Saturday, April 16, 2011

The 5 Words Used to Control / Enslave You

Dees Illustration
Steven, Æ, Contributing Writer

Note:   Many well-known freedom movement spokesmen/women have not been willing to fully discuss and expose this subject for reasons known only to them.  Why? Because, they either think it is too trivial, they do not fully understand it or perhaps in their mind, it's been debunked by an attorney, whom they give credence to, without doing their own thorough due diligence. It is also important to note that there are some well-intentioned lawyers who strive to assist in making our world a safer and better place for all to live. The intention of this article is to shine a bright light and empower you to help break the matrix grip.

First and foremost, it is vitally important to comprehend that everything in the business / commercial world is done by contract, both public and private.   Secondly, relationships are also contractual -- marital, parental and social (friendships).  You both consciously and unconsciously verbally contract all day long, and when merited, in written form as well.  

Words are understood to be very powerful and it is through spelling that spells are cast.   However, it is a very misunderstood fact that words used in everyday language most often do not have the same meaning in a legal sense (contractual or court setting).

What are these 5 words that are used to control / enslave you?  Person, resident, citizen, driver and passenger (all commercial terms).  In my humble opinion, these 5 words are the keys to casting the spell in the attorneys’ legal jargon trickery.  All commercial transactions / contracts have been designed to remove the men and women from the equation and replace with a legal fictional entity in the matrix system.

PERSON is a legal entity - a trust, corporation, partnership, association.   Don't be fooled by the attorney's statutory word trickery if you see  "natural person".  An adjective cannot change the root meaning of a word.   Plain and simple, it is impossible to be a "person".  You are either a man or woman - a living being.   A "person" is a dead entity and attorneys may only represent persons – commercial legal entities. 


RESIDENT is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a State (a legal entity).  To "reside" is a commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes. 

CITIZEN is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a Federal district.  It is also a commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes.  The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may only tax those people who have voluntarily deemed themselves internal to the district.  Thus only legal entities have tax liability.

DRIVER is a For Hire / paid operator of a motor vehicle.  The term "motor vehicle" is defined as every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

PASSENGER is someone who pays a fare for passage on a commercial carrier - airplane, bus, taxi, limousine, cruise ship, train or trolley, rather than a "guest" who travels without charge or fee.

It is necessary to go to the very root when looking at a complex problem.  It is obvious that most politicians and their key staff are attorneys/lawyers, who are minions in servitude to the bankers. The simplest solution is to start removing the attorneys from office.

Take note of these quotes:

"In a recent conversation with an official at the Internal Revenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that 'If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff, the entire system will collapse'." -- Henry Bellmon, U.S. Senator (1969).

"Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment and voluntary compliance." -- Mortimer Caplin, former Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975).

"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions.  They are not ... they are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders.  The sack of the United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history.  Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government.   It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will." -- Congressman Charles McFadden, Chairman, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932.

"The real truth of the matter is, and you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.  History depicts Andrew Jackson as the last truly honorable and incorruptible American president." -- President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, November 23, 1933 in a letter to Colonel Edward Mandell House. 

"... our system of credit is concentrated ... in the hands of a few men .. a power so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that [we had] better not speak above [our] breath when [we] speak in condemnation of it ... We have come to be ... completely controlled ... by ... small groups of dominant men." -- President Woodrow Wilson.

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes" -- Felix Frankfurter, United States Supreme Court Justice.

"Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws." -- Baron M.A. Rothschild (1744 - 1812)

The Solution for unraveling control in the matrix grip:

The NAME = all Capital letter designation - JOHN DOE or JANE DOE is the corporate legal entity = person (also known as - strawman).  

This is not a trivial matter.  The key to your freedom is to know that you are not this NAME / PERSON.  The voluntary act of identifying yourself in a legal contractual setting without proper status declaration will continue your enslavement to the system.  You are a living being. 

There are 4 ways to respond when offered a contract - acceptance, conditional acceptance, rejection or going silent (acquiescence).  The first two choices are honorable and the last two choices are dishonorable.   

