Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Iranian Hostage Crisis: Reloaded

Jack Mullen 

Without Osama Bin Laden to play the role of Orwell’s 1984 elusive bad guy, Emanuel Goldstein, the New World Order master controllers have elevated “bad country” Iran to the position of most feared enemy. 

Iran and North Korea are special nations reserved for global theatre operations, carried out by global masters and their intelligence mafias, to be bogeyman; scaring and scapegoating false flag events, supporting a global agenda. Iran was used previously in a false flag hostage situation for the purpose of putting religious fanatic Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in control of Iran, and ensuring Ronald Reagan -- and, more importantly, his Vice President, George Herbert Walker Bush, -- would defeat incumbent Jimmy Carter in the 1980 Presidential election. The 1980 false flag event was called the "Iran Hostage Crisis." 

In 2012, Iran is again holding hostages; this time Israel and Western nations including the United States, but it is called the “Iranian Nuclear Crisis” -- where Israel and the West are held hostage to the fiction that Iran is building nuclear weapons to bomb Israel and the West. In this “reloaded” version of the hostage crisis, the false flag event will be used to bolster support for the failing presidency of Obama and to commit sovereign nation suicide as Iran and its resources are transferred to the globalists hoping to usher in a New World Government. 

Additionally, if possible, Iran may actually retaliate against their global masters and cause World War III, something that would also fit the agenda of the New World Puppeteers. 


Like in a nightmare, it is often possible to know you are dreaming by trying to make some measurement, or by noticing some outlandish dream props. With the contrived Iran as “bad country” dream,  the outlandish prop is the claim that Iran is a violent, hostile nation intent on bombing Israel and the West when, in reality, Iran has peacefully coexisted with its neighbors and the world, except when defending against attack, for 120 plus years. Iran is not an aggressive warmongering nation. 

The next measurement that doesn’t add up is that Iran has stated clearly and proven directly they are not, at least for now, building nuclear weapons, but are trying to obtain nuclear power.  

In the United States, the lying lapdog corporate propaganda machine (telescreen of Orwell’s ‘Ministry of Truth’) provide authoritative water-carrying to the idea that Iran is some evil empire existing separate and apart from the politically correct world of central-bank loving, western sympathetic, near east nations like Saudi Arabia or Israel. The ‘Ministry of Truth’ (CIA) script writers never let Americans see what life is like inside the country of Iran, but rather we hear only what the Mullahs and puppet presidents have to say as they play their part in a scripted scenario, orchestrated to create war; promoting not the interests of the people of Iran, Israel or the United States, but rather the interests  of global chess players moving pieces on a black and white board called Earth.

The false flag event of the 1970s took several years of preparation before the curtain began to rise in early 1979. The globalists were already busy preparing the United States for their first preview of the coming global tyranny, as the nation was experiencing the natural results of a fiat currency -- first inflation and then crippling deflation -- deliberately caused by fiat currency debauchery and an artificially created oil shortage. 

It was at that most painful time when Iran was used to terrorize the United States. Suddenly, the so-called religious fanatics starting taking hostages, first in February of 1979 (hostages were quickly released) and then again in November of 1979. Americans were righteously angry at the dialectically positioned Islamic terrorists that dared take hostages on American soil in Iran. 

However, behind the scenes with no publicity, just a year before the hostage crisis, wannabe president Ronald Reagan, globalist top-ranked minion George Bush, and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher visited Iran for a secret meeting that would set in motion the “Iranian Hostage Crisis” and set the agenda to infect the United States with Bush regimes for decades to come, while saddling the Iranians with a religious zealot managed by the CIA.  

Through the use of staged events in Iran, the CIA (undoubtedly under direction of George H.W. Bush) orchestrated a regime change (again) in Iran and concomitantly guaranteed the Reagan and Bush regime in the United States. During the entire period, the American ‘telescreens’ presented the ‘Ministry of Truth’s’ message that Iran was a nation of fanatics willing to murder and kidnap Americans without provocation.  In reality, the script was prepared in advance; Iran was cast as the antagonist, and the Americans were the innocent victims of religious madmen. Americans were glued to their televisions throughout the agonizing 444 days of a staged, albeit violent, Iran Hostage Crisis -- while advertisers reaped the benefit of increased TV viewership.   

Back in Iran during the 1978-80 staged event, the Shah (a CIA-installed leader) was double crossed by his ‘allies’ in the back rooms of Western intelligence agencies after he had outlived his usefulness. At the same time, Iranian students were mowed down in September of 1978 by the Shah when the bewildered dictator reacted to his betrayal and attacked demonstrators who were actually part of frequent and growing protests provoked by foreign intelligence agencies to give cover for the events that would unfold in November in February and November of 1979.  

