Thursday, February 23, 2012

CIA raising prices on declassification reviews, National Security Archive fights back

Madison Ruppert, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has been actively working in a covert manner to fight back against the American public’s ability to get secret CIA documents declassified, known as the Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR).

Without any notices for public comment, the CIA printed a two page document in the Federal Register on September 23, 2011 which radically changed the MDR process, and not for the better.

These two pages made it so that overnight the costs associated with MDRs were raised to such a ludicrously high degree that it prohibits all but the wealthiest individuals from pursuing such a review.

The reviews now cost those who request them up to $72 per hour. That cost remains the same even if no information is found, or if they decide not to release the information.

In addition, just submitting the request itself now costs a minimum of $15, and this too is in place even if nothing is released as a result of the review!

This is being done likely because the MDR process is the best weapon we, as the American public, have to force the government to be transparent.


The Obama administration has done a phenomenal job of showing that they abhor transparency (despite the campaign promises) as seen here and here and this is just another incarnation of this abuse of secrecy.

The National Security Archive accurately points out, “Mandatory Declassification Review is an extremely powerful tool because it eventually allows declassification decisions to be removed from the control of the overly-secretive CIA and decided by an independent, rational, democratic, outside entity.”

In another piece published on February 21, they also write, “It’s hard to imagine that these fee hikes are anything other than an attempt to dissuade people from filing MDRs,” and I completely agree.

When they can’t completely ban people from engaging in the process, they can circumvent this by simply making the costs prohibitive for most Americans.

I don’t know about you, but I couldn’t risk $72 per hour on top of $15 just to have the CIA tell me that they won’t release anything.

The high costs discourage people from even beginning the MDR process, which prevents the cases from making it all the way to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) which has a record of reversing CIA denials over 65% of the time.

Obviously the CIA would rather avoid having anything go that far, so placing high costs to even begin the process cuts down significantly on the amount of cases that will ever actually reach the ISCAP.

In an attempt to find out the justification for this ludicrous regulation, especially during the reign of Obama’s “open government,” the National Security Archive filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the CIA for all “emails, memos, position papers, power point presentations, and reports” pertaining to the CIA’s decision regarding the fee changes for MDRs.

As you can see in the following image from the FOIA request, the National Security Archive said that even if the CIA believes that any of the documents are exempt from the FOIA’s disclosure requirements, the CIA should “nonetheless exercise your discretion to disclose them.”

click to enlarge

I share the hope with the National Security Archive that their FOIA request will help expose some of how the CIA justifies making what they call “horrible, counter-productive transparency decisions.”

I think we all know that the CIA has no interest in being transparent, as it would likely tarnish their image and greatly reduce their ability to conduct questionable operations around the globe.

In response to this latest assault on transparency and our right to know what our government is doing in our name, OpenTheGovernment put up a petition on February 15 which I highly recommend you take a moment to sign.

Even though I’m not one to think that the government will actually pay attention to petitions (just look at how they’ve been dismissing most of the WhiteHouse.gov petitions to see this), it certainly can’t hurt to raise awareness and put some pressure on our corrupt government and their abuses of secrecy.

While some might not consider filing a FOIA request to be “fighting back” per se, there’s not much else we have in our arsenal to push back against the behemoth and overly powerful CIA. I laud them for their efforts, as I think anything we as the American people can do to take our government back is desperately needed. 

This article first appeared at EndtheLie.com. Read other contributed articles by Madison Ruppert here.

Madison Ruppert is the Editor and Owner-Operator of the alternative news and analysis database End The Lie and has no affiliation with any NGO, political party, economic school, or other organization/cause. He is available for podcast and radio interviews. Madison also now has his own radio show on Orion Talk Radio from 8 pm -- 10 pm Pacific, which you can find HERE.  If you have questions, comments, or corrections feel free to contact him at admin@EndtheLie.com


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW


BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW

1 comment:

Marsh said...

We already have the tool we need to take back our government. The Constitution provides us with a judicial branch with the power to nullify unconstitutional statutes. However, the courts have adopted a policy of first deciding issues on any other basis before examining them for their constitutionality. Common sense dictates that constitutionality be the first test of any law passed by the legislature. Anyone who walks into a courtroom armed with the facts and the law will find out that the judge will stand court procedure and the law on it's head to protect the governments interests, routinely denying litigants due process of law.
We must first take back our courts and then use them for the purpose for which they were intended. Until judges are forced to choose between honoring their oath to support the Constitution, within which is found your right to due process of law, and going to jail for failing to do so, we will continue to suffer the accumulation of unconstitutional statutes.
Jail for Judges is a plan whereby complaints lodged against judges are reviewed by a panel composed of the citizenry with an eye toward correcting denials of due process and punishing judges up to and including imprisonment.Once the rule of law and due process of law are re-established in a single jurisdiction, i.e. any State of the Union, the process of unraveling the unconstitutional statutes, codes, regulations and facially void judgments of that State and all others may proceed. People denied due process in any other jurisdiction need only move to this State long enough to meet residency requirements in order to petition the court for vacation of a facially void judgment which originated in another jurisdiction. We must take control of and use the power of the courts.

Post a Comment