Why is a judge referred to as Your Honor? – It’s because he/she is weighing who is before him/her and remaining in honor . . . like a mirror and also weighing who will get into argument and therefore acting in dishonor.

Lessons in HONOR AND DISHONOR
 
You will always lose unless you abide by the rules of the matrix game. You will probably lose even if you use the rules, because you will argue and that is what the "controllers" want you to do, argue.  When you argue, you are in dishonor.   This is unfortunately how we’ve been conditioned.

Forget about the law. The law is only for those that have violated some tenet of commerce.

Remember, everything in this world is a contract. When you go to the store to purchase a quart of milk, you are about to enter into a contract. When you pick up the milk and pay for it, the clerk will give you a receipt. This receipt is the title to the quart of milk. If you discard the receipt before you leave the store and you leave the store, you could be charged with stealing since you do not have the title to the milk.

You will probably begin to argue. Once you begin to argue, you are in dishonor and when you are in dishonor nothing matters except getting back in honor.
 
Here is a Biblical story example:  Jesus came upon the land to teach people how to operate in commerce. His main purpose was to save us from our dishonor. Yet we persist in this dishonor by acquiring things, which we are treating as little demigods.

One of the best lessons Jesus taught was by his example. On his trip to Galilee, he encountered three beggars, who called out and said "Jesus, heal us"!  They were offering Jesus a contract.

There are four possible ways in which to answer when one is offered a contract.

a. Agree to the contract and you are in honor.

b. Remain silent (is consider insolent) and therefore you are in dishonor.

c. To argue about the contract is a dishonor. That is why the courts want you to have an attorney. Attorneys argue and get you in dishonor.  They are there to turn you in!

d. Doing a novation is like bargaining and it is a conditional acceptance. For example, if a merchant is selling apples for one dollar each and you want an apple, but you don't want to pay a dollar, you may offer fifty cents.  This is bartering, not dishonor and you are remaining in honor. You have just placed the merchant in the position of having to make one of the same four choices on how to answer.  You will probably walk away and he will lose the sale if he declines by arguing or remaining silent.  He lost because he dishonored you.  He remains in honor if he chooses 'd'.

Getting back to the lesson. The beggars offered Jesus a contract. Jesus replied, “What would you have me do?” He is now doing a novation to the contract. Before he can comply, he has to know what the contract requires.  The beggars then re-offered the contract to Jesus by saying, "make us see".  He then agreed by saying, "you are healed". The beggars and Jesus were always in honor and the contract was completed and everyone was satisfied.

In a court setting, you should re-offer the Judge, by stating:  Your Honor, I conditionally accept your offer to give you a NAME upon Proof of Claim that if I do so, it will not bind me to any contract with the State of XYZ (whatever jurisdiction you are supposedly in). The judge will keep trying to get you into contract. You must continue to conditionally accepting the judge’s offer by continually repeating, upon Proof of whatever Claim they are making.

The case is The State of XXY v. JOHN DOE. The judge asks you…How do you plead, Guilty or Not Guilty? or he may say Responsible or Not Responsible?  Your answer: Your honor, I conditionally accept your offer to plead upon Proof of Claim that the State of XYX is an injured or the State of XYZ and I have a contract and upon Proof of Claim that the XYZ on the complaint, in all upper case letters is not a legal fiction and upon Proof of Claim that, I, a living being, am a corporation.

PRESUMPTION

The people of the courts and all levels of government presume that you are a corporation because all courts and governments are legal fictions and following the law of like kind can only deal with other legal fictions or incompetent persons.  All government codes/statutes (laws) deal only with persons, corporations, trusts, partnerships or other like entities. They are not real. They only exist on paper (in form). They do not exist in the physical sense (substance).