Back In the States, audiences were told that Iranian religious zealots were angry at US support of the ruthless and brutal Shah (placed into power in 1953 by the US and British intelligence services in what was called Operation AJAX) and that these religious right wingers were calling the United States the "Great Satan."  In a moment of extreme anger, resulting from US evacuation of the Shah from Iran to an American hospital for cancer treatment, the zealots stormed the US embassy (again) and took hostages, of which 52 Americans were held for 444 days with a release negotiated just in time to help Ronald Reagan secure his October Surprise and win the 198- presidential election.  Bush, it turns out, may also have been working against Carter after Carter fired 800 CIA employees in his October Surprise of 1979.

Once again, 36 years later we are in the same situation; this time Iran is apparently holding the whole world hostage, because, we are told, they might create nuclear weapons and attack Israel and threaten the United States. In this “Iranian Hostage Crisis: Reloaded”, Americans are supposed to believe a list of preposterous fictions, including just a few that I'll mention here: 
  1. Iran is not entitled to nuclear weapons because, if they get them, they will immediately commit suicide by bombing Israel and other nations. 
  2. Iran is capable of enriching nuclear materials to the level required for weapons-grade uranium. 
  3. Iran is enriching uranium for nuclear weapons and not nuclear power as they have repeatedly declared and has been shown to be true by nuclear weapons inspectors. 
  4. That attacking Iran preemptively is the best solution to a problem which so far doesn’t exist. 
  5. That Iranian leaders are not again working in concert with Western intelligence agencies to create world events serving interests other than Iranian interests.   
This list is by no means exhaustive; there are many other straw stories being generated in the dungeons of the intelligentsia for distribution to the masses on the telescreen of the modern-day 'Ministry of Truth.'

Starting with the idea that Iran doesn’t have a right to a nuclear weapon, but countries all around Iran have nukes, and plenty of them, is a disgraceful conceit on the part of the American/Israeli empire. That any country has a nuclear weapon is the only excuse another nation needs to build a bomb.

Simple game theory proves that the world is most likely to experience the hell of a nuclear attack when only one nation has a bomb. This case was demonstrated when the United States -- the only nation at the time on Earth to have had a nuclear (atomic) weapon -- used the bomb on Japan . . .  not once but twice. The same game theory also proves that the world is safest from nuclear weapons when all nations have the technology. Remember, it is not the bombs that makes us safe; it is the threat of use that does.  

Next, processing uranium to 90% enrichment is still not even possible in Iran. According to Mark Fitzpatrick, former deputy assistant secretary of state for nonproliferation, “it would not be surprising” if Iran installed full cascades for enrichment to 20 percent. “But Iran probably still lacks a self-sufficiency in all the parts that would enable it to install advanced centrifuges in large numbers.” [Source] 

Enrichment to 20% has only just begun in Iran and, at this level of enrichment, only nuclear power is possible, not nuclear bombs. The fear of Iran being able to make a bomb at this time, or any foreseeable time is pure theatre -- with a speculative plot. Iran has stated repeatedly that nuclear power is the goal of their nuclear enrichment program, and since they are only able to enrich uranium to 20% (and 20% is required for nuclear power), then we have to agree that Iran is attempting to create nuclear materials for power generation, something the country demonstrably needs.  

Then we hear noises about Preemptive War. Preemptive War has historically been considered a policy of last resort, and for use only when a clear and present threat is identified. In the case of Iran, the threat is neither clear nor present, as shown above; therefore, there is no sanction for Preemptive War in this case.  

The long standing moral prohibition against Preemptive War is historically preserved in the idea of jus ad bellum (justice in going to war) doctrine, with a tradition of requiring justice to declare and pursue war; a philosophical and theological doctrine of military ethics that dates back more than 700 years. With respect to Iran, no case can be made for a ‘Just War’. 

Iran’s rhetoric is scripted nonsense. The empty but fiery rhetoric from Iranian President Ahmadinejad suggesting that Israel “should be wiped off the map” has the earmarks of a scripted incendiary outburst written to coalesce support for Israel from all quasi-conscious followers of Zionist propaganda and to gain support from hawks and religious conservatives in Iran. Furthermore, this oft-cited phrase used to demonstrate prime evil was proven to be a mistranslation and perhaps the rumor of the century.  A very dangerous rumor indeed.  This is similar to the nonsensical slogans used by the Telescreen propagandists of the US ‘Ministry of Truth’ selling the war in Iraq, or convincing Americans that 9-11 was the work of low-tech cave dwellers who learned to fly Cessna’s before flying jumbo jets -- later, with precision, flown into three buildings.

