on how to counter terrorism. Of course they will get paid and commended and all that good stuff. But they must never discuss this with anyone - it will disrupt the whole exercise. They even start getting weekly salaries. So the dimwit, or illegal immigrant or stupid young muslims happily goes along with the exercise until BOOM.
If they are not killed in the event, they end up in jail and of course they are severely threatened to go along with the story as told by the FBI and CNN or else they will get the death penalty; they are told that if they go along with it they will spend just a couple of months n jail and the good guys will arrange to get them out and provide a new identity etc. So... they go to court, plead guilty, read out a stupid sounding script about jihad etc. and... case closed. A neww terror plot is planted in the minds of the equally stupid American people.

Anonymous said...

All wars of aggression are preceded by false flag attacks. Cartalucci documents this fact for the rising tide of support for a war on Iran, despite the lack of Iranian aggression and no evidence of nuclear weapons.

Pre-emption is a fascist doctrine (according to Eisenhower) but requires an attack to justify the claim of self-defense. All the recent "terrorist" attacks have been set up by the government for just this purpose.

And the American people are falling for this deception once again, including the media coverage which ignores that the rebels in Syria (the road to Tehran runs thru Damascus) are armed and guilty of attacking civilians as well as Syrian defense. In Libya, the "pro-democracy" government is led by former Al Quada and engaged in genocide of black residents.

What can we do?

Anonymous said...

yeah, knowing all this and doing something about are two entirely different things, soon we wont be able to even speak about it without risking imprisonment or worse. so what to do?given that all this is a given that is

Anonymous said...

Israel's intelligence agency the Mossad did 911 with help from some traitors in our government, mostly Jewish Zionists. The Muslims were patsies. There is no evidence they even got on the planes. The planes were flown by remote control. Here is the evidence:

Christopher Bollyn is offering a free download of his book Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World. A must read. He is one of the best 911 investigators.

Anonymous said...

I'm afraid this commenter is correct:

"yeah, knowing all this and doing something about are two entirely different things, soon we wont be able to even speak about it without risking imprisonment or worse. so what to do?given that all this is a given that is"

What can we do?

Post a Comment