A city, a county and a state have lines drawn on a map that show (what they claim to be) their jurisdiction. There are buildings that are referred to as schools, courts, offices and other titles.  They are real because they are made with gravel, cement, wood and other physical materials. The government is a fiction created from a man's imagination.  It is of course not real, and only an image in people's minds.  It cannot do anything without the physical man. The physical man has a "go between" and that "go between" is a legal fiction.  It is a transmitting utility. Just like the electric power company manufactures electrical power for business or home use, the transmission lines are the transmitting utility that connects them together.  The person - legal entity - strawman - all capital letter name fictional corporation is the transmitting utility between the flesh and blood man and the government and its agencies.

Presumption comes into play when you receive a contract from the government, a police officer, court, etc., and if you do not correct them, they will presume that you are the all capital letter NAME - legal entity. It is when you don't correct them that the presumption becomes a stipulation of fact.

STIPULATION

A stipulation is an agreement that the facts of the case are not in dispute and therefore will not and cannot be addressed from the point of stipulation.  The way that you get into a contract is by doing something that you may be unaware of . . . like a drivers license.  You are offering the State to allow you to operate a vehicle in a commercial venture on the roadways within the State, when you apply for a driver’s license.

Whomever offers the contract has the energy or the power because they are the Creditor. The one who is being offered the contract is the Debtor. You always want to be the Creditor.  Now, while you are operating the vehicle in commerce, you violate a rule (law) that you agreed to abide by accepting the license.

You were the Creditor when you applied for a license, and were in honor. They were the Debtor. Then they re-offered you the license, making them the Creditor and you the Debtor. Everyone is still in honor when you accepted the license (contract).   When you violate some rule (law), you are in dishonor and have to go to a hearing (court). Once again, you are going through the same rules. Honor and dishonor.

CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

Condition yourself to remember that everything is a contract.  When somebody offers you a contract and you do not like the terms, simply re-offer or counter-offer.  When a debt collector sends a letter / a collection notice that is a contract. You now have the choices of a, b, c, and d.  What are you going to do? The thing not to do is argue or remain silent. You must re-offer in a timely manner.

"Mr. Debt Collector, I conditionally accept your offer to pay the debt indicated, upon Proof of Claim that you are the owner of the debt and upon Proof of Claim that you and I have a signed contract.

When a police officer pulls you over and offers you a ticket for speeding, the ticket is a contract. When he asks you to sign the ticket, stating that you promise to appear at a certain date, that is a contract. You may properly do two things.

1. You may demand that the police officer takes you to a Judge/Magistrate immediately or;

2. You may sign the ticket: All rights reserved, UCC 1-308, and then sign the Name below what you just wrote on the ticket.  This action allows you 72 hours to rescind the contract. A widely recognized and universal law of commerce is that contracts can be canceled within 72 hours. Many contracts include a document titled "notice of rescission." The buyer, in most cases, must execute / sign and date the document and get it into the possession of the seller in order to properly rescind the sale.

If you are arrested and taken before a Magistrate, he/she will ask you to state your Name. The Magistrate is making you an offer to enter their jurisdiction.  Next you will be invited to sign the paper the clerk offers you.  You will be in a contract if you sign it.

Remember, if you are about to go into court, it is vitally important to declare that you are not a corporation prior to a hearing or trial.  Otherwise, the judge will find your silence on that point a fact and then proceed under the presumption that you are a corporation.

Please remember, you are not a Name.  You are a very powerful living being when in honor.

One, known as Steven, Æ spiritual Living Being having a human experience. One lives "life in this realm" intentionally and loves, honors and respects all Universal beings as One. He does not have to prove the negative, rather One just needs to know to not get trapped with controlling words and jargon designed as such. One is not a person, not a subject or citizen nor has any allegiance to any country, State or States in contract, not a U.S. Citizen or National, not a civilian, not a resident, not a legal entity dolus trust, not an enemy combatant, and One is not a member of any Jural, political or religious society/body. Be it also known that “person” is a word of the Private Civil Law, and a “man” is a word of nature.



BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW

31 comments:

Ken D Berry MD said...

Very interesting... I have read a little on these words before, this is a good intro for others.

Anonymous said...

Interesting indeed! Law is technically a game. The legal aspect engages in strategy, tactics, and subterfuge to support perception.