Americans are not awake and not listening; critical thinking skills have been lost to years of outcome-based education and fluoridated water. The fact that Iran has been used and controlled by the West and their military and intelligence organizations in previous false flag operations is published and documented fact.  In this case, it is clear that we cannot believe or act on any explosive rhetoric emanating from any of the nations involved, including Iran, Israel and the United States. 

There is ample proof that Iranian officials are corrupt and working in league and at the behest of those who wish to govern the world. Using these facts as a guide, it is most likely that puppet Ahmadinejad and the corrupt leadership of Iranian religious Mullahs are acting for the globalists against all the people in the region, including Israel.  

We have reached an important and critical time for mankind. A time when good and evil are locked in a gigantic battle for control of the world. This is the time for cool heads and focused minds to think carefully and then act on the side of goodness.  We have passed the point of acting out of loyalty to a name or person; rather, we must show loyalty only to goodness over evil. This is not the time to follow the rules, procedures and protocol. It is a time to acknowledge that the world is being manipulated by a centralized group of powerful, wealthy and malicious evil elite. A group using the law and above the law, without loyalty to mankind and life, only loyalty to evil and death: A death cult. 

It would seem that ancient religions have now and always have ruled the face of reality -- this is a false reality and mankind is stronger and bigger than the ‘gods’ of Genesis. Now is a time to break the godspell and stand against any of the phony gods that manipulate this world. 

The peoples of Iran, Israel, and the United States are sovereign -- giving power through tacit support to illegitimate governments must end -- revoke that power. Oppose these wars, stand up and say stop -- energize your friends, and tell your government servants to stand down. 

Soldiers, lay down your weapons. 

References:
“Iran hostage crisis” :http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h2021.html
“The real Iranian hostage story”: http://dmc.members.sonic.net/sentinel/1earth2.html
"The Myth of National Defense" Edited by Hans-Hermann Hoppe, 2003, Ludwig von Mises Institute, ISBN:0-945466-37-4 
“Just War” :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_war_theory 
“Iran to boost enrichment”: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2011_%2007-08/%20Iran_to_Boost_Enriched_Uranium_Output
“Preventative War and Counter Terror”: http://www.globalpolitician.com/print.asp?id=3426 
“Lists of the Wars of Persia”: http://www.zum.de/whkmla/military/centrasia/milxiran.html 
“Dealing with Iran: Anything but transparent”: http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Dealing-with-IRAN--Anythi-by-Patrick-Lafferty-090225-405.html 
Preemption and Just War: Considering the Case of Iraq 
Franklin Eric Wester : http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/parameters/Articles/04winter/wester.pdf

Please help us combat censorship: vote for this story on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/pgew2/iranian_hostage_crisis_reloaded/

Jack Mullen has been a businessman for more than 25 years, owning 3 radio stations, several technology based companies and a resource development company.  He endorses Ron Paul for President of the United States of America as a necessary step toward restoring sanity to the U.S. government.

Please read other articles by Jack Mullen here.



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

it was the 1980 US presidential election but otherwise correct.

Jack Mullen said...

oops .. fixed it , thanks

Joe Myrick said...

A very well thought out piece of work. You are gifted with the insight of one who has eyes to see with, and a brain being used for what it was designed for. It is surely God who enables
one to see, & discern such matters as you have. Are you left handed?

citizen ron said...

...yeah, except those "people" aren't 'hoping' to usher in a new world order; they're DOING IT. 'hoping' is for people who have no idea of the outcome. those who prepare and plan and plot and conspire (root word of conspiracy) don't have to hope. this is historically accurate. neocons don't hope, they DO. look at what they've done already. they're still doing it, no hope involved.

DIS EN GAGE.

Anonymous said...

I think some things seem seriously wrong with this article. It contains much truth but several notable mistakes, assumptions or misinformation as far as I can tell. For example, it says that Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher visited Iran (perhaps about 1978) for a secret meeting that would set in motion the “Iranian Hostage Crisis” like a false flag operation. I've read quite a bit about this period of history & I was 27 at the time of the 1979 Iranian revolution so I remember it well. I've read nothing that indicates this version of history with this secret meeting. That's not to say it isn't true, but I'd like proof, not just allegations. I don't think any of these 3 (Reagan, Bush, or Thatcher) ever visited Iran.

If the religious zealots that took over Iran in 1979 were actually managed by the CIA as this article alleges, why then did the CIA side with Iraq shortly thereafter in an attempt to fight Iran in a long war? This just doesn't make sense to me. Reagan probably took advantage of the American hostage situation over the Iranian revolution to get elected & I have no doubt the CIA were doing their black ops thing too especially after the revolution, which may account for why Carter's new CIA director Stansfield Turner fired 800 CIA employees, in an attempt to clean up the CIA. But I don't buy the premise that the 1979 Iranian revolution was a false flag operation by the CIA. It makes more sense that the 1979 Iranian revolution was blow-back for America installing the Shah in 1953, the Shah finally losing a grip on power as America's puppet dictator in Iran & as he became sicker with cancer.