Legal jargon has contorted the meanings of some words and procedures so as to be interpreted as an unsuspecting act of self incrimination by an opponent to committing an infraction.

History shows that law, wherever practiced, eventually transmogrifies into the enemy of the people that it was intended to benefit!

david robert said...

well written and well explained Steven (man). I am glad we are friends and that the Universe has brought us together. If everyone who entered the Black Robed Administrators Bank (aka make believe Court) we would tie them up where NO one would be drawn into their "wealth extraction" process.

Anonymous said...

Great knowledge and advice given! Just wanted to add that the Bible(all translations) acknowledge that "Hebrew" is the only inspired language(Zeph. 3:9, Acts 26:14, 1 Cor. 4:6) indicating that the name "Jesus" can not be the true Messiah, owning a small country or not(Vatican)! The Hebrew name given in the Bible is "Yahshua," meaning "Yahweh means salvation" and I believe this is in context with your current meaasge! It either is or it isn't and it's that simple!

occultebooks said...

go to www.stopthepirates.blogspot.com for all the intel.

Anonymous said...

I have been misrepresented by my very incompitent divorce attorney, who has turned out to be just a bad of a wolf in sheeps clothing as my ex and between the two of them I have been devestated emotionally/mentally/financially and even spiritually. Also due to a car accident and being on medications during proceedings (she was aware) I was not in my right frame of mind to comphrehend the facts, there are stipulations she never even discussed with me...long story short I am now facing financial ruin as they way she worded transfer of assetts/monies are so vague he got away with not abiding to it.
Now I dont have any more money to go back to court and reverse this mess...the mental/emotional stress has taken a toll on me physically also...and he still continues to keep me in the courts for various issues due to my attorneys incompetance.

Anyway you article opened my eyes to the semantics they play to enslave you to keep needing an attorney and financially stripping you down. I covet your prayers that the Lord will send me a good man/woman to prepresent me in fixing this mess in the evil legal system.

Thank you and God bless you.

Anonymous said...

well put.
www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net has a very interesting approach to Declaration of Freedom from Slavery - recording a renouncement or withdrawal from the Strawman/birth certificate/society, under Canonical Law, the basis of all Law. The trick is to be NOT QUALIFIED TO CONTRACT - cannot/will not participate in any way in the Commerce Game - just live and privately interact with other private living beings.

Anonymous said...

Steven,
Regarding "natural person", and your comment about the inability of an "adverb" to modify the root meaning of another word, in this case "person," a noun, I'm guessing you meant adjective, not adverb. Adjectives modify nouns, adverbs modify verbs, e.g., "the boy runs (v) quickly (a)." I'm sure you know that, but others reading this might not, such is the school system.

That said, have you used UCC to liberate yourself? I keep looking for success stories, but only see theory given. Thanks for writing your article.

Rog said...

You say there are four ways to respond to an offer to contract. What if I do not wish to enter into a contract? Novation is not an option if one does not wish to enter into a contract. There is nothing dishonorable about that.

This UCC stuff is interesting, like calculus is interesting. It may or may not get you out of a jam with these people who only seek power over you. It is my opinion that the sovereignty approach is the only way we will overcome this tyranny of commerce. Not everything is commerce and I will not be tricked, cajoled, coerced or bamboozled into a contract situation without my consent or knowledge.

As sovereigns we must insist that we want nothing to do with these people, that they require our consent to do anything, and that their forced "contracts," licenses, permits, permission slips etc. are just pieces of paper.

Unfortunately, these people (government Inc.) are about power and they will not relinquish that power without a struggle. We must reject this game and walk away from it. Remember who you are, you are sovereign, a child of God and no man may have dominion over you.

Anonymous said...

I actually have to go to court thurday to have my DUI Judgment vacated due to fraud. The dmv didnt give full discloser of its contract of me representing a straw man. I also sign my bond without prejudice (another weapon to use in my defense). Anyone interested in the motion can contact me. edhambrick@hotmail.com....wish me victory!!

Anonymous said...

I didn't follow all of your traffic ticket example. Are you stating that the proper course (other than being taken immediately to the magistrate) is to sign:

All Rights Reserved. UCC 1-308
your signature

and then returning the ticket within 72 hours invoking your right to break the contract?

If this is not correct, what is the proper method?

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the information. I'm learning. What about being referred to as "defendant" on a legal summons? I would think it's the same as 'person'. Please advise. Thanks again. Rebecca Jean

Bob said...

Good article. I'd like to see a complete training course with success examples showing that courts actually do comply with these procedures.

I must agree with the above comment as I too see only theory but no proof or documented success.

There are many patriots for profit selling law theories as fact. They stuff their pockets with cash as they watch their students go off to jail when the theories fail. Of course they always blame the student and keep the cash.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Rog. This article is mental masturbation. Do you think you can play by the rules of the elite and win? Please don't make me laugh. Have faith in your magical incantations if you like but the only justice you will get is at the point of a gun. THERE ARE NO RULES MORON!

Anonymous said...

Similar concepts appear in "They Own It All (Including You!) by Means of Toxic Currency" by Ronald MacDonald and Robert Rowen, M.C.

I want to learn more. I think it is critical to our well being to understand how we have been and continue to be enslaved. -- Stewart Dale Spencer, San Marcos, Texas

Joe said...

I also learned that when going to court we are under
MARITIME Law. The Court room is designed like a ship with its own deck and enclosures. Anyone else hear about that?

Joe
CCFIILE.com

Activist said...

The following response to comments is from the author:

Thanks for interest in the article, and the 'anon' correction regarding - adjective - I corrected my blog.
-----------------------

(In My Humble Opinion) IMHO, The UCC is not the end all in "liberating" or a tool for achieving the 'silver bullet' some claim it is to escape the matrix. Freedom is a state of mind and action, rather than something on paper.
------------------------

Yes, Rebecca Jean - Defendant is the PERSON /legal entity.
-------------------------------

Traffic ticket - yes, that is correct process on signing.
----------------------------

IMHO - Jesus/Yahshua, etc. was one of many spiritual messengers...

"Let's celebrate the message of Love - rather than the messengers"
-------------------

If you do not like the terms of a contract - then conditionally accept it with another offer - which may be 'thanks, but no thank you'.
---------------------

I would caution using the term 'sovereign' - since so many people have contracts - like DLs, bank accounts, insurance, etc.- you are correct, no one has dominion over you other than the Creator, however law enforcement will just say - oh, you're one of those.
--------------------

Bob - I fully agree with you about the paytriot gurus. However, I'm not on any lecture circuit. There is a guy known as Gordon Hall who does provide similar info on honor/dishonor, that I found interesting to listen to via an mp3 shared with me.

As far as proof - think about it, cases are dismissed or buried. Like anything in the legal jungle - do your own due diligence. Freely given, so the choice is yours to accept or deny.
---------------------

Mocking this info as theory or nonsense? - It's possible that these are 'disinfo' agents, people in denial / living in fear, or those who simply choose to not do their own due diligence, but spend time on forums/blogs belittling rather than researching.
-----------------------

"The truth requires responsibility and that is what people dread most" ~ from the movie - 'The International'

Doug Plumb said...

Others are: liable (Lie Able) There is no money yet courts are commercial. All money taken in 1933, replaced with script. Represent - re-present changes one from a natural man into a surety for international banksters and thus makes you lie-able for charges.

Lou Dobbs, on Alex Jones recently said something about not wanting to be represented in congress, rather advocated for.

Anonymous said...

If you are going to reject (dishonor) the contract, then you better be prepared to a) defend you position with physical force, or b) transcend to a space where the other party cannot bring physical force to bear. The one choice involves martial arts, the
other spiritual arts. What's always amusing are the human beings who think verbal legalisms - the letter of the law - will save them. It will not. The classical example is that of the neighborhood bully or street gang who offers you the contract to become their slave or foot soldier. (That is, submission to their will and authority.) The only "honorable" option you may have to "novate" the offered contract is to demonstrate by physical force that the cost of the contract, to the other party, is too great - getting them to "withdraw" the offer. Oh yeah, did I not mention? Often other, third parties, i.e., the State gets involved in these disputes, as well. Don't be surprised if the State thinks it more honorable for you to have become someone else's slave rather than fight. Anyone familiar with street life in any big city should be familiar with these principles. Suggest watching the movie "Never Back Down" viewing every single move in the fight scenes as a "novation" of the contract offered. I think you'll get the idea.