The article says "Back In the States, audiences were told that Iranian religious zealots were angry at US support of the ruthless and brutal Shah (placed into power in 1953 by the US and British intelligence services in what was called Operation Ajax)..." I'm sorry to have to tell you this, but while this is what actually happen in 1953, the America public was NOT told by their media in 1979 that this was the reason for the Iranian revolution against the America & it's puppet the Shah. For the most part, the American public did not find out about these truths for many years later (probably 2003) when they were declassified or leaked in the news. However, the American president during the Iranian revolution (Jimmy Carter) WAS aware of these truths (that America had adversely interfered in a democratically elected leader of Iran in 1953), which is why he would not go to war with Iran & instead did secret negotiations with the Iranians & hostage takers. This resulted in the release of all the American hostages 20 minutes after Reagan was sworn in at his inauguration. Carter did the right thing & gave up a chance for a 2nd term of being president, to save both American & Iranian lives. Not many presidents would do that, lose political power to avoid a war. If there was any CIA involvement, it was to make Carter look bad & ruin his chances of a second term.

This article is wrong when it says "..a release negotiated just in time to help Ronald Reagan secure his October Surprise and win the 1980 presidential election." It was not a surprise win & President Carter has revealed in his books that it was HIS people who negotiated the release of American hostages (not Reagan's people) & the final details of which weren't negotiated until the last few days of his administration in January 1981. Carter has admitted he didn't sleep the last 3 days of his presidency as he helped finalize these negotiations. The Iranian hostage takers honoured the negotiations that Carter & his staff worked out & all the American hostages were released as soon as the new president (Reagan) was sworn in.

Anonymous said...

Far from Margaret Thatcher being part of a false flag operation in the Iranian revolution as this article alleges, tapes release last December indicate she praised Carter's 'Wonderful' Handling Of Iran Hostage Crisis, even though she was glad to see Reagan win the election. Iran & the hostage takers had agreed to release the America hostages if the US unfroze Iranian assets, the Bank of England helped facilitate the transfer of funds (with Margaret Thatcher's help) & the Carter administration secretly brokered the whole deal with the hostages so nobody would die. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/12/30/jimmy-carter-praised-by-thatcher-for-wonderful-handling-of-iran-hostage-crisis_n_1175934.html

Here is another piece of ambiguous information from this article where it says "Iran’s rhetoric is scripted nonsense. The empty but fiery rhetoric from Iranian President Ahmadinejad suggesting that Israel 'should be wiped off the map' has the earmarks of a scripted incendiary outburst written to coalesce support for Israel from all quasi-conscious followers of Zionist propaganda and to gain support from hawks and religious conservatives in Iran." Iranian President Ahmadinejad did NOT suggest that Israel should be wiped off the map, what he said when properly translated was that he would like the Zionist regime (Zionist government) of Israel to be wiped from the pages of time (as though Zionism had never existed). The article does correctly mention the mistranslation. Ahmadinejad's rhetoric is not empty at all, he has many valuable things to say if we bother to listen to him (as I did in his 30 minute UN speech last September). This article seems to suggest that either Ahmadinejad & others in his government are secretly part of the CIA script, OR that the CIA is purposely twisting everything the government of Iran says, with their permission. I don't buy either of these premises, it presumes that the government of Iran is setting it's own country up for a war it can't possibly win, it just doesn't make any sense. Not everything is a false flag operation, nor is everything within the control of the CIA like this article seems to suggest.

The article says "There is ample proof that Iranian officials are corrupt and working in league and at the behest of those who wish to govern the world." I'm sorry but I don't come to that same conclusion, in fact I see Iran as strongly standing up not only to bullies militarily (America & Israel), but also to the international banking community (Rothschild) who would very much like to control Iran's banking system. I have no doubt there are corrupt elements within the Iranian government, that much is obvious by their infighting & it happens in every government. I could be wrong but I don't see ample proof that Iranian officials are working with those who want a New World Order. If there is ample proof, this article should have given it rather than mix speculation & misinformation in with lots of truths. I just don't feel comfortable with the complete accuracy of this article, my radar (intuition) & historical knowledge is usually pretty good.

I do agree with this article where it says "we must show loyalty only to goodness over evil." I wholeheartedly agree with that, goodness wherever it is found, even among those in another country, religion, or culture is to be embraced. Evil wherever it is found, even in your own country, religion or culture is to be exposed for the evil that it is. My own group of Christians know that I will admonish & whistle-blow on them if they do evil.

Post a Comment