Anonymous said...

Bro, Ken.

Their are People, in the Republic for the United States Of America, That are Making a Differance, Using the Ucc...
K W We Need to Stay in Prayer, for our Lords Right Hand to Intervine in Our Behaft...

2Cornicals, 7:14 If My Pople Will Humble thim Selfs Seek My Face and Turn from their witcked ways, [[Then Will I Here from Heven, and Heal, "Thir Land"! ]]

Do we Realy want this... were 2-or more agree on any thing, the Lord Says HE Will do It ! Do you Will You ?

Anonymous said...

Are some of the people commenting on here reading the same article I just did? There are no rules. Correct, there is only commerce!
mental masturbation? - perhaps it is lack of comprehension on your part or cognitive dissonance. (You may have to look that up) lol

Anon poster - "defend with force"? - whatever happened to living in peace and harmony, or are you an advocate of violence and war too?

btw: the "People" in the Constitution is not what you may think it is. It isn't you or I, since it has been capitalized, that makes it a capitonym, which is a word that changes its meaning. Therefore, this particular "People" is those who have either taken an oath to defend the Constitution or they are the Posterity (lineage of families who did sign) or anyone who agreed to it in written form, since it is a contract. Yep folks, Constitutions are contracts.

Definition of CONSTITUTION, contracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt. 1 Bell's Com. 332, 5th ed.

Definition of CONSTITUTOR, civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation. Inst. 4, 6, 9.

Anonymous said...

all hail Sarah Palin!

Anonymous said...

These websites have interesting viewpoints. All of this legal jargon nonsense can be solved in a court of record.

http://www.ohiolawnotes.netne.net/
http://www.1215.org/

Anonymous said...

"Redemption Manual"
That is where this whole post is derived from. Go to the source for the honey!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13350740/Redemption-Manual

a non said...

"Redemption Manual"
That is where this whole post is derived from. Go to the source for the honey!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13350740/Redemption-Manual

Anonymous said...

I'm all for liberty, freedom, and sovereignty, however, if the information will not work in the matrix system, then what good is the information? I'm not trying to be a nay-sayer, I'm more interested in seeing documented proof that the principles espouced have teeth.

It is a known fact that the State, or governments in general don't exactly follow the law anymore. They use the law to bind and enslave selectively to suit their purposes rather than to hold to account.

Thomas Retterbush said...

You're right I am not a name. I am a number. To the powers that be, we are all just numbers: SS, IRS and VISA account numbers, as well as many more.

Henry said...

The Redemption process is a proven failure in court. Rejected time and time again. Google the terms, failed legal arguments & redemption process.

Lots of profit patriot$ selling this nonsense. So where are all the documented "wins" in court?

Courts issue written decisions and findings. Let's see a bunch of winning results in writing from the courts. If the courts respect this law and the courts stay in honor then there should be written decisions affirming such. There are none!

Yes the courts are corrupt but if they follow the UCC then there would be written decisions, findings and etc.

Anonymous said...

It woul be great if ther was truth to this, but there doesn't seem to be any proof. Thats a shame. I would hate to go into court and make an ass of my self. Please post proof. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

and this is wut i mean when i claim myself to be an Anarcist..it is not a negative or bad thing to be...just choosing to not be a part of the heerd of society just because "They" say so...who are THEY Anyway!?

Anonymous said...

and this is the kind of mentallity that makes you all the Heerd just believing wut "They" say to do,say,and how to act in society..cuz people believe the biggest crooks walking this earth (Politicians,LawMakers etc...

Post a Comment